A transfer-learning approach to predict antigen immunogenicity and T-cell receptor specificity
Abstract
Antigen immunogenicity and the specificity of binding of T-cell receptors to antigens are key properties underlying effective immune responses. Here we propose diffRBM, an approach based on transfer learning and Restricted Boltzmann Machines, to build sequence-based predictive models of these properties. DiffRBM is designed to learn the distinctive patterns in amino-acid composition that, on the one hand, underlie the antigen's probability of triggering a response, and on the other hand the T-cell receptor's ability to bind to a given antigen. We show that the patterns learnt by diffRBM allow us to predict putative contact sites of the antigen-receptor complex. We also discriminate immunogenic and non-immunogenic antigens, antigen-specific and generic receptors, reaching performances that compare favorably to existing sequence-based predictors of antigen immunogenicity and T-cell receptor specificity.
Data availability
The current manuscript is a computational study, so no data have been generated for this manuscript. The data used are downloaded from public databases. The pre-processed data, the results of the analysis, the codes to train and evaluate the models as well as the trained models are all available at the github page https://github.com/bravib/diffRBM_immunogenicity_TCRspecificity.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (RBMPro CE30-0021-01)
- Andrea Di Gioacchino
- Jorge Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz
European Research Council (COG 724208)
- Jorge Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz
- Aleksandra M Walczak
HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (101026293)
- Andrea Di Gioacchino
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (RBMPro CE30-0021-01)
- Simona Cocco
- Rémi Monasson
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Prodigen)
- Andrea Di Gioacchino
- Jorge Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Prodigen)
- Simona Cocco
- Rémi Monasson
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Decrypted CE30-0021-01)
- Andrea Di Gioacchino
- Jorge Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Decrypted CE30-0021-01)
- Simona Cocco
- Rémi Monasson
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (RESP-REP CE45-0018)
- Aleksandra M Walczak
- Thierry Mora
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (RESP-REP CE45-0018)
- Barbara Bravi
European Research Council (COG 724208)
- Barbara Bravi
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Copyright
© 2023, Bravi et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,944
- views
-
- 342
- downloads
-
- 10
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Computational and Systems Biology
Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Neuroscience
Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.