Regeneration: How the liver keeps itself in shape
After fasting, hepatocytes proliferate to help the liver grow back to its original size.
- Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, United Kingdom
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Are you hungry? When was the last time you consciously chose not to eat? Does fasting change the way your major organs work? Researchers performing preclinical experiments on rats and mice tend not to ask these questions, but the answers could have major implications for how the results of such experiments are interpreted.
Most lab animals are fed regularly, but this does not reflect what happens in the wild, where most rodents and other mammals (including humans) may have to undergo periods of fasting. However, the ways in which living without food affects metabolism are not fully understood. This is particularly true for the liver, which plays an important role in processing and storing energy from nutrients.
Livers are able to grow or shrink to suit the body’s requirements, and to regrow after injury (Michalopoulos and Bhushan, 2021). This ability to regnerate has fascinated scientists for centuries, as far back as the ancient Greeks: in mythology, Promethus had parts of his liver eaten every day by an eagle only for it to regrow overnight, leading to an eternity of punishment. In addition to being able to recover from damage, every day the liver produces a small number of new hepatocyte cells which are pivotal for metabolism. Now, in eLife, Abby Sarkar, Roel Nusse and colleagues at Stanford University School of Medicine and the Chan-Zuckerberg Biohub report how fasting affects the regeneration of hepatocytes in laboratory mice (Sarkar et al., 2023).
The team compared the livers of mice that had been continuously fed with mice that had been subjected to intermittent periods of living without food. Fasting on alternate days for a week altered liver metabolism, resulting in changes in fat storage and the key enzymes that produce the elements of bile, and also decreased the weight of the liver. But when the fasting mice were given continuous access to food again, their livers grew back to their original size by increasing the proliferation of their hepatocytes.
While every hepatocyte can proliferate, some are more prone to dividing and generating new cells than others, depending on where they sit within the liver (Wei et al., 2021; He et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2020; Planas-Paz et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2018). The liver is divided into small subunits called lobules that are covered in hepatocytes, and are supplied by both normal blood and blood from the intestine (Figure 1A). In continuously fed mice, the proliferation of hepatocytes happens in the mid-lobular region. However, Sarkar et al. found that proliferation happens in a different part of the liver – known as the pericentral region – in fasting mice, once they have been fed again (Figure 1B). The pericentral region has high levels of signalling through a network of proteins known as the WNT pathway, which activates another signal within hepatocytes that is crucial for development and regeneration (Russell and Monga, 2018).
Figure 1
Two signals work in synergy to adjust liver size after fasting.
(A) At the microscopic scale, the liver is divided into units called lobules which receive blood from the intestine through the portal vein (PV; blue circle). The blood passes over cells called hepatocytes (beige circles), which are responsible for most of the functions performed by the liver, and then drains out of the liver via the central vein (CV; white circle). (B) Some hepatocytes (highlighted in red) can also proliferate and regenerate parts of the liver. In mice that have been continuously fed (left), the hepatocytes that proliferate reside in the mid-lobular region. However, mice that have experienced intermittent periods of fasting (right) rely on a separate population of hepatocytes in the pericentral region (which is close to the central vein) to proliferate and regrow the liver once they start to eat again. These hepatocytes are activated by a signal called FGF15, which is released from the intestine when feeding restarts: the FGF15 pathway then works with the WNT pathway to stimulate proliferation.
Image credit: Stephanie May (CC BY 4.0).
Sarkar et al. then used a labelling system to mark which hepatocytes in the pericentral region responded to WNT, and tracked their progeny over time. They found a signal called FGF15, which is produced from the intestine, works together with the WNT pathway to promote regeneration when the fasted mice started eating again. By manipulating the FGF15 or WNT pathways in the liver, they showed that WNT and FGF15 synergistically drive the compensatory liver regeneration by pericentral hepatocytes after re-feeding: without FGF15 there is no growth, and without WNT the hepatocytes fail to complete cell division.
This study is the first to highlight specific changes in the regenerative machinery controlling how the liver responds to dietary fasting. It shows that pathways active within the liver can interact with signals from other parts of the body, like the intestine. The connection observed by Sarkar et al. may also be impacted by the intestine absorbing nutrients the liver then metabolizes, or bile flowing from the liver to the intestine. Whether other organs can similarly respond to fasting and/or influence regeneration elsewhere in the body remains to be seen, but the list of potential candidates is expanding (Cerletti et al., 2012).
The findings of Sarkar et al. have profound implications for how rodents and other mammals respond to fluctuations in food supply. Comparing the human body to laboratory animals that are continuously fed is likely oversimplifying biology that is vastly more complex. Fasting during development, injury or cancer may affect how multiple organs respond to a disease, both at the time and in the future. Also, how specific diets, physiological changes (e.g. pregnancy) or even differing biological sex superimpose upon this complexity remains to be explored. Nevertheless, it is clear that mammals are highly adapted to cope with periods of food unavailability, and when using animals to study health and disease, we should consider the complexity of individual dietary behaviours.
References
-
Liver regeneration: biological and pathological mechanisms and implicationsNature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 18:40–55.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-020-0342-4
-
The RSPO-LGR4/5-ZNRF3/RNF43 module controls liver zonation and sizeNature Cell Biology 18:467–479.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3337
-
Wnt/β-catenin signaling in liver development, homeostasis, and pathobiologyAnnual Review of Pathology 13:351–378.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-044010
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, May and Bird
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 4,279
- views
-
- 136
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Regeneration: How the liver keeps itself in shape
eLife 12:e85606.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85606
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
- Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
Sensory dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons have a unique pseudo-unipolar morphology in which a stem axon bifurcates into a peripheral and a central axon, with different regenerative abilities. Whereas peripheral DRG axons regenerate, central axons are unable to regrow. Central axon regeneration can however be elicited by a prior conditioning lesion to the peripheral axon. How DRG axon asymmetry is established remains unknown. Here we developed a rodent in vitro system replicating DRG pseudo-unipolarization and asymmetric axon regeneration. Using this model, we observed that from early development, central DRG axons have a higher density of growing microtubules. This asymmetry was also present in vivo and was abolished by a conditioning lesion that decreased microtubule polymerization of central DRG axons. An axon-specific microtubule-associated protein (MAP) signature, including the severases spastin and katanin and the microtubule regulators CRMP5 and tau, was found and shown to adapt upon conditioning lesion. Supporting its significance, interfering with the DRG MAP signature either in vitro or in vivo readily abolished central-peripheral asymmetries in microtubule dynamics and regenerative ability. In summary, our data unveil that axon-specific microtubule regulation drives asymmetric regeneration of sensory neuron axons.
-
- Developmental Biology
- Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
Chromocenters are established after the 2-cell (2C) stage during mouse embryonic development, but the factors that mediate chromocenter formation remain largely unknown. To identify regulators of 2C heterochromatin establishment in mice, we generated an inducible system to convert embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to 2C-like cells. This conversion is marked by a global reorganization and dispersion of H3K9me3-heterochromatin foci, which are then reversibly formed upon re-entry into pluripotency. By profiling the chromatin-bound proteome (chromatome) through genome capture of ESCs transitioning to 2C-like cells, we uncover chromatin regulators involved in de novo heterochromatin formation. We identified TOPBP1 and investigated its binding partner SMARCAD1. SMARCAD1 and TOPBP1 associate with H3K9me3-heterochromatin in ESCs. Interestingly, the nuclear localization of SMARCAD1 is lost in 2C-like cells. SMARCAD1 or TOPBP1 depletion in mouse embryos leads to developmental arrest, reduction of H3K9me3, and remodeling of heterochromatin foci. Collectively, our findings contribute to comprehending the maintenance of chromocenters during early development.
