Functionally refined encoding of threat memory by distinct populations of basal forebrain cholinergic projection neurons

  1. Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  2. Mala R Ananth
  3. Ronald Kim
  4. Richard B Crouse
  5. Li Jiang
  6. Gretchen López- Hernández
  7. Chongbo Zhong
  8. Christian Arty
  9. Shaohua Wang
  10. Alice Jone
  11. Niraj S Desai
  12. Yulong Li
  13. Marina R Picciotto
  14. Lorna W Role  Is a corresponding author
  15. David A Talmage  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, United States
  2. Yale University, United States
  3. Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, United States
  4. LinkedIn, United States
  5. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, United States
  6. Steris, United States
  7. Peking University, China

Abstract

Neurons of the basal forebrain nucleus basalis and posterior substantia innominata (NBM/SIp) comprise the major source of cholinergic input to the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Using a genetically-encoded acetylcholine (ACh) sensor in mice, we demonstrate that BLA-projecting cholinergic neurons can 'learn' the association between a naïve tone and a foot shock (training) and release ACh in the BLA in response to the conditioned tone 24h later (recall). In the NBM/SIp cholinergic neurons express the immediate early gene, Fos following both training and memory recall. Cholinergic neurons that express Fos following memory recall display increased intrinsic excitability. Chemogenetic silencing of these learning-activated cholinergic neurons prevents expression of the defensive behavior to the tone. In contrast, we show that NBM/SIp cholinergic neurons are not activated by an innately threatening stimulus (predator odor). Instead, VP/SIa cholinergic neurons are activated and contribute to defensive behaviors in response to predator odor, an innately threatening stimulus. Taken together, we find that distinct populations of cholinergic neurons are recruited to signal distinct aversive stimuli, demonstrating functionally refined organization of specific types of memory within the cholinergic basal forebrain of mice.

Data availability

Source data for the fiber photometry experiments presented in Figure 1 and supplements are provided as individual source data files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Prithviraj Rajebhosale

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9893-3025
  2. Mala R Ananth

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ronald Kim

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Richard B Crouse

    Office of New Haven Affairs, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9509-9263
  5. Li Jiang

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Gretchen López- Hernández

    Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chongbo Zhong

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christian Arty

    LinkedIn, Sunnyvale, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Shaohua Wang

    National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Alice Jone

    Regulatory Affairs Division, Steris, Mentor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Niraj S Desai

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yulong Li

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Marina R Picciotto

    Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4404-1280
  14. Lorna W Role

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    Lorna.Role@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5851-212X
  15. David A Talmage

    NINDS, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    david.talmage@NIH.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4627-3007

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1ZIANS009424)

  • David A Talmage

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1ZIANS009416,1ZIANS009422)

  • Lorna W Role

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS22061)

  • Lorna W Role
  • David A Talmage

National Institute of Mental Health (U01-MH109104)

  • Lorna W Role
  • David A Talmage

National Institute of Mental Health (MH077681)

  • Marina R Picciotto

National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA14241,DA037566)

  • Marina R Picciotto

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS007224)

  • Richard B Crouse

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees (ACUC) of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders & Stroke (NINDS) (Protocol #1531), SUNY Research Foundation at Stony Brook University (Protocol #1618), and Yale University (Protocol #2019-07895).

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,375
    views
  • 195
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  2. Mala R Ananth
  3. Ronald Kim
  4. Richard B Crouse
  5. Li Jiang
  6. Gretchen López- Hernández
  7. Chongbo Zhong
  8. Christian Arty
  9. Shaohua Wang
  10. Alice Jone
  11. Niraj S Desai
  12. Yulong Li
  13. Marina R Picciotto
  14. Lorna W Role
  15. David A Talmage
(2024)
Functionally refined encoding of threat memory by distinct populations of basal forebrain cholinergic projection neurons
eLife 13:e86581.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86581

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86581

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Brian C Ruyle, Sarah Masud ... Jose A Morón
    Research Article

    Millions of Americans suffering from Opioid Use Disorders face a high risk of fatal overdose due to opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD). Fentanyl, a powerful synthetic opioid, is a major contributor to the rising rates of overdose deaths. Reversing fentanyl overdoses has proved challenging due to its high potency and the rapid onset of OIRD. We assessed the contributions of central and peripheral mu opioid receptors (MORs) in mediating fentanyl-induced physiological responses. The peripherally restricted MOR antagonist naloxone methiodide (NLXM) both prevented and reversed OIRD to a degree comparable to that of naloxone (NLX), indicating substantial involvement of peripheral MORs to OIRD. Interestingly, NLXM-mediated OIRD reversal did not produce aversive behaviors observed after NLX. We show that neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (nTS), the first central synapse of peripheral afferents, exhibit a biphasic activity profile following fentanyl exposure. NLXM pretreatment attenuates this activity, suggesting that these responses are mediated by peripheral MORs. Together, these findings establish a critical role for peripheral MORs, including ascending inputs to the nTS, as sites of dysfunction during OIRD. Furthermore, selective peripheral MOR antagonism could be a promising therapeutic strategy for managing OIRD by sparing CNS-driven acute opioid-associated withdrawal and aversion observed after NLX.

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance Updated

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (eight total) in a conditioned suppression setting using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. These shock-paired visual cues further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.