Multicellular factor analysis of single-cell data for a tissue-centric understanding of disease
Abstract
Biomedical single-cell atlases describe disease at the cellular level. However, analysis of this data commonly focuses on cell-type centric pairwise cross-condition comparisons, disregarding the multicellular nature of disease processes. Here we propose multicellular factor analysis for the unsupervised analysis of samples from cross-condition single-cell atlases and the identification of multicellular programs associated with disease. Our strategy, which repurposes group factor analysis as implemented in multi-omics factor analysis, incorporates the variation of patient samples across cell-types or other tissue-centric features, such as cell compositions or spatial relationships, and enables the joint analysis of multiple patient cohorts, facilitating the integration of atlases. We applied our framework to a collection of acute and chronic human heart failure atlases and described multicellular processes of cardiac remodeling, independent to cellular compositions and their local organization, that were conserved in independent spatial and bulk transcriptomics datasets. In sum, our framework serves as an exploratory tool for unsupervised analysis of cross-condition single-cell atlases and allows for the integration of the measurements of patient cohorts across distinct data modalities.
Data availability
The datasets and computer code produced in this study are available in the following databases:-All scripts related to this manuscript can be consulted here: https://github.com/saezlab/MOFAcell.-The R package implementing multicellular factor analysis can be found in:https://github.com/saezlab/MOFAcellulaR-The python implementation of multicellular factor analysis is available here:https://liana-py.readthedocs.io/en/latest/notebooks/mofacellular.html-A Zenodo entry containing data associated to this manuscript can be accessed here: https://zenodo.org/record/8082895.
-
Multiplexing droplet-based single cell RNA-sequencing using genetic barcodesGene Expression Omnibus GSE96583.
-
Spatial multi-omic map of human myocardial infarctionHuman Cell Atlas Data Portal, e9f36305-d857-44a3-93f0-df4e6007dc97.
-
Cells of the Adult Heartad98d3cd-26fb-4ee3-99c9-8a2ab085e737.
-
The Reference of the Transcriptional Landscape of Human End-Stage Heart FailureZenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3797044.
-
Pathogenic variants damage cell composition and single cell transcription in cardiomyopathiescellxgene, e75342a8-0f3b-4ec5-8ee1-245a23e0f7cb.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
DFG CRC 1550 (464424253)
- Ricardo Omar Ramirez Flores
- Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Informatics for Life
- Jan David Lanzer
- Julio Saez-Rodriguez
EU ITN Marie Curie StrategyCKD (860329)
- Daniel Dimitrov
- Julio Saez-Rodriguez
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Copyright
© 2023, Ramirez Flores et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 4,845
- views
-
- 564
- downloads
-
- 26
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Computational and Systems Biology
Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Neuroscience
Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.