Hearing: Letting the calcium flow
Hearing the voice of your lover, the symphonies of Beethoven or a fire alarm, all rely on acoustic information being translated into messages that can be understood by the brain. This process depends on sensory cells known as hair cells which are housed in a hollow within the inner ear known as the cochlea. When sound waves enter the ear, their vibrations cause fluid in the cochlea to move and bend protrusions at the top of hair cells known as stereocilia (Fettiplace, 2017). This activates hair cells and triggers calcium to enter, leading to secretion of the neurotransmitter glutamate which then activates auditory nerve fibers that convey signals to the brain (Moser et al., 2020).
The calcium influx that drives glutamate release is a critical step in the process of hearing (Pangrsic et al., 2018). In most cell types, calcium enters via channels which open upon cell activation and then inactivate themselves by closing. However, the calcium channels in hair cells (known as Cav1.3) show an interesting property: they do not inactivate and remain open for as long as the hair cell is stimulated. When the Cav1.3 channel is expressed in other cell types, the calcium channel closes itself like other calcium channels (Cui et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2006), suggesting that there is something in hair cells that stops Cav1.3 from inactivating.
Calcium channels can be inactivated in a voltage-dependent or calcium-dependent manner. Previous work found that deletion of a calcium-binding protein known as CaBP2 prevented voltage-dependent inactivation (Picher et al., 2017); a mutation in the gene encoding this protein was also shown to cause human deafness (Schrauwen et al., 2012). However, calcium-dependent inactivation was mostly unaffected by the disruption of CaBP2. Moreover, deletion of another calcium-binding protein, CaBP1, did not affect calcium-mediated inactivation, nor the voltage-dependent mechanism (Yang et al., 2018). Now, in eLife, Tina Pangrsic and colleagues from the University Medical Centre Göttingen and Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Science – including David Oestreicher as first author – report that CaBP1 and CaBP2 work together to prevent calcium channels from closing during hair cell stimulation (Figure 1; Oestreicher et al., 2024).
The team found that deleting the genes for CaBP1 and CaBP2 simultaneously led to greater inactivation of calcium channels than deleting either gene alone. As a result of the calcium channels not staying fully open, calcium influx and glutamate release were depressed, leading to reduced activation of auditory fibers. Consequently, the neural message conveyed along the auditory pathway was degraded, resulting in severe hearing loss in the genetically modified mice. Notably, even when there was a small amount of calcium influx through the temporarily open calcium channels, glutamate secretion was still almost completely abolished. This suggests that CaBP1 and CaBP2 may affect the release of glutamate independently from their role on calcium channels.
To strengthen the data, Oestreicher et al. re-expressed the gene for CaBP2 in the mice. This led to a substantial – but not complete – rescue of calcium channel activity, glutamate secretion, auditory fiber activation and hearing. Taken together, the experiments demonstrate that both CaBP1 and CaBP2 contribute to calcium-triggered glutamate release in hair cells of the inner ear, suggesting they have partially overlapping roles.
These findings also raise exciting questions for future studies. For instance, how do CaBP1 and CaBP2 work together to control calcium channel activity? Additionally, how do these calcium-binding proteins directly influence the secretion of glutamate in addition to controlling calcium channels? Further experiments that help to answer these questions, and others, could provide more insights into how hair cells transmit sound to the brain, which could potentially help identify therapeutic targets for hearing impairments.
References
-
Ca2+-binding proteins tune Ca2+-feedback to Cav1.3 channels in mouse auditory hair cellsThe Journal of Physiology 585:791–803.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142307
-
Hair cell transduction, tuning, and synaptic transmission in the mammalian cochleaComprehensive Physiology 7:1197–1227.https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c160049
-
Sensory processing at ribbon synapses in the retina and the cochleaPhysiological Reviews 100:103–144.https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00026.2018
-
Voltage-gated calcium channels: Key players in sensory coding in the retina and the inner earPhysiological Reviews 98:2063–2096.https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00030.2017
-
A mutation in CABP2, expressed in cochlear hair cells, causes autosomal-recessive hearing impairmentAmerican Journal of Human Genetics 91:636–645.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.018
-
Switching of Ca2+-dependent inactivation of Ca(v)1.3 channels by calcium binding proteins of auditory hair cellsThe Journal of Neuroscience 26:10677–10689.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3236-06.2006
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Nouvian
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 822
- views
-
- 48
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Neural diversity can expand the encoding capacity of a circuitry. A striking example of diverse structure and function is presented by the afferent synapses between inner hair cells (IHCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) in the cochlea. Presynaptic active zones at the pillar IHC side activate at lower IHC potentials than those of the modiolar side that have more presynaptic Ca2+ channels. The postsynaptic SGNs differ in their spontaneous firing rates, sound thresholds, and operating ranges. While a causal relationship between synaptic heterogeneity and neural response diversity seems likely, experimental evidence linking synaptic and SGN physiology has remained difficult to obtain. Here, we aimed at bridging this gap by ex vivo paired recordings of murine IHCs and postsynaptic SGN boutons with stimuli and conditions aimed to mimic those of in vivo SGN characterization. Synapses with high spontaneous rate of release (SR) were found predominantly on the pillar side of the IHC. These high SR synapses had larger and more temporally compact spontaneous EPSCs, lower voltage thresholds, tighter coupling of Ca2+ channels and vesicular release sites, shorter response latencies, and higher initial release rates. This study indicates that synaptic heterogeneity in IHCs directly contributes to the diversity of spontaneous and sound-evoked firing of SGNs.
-
- Neuroscience
Chronic back pain (CBP) is a global health concern with significant societal and economic burden. While various predictors of back pain chronicity have been proposed, including demographic and psychosocial factors, neuroimaging studies have pointed to brain characteristics as predictors of CBP. However, large-scale, multisite validation of these predictors is currently lacking. In two independent longitudinal studies, we examined white matter diffusion imaging data and pain characteristics in patients with subacute back pain (SBP) over 6- and 12-month periods. Diffusion data from individuals with CBP and healthy controls (HC) were analyzed for comparison. Whole-brain tract-based spatial statistics analyses revealed that a cluster in the right superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) tract had larger fractional anisotropy (FA) values in patients who recovered (SBPr) compared to those with persistent pain (SBPp), and predicted changes in pain severity. The SLF FA values accurately classified patients at baseline and follow-up in a third publicly available dataset (Area under the Receiver Operating Curve ~0.70). Notably, patients who recovered had FA values larger than those of HC suggesting a potential role of SLF integrity in resilience to CBP. Structural connectivity-based models also classified SBPp and SBPr patients from the three data sets (validation accuracy 67%). Our results validate the right SLF as a robust predictor of CBP development, with potential for clinical translation. Cognitive and behavioral processes dependent on the right SLF, such as proprioception and visuospatial attention, should be analyzed in subacute stages as they could prove important for back pain chronicity.