Evaluation of clonal hematopoiesis and mosaic loss of Y chromosome in cardiovascular risk: An analysis in prospective studies

  1. Sami Fawaz
  2. Severine Marti
  3. Melody Dufossee
  4. Yann Pucheu
  5. Astrid Gaufroy
  6. Jean Broitman
  7. Audrey Bidet
  8. Aicha Soumare
  9. Gaëlle Munsch
  10. Christophe Tzourio
  11. Stephanie Debette
  12. David-Alexandre Trégouët
  13. Chloe James
  14. Olivier Mansier  Is a corresponding author
  15. Thierry Couffinhal  Is a corresponding author
  1. CHU de Bordeaux, Service des Maladies Coronaires et Vasculaires, France
  2. CHU de Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'hematologie, France
  3. Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, Biologie des maladies cardiovasculaires, France
  4. Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, INSERM, France
3 figures, 4 tables and 2 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), mosaic loss of Y chromosome (mLOY) and their combination are as frequent in myocardial infarction (MI)(+) and MI(-) subjects.

(A) Prevalence of CHIP, mLOY, and their combination in the total cohort of 449 subjects, in MI(+) as well as in MI(-) subjects. (B) Mutational spectrum of CHIP expressed as the proportion of mutations detected in the indicated genes. (C) Variant allele frequency (VAF) measured for the different mutations detected in the 449 subjects detected in the indicated genes. (D) Prevalence of CHIP and mLOY depending on age in the total cohort (for CHIP) and in male subjects (for mLOY).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Variant allele frequency (VAF) of somatic mutations detected in myocardial infarction (MI)(+) and MI(-) subjects.

The graph represents the VAF measured for the different mutations detected in MI(+) and MI(-) subjects in the indicated genes.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) and mosaic loss of Y chromosome (mLOY) do not increase significantly the risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI), but could accelerate it in male subjects.

Incidence of MI during follow-up according to the presence of CHIP (A) or mLOY (B) in MI(-) subjects. Incidence of MI during follow-up according to the presence of CHIP (C) or the combination of CHIP and mLOY (D) in male MI(-) subjects. Survival was compared between the different groups with log-rank tests.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) do not increase significantly the risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI).

Incidence of MI during follow-up according to the variant allele frequency (VAF) (A) or the mutated gene (B) in MI(-) subjects. Incidence of MI during follow-up according to the presence of CHIP in MI(-) female subjects (C). Survival was compared between the different groups with log-rank tests.

Author response image 1

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Sequence-based reagentPrimer-amel-FwdThis paperPCR primersCCCCTGGGCACTGTAAAGAAT
Sequence-based reagentPrimer-amel-RevThis paperPCR primersCCAAGCATCAGAGCTTAAACTG
Sequence-based reagentProbe-amelXThis paperPCR probeCCAAATAAAGTGGTTTCTCAAGT
Sequence-based reagentProbe-amelYThis paperPCR probeCTTGAGAAACATCTGGGATAAAG
Commercial assay or kitddPCR supermix for Probes (no dUTP)BioradPCR mix
Commercial assay or kitSureSelect XT Low Input kitAgilentNGS custom RNA-baits panel
Software, algorithmQuantasoftBioradAnalysis software
Software, algorithmRCRANhttps://www.r-project.org/
Table 1
Subjects' characteristics.
All subjectsn=446MI(+) subjectsn=149MI(-) subjectsn=297p-value
Male, n (%)257 (57.6)98 (66)159 (54)0.015
Median age, years (Q1;Q3)76.4 (71.9;80.9)82.0 (78.0;86.0)73.6 (70.6;77.8)p<10–4
Cardiovascular risk factors
BMI, kg/m2 (Q1;Q3)25.5 (23.6;28.3)25.5 (23.6;28.5)25.5 (23.6;28.1)0.14
Diabetes, n (%)94 (21.2)47 (32%)47 (16%)p<10–4
Hypertension, n (%)362 (82.8)107 (76.4)255 (85.9)0.020
Total cholesterol, g/L (Q1;Q3)2.08 (1.72;2.38)1.45 (1.25;1.72)2.23 (2.00;2.47)p<10–4
LDL-c, g/L (Q1;Q3)1.25 (0.94;1.52)0.77 (0.61;1.03)1.39 (1.19;1.60)p<10–4
HDL-c, g/L (Q1;Q3)0.56 (0.46;0.66)0.47 (0.39;0.57)0.59 (0.50;0.68)p<10–4
Smoking, n (%)32 (7.2)6 (4.4)26 (8.7)0.117
Prevalence of CHIP and mLOY
CHIP prevalence, n (%)201 (45.1)79 (53%)122 (41%)0.923
Prevalence of CHIP with VAF ≥5%88 (19.7)30 (20.1)58 (19.5)0.069
Subjects tested for mLOY, n22097123-
mLOY prevalence, n (%)83 (37.7)44 (45.4)39 (31.7)0.783
CHIP(+) / mLOY(+) prevalence, n (%)39 (17.7)22 (22.7)17 (13.8)0.797
  1. Data are expressed as numbers and frequency or median, first and third quartiles. For quantitative values, comparisons were made by linear regression of log values adjusted for age and sex. For qualitative parameters, comparisons were made by the fisher test. For each variable, results are expressed among patients with available value.

Table 2
.CHIP and mLOY are not associated with increased hsCRP level.
hsCRP level All subjectsp valuehsCRP level MI(+) subjectsp valuehsCRP level MI(-) subjectsp value
CHIP(-)1.64 (1.00;3.69)0.6521.40 (1.00;4.00)0.6001.71 (0.97;3.22)0.141
CHIP(+)2.00 (1.00:3.90)2.20 (1.10;5.00)1.63 (0.91;2.54)
mLOY(-)1.45 (0.99;2.75)0.1561.8 (1.0;4.8)0.1491.41 (0.74;2.16)0.358
mLOY(+)1.73 (1.01;4.00)2.4 (1.03;4.5)1.2 (0.99;2.99)
CHIP (-) mLOY (-)1.11 (0.76;2.19)0.4101.00 (0.77;2.72)0.4301.35 (0.79;2.14)0.570
CHIP (+) mLOY (-)1.87 (1.00;3.03)2.30 (1.35;7.35)1.43 (0.72;2.37)
CHIP (-) mLOY (+)2.20 (1.02;4.00)2.50 (1.30;4.00)1.37 (0.95;3.75)
CHIP (+) mLOY (+)1.23 (1.01;3.80)2.00 (1.02;4.75)1.17 (1.03;1.73)
  1. hsCRP Data are expressed as median, first and third quartiles. Comparisons were performed by linear regression of log values adjusted for age and sex. hsCRP levels are expressed in mg/L For each variable, results are expressed among patients with available value.

Table 3
CHIP and mLOY are not associated with an increased atherosclerotic burden.
Atherosclerosis burden evaluation in MI(+) subjects
All patients (n=149)CHIP (-) (n=70)CHIP (+) (n=79)p-valuemLOY (-) (n=53)mLOY (+) (n=44)p-value
Multitroncular lesions, n (%)68 (45.6)29 (41.4)39 (49.4)0.48425 (47.2)20 (45.4)0.717
Carotid stenosis ≥50%, n (%)7 (4.7)2 (2.8)5 (6.3)0.3172 (3.8)3 (6.8)0.451
Global atheroma volume (mm3), median (Q1;Q3)499.5 (408.0;604.5)455.0 (374.0;555.0)520.0 (411.5;611.5)0.333601.0 (412.0;718.0)492.0 (344.5;600.5)0.707
Atherosclerosis burden evaluation in MI(-) subjects
All patients (n=297)CHIP (-) (n=175)CHIP (+) (n=122)p-valuemLOY (-) (n=84)mLOY (+) (n=39)p-value
Patients with atherosclerotic plaque, n (%)135 (45.4)81 (46.3)54 (44.3)0.99734 (40.5)19 (48.7)0.537
Number of plaque, median (Q1;Q3)1 (1;2)2 (1;2)1 (1;2)0.2582 (1;2)2 (1;2)0.863
Intima Media Thickness (mm), median (Q1;Q3)0.68 (0.60;0.76)0.67 (0.60;0.76)0.68 (0.59;0.74)0.8970.67 (0.62;0.76)0.72 (0.57;0.83)0.706
  1. Data are expressed as numbers and frequency or median, first and third quartiles. For quantitative values, comparisons were made by linear regression of log values adjusted for age and sex. For qualitative parameters, comparisons were made by the fisher test and logistic regression. For each variable, results are expressed among patients with available value.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Additionnal data about genetic, inflammatory and atheroscletrotic parameters in the studied subjects.

(a) Targeted sequencing panel used in the laboratory of Hematology of the University Hospital of Bordeaux for the diagnosis and follow-up of myeloid hematological malignancies and used in this study. (b) Characteristics of the identified mutations according to the degree of certainty of their pathogenicity (deleterious, possibly deleterious, or variant of undetermined significance). Exceptions: ASXL1/ASXL2/TET2: only variants resulting in a truncated protein were retained as deleterious variants (A). For TET2, missense mutations were retained only when they affected CD1 or CD2 domain ANKRD26: non-coding region 5’-UTR was retained. TP53: database IARC (https://p53.iarc.fr/) was used for the classification. * Only variants classified as A or B are retained as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in the study. (c) Mutational profile of CHIP(+) MI(+) subjects. (d) Mutational profile of CHIP(+) MI(-) subjects. (e) Comparison of characteristics of MI(+) subjects depending on their CHIP and mosaic loss of Y chromosome (mLOY) status. (f) comparison of characteristics of MI(-) subjects depending on their CHIP and mLOY status. For statistical analysis, logistical regression (adjusted on age and sex) and/or Fisher’s test were used to compare qualitative variables, and linear regression (adjusted on age and sex) and/or ANOVA were used to compare quantitative variables. Blood counts were not available for MI(-) subjects. (g) CHIP associated with DNMT3A or TET2 mutations do not present differential effect on inflammation or atherosclerotic burden. Data are expressed as numbers and frequency or median, first, and third quartiles. For quantitative values, comparisons were made by linear regression of log values adjusted for age and sex. For qualitative parameters, comparisons were made by the fisher test. (h) Important clones of CHIP and mLOY are not associated with increased inflammation, atherosclerosis, or CVE. Data are expressed as numbers and frequency or median, first, and third quartiles. For quantitative values, comparisons were made by linear regression of log values adjusted for age and sex. For qualitative parameters, comparisons were made by the Fisher test and logistic regression. For each variable, results are expressed among patients with available values. (i) mLOY do not impact the atherosclerotic burden in the presence of CHIP. Data are expressed as numbers and frequency or median, first and third quartiles. For quantitative values, comparisons were made by linear regression of log values adjusted for age and sex. For qualitative parameters, comparisons were made by the Fisher test. For each variable, results are expressed among patients with available values. (j) Characteristics of MI(-) patients at the time of inclusion depending on whether they presented a myocardial Infarction (MI) during follow-up or not. Data are expressed as numbers and frequency or median, first and third quartiles. For quantitative values, comparisons were made by linear regression of log values adjusted for age and sex. For qualitative parameters, comparisons were made by the Fisher test and logistic regression. For each variable, results are expressed among patients with available values. (k) CHIP may accelerate the incidence MI in the absence of mLOY in male subjects. Data are expressed as numbers and frequency or median, first and third quartiles. For the ‘time to MI’ in MI(-) subjects, comparisons were performed by the Mann-Whitney test for CHIP and mLOY separately and the Kruskall-Wallis test for combinations of CHIP +/- mLOY. For qualitative parameters, comparisons were made by the Fisher test. For each variable, results are expressed among patients with available values.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96150/elife-96150-supp1-v1.docx
MDAR checklist
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96150/elife-96150-mdarchecklist1-v1.docx

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sami Fawaz
  2. Severine Marti
  3. Melody Dufossee
  4. Yann Pucheu
  5. Astrid Gaufroy
  6. Jean Broitman
  7. Audrey Bidet
  8. Aicha Soumare
  9. Gaëlle Munsch
  10. Christophe Tzourio
  11. Stephanie Debette
  12. David-Alexandre Trégouët
  13. Chloe James
  14. Olivier Mansier
  15. Thierry Couffinhal
(2024)
Evaluation of clonal hematopoiesis and mosaic loss of Y chromosome in cardiovascular risk: An analysis in prospective studies
eLife 13:RP96150.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96150.3