A-to-I RNA editing of CYP18A1 mediates transgenerational wing dimorphism in aphids

  1. Bin Zhu
  2. Rui Wei
  3. Wenjuan Hua
  4. Lu Li
  5. Wenlin Zhang
  6. Pei Liang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, China
  2. Berry Genomics Corporation, China
7 figures, 1 table and 8 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Assembled genome for Metopolophium dirhodum.

(A) k-mer (K=17) distribution of Illumina genome sequencing reads. (B) Hi-C contact heat map of the assembled genome. (C) Chromosome-level synteny analysis between M. dirhodum and Acyrthosiphon pisum. (D) Maximum likelihood phylogeny of M. dirhodum and nine other insect species based on a concatenated alignment of the conserved single copy orthologues. The histograms are subdivided to represent different categories of orthology: 1:1:1 (single copy orthologous genes in communal gene families); N:N:N (multiple copy orthologous genes in communal gene families); specific (genes from unique gene families from each species); other (genes that do not belong to any of the above mentioned orthologous categories); uncluster (genes that do not cluster to any families).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Venn diagram of functional annotation based on five databases for Metopolophium dirhodum.
Landscape of A-to-I editomes in Metopolophium dirhodum.

(A) Density distribution map of A-to-I RNA-editing sites on nine chromosomes. (B) Number and distribution of the detected A-to-I editing sites over different genic regions. (C) Average editing levels of the detected A-to-I editing sites on nine chromosomes.

Figure 3 with 3 supplements
A-to-I RNA editing on CYP18A1 is linked to transgenerational wing dimorphism under crowding condition in Metopolophium dirhodum.

(A) 20-hydroxyecdysone biosynthesis and metabolism pathway. (B) Schematic diagram for normal and crowding conditions. (C, D) Representative chromatograms of the PCR product direct sequencing for the two synonymous A-to-I RNA-editing sites (editing site 528 and 759, 528th or 759th nucleotide in the CDS region of CYP18A1) on CYP18A1. (E) The proportion of editing individuals under normal, crowding, and crowding + 20E conditions. (F) The proportion of winged offspring under normal, crowding, and crowding + 20E conditions. (G, H) The expression level of CYP18A1 under normal, crowding and crowding + 20E conditions by RT-qPCR and western blot. (I) The 20E titers under normal and crowding conditions. (J) The expression level of ADAR2 under normal, crowding, and crowding + 20E conditions by RT-qPCR. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the treatment and the corresponding control (Student’s t-test, *0.01<p<0.05, **p<0.01). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests, p<0.05).

Figure 3—source data 1

Labeled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 3H (CYP18A1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig3-data1-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 2

Uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 3H (CYP18A1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig3-data2-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 3

Labeled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 3H (β-actin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig3-data3-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 4

Uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 3H (β-actin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig3-data4-v1.zip
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
The proportion of A-to-I RNA-editing individuals for genes involved in 20E biosynthesis and metabolism under normal and crowding conditions.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2
The relative expression for genes involved in 20E biosynthesis and metabolism under normal and crowding conditions.
Figure 3—figure supplement 3
Bioinformatics analysis of the ADAR2 protein.

(A) Amino acid sequence alignment of ADAR2 homologs from Aphidoidea and other insect species. The identical and similar residues are respectively marked with black and gray backgrounds. (B) Phylogenetic tree constructed using the protein sequences of ADAR2 homologs from Aphidoidea and other insect species.

RNAi-mediated knockdown of ADAR2 could regulate the A-to-I RNA-editing level and expression of CYP18A1.

(A, B) The expression level of CYP18A1 under crowding condition treated with dsCYP18A1 and dsADAR2 after 48 h by RT-qPCR and western blot. (C) The expression level of ADAR2 under crowding condition treated with dsCYP18A1 and dsADAR2 after 48 h by RT-qPCR. (D) The proportion of editing individuals under crowding condition treated with dsCYP18A1 and dsADAR2 after 48 h. (E) The 20E titers under crowding condition treated with dsCYP18A1 and dsADAR2 after 48 h. (F) The proportion of winged offspring under crowding condition treated with dsCYP18A1 and dsADAR2 after 48 h. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the treatment and the corresponding control (Student’s t-test, *0.01<<0.05, **<0.01).

Figure 4—source data 1

Labeled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 4B (CYP18A1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig4-data1-v1.zip
Figure 4—source data 2

Uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 4B (CYP18A1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig4-data2-v1.zip
Figure 4—source data 3

Labeled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 4B (β-actin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig4-data3-v1.zip
Figure 4—source data 4

Uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 4B (β-actin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig4-data4-v1.zip
Figure 5 with 1 supplement
miR-3036-5p targets on CYP18A1 in Metopolophium dirhodum.

(A) The putative miR-3036-5p binding sites in CYP18A1. (B) The expression level of miR-3036-5p under normal and crowding conditions. (C) Interactions between miR-3036-5p and CYP18A1 determined by RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) in vivo. (D) Dual-luciferase reporter assays through co-transfection of miR-3036-5p agomir with recombinant pmirGLO vectors containing wild-type (wt), edited (edit) or mutated (mt) binding sites. (E) Co-localization of miR-3036-5p and CYP18A1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the treatment and the corresponding control (Student’s t-test, *0.01<p<0.05, **p<0.01). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests, p<0.05).

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Co-localization of miR-3036-5p and CYP18A1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay.
miR-3036-5p regulates transgenerational wing dimorphism by targeting CYP18A1 in Metopolophium dirhodum.

(A) Schematic diagram for normal condition. (B) The expression level of miR-3036-5p under normal condition treated with miR-3036-5p agomir or antagomir after 48 h. (C, D) The expression level of CYP18A1 under normal condition treated with miR-3036-5p agomir or antagomir after 48 h by RT-qPCR (C) and western blot (D). (E) The 20E titers under normal condition treated with miR-3036-5p agomir or antagomir after 48 h. (F) The proportion of winged offspring under normal condition treated with miR-3036-5p agomir or antagomir after 48 h. (G) Schematic diagram for crowding condition. (H) The expression level of miR-3036-5p under crowding condition treated with miR-3036-5p agomir or antagomir after 48 h. (I, J) The expression level of CYP18A1 under crowding condition treated with miR-3036-5p agomir or antagomir after 48 h by RT-qPCR (I) and western blot (J). (K) The 20E titers under crowding condition treated with miR-3036-5p agomir or antagomir after 48 h. (L) The proportion of winged offspring under crowding condition treated with miR-3036-5p agomir or antagomir after 48 h. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the treatment and the corresponding control (Student’s t-test, *0.01<p<0.05, **p<0.01).

Figure 6—source data 1

Labeled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 6D (CYP18A1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig6-data1-v1.zip
Figure 6—source data 2

Uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 6D (CYP18A1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig6-data2-v1.zip
Figure 6—source data 3

Labeled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 6D (β-actin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig6-data3-v1.zip
Figure 6—source data 4

Uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 6D (β-actin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig6-data4-v1.zip
Figure 6—source data 5

Labeled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 6J (CYP18A1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig6-data5-v1.zip
Figure 6—source data 6

Uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 6J (CYP18A1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig6-data6-v1.zip
Figure 6—source data 7

Labeled file for the western blot analysis in Figure 6J (β-actin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig6-data7-v1.zip
Figure 6—source data 8

Uncropped file for the western blot analysis in Figure 6J (β-actin).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-fig6-data8-v1.zip
Schematic model of the miR-3036-5p-mediated control of transgenerational wing dimorphism by targeting CYP18A1 in Metopolophium dirhodum.

The components that are less active or inactive are shown in gray.

Tables

Table 1
Assembly features for genomes of Metopolophium dirhodum and other Aphidinae insects.
Genome assembly/speciesM. dirhodumS. graminumS. miscanthiR. maidisA. pisumE. lanigerumD. noxiaM. persicaeA. gossypii
LevelChr.Chr.Chr.Chr.Chr.Chr.Scaf.Scaf.Scaf.
No. chr.969456---
Size (Mb)447.8499.2397.9326541.1330393347.3294
No. contig296276114868960,62312,70349,357604422,569
Contig N50 (bp)8,194,99828,074,4501,638,3299,046,39628,192165,67512,578218,92245,572
No. scaf.682265622023,9247929564140214724
Scaf. N50 (bp)39,359,500104,490,32336,263,04593,298,903518,5464,427,088397,774435,781437,960
No. gene18,00313,35316,00617,62936,19528,18619,09723,91014,694

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Statistics for sequencing data for Metopolophium dirhodum assembly.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-supp1-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 2

Overview of chromosome length of Metopolophium dirhodum assembly.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-supp2-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 3

Gene family clusters of 10 species.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-supp3-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 4

Chromosome-level synteny analysis between Metopolophium dirhodum and Acyrthosiphon pisum.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-supp4-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 5

Overview of the A-to-I RNA-editing sites in Metopolophium dirhodum.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-supp5-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 6

A-to-I RNA-editing sites for genes involved in 20E biosynthesis and metabolism pathway.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-supp6-v1.xlsx
Supplementary file 7

All primers used in this study.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-supp7-v1.xlsx
MDAR checklist
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/96540/elife-96540-mdarchecklist1-v1.docx

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bin Zhu
  2. Rui Wei
  3. Wenjuan Hua
  4. Lu Li
  5. Wenlin Zhang
  6. Pei Liang
(2025)
A-to-I RNA editing of CYP18A1 mediates transgenerational wing dimorphism in aphids
eLife 13:RP96540.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96540.3