Abstract

Hippocampome.org is a comprehensive knowledge base of neuron types in the rodent hippocampal formation (dentate gyrus, CA3, CA2, CA1, subiculum, and entorhinal cortex). Although the hippocampal literature is remarkably information-rich, neuron properties are often reported with incompletely defined and notoriously inconsistent terminology, creating a formidable challenge for data integration. Our extensive literature mining and data reconciliation identified 122 neuron types based on neurotransmitter, axonal and dendritic patterns, synaptic specificity, electrophysiology, and molecular biomarkers. All ~3700 annotated properties are individually supported by specific evidence (~14,000 pieces) in peer-reviewed publications. Systematic analysis of this unprecedented amount of machine-readable information reveals novel correlations among neuron types and properties, the potential connectivity of the full hippocampal circuitry, and outstanding knowledge gaps. User-friendly browsing and online querying of Hippocampome.org may aid design and interpretation of both experiments and simulations. This powerful, simple, and extensible neuron classification endeavor is unique in its detail, utility, and completeness.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Diek W Wheeler

    Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Charise M White

    Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christopher L Rees

    Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexander O Komendantov

    Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David J Hamilton

    Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Giorgio A Ascoli

    Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States
    For correspondence
    ascoli@gmu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2015, Wheeler et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 14,058
    views
  • 1,729
    downloads
  • 138
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Diek W Wheeler
  2. Charise M White
  3. Christopher L Rees
  4. Alexander O Komendantov
  5. David J Hamilton
  6. Giorgio A Ascoli
(2015)
Hippocampome.org: A knowledge base of neuron types in the rodent hippocampus
eLife 4:e09960.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09960

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09960

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zachary Fournier, Leandro M Alonso, Eve Marder
    Research Article

    Circuit function results from both intrinsic conductances of network neurons and the synaptic conductances that connect them. In models of neural circuits, different combinations of maximal conductances can give rise to similar activity. We compared the robustness of a neural circuit to changes in their intrinsic versus synaptic conductances. To address this, we performed a sensitivity analysis on a population of conductance-based models of the pyloric network from the crustacean stomatogastric ganglion (STG). The model network consists of three neurons with nine currents: a sodium current (Na), three potassium currents (Kd, KCa, KA), two calcium currents (CaS and CaT), a hyperpolarization-activated current (H), a non-voltage-gated leak current (leak), and a neuromodulatory current (MI). The model cells are connected by seven synapses of two types, glutamatergic and cholinergic. We produced one hundred models of the pyloric network that displayed similar activities with values of maximal conductances distributed over wide ranges. We evaluated the robustness of each model to changes in their maximal conductances. We found that individual models have different sensitivities to changes in their maximal conductances, both in their intrinsic and synaptic conductances. As expected, the models become less robust as the extent of the changes increases. Despite quantitative differences in their robustness, we found that in all cases, the model networks are more sensitive to the perturbation of their intrinsic conductances than their synaptic conductances.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.