1. Ecology
  2. Evolutionary Biology

Reconstructing the phylogeny and evolutionary history of freshwater fishes (Nemacheilidae) across Eurasia since early Eocene

  1. Vendula Bohlen Šlechtová
  2. Tomáš Dvořák
  3. Jörg Freyhof
  4. Maurice Kottelat
  5. Boris Levin
  6. Alexander Golubtsov
  7. Vlastimil Šlechta
  8. Joerg Bohlen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic
  2. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Czech Republic
  3. Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Germany
  4. Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  5. Papanin Institute of Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
  6. A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.101080.3
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Vendula Bohlen Šlechtová
  2. Tomáš Dvořák
  3. Jörg Freyhof
  4. Maurice Kottelat
  5. Boris Levin
  6. Alexander Golubtsov
  7. Vlastimil Šlechta
  8. Joerg Bohlen
(2025)
Reconstructing the phylogeny and evolutionary history of freshwater fishes (Nemacheilidae) across Eurasia since early Eocene
eLife 13:RP101080.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.101080.3
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

eLife Assessment

In this important study, the authors reconstruct the evolutionary history of a large and widespread group of freshwater fishes (Nemacheilidae) across Eurasia since the early Eocene, based on molecular phylogenetic analysis with very comprehensive samplings including 471 specimens belonging to 250 living species. The authors convincingly infer that range expansions of the family were facilitated by tectonic connections, favourable climatic conditions, and orogenic processes, adding to our understanding of the effects of climatic change on biodiversity during the Cenozoic. This work is of interest to evolutionary biologists, ichthyologists, paleontologists, and general readers.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.101080.3.sa0

Abstract

Eurasia has undergone substantial tectonic, geological, and climatic changes throughout the Cenozoic, primarily associated with tectonic plate collisions and a global cooling trend. The evolution of present-day biodiversity unfolded in this dynamic environment, characterised by intricate interactions of abiotic factors. However, comprehensive, large-scale reconstructions illustrating the extent of these influences are lacking. We reconstructed the evolutionary history of the freshwater fish family Nemacheilidae across Eurasia and spanning most of the Cenozoic on the base of 471 specimens representing 279 species and 37 genera plus outgroup samples. Molecular phylogeny using six genes uncovered six major clades within the family, along with numerous unresolved taxonomic issues. Dating of cladogenetic events and ancestral range estimation traced the origin of Nemacheilidae to Indochina around 48 mya. Subsequently, one branch of Nemacheilidae colonised eastern, central, and northern Asia, as well as Europe, while another branch expanded into the Burmese region, the Indian subcontinent, the Near East, and northeast Africa. These expansions were facilitated by tectonic connections, favourable climatic conditions, and orogenic processes. Conversely, aridification emerged as the primary cause of extinction events. Our study marks the first comprehensive reconstruction of the evolution of Eurasian freshwater biodiversity on a continental scale and across deep geological time.

eLife digest

Stone loaches, also known as Nemacheilidae, are a large family of fish commonly found in the streams and rivers of Europe and Asia, with a small number of species also inhabiting certain Ethiopian lakes.

How these fish, which originated in Asia about 50 million years ago, made their way into European and African waters remains poorly understood. Major geological and climate changes took place throughout this period, from the formation of the Himalayas and other mountain ranges in eastern and western Asia to large drops in temperatures or rainfalls in certain regions.

Šlechtová et al. studied the influence of these events on the spread and evolution of stone loaches. The team used a large dataset of 471 samples obtained from more than 250 species to reconstruct the evolutionary tree of the Nemacheilidae. The analysis uncovers six major groups (or clades) within the family, all stemming from a common ancestor living 48 million years ago in Indochina (current mainland Southeast Asia). Each clade has separate yet sometimes overlapping geographical distributions. They followed distinct routes to spread across Asia and Europe, which Šlechtová et al. were able to examine in the light of geological and climate changes.

For instance, a major aridification event taking place in Central Asia between 34 to 23 million years ago created a geographical divide within an ancestral stone loach group, splitting it into two parts that evolved separately to form two of the six current clades. While the Himalayas also acted as a strong barrier, growing highlands in eastern and western Asia expanded the range of suitable habitats for the fish, allowing them to colonize central and northern Asia and, from there, Europe.

Other major geological events played a strong role in the propagation of the Nemacheilidae. When a small tectonic plate known as West Burma Terrane first contacted Southeast Asia 33 million years ago and later northeast India around 30 million years ago, the ancestral fish family used the plate like a ferry boat to spread to these new territories, and from there, expand into the Near East, Southeast Europe and Northeast Africa.

These findings build on prior work investigating how geological and climate events have shaped evolution. However, they are the first case study to show the complete evolution of an animal group over such a large area and long period. It is the first detailed example of its type and could be precious to inform future work on evolution.

Introduction

The present-day species- and genus-level diversity on earth is mainly the result of the evolution during Cenozoic, when biodiversity recovered from the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction event, which eradicated three-quarters of all animal and plant species. During the Cenozoic new lifeforms flourished; often from lineages that had played only a minor role before the mass extinction, like mammals, birds, and teleost fishes (Feduccia, 1995; Friedman, 2010).

The Cenozoic is also a period of significant and relatively rapid climatic and geological changes (Summerhayes, 2015). The biggest geological changes occurred in Eurasia, resulting from its collision with the African, Arabian, and Indian plates, which caused the closure of the Tethys Sea and the Alpine–Himalayan orogeny (Trifonov et al., 2012). The climate also changed dramatically during Cenozoic; transitioning Earth from a warm and humid hothouse state to a cool and dry icehouse (Westerhold et al., 2020), but with a complex interplay of large-scale changes and smaller-scale fluctuations, creating a diverse range of climatic conditions on the local scale (Mudelsee et al., 2014).

Geological and climatic changes are major drivers of biodiversity evolution (Antonelli et al., 2018; Fritz et al., 2016; Mayhew et al., 2012). Numerous biogeographical studies show distribution patterns and local vicariance and radiation events in the Eurasian biodiversity (e.g. Andreyenkova et al., 2021; Ishii et al., 2023). The majority of these studies focused on terrestrial fauna and flora, but we believe that the best-suited model organisms for biogeographical analysis are strict freshwater species. Such hololimnic species are confined to a given water body unless a physical connection with another water body appears. At the same time, the evolution of the earth’s hydrographic network is caused by local geomophological and climatic conditions. The locally ‘locked’ freshwater fauna thus reflects the environmental past of any region on earth in much more detail than most terrestrial animals or plants (e.g. Bănărescu, 1992; Bohlen et al., 2020a).

Despite this potential, there is a paucity of research on the evolutionary history of Eurasian freshwater biodiversity covering the large geographic and temporal scales. While numerous studies have examined certain geological or climatic changes during specific periods of the Cenozoic (e.g. Ballarin and Li, 2018; Gu et al., 2022; Kahlke, 2014) or within limited regions of Eurasia (e.g. Delić et al., 2020; Deng et al., 2020; Saito et al., 2018), a comprehensive analysis encompassing the whole Eurasia and through most of the Cenozoic era and considering climatic as well as geological events as driving forces of biodiversity evolution is lacking.

For the present study, we chose the species-rich (presently 838 species) freshwater fish family Nemacheilidae (stone loaches) as model, which is present in almost all water bodies of Europe and Asia (Dvořák et al., 2022; Kottelat, 2012) and stretches from Spain to Japan in west–east direction and from Russia to Indonesia in north–south direction. Most species are small (<12 cm SL), benthic and inhabit streams and rivers, although a few are found in swamps, caves, and lakes. Few even occupy extreme environments: Nemacheilidae include the deepest freshwater cave fish in the world (Triplophysa gejiuensis, 400 m below surface) and the fish living at the highest altitude (Triplophysa stolickai, 5200 m a.s.l.) (Chu and Chen, 1979; Kottelat, 2012).

The aim of this study is to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the family Nemacheilidae as example for the evolution of freshwater fauna across Eurasia and since early Cenozoic. The research concept includes a phylogenetic reconstruction based on molecular genetic data, followed by the dating of cladogenetic events and a biogeographic analysis in order to reconstruct ancestral distribution ranges. The results are compared with the known geological and climatic history of Eurasia to identify the causative factors and processes that have influenced the diversification of Eurasian freshwater fishes.

Results

Major clades within Nemacheilidae

To understand the phylogenetic diversity of the family Nemacheilidae and identify the largest units within, we analysed sequence data for one mitochondrial (cytochrome b) and up to five nuclear (EGR3, IRBP2, Myosin6, RAG1, Rhodopsin1) genes of 471 nemacheilid specimens representing 279 species and 37 genera from across Eurasia (Figure 1, Supplementary file 1). This is by far the most comprehensive genetic dataset of Nemacheilidae ever published. The outgroup included additional 21 species from nine related families (Supplementary file 1). We applied maximum likelihood (ML) analysis in IQ-TREE and Bayesian inference (BI) in MrBayes on the concatenated dataset. Besides, the individual unrooted ML gene trees were reconstructed in IQ-TREE and subsequently used as input files for ASTRAL III (Zhang et al., 2018) to infer species tree. All analyses revealed Nemacheilidae as monophyletic group and recovered the presence of six monophyletic major clades within the dataset (Figure 2).

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
Phylogenetic tree of Nemacheilidae, including all 471 analysed nemacheilid specimens, reconstructed in MrBayes based on six loci.

The topologies of Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) trees were congruent. The values at the basal nodes correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap supports, respectively. Only the ingroup is shown. The nemacheilid pictured in the centre is Barbatula sp. Korea.

Figure 2
Download asset Open asset
Topologies of main clades derived from various analyses.

(A) Topologies recovered by ML analyses of single gene trees, with values at branches indicating bootstrap supports. Topologies congruent to the concatenated data-derived as well as species tree is revealed by Cyt b, MYH6 and IRBP2. Three slightly different topologies were derived from RH, EGR3 and RAG1 (B) Topology obtained from analyses of concatenate dataset, the values at the branches correspond to ML/MrBayes PP/BEAST PP supports, respectively. (C) Topology inferred by ASTRAL-III using the unrooted ML single gene trees as input. The values at the branches correspond to support values/gCF/sCF.

Each major clade exhibits a distinct distribution Figure 2. The most widely distributed is the ‘Northern Clade’ (Figure 2A), which inhabits the northern parts of Asia and most of Europe from Japan to Spain and southwards to Yunnan. In our analyses it includes all species of the genera Barbatula, Claea, and Triplophysa. The ‘Southern Clade’ (Figure 2A) has the second largest distribution and inhabits the Indian subcontinent, the Burmese region and West Asia from the Salween River to southeast Europe; isolated species are found also in Indochina and East Africa (Ethiopia). The Southern Clade is the clade with the highest taxonomic diversity including all analysed species of 14 genera (Afronemacheilus, Mesonoemacheilus, Mustura, Nemachilichthys, Neonoemacheilus, Oxynoemacheilus, Paracobitis, Paraschistura, Petruichthys, Physoschistura, Pteronemacheilus, Sasanidus, Seminoemacheilus, and Turcinoemacheilus) plus several species of the genus Schistura. Another clade is the ‘Burmese Clade’ (Figure 2B) with a continuous distribution from western Thailand to Northeast India, plus isolated species in the Western Ghats of India and in eastern Thailand and Cambodia. It comprises all analysed species of the genera Aborichthys, Acanthocobitis, and Paracanthocobitis, as well as several species classified as Schistura. The ‘Sundaic Clade’ (Figure 2B) includes only the species of the genus Nemacheilus and is distributed across Sundaland (the Great Sunda Islands Borneo, Sumatra and Java, and the Malay Peninsula) and in the Indochinese rivers draining to the Gulf of Thailand (Mekong, Mae Khlong, and Chao Phraya). The ‘Eastern Clade’ (Figure 2C) is found along the eastern margin of Asia from the Russian Far East to eastern Borneo. Its disjunct distribution consists of a single genus (Sundoreonectes) in northeast Borneo, the majority of genera and species in northern Vietnam and southeast China and a single genus (Lefua) on the Korean Peninsula, the Japanese Archipelago, northeast China, and the Russian Far East. The Eastern Clade comprises all analysed species of the genera Karstsinnectes, Lefua, Micronemacheilus, Oreonectes, Paranemachilus, Sundoreonectes, Traccatichthys, Troglonectes, and Yunnanilus. The sixth clade (‘Indochinese Clade’, Figure 2C) has a continuous distribution throughout Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, central Myanmar and southern China, as well as isolated species in the upper/middle Yangtze and on Tioman Island (Malaysia). It is composed of all analysed species belonging to Homatula, Rhyacoschistura, Sectoria, Spaeonectes, and Tuberoschistura, in addition to many species currently assigned to Schistura and four species of uncertain generic assignment (‘Nemacheilus’).

The distribution areas of the six major clades are not mutually exclusive. While the Northern, Indochinese, and Southern Clades exhibit limited overlap with each other, the Sundaic Clade shares its northern range with the Indochinese Clade. The Eastern Clade overlaps with the Northern Clade in the north, the Indochinese Clade in the middle, and the Sundaic Clade in the south. The Burmes Clade shares most of its distribution area with the Southern Clade.

Analyses of the concatenated dataset as well as ASTRAL analysis inferring a species tree from single gene trees revealed a basal dichotomy in the family Nemacheilidae (Figure 1; Figure 2 and Figure 3). The one branch consists of the Eastern Clade as sister to the pair Indochinese plus Northern Clade. The second branch is made of the Sundaic Clade as sister to the pair Burmese and Southern Clade. All basal nodes and most of tip nodes are supported by high statistical supports in all analyses.

Figure 3
Download asset Open asset
Divergence time estimation resulting from Bayesian divergence time analysis of concatenated dataset in BEAST 2: maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree of the whole dataset, with the Nemacheilidae ingroup collapsed into main clades.

Red stars indicate calibration points, values at branches represent posterior probabilities (PPs lower than 0.90 not shown) and blue horizontal bars denote 95% HPD. The time scale is in millions of years. Pictures on the right show one example species for each clade; from top: Schistura hypsiura (Southern Clade), Paracanthocobitis pictilis (Burmese Clade), Nemacheilus chrysolaimos (Sundaic Clade), Schistura yersini (Indochinese Clade), Triplophysa stenura (Northern Clade), and Traccatichthys taeniatus (Eastern Clade).

Divergence times

The ages of the genealogical events were determined using three fossil records and one geological event as calibration points (details of calibration under ‘Methods’). The results indicate that Nemacheilidae shared the last common ancestor with other families of Cobitoidea about 48.5 mya (Figure 4). The first notable split that separated the family into two big branches took place around 39 mya (for details, see Figure 5).

Figure 4
Download asset Open asset
Geographic distribution of the six major clades of Nemacheilidae.

(A) The Northernand Southern Clades, (B) The Burmese and Sundaic Clades, (C) The Eastern and Indochinese Clades.

Figure 5
Download asset Open asset
Divergence time estimation: ingroup of the maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree resulting from Bayesian divergence time analysis of concatenated dataset in BEAST 2.

The red star indicates internal calibration point, the values at the nodes represent posterior probabilities (PPs lower than 0.90 not shown), and the blue bars relevant 95% HPD. The time scale is in millions of years. Inset in the top-left corner shows complete tree: Nemacheilidae is highlighted in yellow, while the outgroup is not highlighted; all calibration points are indicated by red stars.

Biogeographic reconstructions

The biogeographic reconstruction of Nemacheilidae considered 11 geographic regions within Eurasia and northeast Africa. The results show that Nemacheilidae originated in the region of nowadays Indochina and expanded from there in multiple waves. More details are given in Figure 6.

Figure 6
Download asset Open asset
Reconstruction of the biogeographical history of Nemacheilidae.

The inset map in the top-left corner shows the defined biogeographical regions of Eurasia recognised in the analysis; below the map the colour – region code for the main tree. Grey colour indicates combination of two regions as ancestral (FH); black colour indicates ancestral ranges identified with likelihood <10%. Main tree: ancestral range reconstruction with use of DEC+J model based on the phylogeny derived from BEAST2. Pie charts at the nodes indicate relative likelihood of ancestral ranges of most recent common ancestors (MRCA), while the current distribution of taxa is indicated at the tips.

Discussion

The evolutionary history of Nemacheilidae (Figures 7 and 8, Table 1)

Figure 7
Download asset Open asset
Time tree of the evolutionary history of Nemacheilidae: the figure presents the evolutionary history of Nemacheildae, highlighting the dating of key geological or climatic key paleo-events that might have significantly impacted their evolution.

Orange bars represent exceptionally warm periods, blue bars denote cold periods. Boxes indicate specific geological or climatic event. For detailed explanations of these events and their impact on nemacheilid evolution, refer to text. Climatic states from Westerhold et al., 2020.

Figure 8
Download asset Open asset
Paleomaps visualising the geographical and chronological aspects of the main events during the evolutionary history of the freshwater fish family Nemacheilidae across Eurasia.

(A) Early Eocene, (B) Middle Eocene, (C) Late Eocene, (F) Miocene, (G) Pliocene, (H) Today A red star marks the point of origin, arrows indicate dispersal events. Background maps were drawn according to information given in Blakey, 2023, Atlas, 2023, Wang, 2004, Westerweel et al., 2020.

Table 1
Overview of the major evolutionary events in the six main clades within Nemacheilidae from its origin 48 mya until today.
PeriodEasternIndochineseNorthernSundaicBurmeseSouthern
Early Eocene
48 mya		Origin of Nemacheilidae in the area of present-day Indochina;
probably related to a strong diversification period during the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum (54–49 mya).
Middle Eocene
39 mya		Split of Nemacheilidae into two branches (Proto Eastern + Indochinese + Northern branch
and Proto Sundaic +Burmese + Southern branch). The ultimate cause for this split is unknown.
Late Eocene
36 mya		Formation of Eastern Clade; spreading along the eastern margin of Asia.The Proto Indochinese + Northern Clade starts expanding northwards and southwards (at least to present-day southern Malay Peninsula).
Early Oligocene
33 mya		Formation of the Sundaic Clade by separation of the Proto Burmese +Southern Clade.The Proto Burmese + Southern Clade forms by colonising the Burmese Terrane, a tectonic microplate that travels northwards with the Indian plate.
Oligocene
34–23 mya		The distribution of the Eastern Clade becomes fragmented by strong aridification of Central Asia.Proto Indochinese + Northern Clade in two refuges during strong aridification of Central Asia. The Proto- Northern Clade endures the period on the northern part of the young Tibetan Plateau, the Proto-Indochinese Clade east of the Tibetan Plateau. After this long time of separation they form the Northern and Indochinese Clades.The Proto Burmese +Southern Clade colonises the Indian Plate (30 mya). Burmese Terrane and India collide with Asian mainland, causing the rise of the Indo-Burmese mountain ridge (from 28 mya), separating the Southern Clade from the Burmese Clade.
Early and Middle Miocene
23–10 mya		The genus Barbatula spreads northwards as the Kunlun, Pamir and Altai mountains form (from 25 mya), then eastwards to Korean Peninsula; the genus Triplophysa spreads eastwards into southern China.The Southern Clade colonises the freshly forming Near East in several waves.
The Proto-Afronemacheilus separates from Indian species.
Miocene
23–5.3 mya		Period of strong diversification, especially around the time of the Middle Miocene Climatic optimum (17–14.5 mya),
Number of lineages in Nemacheilidae rises from 16 to 177.
Pliocene
5–2.5 mya		Barbatula spreads westwards due to ice formation in northern Siberia and colonises Europe. In the east it colonises the Japanese Archipelago.
Pleistocene from 2.6 myaExtinctions from Arab Peninsula and the lower Nile valley due to strong aridification.

Early Eocene (56–48 mya): The origin of Nemacheilidae (Figure 8A)

The family Nemacheilidae shared the last common ancestor with the other Cypriniformes about 48.5 mya (Figure 3), and our biogeographic analysis identified the region of nowadays Indochina as most likely place of origin of Nemacheilidae (Figure 6). During the early Eocene, Southeast Asia experienced a warm and perhumid climate, characterised by both highlands and lowlands with numerous rivers (Morley, 2018); conditions under which stone loaches flourished (Figures 7 and 8A; Table 1).

Middle to late Eocene (48–34 mya): First range expansions and formation of the first major clades (Figure 8B and C)

The first detectable cladogenetic event within the family occurred about 39 mya and separated a lineage formed by the Eastern, Northern, and Indochinese Clades (branch A in Figure 5) from a lineage including the Sundaic, Burmese, and Southern Clades (branch B). Our biogeographic analysis of the dataset revealed Indochina as most parsimony area of the first cladogenetic event; and consequently as region of origin for branch A as well as branch B.

The Eastern Clade was the first of the six present major clades to form: it separated about 35.8 mya from the common ancestor of the Indochinese and Northern Clades, either in the region of Indochina or Vietnam-south China. Taking into consideration its present-day distribution (Figure 2), we assume that the young Eastern Clade spread mainly along the eastern coastline of Asia southwards to Borneo and northwards to northeast China. Geological data support this hypothesis: during the Eocene, Asia was much smaller than today and had a rather flat relief with old mountains mainly along its eastern coast due to the collision with the Pacific Plate since 190 mya (Seton et al., 2012; Wang, 2004), while the upfolding of east-west mountain ridges had just started. The generally warm and humid climate during Eocene (Morley, 2018; Westerhold et al., 2020) additionally promoted the range expansion of the Eastern Clade. It can be assumed that shortly after the range expansion the distribution of the Eastern Clade was more or less continuous and not separated into several disjunct areas as nowadays.

The ancestral Indochinese + Northern Clades also spread northwards, but their present-day distribution (Figure 2) suggests that they took a route through Central Indochina and China. Most likely, this first geographic expansion led the ancestral Indochinese + Northern Clades northward to at least the Tibetan Protoplateau, which during Eocene epoch had its northern boundary in the region of today’s Tanggula mountains (Wang et al., 2008), which means not even half of its present north-south extension. The presence of the two protoclades on the early Tibetan Plateau is indicated by the presence of some of their most basal members in the Yangtze basin and Yunnan: the genus Homatula for the Indochinese Clade and several species of Triplophysa for the Northern Clade (Figures 1 and 5).

Oligocene (34–23 mya): Range expansions, extinctions, and the formation of the remaining major clades (Figure 8D and E)

The Eocene–Oligocene transition brought a period of significant global cooling (Hutchinson et al., 2021) as well as a change in the precipitation regime of Central Asia (Clift and Webb, 2019; Ye et al., 2022) due to the ongoing uplift of the Himalayan chain (Ding et al., 2017). A substantial decrease of rainfall in Central Asia caused an aridification from 34 to 23 mya (Bosboom et al., 2014) extending across nearly all of Oligocene Asia from the western to the eastern coast (Wang, 2004). The distribution area of the Eastern Clade became fragmented during this period (Figure 2).

The Central Asian arid zone also split the Indochinese–Northern protoclade into two parts that evolved into two separate major clades, the Indochinese Clade and the Northern Clade. Moreover, the distribution area of the Indochinese Clade was split and separated the southernmost taxa (Speonectes and Tuberoschistura) from the taxa presently inhabiting all of Indochina and southern China, including the middle Yangtze basin (Figure 2). The absence of the Indochinese Clade from any waters north of the Tibetan Plateau suggests that its Oligocene refuge was located southeast of the Tibetan Protoplateau. In contrast, the early Northern Clade found its refuge further north on the Tibetan Protoplateau, the only region that can explain the further history and the present distribution of the clade. By late Oligocene, the climate in Central Asia returned to a warmer and moister state (Zachos et al., 2001) and the Pamir and western Kunlun Mountains (in present-day SE Tajikistan, N Pakistan, and W China) rapidly thrust upwards as an expansion of the northern Tibetan Plateau (Zheng et al., 2015). These favourable conditions coincided with a major split within the Northern Clade at 20 mya (Figure 5), when the proto-Barbatula clade colonised the Pamir and Kunlun Mountains, while the proto Triplophysa branch found its main distribution rather east of the Tibetan Plateau.

Different geological events drove the evolution of branch B: the common ancestor of the Burmese and Southern Clades split at 32.5 mya in Indochina from the Sundaic Clade because the former left Southeast Asia by colonising the West Burma Terrane, a microplate that was pushed northward by the Indian plate (Morley et al., 2021) and made temporary contact with western Sundaland (today’s western Malay Peninsula) around Eocene–early Oligocene (Westerweel et al., 2019). Around 30 mya, it made contact with northeast India (Morley et al., 2021), allowing fishes from the West Burma Terrane to colonise the Indian subcontinent. During the Oligocene, the Indian plate and the West Burma Terrane both collided with mainland Asia. The Indian plate presently forms the Indian subcontinent, the West Burma Terrane now forms western Myanmar (Westerweel et al., 2020). Their parallel collision with mainland Asia caused the uplift of the north–south directed Indo-Burmese mountain range (Morley et al., 2020), separating the aquatic fauna of the Brahmaputra basin on the Indian side, from the Chindwin-Irrawaddy basin on the Burmese side, thus separating the Burmese Clade from the Southern Clade.

Miocene (23–5.3 mya): Rapid diversification (Figure 8F and G)

The Miocene is generally an epoch of cooling, with temperatures decreasing from about 5.5°C above present conditions to conditions similar to present (Zachos et al., 2001). But temperatures also underwent strong fluctuations, leading to exceptionally warm periods like the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum (17–14.5 mya), as well as to drastic cooling events like the Middle Miocene Climatic transition (14 mya) (Morley, 2018). Additionally, the Asian monsoon regime strengthened from the early Miocene (Clift and Webb, 2019), increasing precipitation and altering the distribution of climatic regions across Asia (Sun and Wang, 2005). Moreover, during the Miocene the Himalayan Mountains experienced their main uplift (Ding et al., 2017) and the upfolding area of Central Asia mountain ranges expanded northwards, giving rise to the Tian Shan and Altai ranges (Nissen et al., 2009; Zheng et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2023).

During this complex geological and climatic scenario, the family Nemacheilidae underwent a massive diversification. In our phylogenetic hypothesis, the family comprised 16 lineages at the beginning of Miocene. These lineages diversified during Miocene into 177 lineages. The radiation occurred across all six major clades, albeit to a lesser extent in the Eastern Clade. Interestingly, it manifested similarly in the region of the Indian monsoon and the East Asian monsoon. In both regions, major radiations occurred during the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum, including the radiation of the Barbatula lineage in the Northern Clade, of the Indochinese Clade, the Sundaic Clade and of six branches in the Southern Clade. It appears that under increased temperature and precipitation freshwater fishes flourished, across all of Asia and under different monsoon systems.

One of the radiations that began during the Middle Miocene Climate Optimum involves Afronemacheilus, the sole nemacheilid genus found in Africa (Prokofiev and Golubtsov, 2013). Our results confirm that the ancestral Afronemacheilus separated from the Southern Clade about 18–17 mya. It could have utilised two potential pathways to Africa: one across the Arabian Peninsula and via the southern Danakil Isthmus, a broad landbridge that stretched from Djibouti to Aden from late Miocene to Pliocene (Bosworth et al., 2005; Stewart and Murray, 2017). The second pathway would lead through the Levant and via Sinai into the Nile (‘Gomphotherium landbridge’; Harzhauser et al., 2007), and subsequently upstream into the Ethiopian highlands. Unfortunately, the nearly complete extinction of freshwater fishes from the Arabian Peninsula and from the Nile during Pleistocene aridification (Kotwicki and Al Sulaimani, 2009; Leplongeon, 2021) complicates the reconstruction of its pathway to Africa.

In the Northern Clade, the Triplophysa lineage flourished during the Miocene. Its present wide distribution in southern and Central China suggests that it expanded from its Oligocene refuge on the eastern part of the Tibetan Plateau in an eastern direction (Figure 2). In contrast, the Barbatula branch expanded from its refuge on the western Tibetan Plateau northwards, traversing the uplifting Tian Shan and Altai ranges. This expansion can be traced from the geographic position of the most basal species (T. labiata – Tian Shan, B. altayensis – Altai), and then eastwards (B. compressirostris + B. dgebuadzei – west Mongolia, B. cf. toni – east Mongolia; tip species in Korea [B. indet Korea] and Japan [B. oreas]).

During late Miocene, Barbatula also expanded westwards through Siberia and colonised Europe between 5.6 mya (separation of the European taxa from the Mongolian sister taxon) and 3.0 mya (oldest split within European Barbatula). During this cool and dry period, glaciations occurred on the northern hemisphere (Zachos et al., 2001), and in Siberia the mean temperature of the coldest month dropped below 0° for the first time during Cenozoic (Popova et al., 2012). Freezing of the northern margin of Eurasia prevented the Siberian rivers (which flow from south to north) from discharging their water into the Northern Ocean and produced extensive wetlands on the shallow relief of Siberia. These wetlands served as pathways for freshwater fishes from East Asia to European river systems during Pleistocene (Kalous et al., 2012), and we assume that the same mechanism brought Barbatula to Europe during Pliocene.

Pliocene and Pleistocene (5.3–0.01 mya): Ice ages

During Pliocene and Pleistocene, global cooling continued until massive glaciations repeatedly covered the north of Eurasia (De Schepper et al., 2014). However, the Pliocene also brought a much stronger seasonality to Eurasia, especially in the form of cold winters (Shen et al., 2018). Despite these significant changes in climatic conditions, the evolution of Nemacheilidae seems not to have experienced any dramatic negative impact, but reveals mainly local speciation events (e.g. the genus Barbatula colonised Eastern Siberia, Japan, and the Korean Peninsula and the European Barbatula diversified geographically). We know from more detailed studies on Nemacheilidae (Bohlen et al., 2020a; Bohlen et al., 2020b; Šlechtová et al., 2021) that during Pliocene and Pleistocene also geographic shifts as well as expansions and disappearances occurred, but since these happened on rather local scale they were too insignificant to reflect in the present intercontinental dataset.

Taxonomic implications

Besides its conclusions on biogeography and evolutionary history of the Eurasian freshwater fauna, the present dataset offers insights into the taxonomy of Nemacheilidae. Among the 37 analysed genera, 11 are represented by a single species in the dataset; 18 of the genera with several species in the dataset appear as monophyletic units in our analysis. However, seven genera (Mustura, Paraschistura, Physoschistura, Oxynoemacheilus, Schistura, Sectoria, Triplophysa) are identified as para- or polyphyletic based on our results. The most scattered genus is Schistura, which is listed in three of the six major clades and in a total of about 20 different genetic lineages.

In fact, this is nothing new. The ‘polyphyly’ of several larger genera, particularly Schistura, has been recognised for a long time: already Kottelat, 1990 referred to Schistura and Nemacheilus as ‘wastebasket names’. These are not really cases of polyphyly; it is simply that a large number of new species have been described in the last 40 years and, not knowing in which genus to place them, authors simply ‘dumped’ them in a few catch-all genera, waiting for more comprehensive studies and knowing well that the used genus names are mere labels. In recent years, more detailed morphological studies have resolved the relations of some groups of species within these catch-all genera (e.g. Conway and Kottelat, 2023; Dvořák et al., 2023; Kottelat, 2018; Kottelat, 2019). Moreover, every genetic study that included more than five species of Schistura resulted in polyphyly of the genus (e.g. Chen et al., 2019; Min et al., 2023; Sember et al., 2015; Sgouros et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2006). A recent detailed phylogenetic investigation of the genus Nemacheilus Šlechtová et al., 2021 found the genus to be polyphyletic, but it became monophyletic after identifying five species that were falsely placed into Nemacheilus (these species are labelled ‘Nemacheilus’ in the present study). Similarly, revisionary studies of the genera Paracanthocobitis, Troglonectes, Micronemacheilus, Paranemachilus, and Oreonectes also allowed to resolve their intrarelationships and redefine them into monophyletic taxa (Singer and Page, 2015; Luo et al., 2023). The main obstacles to a comprehensive taxonomic revision of Nemacheilidae is its vast size, a fast increasing number of new species, and the difficulty to access material from critical areas because of international and local political issues. We believe that results of the present study will facilitate future research on the taxonomic understanding of Nemacheilidae.

Another aspect of Nemacheilidae taxonomy is the existence of numerous undescribed species. Among the 279 species in our dataset, 36 (13%) were either clearly undescribed (‘Genus sp.’) or named with reservations (‘Genus’ cf. xxx’). This ratio is an underestimate, since, in general, undescribed species were avoided when composing the dataset. However, the existence of a vast amount of undescribed species within Nemacheilidae is illustrated by the fact that 430 of the 838 valid species of Nemacheilidae known in November 2024 (51%) have been described in the last 25 years (pers. obs.; Kottelat, 2012; Kottelat, 2013, updated).

Conclusions

  • We reconstruct the evolutionary history of the Eurasian freshwater fish family Nemacheilidae during most of Cenozoic era. The extensive dataset (471 specimens, 279 species, 6 genes) from across Eurasia and the low dispersal capacity of the model resulted in high resolution of the phylogenetical and biogeographical analysis.

  • Molecular phylogeny uncovered six major clades within the family. Dating of cladogenetic events and ancestral range estimation traced the origin of Nemacheilidae to Indochina around 48 mya.

  • Major expansions were facilitated by tectonic connections, favourable climatic conditions, and orogenic processes. Conversely, aridification emerged as the primary cause of extinction events.

  • Our study represents the first comprehensive and holistic reconstruction of the evolution of Eurasian freshwater biodiversity on a continental scale and through deep geological time.

  • Our analyses identified numerous polyphyletic or paraphyletic taxa, highlighting the need for a thorough taxonomic revision within the family Nemacheilidae.

Methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Biological sample (Nemacheilidae)DNA sequencesGenBank104 different species from the fish family Nemacheilidae (details in Supplementary file 1)
Biological sample (Nemacheilidae)Tissue samplesThis paper175 different species from the fish family Nemacheilidae (details in Supplementary file 1)
Sequence-based reagentPCR primersSee Supplementary file 2
Commercial assay or kitDNeasy Blood and Tissue kitQIAGENDNA isolation kit
Software, algorithmDNA StarLASERGENE
Software, algorithmBioEditHall, 1999
Software, algorithmPhyloSuite v1.2.2Zhang et al., 2020
Software, algorithmMrBayes 3.2.7aRonquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003
Software, algorithmASTRAL IIIZhang et al., 2018
Software, algorithmBEAST 2.6.4Bouckaert et al., 2014

Sampling and laboratory procedures

Altogether, 492 samples were examined, including 21 outgroup species and 471 nemacheilid samples covering 279 species from 37 genera of the family Nemacheilidae, including the set of sequences of 364 specimens analysed in our laboratory and sequences of 107 specimens obtained from GenBank. Tissue samples used for the present study were fixed and stored in 96% ethanol. For more details about species, geographical origin, and GenBank accession numbers, see Supplementary file 1.

Total genomic DNA was isolated using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s instructions. One mitochondrial gene (cytochrome b) and five nuclear genes (RAG1, IRBP2, MYH6, RH1, and EGR3) were selected. For the list of primers, see Supplementary file 2, and details about the PCR settings are described in Chen et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2008 and Dvořák et al., 2022.

Sequencing of the PCR products was performed at the Laboratory of Fish Genetics on ABI Prism 3130 GA or via sequencing service in Macrogen Europe BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands).

Phylogenetic analyses

Chromatograms were checked and assembled in the SeqMan II module of the DNA Star software package (LASERGENE). Single-gene alignments were done in BioEdit (Hall, 1999) with use of ClustalW (Larkin et al., 2007) multiple alignment algorithm. The datasets were concatenated in PhyloSuite v1.2.2 (Zhang et al., 2020).

The best-fit substitution models and partitioning schemes (Supplementary file 3) were estimated using Partition Finder 2 (Lanfear et al., 2016) implemented in PhyloSuite 1.2.2 based on the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc).

The 492 specimen phylogenetic trees were inferred from six loci concatenated dataset using the ML and BI. The ML analyses were performed using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al., 2015) implemented in PhyloSuite. The best-fit evolutionary model for each codon partition was automatically determined with ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017). The node support values were obtained with 5000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates (UFBoot) (Hoang et al., 2018). For the BI analyses, we used MrBayes 3.2.7a (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) on CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al., 2010). The datasets were partitioned into genes and codon positions and analyses were performed in two parallel runs of 10–20 million generations with eight Metropolis Coupled Markov Chains Monte Carlo. The relative burnin of 25% was used, and from the remaining trees a 50% majority rule consensus trees was constructed.

For reconstructing of the species tree, we used the Accurate Species TRee ALgorithm (ASTRAL III) (Zhang et al., 2018). For ASTRAL, we used unrooted single gene ML trees reconstructed in IQ-TREE implemented in PhyloSuite. We have used IQ-TREE 2 (Minh et al., 2020) to calculate gene concordance factor (gCF, indicating the percentage of decisive gene trees containing particular branch) and site concordance factor (sCF, indicating the percentage of decisive alignment sites that support a branch in the reference tree) for every branch in the ASTRAL species tree. Distribution maps in Figure 3 were designed using HYDROSHEDS (Lehner and Grill, 2013). All original trees are available from authors upon request.

Divergence time estimations and ancestral range reconstruction

The ages of cladogenetic events were estimated in BEAST 2.6.4 (Bouckaert et al., 2014) via CIPRES Science Gateway with use of four calibration points. The first calibration point is based on the oldest known fossil of the family Catostomidae, Wilsonium brevipinne, from early Eocene (Liu, 2021), approximately 56–48 my old. The second calibration point is derived from the only known nemacheilid fossil record, Triplophysa opinata from Kyrgyzstan from middle-upper Miocene (16.0–5.3 mya) (Böhme and Ilg, 2003; Prokofiev, 2007). For some time, the Miocene fossil species Nemachilus tener from Central European was considered a member of Nemacheilidae. However, subsequent research has cast doubt on placement of this species within loaches (Obrhelova, 1967), leaving T. opinata as the only known fossil of Nemacheilidae. Third calibration point is based on the oldest known fossil of the genus Cobitis, C. naningensis, from early to middle Oligocene in southern China, 34–28 my old (Chen et al., 2015). The fourth calibration point, based on the river history of the southern Korean Peninsula, dates the separation between the species Cobitis tetralineata and C. lutheri to 2.5–3.5 my (Kwan et al., 2014). For the fossil-based calibration points, we have used a fossil calibration prior implemented in CladeAge (Matschiner et al., 2017), the fourth calibration point was set to a uniform prior (2.5–3.5). The calibration points are depicted in Figures 3 and 5.

For the final analyses, the partitions were unlinked and assigned the estimated evolutionary models. We used relaxed lognormal molecular clock and birth-death prior. Given the large and complex nature of our dataset, and in light of several preliminary analyses where MCMC chains did not provide satisfactory effective sampling sizes (ESSs) even after 1 billion iterations, we made the decision to streamline the dataset by retaining only one specimen per species. To enhance the performance of the analysis, we also implemented parallel tempering using the CoupledMCMC package (Müller and Bouckaert, 2020; Müller and Bouckaert, 2019). The analysis was configured with four parallel chains of 6 × 108 generations, with resampling every 1000. Tree and parameter sampling intervals were set to 60.000. The ESSs for all parameters were assessed in Tracer 1.7.1 (Rambaut et al., 2018). A maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree was built in TreeAnnotator 2.6.0 (Rambaut and Drummond, 2010) after discarding the first 25% of trees. The final trees were visualised in FigTree 1.4.4 (Rambaut, 2019). ML and BI were performed with both full as well as the reduced datasets.

The biogeographical analysis was conducted using the BioGeoBEARS package (Matzke, 2013) implemented in RASP 4.0 (Reconstruct Ancestral Stage in Phylogenies, Yu et al., 2015). We set 11 biogeographic regions according to drainage areas separated by major mountain ridges (Ural, Caucasus. Himalayas, Tenasserim Ridge, Indo-Burmese Range, Annamite Cordilliera, Balkan, Hindukush) or saltwater straits (Red Sea) (see Figure 4A). The selected biogeographic regions are mostly congruent with the classical subregions of the Palaearctic (European, Siberian, East Asia, and Mediterranean) and the Oriental (Indian, Malay, and Chinese). For the analysis, we utilised the final MCC tree and 100 post burnin trees from the previous BEAST analysis. A maximum of two-unit areas was allowed to be present in every reconstructed ancestral range. The comparison of six biogeographic models (DEC, DEC+J, DIVALIKE, DIVALIKE+J, BAYAREALIKE, BAYAREALIKE+J) suggested that the DEC+J is the best-suited model for the given dataset (as indicated by AICc weight value, Supplementary file 4). Likelihood ratio test (LRT) p-values, comparing models with and without the J factor, indicated that the addition of the J factor significantly influences the model likelihood. Considering recent criticisms of DEC and DEC+J (Ree and Sanmartin, 2018), we opted to conduct the analysis not only with DEC+J but also with other +J models. Comparison of the results from all applied models revealed only minimal differences.

Data availability

Original sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PP259624–PP259994, PP279842–PP280528 and PP315675–PP315895. Details about data are given in Supplementary files 1 and 2. All original trees are deposited to Dryad.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Šlechtová VB
    2. Dvorak T
    3. Freyhof J
    4. Kottelat M
    5. Levin B
    6. Golubtsov A
    7. Slechta V
    8. Bohlen J
    (2025) Dryad Digital Repository
    Reconstructing the phylogeny and evolutionary history of freshwater fishes (Nemacheilidae) across Eurasia since early Eocene.
    https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rxwdbrvhz

References

  3. Book
    1. Atlas D
    (2023)
    Diercke International Atlas
    Westermann.
  5. Book
    1. Bănărescu P
    (1992)
    Zoogeography of Fresh Waters Vol. 2: Distribution and Dispersal of Freshwater Animals in North America and Eurasia
    Wiesbaden: AULA.
  6. Website
    1. Blakey R
    (2023) DeepTime Maps
    Accessed June 17, 2024.
    https://deeptimemaps.com
  9. Website
    1. Böhme M
    2. Ilg A
    (2003) fosFARbase
    Accessed October 24, 2024.
    https://www.fosfarbase.org//
    1. Chu SL
    2. Chen YR
    (1979)
    A new blind cobitid fish (Pisces, Cypriniformes) from subterranean waters in Yunnan, China
    Acta Zool. Sin 25:285–287.
    1. Hall TA
    (1999)
    BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT
    Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser 41:95–98.
    1. Kalous L
    2. Rylková K
    3. Petrtýl M
    4. Bohlen J
    (2012)
    Hidden diversity within the Prussian carp and designation of a neotype for Carassius gibelio
    Ichthyol. Explor. Freshw 23:11–18.
  38. Book
    1. Kottelat M
    (1990)
    A Revision of Nemacheiline Loaches (Pisces: Cypriniformes) of Thailand, Burma, Laos, Cambodia and Southern Viet Nam
    National Library of Australia.
    1. Kottelat M
    (2012)
    Conspectus Cobitidum: An inventory of the loaches of the world (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cobitoidei)
    Raf. Bull. Zool 26:1–99.
    1. Kottelat M
    (2013)
    The fishes of inland waters of Southeast Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries
    Raf. Bull. Zool 27:1–663.
  55. Conference
    1. Miller MA
    2. Pfeiffer W
    3. Schwartz T
    (2010)
    Creating the CIPRES Science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees
    Proc. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop 2010.
    1. Obrhelova N
    (1967)
    Cyprinoidei (Pisces) aus dem hangenden des miozänen Braunkohlenflözes Nordböhmens
    Palaeontographica, Ser. A 126:141–179.
    1. Prokofiev AM
    2. Golubtsov AS
    (2013)
    Revision of the loach genus Afronemacheilus (Teleostei: Balitoridae: Nemacheilinae) with description of a new species from the Omo-Turkana basin, Ethiopia
    Ichthyol. Explor. Freshw 24:1–14.
  87. Book
    1. Wang P
    (2004) Cenocoic deformation and the history of sea-land interactions in asia
    In: Clift P, Wang P, Kuhnt W, Hayes D, editors. Continent-Ocean Interactions in the East Asian Marginal Seas. American Geophysical Union. pp. 1–22.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/149GM01

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vendula Bohlen Šlechtová

    Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Libechov, Czech Republic
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5499-7550

  2. Tomáš Dvořák

    1. Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Libechov, Czech Republic
    2. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  3. Jörg Freyhof

    Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Resources, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Maurice Kottelat

    Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Present address
    Rue des Rauraques 6 (permanent address), Delémont, Switzerland
    Contribution
    Resources, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  5. Boris Levin

    1. Papanin Institute of Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Russian Federation
    2. A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Contribution
    Resources, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4044-2036

  6. Alexander Golubtsov

    A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Contribution
    Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  7. Vlastimil Šlechta

    Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Libechov, Czech Republic
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Joerg Bohlen

    Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Libechov, Czech Republic
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology
    For correspondence
    joerg_bohlen@yahoo.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1259-008X

Funding

Czech Science Foundation (19-18453S)

  • Vendula Bohlen Šlechtová
  • Joerg Bohlen

Russian Science Foundation (24-44-20019)

  • Boris Levin
  • Alexander Golubtsov

Czech Science Foundation (206/08/0637)

  • Vendula Bohlen Šlechtová
  • Joerg Bohlen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

VŠ, TD, VŠ and JB would like to thank R Hoyer, J Kühne, FF Kullander (NRM), J Kuszniersz, K Lim (ZRC), H Linke, A Nolte, G Ott, M Reichard, I Seidel, S Somadee, HH Tan (ZRC), TK Toe, K Udomritthiruji, T Win, and U Wolf for their help with obtaining specimens for this study and Š Pelikanová for help with laboratory work. VŠ and JB were funded by grants 206/08/0637 and 19-18453S of the Czech Science Foundation. BL and AG greatly acknowledge S Cherenkov for his help in sampling. BL and AG was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 24-44-20019. Materials from Laos, Myanmar, and Mongolia were obtained by MK under various contracts and over the years he was assisted mainly by Nyein Chan, T Phommavong, and the late M Erdenebat; the late T Whitten has been essential in creating these great opportunities.

Version history

  1. Sent for peer review:
  2. Preprint posted:
  3. Reviewed Preprint version 1:
  4. Reviewed Preprint version 2:
  5. Version of Record published:

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.101080. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

© 2024, Šlechtová et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 716
    views
  • 84
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vendula Bohlen Šlechtová
  2. Tomáš Dvořák
  3. Jörg Freyhof
  4. Maurice Kottelat
  5. Boris Levin
  6. Alexander Golubtsov
  7. Vlastimil Šlechta
  8. Joerg Bohlen
(2025)
Reconstructing the phylogeny and evolutionary history of freshwater fishes (Nemacheilidae) across Eurasia since early Eocene
eLife 13:RP101080.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.101080.3

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.101080

Categories and tags

Further reading

    1. Ecology

    Connecting the dots: Managing species interaction networks to mitigate the impacts of global change

    Luis Abdala-Roberts, Adriana Puentes ... Kailen A Mooney
    Review Article

    Global change is causing unprecedented degradation of the Earth’s biological systems and thus undermining human prosperity. Past practices have focused either on monitoring biodiversity decline or mitigating ecosystem services degradation. Missing, but critically needed, are management approaches that monitor and restore species interaction networks, thus bridging existing practices. Our overall aim here is to lay the foundations of a framework for developing network management, defined here as the study, monitoring, and management of species interaction networks. We review theory and empirical evidence demonstrating the importance of species interaction networks for the provisioning of ecosystem services, how human impacts on those networks lead to network rewiring that underlies ecosystem service degradation, and then turn to case studies showing how network management has effectively mitigated such effects or aided in network restoration. We also examine how emerging technologies for data acquisition and analysis are providing new opportunities for monitoring species interactions and discuss the opportunities and challenges of developing effective network management. In summary, we propose that network management provides key mechanistic knowledge on ecosystem degradation that links species- to ecosystem-level responses to global change, and that emerging technological tools offer the opportunity to accelerate its widespread adoption.

    1. Ecology
    2. Neuroscience

    Interdependence between SEB-3 receptor and NLP-49 peptides shifts across predator-induced defensive behavioral modes in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Kathleen T Quach, Gillian A Hughes, Sreekanth H Chalasani
    Research Article

    Prey must balance predator avoidance with feeding, a central dilemma in prey refuge theory. Additionally, prey must assess predatory imminence—how close threats are in space and time. Predatory imminence theory classifies defensive behaviors into three defense modes: pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike, corresponding to increasing levels of threat—–suspecting, detecting, and contacting a predator. Although predatory risk often varies in spatial distribution and imminence, how these factors intersect to influence defensive behaviors is poorly understood. Integrating these factors into a naturalistic environment enables comprehensive analysis of multiple defense modes in consistent conditions. Here, we combine prey refuge and predatory imminence theories to develop a model system of nematode defensive behaviors, with Caenorhabditis elegans as prey and Pristionchus pacificus as predator. In a foraging environment comprised of a food-rich, high-risk patch and a food-poor, low-risk refuge, C. elegans innately exhibits circa-strike behaviors. With experience, it learns post- and pre-encounter behaviors that proactively anticipate threats. These defense modes intensify with predator lethality, with only life-threatening predators capable of eliciting all three modes. SEB-3 receptors and NLP-49 peptides, key stress regulators, vary in their impact and interdependence across defense modes. Overall, our model system reveals fine-grained insights into how stress-related signaling regulates defensive behaviors.

    1. Ecology

    Genetic diversity affects ecosystem functions across trophic levels as much as species diversity, but in an opposite direction

    Laura Fargeot, Camille Poesy ... Blanchet Simon
    Research Article

    Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning stands as a cornerstone in ecological research. Extensive evidence now underscores the profound impact of species loss on the stability and dynamics of ecosystem functions. However, it remains unclear whether the loss of genetic diversity within key species yields similar consequences. Here, we delve into the intricate relationship between species diversity, genetic diversity, and ecosystem functions across three trophic levels – primary producers, primary consumers, and secondary consumers – in natural aquatic ecosystems. Our investigation involves estimating species diversity and genome-wide diversity – gauged within three pivotal species – within each trophic level, evaluating seven key ecosystem functions, and analyzing the magnitude of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions (BEFs). We found that, overall, the absolute effect size of genetic diversity on ecosystem functions mirrors that of species diversity in natural ecosystems. We nonetheless unveil a striking dichotomy: while genetic diversity was positively correlated with various ecosystem functions, species diversity displays a negative correlation with these functions. These intriguing antagonist effects of species and genetic diversity persist across the three trophic levels (underscoring its systemic nature), but were apparent only when BEFs were assessed within trophic levels rather than across them. This study reveals the complexity of predicting the consequences of genetic and species diversity loss under natural conditions, and emphasizes the need for further mechanistic models integrating these two facets of biodiversity.