Dopamine: Making memories
Dopamine is often referred to as the ‘feel-good’ neurotransmitter. Whether it is the satisfaction of a delicious meal, the thrill of success, or the drive to accomplish a goal – dopamine is central to our ability to experience pleasure, stay motivated and feel rewarded (Salamone et al., 2003; Schultz, 1997). However, it is also vital to how we learn and form lasting memories (Shohamy and Adcock, 2010; Takeuchi et al., 2016). So, how exactly does this neurotransmitter help lock memories in place?
When something new is learned, the synapses involved in storing the information become stronger through a process known as long-term potentiation (LTP), which relies on increased protein production. This results in the memory being more stable and easier to retrieve (Santini et al., 2014). Previous research, including work conducted by the research group led by Ole Paulsen, has shown that dopamine is critical for LTP, and that it can also regulate protein synthesis in neurons in the hippocampus, a brain region important for memory (Smith et al., 2005; Fuchsberger et al., 2022). Now, in eLife, Ole Paulsen and colleagues – including Tanja Fuchsberger as first author – report having identified a unique signaling pathway by which dopamine triggers the protein synthesis required to form long-term memories (Fuchsberger et al., 2024).
First, the team (who are based at the University of Cambridge and the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology) used a labelling technique to detect newly synthesized proteins in slices of the mouse hippocampus. This revealed that when dopamine was present, protein production significantly increased in CA1 neurons important for memory formation.
Further experiments showed that dopamine could transform long-term depression – a process that usually weakens synapses – into LTP, effectively converting weak synaptic connections into stronger ones. However, when protein synthesis was blocked, this ability disappeared. When dopamine was applied during neuronal stimulation, the synapses not only maintained their strength but grew even stronger, suggesting neuronal activation also contributes to the dopamine-induced increase in protein synthesis.
Fuchsberger et al. found that this strengthening of synaptic connections was mediated by two dopamine receptors (D1 and D5) that trigger a cascade of signals inside neurons. This includes activating enzymes known as adenylate cyclases, which simulate two other signaling molecules (cAMP and PKA), ultimately leading to a boost in protein production (Figure 1; Sassone-Corsi, 2012).
Genetically removing two types of adenylate cyclase enzymes – called AC1 and AC8 – from CA1 neurons led to dopamine-induced LTP being completely absent. These enzymes are also activated by calcium ions that flood into the synapse during neuronal activation, suggesting that they couple neuronal activity and dopamine signaling in order to induce protein synthesis (Figure 1).
Fuchsberger et al. found that dopamine increased the production of the protein GluA1, a subunit found in AMPA receptors which support LTP. However, the neurotransmitter had no effect on GluA2, another type of subunit found in AMPA receptors.
AMPA receptors formed of only GluA1 subunits have captivated researchers due to their unique structures and signaling properties (Zhang et al., 2023), and the fact that, unlike AMPA receptors featuring other subunits, they allow calcium ions to pass through them (Park et al., 2019). Fuchsberger et al. discovered that when AMPA receptors containing just GluA1 were blocked, dopamine could no longer strengthen synaptic connections, suggesting that these calcium-permeable receptors are needed for dopamine-induced LTP (Figure 1).
These findings offer a fresh perspective on how dopamine influences, not only our motivation and mood, but also our ability to learn and remember. They show which signaling pathways and molecules allow dopamine to induce the protein synthesis required for long-term memory. This opens up exciting possibilities for targeting dopamine pathways in therapies designed to improve memory and learning, particularly for conditions like Alzheimer’s disease where memory formation is impaired. Modulating the effect of dopamine could also help reinforce memory in individuals experiencing cognitive decline.
One of the key challenges ahead is to fully understand the molecular mechanisms and cell-type specificity of dopamine’s influence on protein synthesis in neurons. Timing is also likely to play a crucial role, and understanding when dopamine is released in relation to neuronal activity may reveal critical periods for optimizing learning and memory processing. Future research exploring these temporal dynamics could shed light on the best approaches for harnessing dopamine’s full potential in enhancing memory and cognitive function.
References
-
On the role of calcium-permeable AMPARs in long-term potentiation and synaptic tagging in the rodent hippocampusFrontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience 11:4.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2019.00004
-
Nucleus accumbens dopamine and the regulation of effort in food-seeking behavior: implications for studies of natural motivation, psychiatry, and drug abuseThe Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 305:1–8.https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.102.035063
-
Mechanisms of translation control underlying long-lasting synaptic plasticity and the consolidation of long-term memoryProgress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science 122:131–167.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420170-5.00005-2
-
The cyclic AMP pathwayCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 4:a011148.https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a011148
-
The phasic reward signal of primate dopamine neuronsAdvances in Pharmacology 42:686–690.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60841-8
-
Dopamine and adaptive memoryTrends in Cognitive Sciences 14:464–472.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.002
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Longo
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,886
- views
-
- 162
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Predicting an individual’s cognitive traits or clinical condition using brain signals is a central goal in modern neuroscience. This is commonly done using either structural aspects, such as structural connectivity or cortical thickness, or aggregated measures of brain activity that average over time. But these approaches are missing a central aspect of brain function: the unique ways in which an individual’s brain activity unfolds over time. One reason why these dynamic patterns are not usually considered is that they have to be described by complex, high-dimensional models; and it is unclear how best to use these models for prediction. We here propose an approach that describes dynamic functional connectivity and amplitude patterns using a Hidden Markov model (HMM) and combines it with the Fisher kernel, which can be used to predict individual traits. The Fisher kernel is constructed from the HMM in a mathematically principled manner, thereby preserving the structure of the underlying model. We show here, in fMRI data, that the HMM-Fisher kernel approach is accurate and reliable. We compare the Fisher kernel to other prediction methods, both time-varying and time-averaged functional connectivity-based models. Our approach leverages information about an individual’s time-varying amplitude and functional connectivity for prediction and has broad applications in cognitive neuroscience and personalised medicine.
-
- Neuroscience
Non-linear summation of synaptic inputs to the dendrites of pyramidal neurons has been proposed to increase the computation capacity of neurons through coincidence detection, signal amplification, and additional logic operations such as XOR. Supralinear dendritic integration has been documented extensively in principal neurons, mediated by several voltage-dependent conductances. It has also been reported in parvalbumin-positive hippocampal basket cells, in dendrites innervated by feedback excitatory synapses. Whether other interneurons, which support feed-forward or feedback inhibition of principal neuron dendrites, also exhibit local non-linear integration of synaptic excitation is not known. Here, we use patch-clamp electrophysiology, and two-photon calcium imaging and glutamate uncaging, to show that supralinear dendritic integration of near-synchronous spatially clustered glutamate-receptor mediated depolarization occurs in NDNF-positive neurogliaform cells and oriens-lacunosum moleculare interneurons in the mouse hippocampus. Supralinear summation was detected via recordings of somatic depolarizations elicited by uncaging of glutamate on dendritic fragments, and, in neurogliaform cells, by concurrent imaging of dendritic calcium transients. Supralinearity was abolished by blocking NMDA receptors (NMDARs) but resisted blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. Blocking L-type calcium channels abolished supralinear calcium signalling but only had a minor effect on voltage supralinearity. Dendritic boosting of spatially clustered synaptic signals argues for previously unappreciated computational complexity in dendrite-projecting inhibitory cells of the hippocampus.