Load-based divergence in the dynamic allostery of two TCRs recognizing the same pMHC

  1. Ana Cristina Chang-Gonzalez
  2. Aoi Akitsu
  3. Robert J Mallis
  4. Matthew J Lang
  5. Ellis L Reinherz
  6. Wonmuk Hwang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, United States
  2. Laboratory of Immunobiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States
  3. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States
  4. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, United States
  5. Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, United States
  6. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, United States
  7. Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, United States
  8. Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, United States
  9. Center for AI and Natural Sciences, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Republic of Korea
  10. Department of Physics & Astronomy, Texas A&M University, United States
4 figures, 1 table and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 2 supplements
B7 T-cell receptor (TCR)-peptide-bound major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) interface.

(A) Overview of the base complex used in simulations. The four subdomains of TCRαβ are Vα, Vβ, Cα, and Cβ. Load was applied by holding the Cα atoms of terminal residues (blue spheres at the ends of ‘added strands’) at a given distance from each other. β2m: β2 microglobulin. (B) Magnified view of red box in panel A showing labeled CDR loops and side chains of peptide residues in stick representation. (C) Number of contacts with greater than 50% average occupancy and 80% maximum instantaneous occupancy from 500 to 1000 ns. Bars: std. Criteria for counting contacts and values for A6 are from Chang-Gonzalez et al., 2024. (D) Total contact occupancy measured in 40 ns overlapping intervals. TCR-pMHC (top; intermolecular) and intra-TCR (bottom; intramolecular) contacts are shown separately. Intra-TCR contacts exclude Cα-Cβ contacts (Methods). Circles with outline: B7high; without outline: B7low. Horizontal bar below each panel: B70.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Model of T-cell receptor (TCR)αβ with leucine zipper domain fused to the C-terminal added strands.

Model was built based on PDB 1NFD (Wang et al., 1998). The construct was used in single-molecule optical tweezers experiments (Das et al., 2015). Blue spheres denote Cα atoms of residues corresponding to αT218 and βA259 of B7 TCR (Figure 1A, bottom). Their distance is 6.7 Å. The 10 Å flat-bottom harmonic distance restraint on those atoms (see Methods) mimic the presence of the leucine zipper that prevents large separation of the added strands.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Standard deviation vs. average of the applied force.

All data are measured between 500 and 1000 ns. Open circles are for A6 (Chang-Gonzalez et al., 2024). Red squares for B7low and B7high are from Table 1. Except for Y8Alow (an antagonist) and dFGlow (Cβ FG-loop deletion mutant) for A6, the near-linear relation between the std and average in force is a consequence of the force being applied to the restraining potential via random conformational fluctuation of the complex (Burgess, 1973). See Appendix 3 of Chang-Gonzalez et al., 2024, for further explanation. The fact that data for both B7 and A6 lie on approximately the same line also reflects consistency in our force measurement.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Load-dependent behavior of the B7 T-cell receptor (TCR)-peptide-bound major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) interface.

(A) Number of MHC-Vα, MHC-Vβ, peptide-Vα, and peptide-Vβ contacts in B7 and A6 TCRs between 500 and 1000 ns. Data for A6 are from Chang-Gonzalez et al., 2024. (B) Hamming distance H. Histograms were calculated using data between 500 and 1000 ns (marked by vertical dashed lines). (C) Location of V-module residues forming contacts with pMHC with greater than 50% average occupancy. The frame at 1000 ns is used for visualization. The backbone of the Tax peptide is shown as a purple tube. CDRs are labeled in the first panel. (D) Total (pink) and per-residue (blue) buried surface area (BSA) for interfacial residues between 500 and 1000 ns. (E) pMHC residues forming contacts with the V-module with average occupancy greater than 50% in the high-load case. Left: B7high, right: A6high. MHC residues are shown as sticks and Cα atoms of the peptide residues are shown as spheres. Viewing direction is the same as in panel C.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Additional characterization of the T-cell receptor (TCR)-peptide-bound major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) interface.

(A–D) Contact occupancy heat maps. (A) B70, (B) B7low, (C) B7high, and (D) Vαβ-pMHC. Contacts with overall occupancy greater than 30% and instantaneous occupancy greater than 80% are shown. hb: hydrogen bond, np: nonpolar contact. Arrow in panel D denotes the approximate time when the initial adjustment of contacts in Vαβ-pMHC happens (Figure 2B). (E) Root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of peptide backbone Cα atoms between 500 and 1000 ns. Cα atoms were aligned to those at the beginning of the production run for RMSF calculation. (F) Distance between the V-module and pMHC. Histograms were calculated using data between 500 and 1000 ns, the interval between the vertical dashed lines. For Vαβ-pMHC and B7high, avg±std between 500 and 1000 ns are 32.5±0.31 and 31.9±0.30 Å, respectively. V-module to pMHC distance measured from the B7 crystal structure (1BD2) is denoted by a dashed horizontal line indicated by an arrow at 31.6 Å .

Vα-Vβ motion of B7.

(A) Number of Vα-Vβ contacts with greater than 50% average occupancy and 80% maximum instantaneous occupancy between 500 and 1000 ns. Bars: std. (B) V-module triads {e1,e2,e3}. Arrows denote directions of the first three PC modes for B7high as an example. CDR3s are labeled. (C) Amplitudes for the first six PCs. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed between 500 and 1000 ns. Transparent bands: std for PCA performed in three overlapping intervals (500–800 ns, 600–900 ns, and 700–1000 ns). (D) Histograms of the V-module triad angles. (E) CDR3 distance vs. triad angles. Transparent bands: std. Both D and E were determined from data between 500 and 1000 ns.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
V-C motion of B7.

(A) Number of V-C contacts per chain measured with the same criteria as Figure 3A. (B) Average bead-on-chain (BOC) for B7low and B7high. The V-module of B7high is less bent compared to B7low. The arrows for the first three V-C PC modes are shown, where PC1 corresponds to the V-C bending motion. (C) V-C PC amplitudes for the first six PC modes. Transparent bands: std measured in the same way as in Figure 3C. (D) Differences in amplitudes for the first three PCs between matching V- and H-beads of α and β chains. (E) Histograms of hinge angles defined in panel B. (F) CDR3 distance vs. hinge angles. Transparent bands: std. All panels are generated with data between 500 and 1000 ns.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Additional characterization of the V-C motion.

(A) Dot products computed between the bead-on-chain (BOC) PC vectors of listed systems. Values closer to 1.0 denote similar V-C BOC direction of motion. (B) V-C hinge angle trajectories over time.

Tables

Table 1
Simulation systems constructed based on PDB 1BD2 (Ding et al., 1998).

Extension is the distance between the harmonic potentials on the terminal restrained atoms (blue spheres in Figure 1A), which was selected for B7low and B7high to yield average low and high loads among simulations scanning different extensions (see Methods). Average load is calculated between 500 and 1000 ns. The standard deviation (std) in load as measured in 40 ns intervals between 500 and 1000 ns is shown in parentheses. Their values are consistent with those for A6 (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). The extension and force (average±std) for A6 corresponding to B7low and B7high are 182.6 Å and 13.2±5.65 pN and 187.7 Å and 18.2±9.17 pN, respectively (Chang-Gonzalez et al., 2024), which indicates that B7 is more compliant compared to A6. For B70, B7low, and B7high, simulations were further extended for additional time-dependent stability analysis. However, averaging was done for the 500–1000 ns interval for consistency.

LabelStructureTime (ns)Extension (Å)Load (pN)
VαβVα-Vβ only (no pMHC)1000
TαβTCRαβ only (no pMHC)1000
Vαβ-pMHCVαβ with pMHC (no C-module)1000
B70TCRαβ-pMHC1450
B7lowTCRαβ-pMHC1550173.79.01 (3.96)
B7highTCRαβ-pMHC1550190.014.5 (7.20)

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ana Cristina Chang-Gonzalez
  2. Aoi Akitsu
  3. Robert J Mallis
  4. Matthew J Lang
  5. Ellis L Reinherz
  6. Wonmuk Hwang
(2025)
Load-based divergence in the dynamic allostery of two TCRs recognizing the same pMHC
eLife 13:RP104280.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104280.3