Integrated culturing, modeling and transcriptomics uncovers complex interactions and emergent behavior in a three-species synthetic gut community

  1. Kevin D'hoe
  2. Stefan Vet
  3. Karoline Faust  Is a corresponding author
  4. Frédéric Moens
  5. Gwen Falony
  6. Didier Gonze
  7. Verónica Lloréns-Rico
  8. Lendert Gelens
  9. Jan Danckaert
  10. Luc De Vuyst
  11. Jeroen Raes  Is a corresponding author
  1. KU Leuven, Belgium
  2. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
  3. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium

Abstract

Whereas the composition of the human gut microbiome is well resolved, predictive understanding is still lacking. Here, we followed a bottom-up strategy to explore human gut community dynamics: we established a synthetic community composed of three representative human gut isolates (Roseburia intestinalis L1-82, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165 and Blautia hydrogenotrophica S5a33) and explored their interactions under well-controlled conditions in vitro. Systematic mono- and pair-wise fermentation experiments confirmed competition for fructose and cross-feeding of formate. We quantified with a mechanistic model how well tri-culture dynamics was predicted from mono-culture data. With the model as reference, we demonstrated that strains grown in co-culture behaved differently than in mono-culture and confirmed their altered behavior at the transcriptional level. In addition, we showed with replicate tri-cultures and simulations that dominance in tri-culture sensitively depended on initial conditions. Our work has important implications for gut microbial community modeling as well as ecological interaction detection from batch cultures.

Data availability

RNA-seq results have been deposited to the Short Read Archive under the study identifier SRP136465 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRP136465). Fermentation data have been submitted to Dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.g83f29f). Source data has been provided for Figures 3 to 6.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kevin D'hoe

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Stefan Vet

    Applied Physics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Karoline Faust

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    karoline.faust@kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7129-2803
  4. Frédéric Moens

    Research Group of Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gwen Falony

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Didier Gonze

    Unité de Chronobiologie Théorique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Verónica Lloréns-Rico

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Lendert Gelens

    Laboratory of Dynamics in Biological Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jan Danckaert

    Applied Physics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Luc De Vuyst

    Research Group of Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jeroen Raes

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    jeroen.raes@kuleuven.vib.be
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

  • Kevin D'hoe

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

  • Kevin D'hoe
  • Karoline Faust
  • Frédéric Moens
  • Verónica Lloréns-Rico

Interuniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels

  • Stefan Vet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, D'hoe et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,744
    views
  • 976
    downloads
  • 73
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kevin D'hoe
  2. Stefan Vet
  3. Karoline Faust
  4. Frédéric Moens
  5. Gwen Falony
  6. Didier Gonze
  7. Verónica Lloréns-Rico
  8. Lendert Gelens
  9. Jan Danckaert
  10. Luc De Vuyst
  11. Jeroen Raes
(2018)
Integrated culturing, modeling and transcriptomics uncovers complex interactions and emergent behavior in a three-species synthetic gut community
eLife 7:e37090.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37090

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37090

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Masaaki Uematsu, Jeremy M Baskin
    Tools and Resources

    Plasmid construction is central to life science research, and sequence verification is arguably its costliest step. Long-read sequencing has emerged as a competitor to Sanger sequencing, with the principal benefit that whole plasmids can be sequenced in a single run. Nevertheless, the current cost of nanopore sequencing is still prohibitive for routine sequencing during plasmid construction. We develop a computational approach termed Simple Algorithm for Very Efficient Multiplexing of Oxford Nanopore Experiments for You (SAVEMONEY) that guides researchers to mix multiple plasmids and subsequently computationally de-mixes the resultant sequences. SAVEMONEY defines optimal mixtures in a pre-survey step, and following sequencing, executes a post-analysis workflow involving sequence classification, alignment, and consensus determination. By using Bayesian analysis with prior probability of expected plasmid construction error rate, high-confidence sequences can be obtained for each plasmid in the mixture. Plasmids differing by as little as two bases can be mixed as a single sample for nanopore sequencing, and routine multiplexing of even six plasmids per 180 reads can still maintain high accuracy of consensus sequencing. SAVEMONEY should further democratize whole-plasmid sequencing by nanopore and related technologies, driving down the effective cost of whole-plasmid sequencing to lower than that of a single Sanger sequencing run.