Abstract

Tissue homeostasis is critically dependent on the function of tissue-resident lymphocytes, including lipid-reactive invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells. Yet, if and how the tissue environment shapes the antigen specificity of iNKT cells remains unknown. By analysing iNKT cells from lymphoid tissues of mice and humans we demonstrate that their T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire is highly diverse and is distinct for cells from various tissues resulting in differential lipid-antigen recognition. Within peripheral tissues iNKT cell recent thymic emigrants exhibit a different TCR repertoire than mature cells, suggesting that the iNKT population is shaped after arrival to the periphery. Consistent with this, iNKT cells from different organs show distinct basal activation, proliferation and clonal expansion. Moreover, the iNKT cell TCR repertoire changes following immunisation and is shaped by age and environmental changes. Thus, post-thymic modification of the TCR-repertoire underpins the distinct antigen specificity for iNKT cells in peripheral tissues.

Data availability

The RNAseq data are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database with accession number GSE131420.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rebeca Jimeno

    The Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Marta Lebrusant-Fernandez

    The Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christian Margreitter

    Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Beth Lucas

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Natacha Veerapen

    Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Gurdyal S Besra

    Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Franca Fraternali

    Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3143-6574
  8. Jo Spencer

    The Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Graham Anderson

    Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Patricia Barral

    The Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    patricia.barral@kcl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4324-8973

Funding

Medical Research Council (MR/L008157/1)

  • Patricia Barral

Marie Curie Intraeuropean Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2015-703639)

  • Rebeca Jimeno

Medical Research Council (DKAA.RRAK18742)

  • Graham Anderson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the Francis Crick Institute's and the King's College London's Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body and the United Kingdom Home Office.

Human subjects: Human tissues used in this study were collected with ethical approval from UK Research Ethics Committees administered through the Integrated Research Application System. All samples were collected with informed consent.

Copyright

© 2019, Jimeno et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,092
    views
  • 463
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rebeca Jimeno
  2. Marta Lebrusant-Fernandez
  3. Christian Margreitter
  4. Beth Lucas
  5. Natacha Veerapen
  6. Gurdyal S Besra
  7. Franca Fraternali
  8. Jo Spencer
  9. Graham Anderson
  10. Patricia Barral
(2019)
Tissue-specific shaping of the TCR repertoire and antigen specificity of iNKT cells
eLife 8:e51663.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51663

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51663

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Josep Garnica, Patricia Sole ... Pere Santamaria
    Research Article

    Chronic antigenic stimulation can trigger the formation of interleukin 10 (IL-10)-producing T-regulatory type 1 (TR1) cells in vivo. We have recently shown that murine T-follicular helper (TFH) cells are precursors of TR1 cells and that the TFH-to-TR1 cell transdifferentiation process is characterized by the progressive loss and acquisition of opposing transcription factor gene expression programs that evolve through at least one transitional cell stage. Here, we use a broad range of bulk and single-cell transcriptional and epigenetic tools to investigate the epigenetic underpinnings of this process. At the single-cell level, the TFH-to-TR1 cell transition is accompanied by both, downregulation of TFH cell-specific gene expression due to loss of chromatin accessibility, and upregulation of TR1 cell-specific genes linked to chromatin regions that remain accessible throughout the transdifferentiation process, with minimal generation of new open chromatin regions. By interrogating the epigenetic status of accessible TR1 genes on purified TFH and conventional T-cells, we find that most of these genes, including Il10, are already poised for expression at the TFH cell stage. Whereas these genes are closed and hypermethylated in Tconv cells, they are accessible, hypomethylated, and enriched for H3K27ac-marked and hypomethylated active enhancers in TFH cells. These enhancers are enriched for binding sites for the TFH and TR1-associated transcription factors TOX-2, IRF4, and c-MAF. Together, these data suggest that the TR1 gene expression program is genetically imprinted at the TFH cell stage.