Hierarchical temporal prediction captures motion processing along the visual pathway

  1. Yosef Singer  Is a corresponding author
  2. Luke CL Taylor
  3. Ben DB Willmore
  4. Andrew J King  Is a corresponding author
  5. Nicol S Harper  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

Visual neurons respond selectively to features that become increasingly complex from the eyes to the cortex. Retinal neurons prefer flashing spots of light, primary visual cortical (V1) neurons prefer moving bars, and those in higher cortical areas favor complex features like moving textures. Previously, we showed that V1 simple cell tuning can be accounted for by a basic model implementing temporal prediction - representing features that predict future sensory input from past input (Singer et al., 2018). Here we show that hierarchical application of temporal prediction can capture how tuning properties change across at least two levels of the visual system. This suggests that the brain does not efficiently represent all incoming information; instead, it selectively represents sensory inputs that help in predicting the future. When applied hierarchically, temporal prediction extracts time-varying features that depend on increasingly high-level statistics of the sensory input.

Data availability

All custom code used in this study was implemented in Python. The code for the models and analyses shown in Figures 1-8 and associated sections can be found at https://bitbucket.org/ox-ang/hierarchical_temporal_prediction/src/master/. The V1 neural response data (Ringach et al., 2002) used for comparison with the temporal prediction model in Figure 6 came from http://ringachlab.net/ ("Data & Code", "Orientation tuning in Macaque V1"). The V1 image response data used to test the models included in Figure 9 were downloaded with permission from https://github.com/sacadena/Cadena2019PlosCB (Cadena et al., 2019). The V1 movie response data used to test these models were collected in the Laboratory of Dario Ringach at UCLA and downloaded from https://crcns.org/data-sets/vc/pvc-1 (Nahaus and Ringach, 2007; Ringach and Nahaus, 2009). The code for the models and analyses shown in Figure 9 and the associated section can be found at https://github.com/webstorms/StackTP and https://github.com/webstorms/NeuralPred. The movies used for training the models in Figure 9 are available at https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Natural_movies/24265498.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yosef Singer

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    yosef.singer@stcatz.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4480-0574
  2. Luke CL Taylor

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ben DB Willmore

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2969-7572
  4. Andrew J King

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    andrew.king@dpag.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5180-7179
  5. Nicol S Harper

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    nicol.harper@dpag.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7851-4840

Funding

Wellcome Trust (WT108369/Z/2015/Z)

  • Ben DB Willmore
  • Andrew J King
  • Nicol S Harper

University of Oxford Clarendon Fund

  • Yosef Singer
  • Luke CL Taylor

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Singer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,172
    views
  • 167
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yosef Singer
  2. Luke CL Taylor
  3. Ben DB Willmore
  4. Andrew J King
  5. Nicol S Harper
(2023)
Hierarchical temporal prediction captures motion processing along the visual pathway
eLife 12:e52599.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52599

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52599

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.

    1. Neuroscience
    Franziska Auer, Katherine Nardone ... David Schoppik
    Research Article

    Cerebellar dysfunction leads to postural instability. Recent work in freely moving rodents has transformed investigations of cerebellar contributions to posture. However, the combined complexity of terrestrial locomotion and the rodent cerebellum motivate new approaches to perturb cerebellar function in simpler vertebrates. Here, we adapted a validated chemogenetic tool (TRPV1/capsaicin) to describe the role of Purkinje cells — the output neurons of the cerebellar cortex — as larval zebrafish swam freely in depth. We achieved both bidirectional control (activation and ablation) of Purkinje cells while performing quantitative high-throughput assessment of posture and locomotion. Activation modified postural control in the pitch (nose-up/nose-down) axis. Similarly, ablations disrupted pitch-axis posture and fin-body coordination responsible for climbs. Postural disruption was more widespread in older larvae, offering a window into emergent roles for the developing cerebellum in the control of posture. Finally, we found that activity in Purkinje cells could individually and collectively encode tilt direction, a key feature of postural control neurons. Our findings delineate an expected role for the cerebellum in postural control and vestibular sensation in larval zebrafish, establishing the validity of TRPV1/capsaicin-mediated perturbations in a simple, genetically tractable vertebrate. Moreover, by comparing the contributions of Purkinje cell ablations to posture in time, we uncover signatures of emerging cerebellar control of posture across early development. This work takes a major step towards understanding an ancestral role of the cerebellum in regulating postural maturation.