Stimulus-induced gamma rhythms are weaker in human elderly with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

  1. Dinavahi VPS Murty
  2. Keerthana Manikandan
  3. Wupadrasta Santosh Kumar
  4. Ranjini Garani Ramesh
  5. Simran Purokayastha
  6. Bhargavi Nagendra
  7. Abhishek M. L.
  8. Aditi Balakrishnan
  9. Mahendra Javali
  10. Naren Prahalada Rao
  11. Supratim Ray  Is a corresponding author
  1. Indian Institute of Science, India
  2. MS Ramaiah Medical College & Memorial Hospital, India
  3. National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, India

Abstract

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in elderly adds substantially to socio-economic burden necessitating early diagnosis. While recent studies in rodent models of AD have suggested diagnostic and therapeutic value for gamma rhythms in brain, the same has not been rigorously tested in humans. In this case-control study, we recruited a large population (N=244; 106 females) of elderly (>49 years) subjects from the community, who viewed large gratings that induced strong gamma oscillations in their electroencephalogram (EEG). These subjects were classified as healthy (N=227), mild-cognitively-impaired (MCI; N=12) or AD (N=5) based on clinical history and Clinical Dementia Rating scores. Surprisingly, stimulus-induced gamma rhythms, but not alpha or steady-state visually evoked responses, were significantly lower in MCI/AD subjects compared to their age and gender matched controls. This reduction was not due to differences in eye-movements or baseline power. Our results suggest that gamma could be used as potential screening tool for MCI/AD in humans.

Data availability

All spectral analyses were performed using Chronux toolbox (version 2.10), available at http://chronux.org. Relevant data and codes are available at the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/supratimray/TLSAEEGProjectPrograms.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dinavahi VPS Murty

    Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Keerthana Manikandan

    Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Wupadrasta Santosh Kumar

    Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ranjini Garani Ramesh

    Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Simran Purokayastha

    Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6096-1477
  6. Bhargavi Nagendra

    Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Abhishek M. L.

    Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Aditi Balakrishnan

    Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Mahendra Javali

    Department of Neurology, MS Ramaiah Medical College & Memorial Hospital, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Naren Prahalada Rao

    Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Supratim Ray

    Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India
    For correspondence
    sray@iisc.ac.in
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1968-1382

Funding

Tata Trusts

  • Naren Prahalada Rao
  • Supratim Ray

Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance (Intermediate fellowship 500145/Z/09/Z)

  • Supratim Ray

Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance (Senior fellowship IA/S/18/2/504003)

  • Supratim Ray

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (DBT-IISc Partnership Programme)

  • Supratim Ray

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: We obtained informed consent from all participants before the experiment. The Institute Human Ethics Committees of Indian Institute of Science (IHEC numbers: original: 22/2014, revised: 7-15092017), NIMHANS, and M S Ramaiah Hospital, Bangalore approved all procedures.

Copyright

© 2021, Murty et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,620
    views
  • 519
    downloads
  • 46
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dinavahi VPS Murty
  2. Keerthana Manikandan
  3. Wupadrasta Santosh Kumar
  4. Ranjini Garani Ramesh
  5. Simran Purokayastha
  6. Bhargavi Nagendra
  7. Abhishek M. L.
  8. Aditi Balakrishnan
  9. Mahendra Javali
  10. Naren Prahalada Rao
  11. Supratim Ray
(2021)
Stimulus-induced gamma rhythms are weaker in human elderly with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
eLife 10:e61666.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61666

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61666

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    LeYuan Gu, WeiHui Shao ... HongHai Zhang
    Research Article

    The advent of midazolam holds profound implications for modern clinical practice. The hypnotic and sedative effects of midazolam afford it broad clinical applicability. However, the specific mechanisms underlying the modulation of altered consciousness by midazolam remain elusive. Herein, using pharmacology, optogenetics, chemogenetics, fiber photometry, and gene knockdown, this in vivo research revealed the role of locus coeruleus (LC)-ventrolateral preoptic nucleus noradrenergic neural circuit in regulating midazolam-induced altered consciousness. This effect was mediated by α1 adrenergic receptors. Moreover, gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor type A (GABAA-R) represents a mechanistically crucial binding site in the LC for midazolam. These findings will provide novel insights into the neural circuit mechanisms underlying the recovery of consciousness after midazolam administration and will help guide the timing of clinical dosing and propose effective intervention targets for timely recovery from midazolam-induced loss of consciousness.

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Emily M Adamic, Adam R Teed ... Sahib Khalsa
    Research Article

    Interactions between top-down attention and bottom-up visceral inputs are assumed to produce conscious perceptions of interoceptive states, and while each process has been independently associated with aberrant interoceptive symptomatology in psychiatric disorders, the neural substrates of this interface are unknown. We conducted a preregistered functional neuroimaging study of 46 individuals with anxiety, depression, and/or eating disorders (ADE) and 46 propensity-matched healthy comparisons (HC), comparing their neural activity across two interoceptive tasks differentially recruiting top-down or bottom-up processing within the same scan session. During an interoceptive attention task, top-down attention was voluntarily directed towards cardiorespiratory or visual signals. In contrast, during an interoceptive perturbation task, intravenous infusions of isoproterenol (a peripherally-acting beta-adrenergic receptor agonist) were administered in a double-blinded and placebo-controlled fashion to drive bottom-up cardiorespiratory sensations. Across both tasks, neural activation converged upon the insular cortex, localizing within the granular and ventral dysgranular subregions bilaterally. However, contrasting hemispheric differences emerged, with the ADE group exhibiting (relative to HCs) an asymmetric pattern of overlap in the left insula, with increased or decreased proportions of co-activated voxels within the left or right dysgranular insula, respectively. The ADE group also showed less agranular anterior insula activation during periods of bodily uncertainty (i.e. when anticipating possible isoproterenol-induced changes that never arrived). Finally, post-task changes in insula functional connectivity were associated with anxiety and depression severity. These findings confirm the dysgranular mid-insula as a key cortical interface where attention and prediction meet real-time bodily inputs, especially during heightened awareness of interoceptive states. Furthermore, the dysgranular mid-insula may indeed be a ‘locus of disruption’ for psychiatric disorders.