Abstract

The circadian clock component NR1D1 (REVERBα) is considered a dominant regulator of lipid metabolism, with global Nr1d1 deletion driving dysregulation of white adipose tissue (WAT) lipogenesis and obesity. However, a similar phenotype is not observed under adipocyte-selective deletion (Nr1d1Flox2-6:AdipoqCre), and transcriptional pro1ling demonstrates that, under basal conditions, direct targets of NR1D1 regulation are limited, and include the circadian clock and collagen dynamics. Under high-fat diet (HFD) feeding, Nr1d1Flox2-6:AdipoqCre mice do manifest profound obesity, yet without the accompanying WAT in2ammation and 1brosis exhibited by controls. Integration of the WAT NR1D1 cistrome with differential gene expression reveals broad control of metabolic processes by NR1D1 which is unmasked in the obese state. Adipocyte NR1D1 does not drive an anticipatory daily rhythm in WAT lipogenesis, but rather modulates WAT activity in response to alterations in metabolic state. Importantly, NR1D1 action in adipocytes is critical to the development of obesity-related WAT pathology and insulin resistance.

Data availability

RNA-seq data generated in the course of this study has been uploaded to ArrayExpress and is available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-8840. For reviewer access, the following login details can be used: username "Reviewer_E-MTAB-8840", password "IGGB44Tx". ChIP-seq data generated in the course of this study has been uploaded to ArrayExpress and is available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-10573. For reviewer access, the follow690ing login details can be used: username "Reviewer_E-MTAB-10573", password "nncbrjdh". Access to these datasets will be opened to the public upon acceptance of themanuscript. Raw proteomics data has been uploaded to Mendeley Data . Output of 'omics analyses (proteomics, edgeR, stageR, ReactomePA outputs, peak calling) are provided in the Source Data Files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ann Louise Hunter

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3874-4852
  2. Charlotte E Pelekanou

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Nichola J Barron

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Rebecca C Northeast

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3121-2802
  5. Magdalena Grudzien

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Antony D Adamson

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Polly Downton

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1617-6153
  8. Thomas Cornfield

    OCDEM, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Peter S Cunningham

    Centre for Biological Timing, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Jean-Noel Billaud

    QIAGEN Bioinformatics, Redwood City, United States
    Competing interests
    Jean-Noel Billaud, J-N.B. is an employee of Qiagen..
  11. Leanne Hodson

    OCDEM, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Andrew Loudon

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Richard D Unwin

    Stoller Biomarker Discovery Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Mudassar Iqbal

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. David Ray

    OCDEM, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. David A Bechtold

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    david.bechtold@manchester.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8676-8704

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I018654/1)

  • David A Bechtold

Medical Research Council (MR/N021479/1)

  • Ann Louise Hunter

Medical Research Council (MR/P00279X/1)

  • David A Bechtold

Medical Research Council (MR/P011853/1)

  • David Ray

Medical Research Council (MR/P023576/1)

  • David Ray

Wellcome Trust (107849/Z/15/Z)

  • David Ray

Wellcome Trust (107851/Z/15/Z)

  • David Ray

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments described here were conducted in accordance with local requirements and licenced under the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, project licence number 70/8558 (licence holder Dr. David A Bechtold). Procedures were approved by the University of Manchester Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB).

Copyright

© 2021, Hunter et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,355
    views
  • 563
    downloads
  • 39
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ann Louise Hunter
  2. Charlotte E Pelekanou
  3. Nichola J Barron
  4. Rebecca C Northeast
  5. Magdalena Grudzien
  6. Antony D Adamson
  7. Polly Downton
  8. Thomas Cornfield
  9. Peter S Cunningham
  10. Jean-Noel Billaud
  11. Leanne Hodson
  12. Andrew Loudon
  13. Richard D Unwin
  14. Mudassar Iqbal
  15. David Ray
  16. David A Bechtold
(2021)
Adipocyte NR1D1 dictates adipose tissue expansion during obesity
eLife 10:e63324.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63324

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63324

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Paul Richard J Yulo, Nicolas Desprat ... Heather L Hendrickson
    Research Article

    Maintenance of rod-shape in bacterial cells depends on the actin-like protein MreB. Deletion of mreB from Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 results in viable spherical cells of variable volume and reduced fitness. Using a combination of time-resolved microscopy and biochemical assay of peptidoglycan synthesis, we show that reduced fitness is a consequence of perturbed cell size homeostasis that arises primarily from differential growth of daughter cells. A 1000-generation selection experiment resulted in rapid restoration of fitness with derived cells retaining spherical shape. Mutations in the peptidoglycan synthesis protein Pbp1A were identified as the main route for evolutionary rescue with genetic reconstructions demonstrating causality. Compensatory pbp1A mutations that targeted transpeptidase activity enhanced homogeneity of cell wall synthesis on lateral surfaces and restored cell size homeostasis. Mechanistic explanations require enhanced understanding of why deletion of mreB causes heterogeneity in cell wall synthesis. We conclude by presenting two testable hypotheses, one of which posits that heterogeneity stems from non-functional cell wall synthesis machinery, while the second posits that the machinery is functional, albeit stalled. Overall, our data provide support for the second hypothesis and draw attention to the importance of balance between transpeptidase and glycosyltransferase functions of peptidoglycan building enzymes for cell shape determination.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Pavan K Nayak, Arul Subramanian, Thomas F Schilling
    Research Article

    Mechanical forces play a critical role in tendon development and function, influencing cell behavior through mechanotransduction signaling pathways and subsequent extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Here we investigate the molecular mechanisms by which tenocytes in developing zebrafish embryos respond to muscle contraction forces during the onset of swimming and cranial muscle activity. Using genome-wide bulk RNA sequencing of FAC-sorted tenocytes we identify novel tenocyte markers and genes involved in tendon mechanotransduction. Embryonic tendons show dramatic changes in expression of matrix remodeling associated 5b (mxra5b), matrilin1 (matn1), and the transcription factor kruppel-like factor 2a (klf2a), as muscles start to contract. Using embryos paralyzed either by loss of muscle contractility or neuromuscular stimulation we confirm that muscle contractile forces influence the spatial and temporal expression patterns of all three genes. Quantification of these gene expression changes across tenocytes at multiple tendon entheses and myotendinous junctions reveals that their responses depend on force intensity, duration and tissue stiffness. These force-dependent feedback mechanisms in tendons, particularly in the ECM, have important implications for improved treatments of tendon injuries and atrophy.