1. Evolutionary Biology
  2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

Poxviruses capture host genes by LINE-1 retrotransposition

  1. Sarah M Fixsen
  2. Kelsey R Cone
  3. Stephen A Goldstein
  4. Thomas A Sasani
  5. Aaron R Quinlan
  6. Stefan Rothenburg
  7. Nels C Elde  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Utah, United States
  2. University of California, Davis, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63332
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Sarah M Fixsen
  2. Kelsey R Cone
  3. Stephen A Goldstein
  4. Thomas A Sasani
  5. Aaron R Quinlan
  6. Stefan Rothenburg
  7. Nels C Elde
(2022)
Poxviruses capture host genes by LINE-1 retrotransposition
eLife 11:e63332.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63332
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) provides a major source of genetic variation. Many viruses, including poxviruses, encode genes with crucial functions directly gained by gene transfer from hosts. The mechanism of transfer to poxvirus genomes is unknown. Using genome analysis and experimental screens of infected cells, we discovered a central role for Long Interspersed Nuclear Element-1 (LINE-1) retrotransposition in HGT to virus genomes. The process recapitulates processed pseudogene generation, but with host messenger RNA directed into virus genomes. Intriguingly, hallmark features of retrotransposition appear to favor virus adaption through rapid duplication of captured host genes on arrival. Our study reveals a previously unrecognized conduit of genetic traffic with fundamental implications for the evolution of many virus classes and their hosts.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI SRA database under project code PRJNA614958.All data generated or analyses during this study are included in the manuscript and supplemental files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sarah M Fixsen

    Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  2. Kelsey R Cone

    Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4547-7174

  3. Stephen A Goldstein

    Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. Thomas A Sasani

    Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2317-1374

  5. Aaron R Quinlan

    Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  6. Stefan Rothenburg

    Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2525-8230

  7. Nels C Elde

    Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    For correspondence
    nelde@genetics.utah.edu
    Competing interests
    Nels C Elde, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0426-1377

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R35GM134936)

  • Nels C Elde

National Institutes of Health (T32GM007464)

  • Sarah M Fixsen
  • Thomas A Sasani

National Institutes of Health (T32AI055434)

  • Kelsey R Cone

Burroughs Wellcome Fund (1015462)

  • Nels C Elde

University of Utah (HA and Edna Benning Presidential Endowed Chair)

  • Nels C Elde

National Institutes of Health (R01AI146915)

  • Stefan Rothenburg

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Fixsen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 455
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sarah M Fixsen
  2. Kelsey R Cone
  3. Stephen A Goldstein
  4. Thomas A Sasani
  5. Aaron R Quinlan
  6. Stefan Rothenburg
  7. Nels C Elde
(2022)
Poxviruses capture host genes by LINE-1 retrotransposition
eLife 11:e63332.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63332

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63332

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    LINE-1 retrotransposons facilitate horizontal gene transfer into poxviruses

    M Julhasur Rahman, Sherry L Haller ... Stefan Rothenburg
    Research Article Updated

    There is ample phylogenetic evidence that many critical virus functions, like immune evasion, evolved by the acquisition of genes from their hosts through horizontal gene transfer (HGT). However, the lack of an experimental system has prevented a mechanistic understanding of this process. We developed a model to elucidate the mechanisms of HGT into vaccinia virus, the prototypic poxvirus. All identified gene capture events showed signatures of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1)-mediated retrotransposition, including spliced-out introns, polyadenylated tails, and target site duplications. In one case, the acquired gene integrated together with a polyadenylated host U2 small nuclear RNA. Integrations occurred across the genome, in some cases knocking out essential viral genes. These essential gene knockouts were rescued through a process of complementation by the parent virus followed by nonhomologous recombination during serial passaging to generate a single, replication-competent virus. This work links multiple evolutionary mechanisms into one adaptive cascade and identifies host retrotransposons as major drivers for virus evolution.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    Evolution: A life LINE for large viruses

    Eugene V Koonin, Mart Krupovic
    Insight

    As long suspected, poxviruses capture host genes through a reverse-transcription process now shown to be mediated by retrotransposons.

    1. Evolutionary Biology

    A direct experimental test of Ohno’s hypothesis

    Ljiljana Mihajlovic, Bharat Ravi Iyengar ... Yolanda Schaerli
    Research Article

    Gene duplication drives evolution by providing raw material for proteins with novel functions. An influential hypothesis by Ohno (1970) posits that gene duplication helps genes tolerate new mutations and thus facilitates the evolution of new phenotypes. Competing hypotheses argue that deleterious mutations will usually inactivate gene duplicates too rapidly for Ohno’s hypothesis to work. We experimentally tested Ohno’s hypothesis by evolving one or exactly two copies of a gene encoding a fluorescent protein in Escherichia coli through several rounds of mutation and selection. We analyzed the genotypic and phenotypic evolutionary dynamics of the evolving populations through high-throughput DNA sequencing, biochemical assays, and engineering of selected variants. In support of Ohno’s hypothesis, populations carrying two gene copies displayed higher mutational robustness than those carrying a single gene copy. Consequently, the double-copy populations experienced relaxed purifying selection, evolved higher phenotypic and genetic diversity, carried more mutations and accumulated combinations of key beneficial mutations earlier. However, their phenotypic evolution was not accelerated, possibly because one gene copy rapidly became inactivated by deleterious mutations. Our work provides an experimental platform to test models of evolution by gene duplication, and it supports alternatives to Ohno’s hypothesis that point to the importance of gene dosage.