KSR1-and ERK-dependent translational regulation of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

  1. Chaitra Rao
  2. Danielle E Frodyma
  3. Siddesh Southekal
  4. Robert A Svoboda
  5. Adrian R Black
  6. Chittibabu Guda
  7. Tomohiro Mizutani
  8. Hans Clevers
  9. Keith R Johnson
  10. Kurt W Fisher
  11. Robert E Lewis  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States
  2. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and UMC Utrecht, Netherlands

Abstract

The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is considered a transcriptional process that induces a switch in cells from a polarized state to a migratory phenotype. Here we show that KSR1 and ERK promote EMT-like phenotype through the preferential translation of Epithelial-Stromal Interaction 1 (EPSTI1), which is required to induce the switch from E- to N-cadherin and coordinate migratory and invasive behavior. EPSTI1 is overexpressed in human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Disruption of KSR1 or EPSTI1 significantly impairs cell migration and invasion in vitro, and reverses EMT-like phenotype, in part, by decreasing the expression of N-cadherin and the transcriptional repressors of E-cadherin expression, ZEB1 and Slug. In CRC cells lacking KSR1, ectopic EPSTI1 expression restored the E- to N-cadherin switch, migration, invasion, and anchorage-independent growth. KSR1-dependent induction of EMT-like phenotype via selective translation of mRNAs reveals its underappreciated role in remodeling the translational landscape of CRC cells to promote their migratory and invasive behavior.

Data availability

The high-throughput sequencing data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (accession no. GSE164492).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chaitra Rao

    Eppley Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2834-7458
  2. Danielle E Frodyma

    Eppley Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Siddesh Southekal

    Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Robert A Svoboda

    Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Adrian R Black

    Eppley Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Chittibabu Guda

    Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Tomohiro Mizutani

    Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Hans Clevers

    Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Keith R Johnson

    Department of Oral Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kurt W Fisher

    Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Robert E Lewis

    Eppley Cancer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    For correspondence
    rlewis@unmc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3616-2971

Funding

Nebraska center for Molecular Target Discovery and Drug Development (P20 GM121316)

  • Robert E Lewis

Fred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Support Grant (P30 CA036727)

  • Robert E Lewis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Rao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,247
    views
  • 277
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chaitra Rao
  2. Danielle E Frodyma
  3. Siddesh Southekal
  4. Robert A Svoboda
  5. Adrian R Black
  6. Chittibabu Guda
  7. Tomohiro Mizutani
  8. Hans Clevers
  9. Keith R Johnson
  10. Kurt W Fisher
  11. Robert E Lewis
(2021)
KSR1-and ERK-dependent translational regulation of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
eLife 10:e66608.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66608

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66608

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark LaBarge
    Research Article

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.