Abstract

Organ fibroblasts are essential components of homeostatic and diseased tissues. They participate in sculpting the extracellular matrix, sensing the microenvironment and communicating with other resident cells. Recent studies have revealed transcriptomic heterogeneity among fibroblasts within and between organs. To dissect the basis of inter-organ heterogeneity, we compare the gene expression of murine fibroblasts from different tissues (tail, skin, lung, liver, heart, kidney, gonads) and show that they display distinct positional and organ-specific transcriptome signatures that reflect their embryonic origins. We demonstrate that expression of genes typically attributed to the surrounding parenchyma by fibroblasts is established in embryonic development and largely maintained in culture, bioengineered tissues and ectopic transplants. Targeted knockdown of key organ-specific transcription factors affects fibroblast functions, in particular genes involved in the modulation of fibrosis and inflammation. In conclusion, our data reveal that adult fibroblasts maintain an embryonic gene expression signature inherited from their organ of origin, thereby increasing our understanding of adult fibroblast heterogeneity. The knowledge of this tissue-specific gene signature may assist in targeting fibrotic diseases in a more precise, organ-specific manner.

Data availability

All data has been made available through public databases, as per statement in main manuscript

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Elvira Forte

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    For correspondence
    elviraforte83@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5555-9122
  2. Mirana Ramialison

    Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6315-4777
  3. Hieu T Nim

    Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Madison Mara

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jacky Y Li

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rachel Cohn

    Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sandra L Daigle

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sarah Boyd

    Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Edouard G Stanley

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Andrew G Elefanty

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. John Travis Hinson

    Jackson Laboratory, Farmington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Mauro W Costa

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Nadia A Rosenthal

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Milena B Furtado

    Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1387-325X

Funding

Australian Research Council

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

National Health and Medical Research Council

  • Mirana Ramialison
  • Mauro W Costa
  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Heart Foundation

  • Mirana Ramialison

Jackson Laboratory

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

National Institutes of Health

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Leducq Foundation for Cardiovascular Research

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

Australian Government

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

State Government of Victoria

  • Nadia A Rosenthal

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#16010) of the Jackson Laboratory. All surgery was performed under tribromoethanol anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize pain and suffering.

Human subjects: Human samples were obtained through the Sydney Heart Bank (SHB) in Australia. Investigators have not collected patient samples or been privy to patient records.

Copyright

© 2022, Forte et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,750
    views
  • 522
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Elvira Forte
  2. Mirana Ramialison
  3. Hieu T Nim
  4. Madison Mara
  5. Jacky Y Li
  6. Rachel Cohn
  7. Sandra L Daigle
  8. Sarah Boyd
  9. Edouard G Stanley
  10. Andrew G Elefanty
  11. John Travis Hinson
  12. Mauro W Costa
  13. Nadia A Rosenthal
  14. Milena B Furtado
(2022)
Adult mouse fibroblasts retain organ-specific transcriptomic identity
eLife 11:e71008.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71008

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71008

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Beibei Liu ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    Distal appendages are nine-fold symmetric blade-like structures attached to the distal end of the mother centriole. These structures are critical for formation of the primary cilium, by regulating at least four critical steps: ciliary vesicle recruitment, recruitment and initiation of intraflagellar transport (IFT), and removal of CP110. While specific proteins that localize to the distal appendages have been identified, how exactly each protein functions to achieve the multiple roles of the distal appendages is poorly understood. Here we comprehensively analyze known and newly discovered distal appendage proteins (CEP83, SCLT1, CEP164, TTBK2, FBF1, CEP89, KIZ, ANKRD26, PIDD1, LRRC45, NCS1, CEP15) for their precise localization, order of recruitment, and their roles in each step of cilia formation. Using CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts, we show that the order of the recruitment of the distal appendage proteins is highly interconnected and a more complex hierarchy. Our analysis highlights two protein modules, CEP83-SCLT1 and CEP164-TTBK2, as critical for structural assembly of distal appendages. Functional assays revealed that CEP89 selectively functions in RAB34+ ciliary vesicle recruitment, while deletion of the integral components, CEP83-SCLT1-CEP164-TTBK2, severely compromised all four steps of cilium formation. Collectively, our analyses provide a more comprehensive view of the organization and the function of the distal appendage, paving the way for molecular understanding of ciliary assembly.