Novel mechanistic insights into the role of Mer2 as the keystone of meiotic DNA break formation

  1. Dorota Rousova
  2. Vaishnavi Nivsarkar
  3. Veronika Altmannova
  4. Vivek B Raina
  5. Saskia K Funk
  6. David Liedtke
  7. Petra Janning
  8. Franziska Müller
  9. Heidi Reichle
  10. Gerben Vader
  11. John Russell Weir  Is a corresponding author
  1. Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Germany
  3. Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

In meiosis, DNA double strand break (DSB) formation by Spo11 initiates recombination and enables chromosome segregation. Numerous factors are required for Spo11 activity, and couple the DSB machinery to the development of a meiosis-specific “axis-tethered loop” chromosome organization. Through in vitro reconstitution and budding yeast genetics we here provide architectural insight into the DSB machinery by focussing on a foundational DSB factor, Mer2. We characterise the interaction of Mer2 with the histone reader Spp1, and show that Mer2 directly associates to nucleosomes, likely highlighting a contribution of Mer2 to tethering DSB factors to chromatin. We reveal the biochemical basis of Mer2 association with Hop1, a HORMA domain-containing chromosomal axis factor. Finally, we identify a conserved region within Mer2 crucial for DSB activity, and show that this region of Mer2 interacts with the DSB factor Mre11. In combination with previous work, we establish Mer2 as a keystone of the DSB machinery by bridging key protein complexes involved in the initiation of meiotic recombination.

Data availability

Source data has been provided for the XL-MS experiments and for the IP-mass spec data

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dorota Rousova

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7395-2596
  2. Vaishnavi Nivsarkar

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Veronika Altmannova

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Vivek B Raina

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Saskia K Funk

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. David Liedtke

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Petra Janning

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Franziska Müller

    Department of Mechanistic Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Heidi Reichle

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Gerben Vader

    Department of Human Genetics, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. John Russell Weir

    Friedrich Miescher Laboratory, Tübingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    john.weir@tuebingen.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6904-0284

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Dorota Rousova
  • Vaishnavi Nivsarkar
  • Veronika Altmannova
  • Vivek B Raina
  • Saskia K Funk
  • David Liedtke
  • Petra Janning
  • Franziska Müller
  • Heidi Reichle
  • Gerben Vader
  • John Russell Weir

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WE 6513/2-1)

  • Saskia K Funk
  • John Russell Weir

H2020 European Research Council (638197)

  • Vaishnavi Nivsarkar
  • Vivek B Raina
  • Gerben Vader

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Rousova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,502
    views
  • 437
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dorota Rousova
  2. Vaishnavi Nivsarkar
  3. Veronika Altmannova
  4. Vivek B Raina
  5. Saskia K Funk
  6. David Liedtke
  7. Petra Janning
  8. Franziska Müller
  9. Heidi Reichle
  10. Gerben Vader
  11. John Russell Weir
(2021)
Novel mechanistic insights into the role of Mer2 as the keystone of meiotic DNA break formation
eLife 10:e72330.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72330

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72330

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Kira A Cozzolino, Lynn Sanford ... Dylan J Taatjes
    Research Article

    Hyperactive interferon (IFN) signaling is a hallmark of Down syndrome (DS), a condition caused by Trisomy 21 (T21); strategies that normalize IFN signaling could benefit this population. Mediator-associated kinases CDK8 and CDK19 drive inflammatory responses through incompletely understood mechanisms. Using sibling-matched cell lines with/without T21, we investigated Mediator kinase function in the context of hyperactive IFN in DS over a 75 min to 24 hr timeframe. Activation of IFN-response genes was suppressed in cells treated with the CDK8/CDK19 inhibitor cortistatin A (CA), via rapid suppression of IFN-responsive transcription factor (TF) activity. We also discovered that CDK8/CDK19 affect splicing, a novel means by which Mediator kinases control gene expression. To further probe Mediator kinase function, we completed cytokine screens and metabolomics experiments. Cytokines are master regulators of inflammatory responses; by screening 105 different cytokine proteins, we show that Mediator kinases help drive IFN-dependent cytokine responses at least in part through transcriptional regulation of cytokine genes and receptors. Metabolomics revealed that Mediator kinase inhibition altered core metabolic pathways in cell type-specific ways, and broad upregulation of anti-inflammatory lipid mediators occurred specifically in kinase-inhibited cells during hyperactive IFNγ signaling. A subset of these lipids (e.g. oleamide, desmosterol) serve as ligands for nuclear receptors PPAR and LXR, and activation of these receptors occurred specifically during hyperactive IFN signaling in CA-treated cells, revealing mechanistic links between Mediator kinases, lipid metabolism, and nuclear receptor function. Collectively, our results establish CDK8/CDK19 as context-specific metabolic regulators, and reveal that these kinases control gene expression not only via TFs, but also through metabolic changes and splicing. Moreover, we establish that Mediator kinase inhibition antagonizes IFN signaling through transcriptional, metabolic, and cytokine responses, with implications for DS and other chronic inflammatory conditions.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cancer Biology
    Flavie Coquel, Sing-Zong Ho ... Philippe Pasero
    Research Article

    Cancer cells display high levels of oncogene-induced replication stress (RS) and rely on DNA damage checkpoint for viability. This feature is exploited by cancer therapies to either increase RS to unbearable levels or inhibit checkpoint kinases involved in the DNA damage response. Thus far, treatments that combine these two strategies have shown promise but also have severe adverse effects. To identify novel, better-tolerated anticancer combinations, we screened a collection of plant extracts and found two natural compounds from the plant, Psoralea corylifolia, that synergistically inhibit cancer cell proliferation. Bakuchiol inhibited DNA replication and activated the checkpoint kinase CHK1 by targeting DNA polymerases. Isobavachalcone interfered with DNA double-strand break repair by inhibiting the checkpoint kinase CHK2 and DNA end resection. The combination of bakuchiol and isobavachalcone synergistically inhibited cancer cell proliferation in vitro. Importantly, it also prevented tumor development in xenografted NOD/SCID mice. The synergistic effect of inhibiting DNA replication and CHK2 signaling identifies a vulnerability of cancer cells that might be exploited by using clinically approved inhibitors in novel combination therapies.