An epithelial signalling centre in sharks supports homology of tooth morphogenesis in vertebrates

  1. Alexandre P Thiery
  2. Ariane S Standing
  3. Rory L Cooper
  4. Gareth J Fraser  Is a corresponding author
  1. King's College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of Florida, United States
  3. University of Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Development of tooth shape is regulated by the enamel knot signalling centre, at least in mammals. Fgf signalling regulates differential proliferation between the enamel knot and adjacent dental epithelia during tooth development, leading to formation of the dental cusp. The presence of an enamel knot in non-mammalian vertebrates is debated given differences in signalling. Here we show the conservation and restriction of fgf3, fgf10 and shh to the sites of future dental cusps in the shark (Scyliorhinus canicula), whilst also highlighting striking differences between the shark and mouse. We reveal shifts in tooth size, shape and cusp number following small molecule perturbations of canonical Wnt signalling. Resulting tooth phenotypes mirror observed effects in mammals, where canonical Wnt has been implicated as an upstream regulator of enamel knot signalling. In silico modelling of shark dental morphogenesis demonstrates how subtle changes in activatory and inhibitory signals can alter tooth shape, resembling developmental phenotypes and cusp shapes observed following experimental Wnt perturbation. Our results support the functional conservation of an enamel knot-like signalling centre throughout vertebrates and suggest that varied tooth types from sharks to mammals follow a similar developmental bauplan. Lineage-specific differences in signalling are not sufficient in refuting homology of this signalling centre, which is likely older than teeth themselves.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexandre P Thiery

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ariane S Standing

    Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rory L Cooper

    Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0172-4708
  4. Gareth J Fraser

    Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    For correspondence
    g.fraser@ufl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7376-0962

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council (NE/K014595/1)

  • Gareth J Fraser

Leverhulme Trust (RPG-211)

  • Gareth J Fraser

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Thiery et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,454
    views
  • 338
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexandre P Thiery
  2. Ariane S Standing
  3. Rory L Cooper
  4. Gareth J Fraser
(2022)
An epithelial signalling centre in sharks supports homology of tooth morphogenesis in vertebrates
eLife 11:e73173.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73173

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73173

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Yufei Wu, Sean X Sun
    Insight

    Proteins that allow water to move in and out of cells help shape the development of new blood vessels.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Yanlin Hou, Zhengwen Nie ... Hans R Scholer
    Research Article

    During the first lineage segregation, mammalian embryos generate the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE). ICM gives rise to the epiblast (EPI) that forms all cell types of the body, an ability referred to as pluripotency. The molecular mechanisms that induce pluripotency in embryos remain incompletely elucidated. Using knockout (KO) mouse models in conjunction with low-input ATAC-seq and RNA-seq, we found that Oct4 and Sox2 gradually come into play in the early ICM, coinciding with the initiation of Sox2 expression. Oct4 and Sox2 activate the pluripotency-related genes through the putative OCT-SOX enhancers in the early ICM. Furthermore, we observed a substantial reorganization of chromatin landscape and transcriptome from the morula to the early ICM stages, which was partially driven by Oct4 and Sox2, highlighting their pivotal role in promoting the developmental trajectory toward the ICM. Our study provides new insights into the establishment of the pluripotency network in mouse preimplantation embryos.