Quantification of protein abundance and interaction defines a mechanism for operation of the circadian clock

  1. Alex Ashton Koch
  2. James S Bagnall
  3. Nicola J Smyllie
  4. Nicola Begley
  5. Antony D Adamson
  6. Jennifer L Fribourgh
  7. David G Spiller
  8. Qing-Jun Meng
  9. Carrie L Partch
  10. Korbinian Strimmer
  11. Thomas A House
  12. Michael H Hastings
  13. Andrew SI Loudon  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
  2. Medical Research Council, United Kingdom
  3. University of California, Santa Cruz, United States

Abstract

The mammalian circadian clock exerts control of daily gene expression through cycles of DNA binding. Here we develop a quantitative model of how a finite pool of BMAL1 protein can regulate thousands of target sites over daily time scales. We used quantitative imaging to track dynamic changes in endogenous labelled proteins across peripheral tissues and the SCN. We determine the contribution of multiple rhythmic processes coordinating BMAL1 DNA binding, including cycling molecular abundance, binding affinities and repression. We find nuclear BMAL1 concentration determines corresponding CLOCK through heterodimerization and define a DNA residence time of this complex. Repression of CLOCK:BMAL1 is achieved through rhythmic changes to BMAL1:CRY1 association and high affinity interactions between PER2:CRY1 which mediates CLOCK:BMAL1 displacement from DNA. Finally, stochastic modelling reveals a dual role for PER:CRY complexes in which increasing concentrations of PER2:CRY1 promotes removal of BMAL1:CLOCK from genes consequently enhancing ability to move to new target sites.

Data availability

Modelling and analtyical code has been made publicly available via GitHub. The FCS analysis software is at https://github.com/LoudonLab/FcsAnalysisPipeline and the modeling link is https://github.com/LoudonLab/CLOCK-BMAL1-DNA-Binding.Source Data files have been provided for all FCS measurements and FRAP measurements in Figures 1, 2, 3 ,4, and 6.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alex Ashton Koch

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. James S Bagnall

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nicola J Smyllie

    Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Medical Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nicola Begley

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Antony D Adamson

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jennifer L Fribourgh

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David G Spiller

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Qing-Jun Meng

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9426-8336
  9. Carrie L Partch

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4677-2861
  10. Korbinian Strimmer

    Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Thomas A House

    Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Michael H Hastings

    Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Medical Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Andrew SI Loudon

    Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    andrew.loudon@manchester.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3648-445X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P017347/1)

  • James S Bagnall
  • Nicola Begley
  • Andrew SI Loudon

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P017355/1)

  • Nicola J Smyllie
  • Michael H Hastings

Medical Research Council (MC_U105170643)

  • Michael H Hastings

National Institutes of Health (GM107069)

  • Carrie L Partch

National Institutes of Health (GM141849)

  • Carrie L Partch

Wellcome Trust (107851/Z/15/Z)

  • Andrew SI Loudon

Wellcome Trust (216416/Z/19/Z)

  • Alex Ashton Koch

University of California

  • Jennifer L Fribourgh

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986, UK (License number PP7901495).

Copyright

© 2022, Koch et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,860
    views
  • 313
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alex Ashton Koch
  2. James S Bagnall
  3. Nicola J Smyllie
  4. Nicola Begley
  5. Antony D Adamson
  6. Jennifer L Fribourgh
  7. David G Spiller
  8. Qing-Jun Meng
  9. Carrie L Partch
  10. Korbinian Strimmer
  11. Thomas A House
  12. Michael H Hastings
  13. Andrew SI Loudon
(2022)
Quantification of protein abundance and interaction defines a mechanism for operation of the circadian clock
eLife 11:e73976.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73976

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73976

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bethany M Bartlett, Yatendra Kumar ... Wendy A Bickmore
    Research Article

    During oncogene-induced senescence there are striking changes in the organisation of heterochromatin in the nucleus. This is accompanied by activation of a pro-inflammatory gene expression programme - the senescence associated secretory phenotype (SASP) - driven by transcription factors such as NF-κB. The relationship between heterochromatin re-organisation and the SASP has been unclear. Here we show that TPR, a protein of the nuclear pore complex basket required for heterochromatin re-organisation during senescence, is also required for the very early activation of NF-κB signalling during the stress-response phase of oncogene-induced senescence. This is prior to activation of the SASP and occurs without affecting NF-κB nuclear import. We show that TPR is required for the activation of innate immune signalling at these early stages of senescence and we link this to the formation of heterochromatin-enriched cytoplasmic chromatin fragments thought to bleb off from the nuclear periphery. We show that HMGA1 is also required for cytoplasmic chromatin fragment formation. Together these data suggest that re-organisation of heterochromatin is involved in altered structural integrity of the nuclear periphery during senescence, and that this can lead to activation of cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensing, NF-κB signalling, and activation of the SASP.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Lizbeth de La Cruz, Derek Bui ... Oscar Vivas
    Research Article

    Overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system is a hallmark of aging. The cellular mechanisms behind this overactivity remain poorly understood, with most attention paid to likely central nervous system components. In this work, we hypothesized that aging also affects the function of motor neurons in the peripheral sympathetic ganglia. To test this hypothesis, we compared the electrophysiological responses and ion-channel activity of neurons isolated from the superior cervical ganglia of young (12 weeks), middle-aged (64 weeks), and old (115 weeks) mice. These approaches showed that aging does impact the intrinsic properties of sympathetic motor neurons, increasing spontaneous and evoked firing responses. A reduction of M current emerged as a major contributor to age-related hyperexcitability. Thus, it is essential to consider the effect of aging on motor components of the sympathetic reflex as a crucial part of the mechanism involved in sympathetic overactivity.