Abstract

The cyanobacterial enzyme CylK assembles the cylindrocyclophane natural products by performing two unusual alkylation reactions, forming new carbon-carbon bonds between aromatic rings and secondary alkyl halide substrates. This transformation is unprecedented in biology and the structure and mechanism of CylK are unknown. Here, we report x-ray crystal structures of CylK, revealing a distinctive fusion of a Ca2+ binding domain and a β-propeller fold. We use a mutagenic screening approach to locate CylK's active site at its domain interface, identifying two residues, Arg105 and Tyr473, that are required for catalysis. Anomalous diffraction datasets collected with bound bromide ions, a product analog, suggest these residues interact with the alkyl halide electrophile. Additional mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations implicates Asp440 in activating the nucleophilic aromatic ring. Bioinformatic analysis of CylK homologs from other cyanobacteria establishes that they conserve these key catalytic amino acids but they are likely associated with divergent reactivity and altered secondary metabolism. By gaining a molecular understanding of this unusual biosynthetic transformation, this work fills a gap in our understanding of how alkyl halides are activated and used by enzymes as biosynthetic intermediates, informing enzyme engineering, catalyst design, and natural product discovery.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in the PDB under the accession codes 7RON, 7ROO. All other data generated or analyzed during this study and included in the manuscript and supporting files; Source Data files have been provided for Figure 4.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nathaniel R Braffman

    Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Terry B Ruskoski

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Katherine M Davis

    Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Nathaniel R Glasser

    Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Cassidy Johnson

    Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. C Denise Okafor

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Amie K Boal

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
    For correspondence
    akb20@psu.edu
    Competing interests
    Amie K Boal, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  8. Emily P Balskus

    Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    balskus@chemistry.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5985-5714

Funding

National Science Foundation (1454007)

  • Emily P Balskus

National Science Foundation (2003436)

  • Emily P Balskus

Research Corporation for Science Advancement (Cottrell Scholar Award)

  • Emily P Balskus

National Institutes of Health (GM119707)

  • Amie K Boal

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Braffman et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,894
    views
  • 326
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nathaniel R Braffman
  2. Terry B Ruskoski
  3. Katherine M Davis
  4. Nathaniel R Glasser
  5. Cassidy Johnson
  6. C Denise Okafor
  7. Amie K Boal
  8. Emily P Balskus
(2022)
Structural basis for an unprecedented enzymatic alkylation in cylindrocyclophane biosynthesis
eLife 11:e75761.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75761

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75761

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Marius Landau, Sherif Elsabbagh ... Joachim E Schultz
    Research Article

    The biosynthesis of cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) by mammalian membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases (mACs) is predominantly regulated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Up to now the two hexahelical transmembrane domains of mACs were considered to fix the enzyme to membranes. Here, we show that the transmembrane domains serve in addition as signal receptors and transmitters of lipid signals that control Gsα-stimulated mAC activities. We identify aliphatic fatty acids and anandamide as receptor ligands of mAC isoforms 1–7 and 9. The ligands enhance (mAC isoforms 2, 3, 7, and 9) or attenuate (isoforms 1, 4, 5, and 6) Gsα-stimulated mAC activities in vitro and in vivo. Substitution of the stimulatory membrane receptor of mAC3 by the inhibitory receptor of mAC5 results in a ligand inhibited mAC5–mAC3 chimera. Thus, we discovered a new class of membrane receptors in which two signaling modalities are at a crossing, direct tonic lipid and indirect phasic GPCR–Gsα signaling regulating the biosynthesis of cAMP.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.