Associative learning drives longitudinally-graded presynaptic plasticity of neurotransmitter release along axonal compartments

  1. Aaron Stahl
  2. Nathaniel C Noyes
  3. Tamara Boto
  4. Valentina Botero
  5. Connor N Broyles
  6. Miao Jing
  7. Jianzhi Zeng
  8. Lanikea B King
  9. Yulong Li
  10. Ronald L Davis
  11. Seth M Tomchik  Is a corresponding author
  1. Scripps Research Institute, United States
  2. Peking University, China
  3. Peiking University, China

Abstract

Anatomical and physiological compartmentalization of neurons is a mechanism to increase the computational capacity of a circuit, and a major question is what role axonal compartmentalization plays. Axonal compartmentalization may enable localized, presynaptic plasticity to alter neuronal output in a flexible, experience-dependent manner. Here we show that olfactory learning generates compartmentalized, bidirectional plasticity of acetylcholine release that varies across the longitudinal compartments of Drosophila mushroom body (MB) axons. The directionality of the learning-induced plasticity depends on the valence of the learning event (aversive vs. appetitive), varies linearly across proximal to distal compartments following appetitive conditioning, and correlates with learning-induced changes in downstream mushroom body output neurons (MBONs) that modulate behavioral action selection. Potentiation of acetylcholine release was dependent on the CaV2.1 calcium channel subunit cacophony. In addition, contrast between the positive conditioned stimulus and other odors required the inositol triphosphate receptor (IP3R), which maintained responsivity to odors upon repeated presentations, preventing adaptation. Downstream from the mushroom body, a set of MBONs that receive their input from the g3 MB compartment were required for normal appetitive learning, suggesting that they represent a key node through which reward learning influences decision-making. These data demonstrate that learning drives valence-correlated, compartmentalized, bidirectional potentiation and depression of synaptic neurotransmitter release, which rely on distinct mechanisms and are distributed across axonal compartments in a learning circuit.

Data availability

Raw data have been deposited to Dryad under doi: 10.5061/dryad.dfn2z353h

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Aaron Stahl

    Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3170-1101
  2. Nathaniel C Noyes

    Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Tamara Boto

    Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9974-3714
  4. Valentina Botero

    Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9744-3929
  5. Connor N Broyles

    Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2930-7343
  6. Miao Jing

    Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Peking, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jianzhi Zeng

    Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peiking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5380-6281
  8. Lanikea B King

    Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Yulong Li

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Peiking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ronald L Davis

    Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Seth M Tomchik

    Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    For correspondence
    STomchik@scripps.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5686-0833

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01NS097237)

  • Seth M Tomchik

National Institutes of Health (NS103558)

  • Yulong Li

National Institutes of Health (R01NS114403)

  • Seth M Tomchik

National Institutes of Health (R00MH092294)

  • Seth M Tomchik

Whitehall Foundation (2014-12-31)

  • Seth M Tomchik

National Institutes of Health (R35NS097224)

  • Ronald L Davis

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z181100001318002)

  • Yulong Li

Beijing Brain Initiative of Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z181100001518004)

  • Yulong Li

Guangdong Grant Key Technologies for Treatment of Brain Disorders"" (2018B030332001)

  • Yulong Li

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China Projects (31671118,31871087,31925017)

  • Yulong Li

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Stahl et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,255
    views
  • 338
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Aaron Stahl
  2. Nathaniel C Noyes
  3. Tamara Boto
  4. Valentina Botero
  5. Connor N Broyles
  6. Miao Jing
  7. Jianzhi Zeng
  8. Lanikea B King
  9. Yulong Li
  10. Ronald L Davis
  11. Seth M Tomchik
(2022)
Associative learning drives longitudinally-graded presynaptic plasticity of neurotransmitter release along axonal compartments
eLife 11:e76712.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76712

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76712

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ana Maria Ichim, Harald Barzan ... Raul Cristian Muresan
    Review Article

    Gamma oscillations in brain activity (30–150 Hz) have been studied for over 80 years. Although in the past three decades significant progress has been made to try to understand their functional role, a definitive answer regarding their causal implication in perception, cognition, and behavior still lies ahead of us. Here, we first review the basic neural mechanisms that give rise to gamma oscillations and then focus on two main pillars of exploration. The first pillar examines the major theories regarding their functional role in information processing in the brain, also highlighting critical viewpoints. The second pillar reviews a novel research direction that proposes a therapeutic role for gamma oscillations, namely the gamma entrainment using sensory stimulation (GENUS). We extensively discuss both the positive findings and the issues regarding reproducibility of GENUS. Going beyond the functional and therapeutic role of gamma, we propose a third pillar of exploration, where gamma, generated endogenously by cortical circuits, is essential for maintenance of healthy circuit function. We propose that four classes of interneurons, namely those expressing parvalbumin (PV), vasointestinal peptide (VIP), somatostatin (SST), and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) take advantage of endogenous gamma to perform active vasomotor control that maintains homeostasis in the neuronal tissue. According to this hypothesis, which we call GAMER (GAmma MEdiated ciRcuit maintenance), gamma oscillations act as a ‘servicing’ rhythm that enables efficient translation of neural activity into vascular responses that are essential for optimal neurometabolic processes. GAMER is an extension of GENUS, where endogenous rather than entrained gamma plays a fundamental role. Finally, we propose several critical experiments to test the GAMER hypothesis.

    1. Neuroscience
    John P Grogan, Matthias Raemaekers ... Sanjay G Manohar
    Research Article

    Motivation depends on dopamine, but might be modulated by acetylcholine which influences dopamine release in the striatum, and amplifies motivation in animal studies. A corresponding effect in humans would be important clinically, since anticholinergic drugs are frequently used in Parkinson’s disease, a condition that can also disrupt motivation. Reward and dopamine make us more ready to respond, as indexed by reaction times (RT), and move faster, sometimes termed vigour. These effects may be controlled by preparatory processes that can be tracked using electroencephalography (EEG). We measured vigour in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded study of trihexyphenidyl (THP), a muscarinic antagonist, with an incentivised eye movement task and EEG. Participants responded faster and with greater vigour when incentives were high, but THP blunted these motivational effects, suggesting that muscarinic receptors facilitate invigoration by reward. Preparatory EEG build-up (contingent negative variation [CNV]) was strengthened by high incentives and by muscarinic blockade, although THP reduced the incentive effect. The amplitude of preparatory activity predicted both vigour and RT, although over distinct scalp regions; frontal activity predicted vigour, whereas a larger, earlier, central component predicted RT. The incentivisation of RT was partly mediated by the CNV, though vigour was not. Moreover, the CNV mediated the drug’s effect on dampening incentives, suggesting that muscarinic receptors underlie the motivational influence on this preparatory activity. Taken together, these findings show that a muscarinic blocker impairs motivated action in healthy people, and that medial frontal preparatory neural activity mediates this for RT.