The cellular architecture of memory modules in Drosophila supports stochastic input integration

  1. Omar A Hafez
  2. Benjamin Escribano
  3. Rouven L Ziegler
  4. Jan J Hirtz
  5. Ernst Niebur  Is a corresponding author
  6. Jan Pielage  Is a corresponding author
  1. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  2. University of Kaiserslautern, Germany

Abstract

The ability to associate neutral stimuli with valence information and to store these associations as memories forms the basis for decision making. To determine the underlying computational principles, we build a realistic computational model of a central decision module within the Drosophila mushroom body (MB), the fly's center for learning and memory. Our model combines the electron microscopy-based architecture of one MB output neuron (MBON-α3), the synaptic connectivity of its 948 presynaptic Kenyon cells (KCs), and its membrane properties obtained from patch-clamp recordings. We show that this neuron is electrotonically compact and that synaptic input corresponding to simulated odor input robustly drives its spiking behavior. Therefore, sparse innervation by KCs can efficiently control and modulate MBON activity in response to learning with minimal requirements on the specificity of synaptic localization. This architecture allows efficient storage of large numbers of memories using the flexible stochastic connectivity of the circuit.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed in this study are included in the manuscript.All simulation files and the code and data files needed to replicate the simulations are available as a permanent and freely accessible data collection at the Johns Hopkins University Data Archive:https://doi.org/10.7281/T1/HRK27V.This includes the simulation code itself (python), the structural EM reconstruction of MBON-alpha3 (swc), the EM reconstruction of the related MBON used to model the axon and synaptic terminal structures (swc), the synapse locations as coordinate data (json), and the synapse locations by MBON section (json). Parameter values for model definition and individual simulations are specified within the code files and outlined in each figure legend where appropriate.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Omar A Hafez

    Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Benjamin Escribano

    Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rouven L Ziegler

    Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3050-7692
  4. Jan J Hirtz

    Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ernst Niebur

    Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    niebur@jhu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jan Pielage

    Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
    For correspondence
    pielage@bio.uni-kl.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5115-5884

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01DC020123)

  • Ernst Niebur

National Institutes of Health (R01DA040990)

  • Ernst Niebur

National Institutes of Health (R01EY027544)

  • Ernst Niebur

National Institutes of Health (Medical Scientist Training Program 708 Training Grant T32GM136651)

  • Ernst Niebur

National Science Foundation (1835202)

  • Ernst Niebur

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ 01GQ2105)

  • Jan Pielage

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST 248/293-1)

  • Jan Pielage

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Hafez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,873
    views
  • 233
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Omar A Hafez
  2. Benjamin Escribano
  3. Rouven L Ziegler
  4. Jan J Hirtz
  5. Ernst Niebur
  6. Jan Pielage
(2023)
The cellular architecture of memory modules in Drosophila supports stochastic input integration
eLife 12:e77578.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77578

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77578

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gáspár Oláh, Rajmund Lákovics ... Gábor Tamás
    Research Article

    Human-specific cognitive abilities depend on information processing in the cerebral cortex, where the neurons are significantly larger and their processes longer and sparser compared to rodents. We found that, in synaptically connected layer 2/3 pyramidal cells (L2/3 PCs), the delay in signal propagation from soma to soma is similar in humans and rodents. To compensate for the longer processes of neurons, membrane potential changes in human axons and/or dendrites must propagate faster. Axonal and dendritic recordings show that the propagation speed of action potentials (APs) is similar in human and rat axons, but the forward propagation of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and the backward propagation of APs are 26 and 47% faster in human dendrites, respectively. Experimentally-based detailed biophysical models have shown that the key factor responsible for the accelerated EPSP propagation in human cortical dendrites is the large conductance load imposed at the soma by the large basal dendritic tree. Additionally, larger dendritic diameters and differences in cable and ion channel properties in humans contribute to enhanced signal propagation. Our integrative experimental and modeling study provides new insights into the scaling rules that help maintain information processing speed albeit the large and sparse neurons in the human cortex.