Mapping the single-cell landscape of acral melanoma and analysis of the molecular regulatory network of the tumor microenvironments

  1. Zan He
  2. Zijuan Xin
  3. Qiong Yang
  4. Chen Wang
  5. Meng Li
  6. Wei Rao
  7. Zhimin Du
  8. Jia Bai
  9. Zixuan Guo
  10. Xiuyan Ruan
  11. Zhaojun Zhang
  12. Xiangdong Fang  Is a corresponding author
  13. Hua Zhao  Is a corresponding author
  1. General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, China
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Abstract

Acral melanoma (AM) exhibits a high incidence in Asian patients with melanoma, and it is not well treated with immunotherapy. However, little attention has been paid to the characteristics of the immune microenvironment in AM. Therefore, in this study, we collected clinical samples from Chinese patients with AM and conducted single-cell RNA sequencing to analyze the heterogeneity of its tumour microenvironments (TMEs) and the molecular regulatory network . Our analysis revealed that genes, such as TWIST1, EREG, TNFRSF9, and CTGF could drive the deregulation of various TME components. The molecular interaction relationships between TME cells, such as MIF-CD44 and TNFSF9-TNFRSF9, might be an attractive target for developing novel immunotherapeutic agents.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GSA under accession codes HRA001804.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zan He

    Department of Dermatology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Zijuan Xin

    Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Qiong Yang

    Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chen Wang

    Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Meng Li

    Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Wei Rao

    Department of Dermatology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Zhimin Du

    Department of Dermatology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jia Bai

    Department of Dermatology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Zixuan Guo

    Department of Dermatology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Xiuyan Ruan

    Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Zhaojun Zhang

    Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Xiangdong Fang

    Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    fangxd@big.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Hua Zhao

    Department of Dermatology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    hualuck301@163.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7139-1844

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672698)

  • Hua Zhao

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All samples were obtained from the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China. All volunteers signed informed consent prior to sample acquisition. Four primary AM tissues, three paracancerous tissues, and a metastatic lymph gland sample were included in this cohort. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital and complied with all relevant ethical regulations(Approval No. S2021-626).

Copyright

© 2022, He et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,335
    views
  • 470
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zan He
  2. Zijuan Xin
  3. Qiong Yang
  4. Chen Wang
  5. Meng Li
  6. Wei Rao
  7. Zhimin Du
  8. Jia Bai
  9. Zixuan Guo
  10. Xiuyan Ruan
  11. Zhaojun Zhang
  12. Xiangdong Fang
  13. Hua Zhao
(2022)
Mapping the single-cell landscape of acral melanoma and analysis of the molecular regulatory network of the tumor microenvironments
eLife 11:e78616.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78616

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78616

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Brooke A Conti, Leo Novikov ... Mariano Oppikofer
    Research Article

    DNA base lesions, such as incorporation of uracil into DNA or base mismatches, can be mutagenic and toxic to replicating cells. To discover factors in repair of genomic uracil, we performed a CRISPR knockout screen in the presence of floxuridine, a chemotherapeutic agent that incorporates uracil and fluorouracil into DNA. We identified known factors, such as uracil DNA N-glycosylase (UNG), and unknown factors, such as the N6-adenosine methyltransferase, METTL3, as required to overcome floxuridine-driven cytotoxicity. Visualized with immunofluorescence, the product of METTL3 activity, N6-methyladenosine, formed nuclear foci in cells treated with floxuridine. The observed N6-methyladenosine was embedded in DNA, called 6mA, and these results were confirmed using an orthogonal approach, liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. METTL3 and 6mA were required for repair of lesions driven by additional base-damaging agents, including raltitrexed, gemcitabine, and hydroxyurea. Our results establish a role for METTL3 and 6mA in promoting genome stability in mammalian cells, especially in response to base damage.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Pierluigi Scerbo, Benjamin Tisserand ... Bertrand Ducos
    Research Article

    Why does a normal cell possibly harboring genetic mutations in oncogene or tumor suppressor genes becomes malignant and develops a tumor is a subject of intense debate. Various theories have been proposed but their experimental test has been hampered by the unpredictable and improbable malignant transformation of single cells. Here, using an optogenetic approach we permanently turn on an oncogene (KRASG12V) in a single cell of a zebrafish brain that, only in synergy with the transient co-activation of a reprogramming factor (VENTX/NANOG/OCT4), undergoes a deterministic malignant transition and robustly and reproducibly develops within 6 days into a full-blown tumor. The controlled way in which a single cell can thus be manipulated to give rise to cancer lends support to the ‘ground state theory of cancer initiation’ through ‘short-range dispersal’ of the first malignant cells preceding tumor growth.