Live-cell imaging in human colonic monolayers reveals ERK waves limit the stem cell compartment to maintain epithelial homeostasis

Abstract

The establishment and maintenance of different cellular compartments in tissues is a universal requirement across all metazoans. Maintaining the correct ratio of cell types in time and space allows tissues to form patterned compartments and perform complex functions. Patterning is especially evident in the human colon, where tissue homeostasis is maintained by stem cells in crypt structures that balance proliferation and differentiation. Here, we developed a human 2D patient derived organoid (PDO) screening platform to study tissue patterning and kinase pathway dynamics in single cells. Using this system, we discovered that waves of ERK signaling induced by apoptotic cells play a critical role in maintaining tissue patterning and homeostasis. If ERK is activated acutely across all cells instead of in wavelike patterns, then tissue patterning and stem cells are lost. Conversely, if ERK activity is inhibited, then stem cells become unrestricted and expand dramatically. This work demonstrates that the colonic epithelium requires coordinated ERK signaling dynamics to maintain patterning and tissue homeostasis. Our work reveals how ERK can antagonize stem cells while supporting cell replacement and the function of the gut.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for all main figures

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kelvin W Pond

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Julia M Morris

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Olga Alkhimenok

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Reeba P Varghese

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Carly C Cabel

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nathan A Ellis

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jayati Chakrabarti

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yana Zavros

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Juanita L Merchant

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Curtis A Thorne

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    For correspondence
    curtisthorne@arizona.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8711-8292
  11. Andrew L Paek

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    For correspondence
    apaek@email.arizona.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2835-8544

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM130864)

  • Andrew L Paek

National Institutes of Health (GM147128)

  • Curtis A Thorne

National Institutes of Health (CA242914)

  • Nathan A Ellis

National Institutes of Health (DK118563)

  • Juanita L Merchant

Wellcome Trust (WT223952/Z/21/Z)

  • Kelvin W Pond

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#2021-0772) of the University of Arizona.

Human subjects: All primary colonic organoid cell lines to be used in this study have been anonymized by the Tissue Acquisition and Cellular/Molecular Analysis Shared Resource (TACMASR) at the University of Arizona Cancer Center. TACMASR is an on-campus biorepository to procure, store and retrieve biospecimens in a form that is deidentified and protects the privacy of the donors and confidentiality of the data collected. The individuals from whom the cells originated were resection patients at Banner University Medical Center. All researchparticipants in this proposal receive the cells with de-identified and anonymous labels that cannot trace back to the individual or their families from which they came. Thus, no one involved in this study can access the subject's identities. Therefore, the study is exempt from being considered human subject research.

Copyright

© 2022, Pond et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,769
    views
  • 620
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kelvin W Pond
  2. Julia M Morris
  3. Olga Alkhimenok
  4. Reeba P Varghese
  5. Carly C Cabel
  6. Nathan A Ellis
  7. Jayati Chakrabarti
  8. Yana Zavros
  9. Juanita L Merchant
  10. Curtis A Thorne
  11. Andrew L Paek
(2022)
Live-cell imaging in human colonic monolayers reveals ERK waves limit the stem cell compartment to maintain epithelial homeostasis
eLife 11:e78837.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78837

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78837

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Paul Richard J Yulo, Nicolas Desprat ... Heather L Hendrickson
    Research Article

    Maintenance of rod-shape in bacterial cells depends on the actin-like protein MreB. Deletion of mreB from Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 results in viable spherical cells of variable volume and reduced fitness. Using a combination of time-resolved microscopy and biochemical assay of peptidoglycan synthesis, we show that reduced fitness is a consequence of perturbed cell size homeostasis that arises primarily from differential growth of daughter cells. A 1000-generation selection experiment resulted in rapid restoration of fitness with derived cells retaining spherical shape. Mutations in the peptidoglycan synthesis protein Pbp1A were identified as the main route for evolutionary rescue with genetic reconstructions demonstrating causality. Compensatory pbp1A mutations that targeted transpeptidase activity enhanced homogeneity of cell wall synthesis on lateral surfaces and restored cell size homeostasis. Mechanistic explanations require enhanced understanding of why deletion of mreB causes heterogeneity in cell wall synthesis. We conclude by presenting two testable hypotheses, one of which posits that heterogeneity stems from non-functional cell wall synthesis machinery, while the second posits that the machinery is functional, albeit stalled. Overall, our data provide support for the second hypothesis and draw attention to the importance of balance between transpeptidase and glycosyltransferase functions of peptidoglycan building enzymes for cell shape determination.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Pavan K Nayak, Arul Subramanian, Thomas F Schilling
    Research Article

    Mechanical forces play a critical role in tendon development and function, influencing cell behavior through mechanotransduction signaling pathways and subsequent extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Here we investigate the molecular mechanisms by which tenocytes in developing zebrafish embryos respond to muscle contraction forces during the onset of swimming and cranial muscle activity. Using genome-wide bulk RNA sequencing of FAC-sorted tenocytes we identify novel tenocyte markers and genes involved in tendon mechanotransduction. Embryonic tendons show dramatic changes in expression of matrix remodeling associated 5b (mxra5b), matrilin1 (matn1), and the transcription factor kruppel-like factor 2a (klf2a), as muscles start to contract. Using embryos paralyzed either by loss of muscle contractility or neuromuscular stimulation we confirm that muscle contractile forces influence the spatial and temporal expression patterns of all three genes. Quantification of these gene expression changes across tenocytes at multiple tendon entheses and myotendinous junctions reveals that their responses depend on force intensity, duration and tissue stiffness. These force-dependent feedback mechanisms in tendons, particularly in the ECM, have important implications for improved treatments of tendon injuries and atrophy.