VPS9D1-AS1 overexpression amplifies intratumoral TGF-β signaling and promotes tumor cell escape from CD8+ T cell killing in colorectal cancer

  1. Lei Yang  Is a corresponding author
  2. Xichen Dong
  3. Zheng Liu
  4. Jinjing Tan
  5. Xiaoxi Huang
  6. Tao Wen
  7. Hao Qu  Is a corresponding author
  8. Zhenjun Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Medical Research Center, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
  2. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
  3. Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University & Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, China
8 figures, 1 table and 2 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
VPS9D1-AS1 is significantly upregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) and activates the TGF-β signaling pathway.

(A) RNAscope stained VPS9D1-AS1 in CRC tissues that were enrolled in OUTDO (upper) and BJCYH cohorts (lower). Semiquantitative analyses of the levels of VPS9D1-AS1 in cancer and normal tissues of CRC patients (right). (B) Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves of VPS9D1-AS1-positive and VPS9D1-AS1-negative CRC patients. (C) qRT-PCR evaluation of the mRNA levels of VPS9D1-AS1 (upper). Expression of VPS9D1-AS1 was compared in paired normal and cancer tissues (lower). (D) Representative pictures of VPS9D1-AS1-negative (+, C11) and VPS9D1-AS1-positive (G15, ++++) and multispectral fluorescence immunohistochemistry (mfIHC)-stained TGF-β, TGFBR1, and SMAD1/5/9 in the same CRC patients. (E) Integrative analysis of RNAscope and mfIHC data indicates that cancer tissues with high levels of VPS9D1-AS1 had higher levels of TGF-β, TGFBR1, and SMAD1/5/9 than these with low levels of VPS9D1-AS1. (F) Pearson correlation analyses investigated the mRNA levels of VPS9D1-AS1, TGF-β, TGFBR1, SMAD1, and SMAD9. p-Values were obtained by chi-square (A), log-rank test (B), unpaired t nonparametric test (C, E), paired t test (C), and Pearson correlation test (F). Data are shown as data points with mean ± standard deviation of mean (SEM) (C), data are depicted by violin and scatter plots with mean value (E). * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Levels of VPS9D1-AS1 were not related to TGF-β signaling in cancer stromal cells.

(A) Representative image of VPS9D1-AS1 expressed in normal colonic epithelial cells. (B) Clinical pathologic analyses demonstrated that VPS9D1-AS1 was correlated with lymph node metastasis and TNM stage in the OUTDO and BJCYH cohorts. (C, D) qRT-PCR was used to determine the mRNA levels of TGF-β, TGFBR1, SMAD1, and SMAD9 in the BJCYH cohort. (E) There were no significant relationships between VPS9D1-AS1 levels and TGF-β signaling in cancer stromal cells in OUTDO cohort. p-Values were obtained by Wilcoxon rank-sum test (B), unpaired t nonparametric test (C), and paired t nonparametric test (D). Data points are presented as the mean ± SEM (C) and the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum (E). N.S. not significant.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
VPS9D1-AS1 is associated with reduced T lymphocyte infiltration.

(A) Representative pictures of T cell infiltration (CD4, CD8, FOXP3) in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues for VPS9D1-AS1 quantification. Tumor cells are marked by cytokeratin. (B) Representative pictures of CD8+, CD4+, FOXP3+ T cells, and TGFBR1 stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the BJCYH cohort. (C) The overall survival curves depicting the percentage of surviving CRC patients stratified by the levels of CD8+ T cell infiltration in cancerous (Ca) tissues, cancer stroma (STM), and the Ca/STM ratio. (D) Ca/STM ratios of CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ T cells were calculated to identify the difference between VPS9D1-AS1 negative and positive populations in the OUTDO cohort. (E) The numbers of CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ T cells in cancer tissues of BJCYH cohort were compared between VPS9D1-AS1 negative and positive tissues. (F) Pearson correlation analyses investigated the relationships between T-infiltrating lymphocytes and TGF-β signaling in cancer tissues. Eight protein levels were investigated by multispectral fluorescence IHC assays in same samples, and fluorescence intensity of each protein level was transferred into quantitative data for Pearson correlation analyses. p-Values were obtained by log-rank test (C), unpaired t nonparametric test (D, E), and Pearson correlation test (F). Data are shown by mean ± SEM (D, E). * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Integrative analysis of the relationship between VPS9D1-AS1, TGF-β signaling, and T-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).

(A) The Cancer Genome Atlas analysis confirmed that the highest VPS9D1-AS1 expression was predominantly in consensus molecular subtype 2 (CMS2)-type colorectal cancer patients. (B) CMS2 patients showed the lowest lymphocyte infiltration signal score. (C) Comparison of the percentages of CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ T cells in cancer and cancer stromal tissues of OUTDO cohort. (D) Comparison of the number of CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ T cells in cancer and normal tissues of the BJCYH cohort by immunohistochemistry assays. (E) Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves showed that CD4+ T and FOXP3+ T cells had no prognostic significance. (F) Proportions of CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ T cell out of the total cells of Ca and STM tissues were compared according to the levels of VPS9D1-AS1 in BJCYH cohort. (G) Pearson correlation analyses investigated the relationships between TILs and TGF-β signaling in cancer stromal tissues of BJCYH cohort. p-Values were obtained by unpaired t nonparametric test (A, B, C, D, F), log-rank test (E), and Pearson correlation test (G). Data are shown as data points with mean ± SEM (C, D, F). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 3 with 3 supplements
VPS9D1-AS1 controls TGF-β signaling and drives cell proliferation and metastasis.

(A) The levels of VPS9D1-AS1 were determined by qRT-PCR in 16 cell lines. (colorectal cancer: HCT116, SW620, HT29, RKO, SW480; cervical cancer: Hela; lung cancer: A549, H1299; gastric cancer: BGC823; prostatic cancer: PC3, BPH1; leukemia: K562; pancreatic cancer: PANC1; live cancer: HepG2; HUVEC: human umbilical vein endothelial cell; HASMC: human atrial smooth muscle cell). (B) Northern blotting validated the knockout (KO) of VPS9D1-AS1. (C) Western blotting measured the levels of proteins involved in TGF-β, EMT, and ERK signaling pathways. (D) Representative pictures show the cell morphologies of HCT116 and SW480 cell lines. (E) The proliferation of HCT116/SW480 sgControl and sgVPS cells was determined by Cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) assays. (F) Proliferation of xenograft tumors derived from HCT116 sgControl and sgVPS cells. (G) Immunohistochemistry determined the levels of Ki67 and (H) PDL1 in xenograft tissues. (I) RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-immunofluorescence (IF) and (J) RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays showed the interaction between VPS9D1-AS1 and proteins that included TGF-β, TGFBR1, and SMAD1/5/9. (K) RNA pulldown-Western blotting assays detected the interaction between VPS9D1-AS1 and the intended proteins. (L) Western blotting determined the changes in RPS3, TGF-β, TGFBR1, and SMAD1/5/9 in HCT116 control (CTRL) and VPS9D1-AS1 (VPS)-overexpressing (OE) cells treated with CX5461. RPD, RNA pull down probe. p-Values were obtained by two-way ANOVA (E, F) and paired or unpaired t tests (C, G, H, J). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (C, E, F, G, H, J). *p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.

Figure 3—source data 1

TGF-β, TGFBR1, SMAD4, SMAD1/5/9, SMAD6, SMAD2/3, β-actin, N-cadherin, E-cadherin, vimentin, CK, ERK, and p-ERK western blot for Figure 3C.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79811/elife-79811-fig3-data1-v2.zip
Figure 3—source data 2

RPS3 RNA-pull-down western blot for Figure 3K.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79811/elife-79811-fig3-data2-v2.zip
Figure 3—source data 3

SMAD1/5/9, RPS3, TGF-β, and TGFBR1 western blot for Figure 3L.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79811/elife-79811-fig3-data3-v2.zip
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
VPS9D1-AS1 activated TGF-β signaling.

(A) Northern blotting detected the effectiveness of sgRNA targeting VPS9D1-AS1 in SW480 cells. (B) qRT-PCR was used to determine the levels of VPS9D1-AS1 in stable knockout cells (sgControl vs. sgVPS). (C) Western blotting identified the levels of TGF-β, TGFBR1, and SMAD1/5/9. (D) RNA FISH-IF showed the levels of VPS9D1-AS1 and proteins that included TGF-β, TGFBR1, and SMAD1/5/9 in HCT116 cells. (E) qRT-PCR showed the downregulation of VPS9D1-AS1 after siRNA (siVPS) transfection in HCT116 cells. (F) Changes in TGF-β, TGFBR1, and SMAD1/5/9 after siRNA transfection in HCT116 cells. p-Values were obtained by paired t tests (B, E). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (B, E). * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2
VPS9D1-AS1 regulated TGF-β signaling and promoted tumor proliferation and migration.

(A, B) mRNA levels of TGF-β, TGFBR1, SMAD1, ~5, and ~9 after VPS9D1-AS1 knockout or knockdown. (C) Human recombinant (h) TGF-β- and SB431542-treated SW480 and HCT116 cells. (D) hTGF-β and SB431542 had no effect on VPS9D1-AS1 levels. (E) VPS9D1-AS1 levels were decreased by siTGF-β, siTGFBR1, and siSMAD1, ~5, ~9. (F) Clone forming assay results of RKO/SW480/HCT116 sgControl and sgVPS cells after culturing for 14 days. (G) Transwell assays determined the migration of HCT116 and SW480 cells. (H) The levels of ERK and pERK in RKO cells (the interference gene was same with used as Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). (I) SW480 sgControl and sgVPS cells were separately transplanted subcutaneously into BALB/c nude mice. p-Values were obtained by paired or unpaired t tests (A, B, D, E, G). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (A, B, D, E, G). N.S. not significant, ** p<0.01.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3
VPS9D1-AS1 functions as the scaffolding lncRNA.

(A) Synthesized probes used in RNA pulldown (RPD) assays for targeting the sequence of VPS9D1-AS1. (B) Subcellular localizations of VPS9D1-AS1 were analyzed by online tools (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/lncLocator/).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
VPS9D1-AS1 regulates interferon signaling.

(A) Heatmap illustrating the results of RNA sequencing of the genes regulated by VPS9D1-AS1. (B) VPS9D1-AS1 regulated the pathways associated with interferon signaling. (C) Differential expression of 17 genes in the IFNα/β signaling pathway was validated in HCT116 cells. (D) Colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue mRNA levels of IFI27 and OAS1 were determined by qRT-PCR, and (E) their relationships with VPS9D1-AS1 were calculated with Pearson correlation analysis. (F) Effect of VPS9D1-AS1 on STAT1 pathway activation induced by human recombinant IFNα. (G) VPS9D1-AS1 overexpression (OE) increased the expression of IFI27 and OAS1 through activated TGF-β signaling. (H) OAS1 and (I) IFI27 levels exhibited disparate changes upon IFNα stimulation in VPS9D1-AS1 OE cells and control (CTRL) cells. (J) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays demonstrated the interactions between SMAD4 and the promoter regions of OAS1. (K) Pearson correlation analyses investigated the relationships among VPS9D1-AS1, OAS1, IFNAR1, and TGFBR1 in CRC tissues. (L) Immunohistochemistry assays showed the levels of OAS1, IFNAR1, and TGFBR1 in patients with negative or positive expression of VPS9D1-AS1. p-Values were obtained by unpaired t test (D, J), two-way ANOVA (G, H, I), and Pearson correlation (K). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (D, G, H, I, J). * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001. N.S., not significant.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
VPS9D1-AS1 plays a role on interferon signaling.

(A) Volcano plot displaying the differential mRNA profiles of HCT116sgControl and HCT116sgVPS cells. (B) Gene ontology (GO) analyses explored the roles of VPS9D1-AS1 in regulating IFNα/β signaling. (C) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) revealed that VPS9D1-AS1 was involved in pathways related to cell death and immune system processes. (D) Differential expression of 17 genes in the IFNα/β signaling pathway was validated in RKO and SW480 cells. (E) TCGA COAD and READ datasets confirmed the overexpression (OE) of OAS1 and IFI27. The fold changes for OAS1 and IFI27 expression in cancer tissues relative to normal tissues were shown. (F) hTGF-β prevents hIFNα from activating STAT1 phosphorylation in HCT116 cells. (G) Fold changes of VPS9D1-AS1 in HCT116 and SW480 VPS9D1-AS1 OE stale cell lines relative to control (CTRL) stale cell lines. ROI, region of interest. (H) Levels of IFI27 and OAS1 in cells with VPS9D1-AS1 OE. (I) ChIP assays determined the interaction of antibodies against TGF-β and SMAD4 with the promoter regions of OAS1 and IFI27 in HCT116 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (G, H).

Figure 5 with 1 supplement
VPS9D1-AS1 mediates crosstalk between T cells and cancer cells by regulating IFNAR1.

(A) Flow cytometry (FCM) revealed the decrease in IFNAR1 after VPS9D1-AS1 knockout in HCT116 cells and (B) in HCT116 sgControl and sgVPS cells after CRISPR/Cas9-mediated inhibition of OAS1. Experiments were repeated three times. (C) Levels of IFNAR1 on the surface of CD8+ T cells cocultured with HCT116 control (CTRL), VPS overexpression (OE), sgControl, and sgVPS cells were detected by FCM in three independent assays. (D), (E) FCM determination demonstrated that colorectal cancer patients with positive VPS9D1-AS1 expression had lower levels of IFNAR1 in CD4+ and higher levels of PD1 in CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood than these patients with negative VPS9D1-AS1 expression. (F) T cell cytotoxicity assays against CTRL and VPS9D1-AS1-OE MC38-OVA cell lines by OT-1 CD8+ T cells. VPS9D1-AS1 OE reduced the cytotoxicity of activated OT-1 CD8+ T cells. (G) FCM determined the IFN-γ levels in OT-1 CD8+ T cells after exposure to CTRL and VPS-OE MC38 cells. Antibodies against TGF-β and PD1 were added to the medium. The experiments were repeated three times. p-Values were obtained by unpaired t test (A, B, C, E, F, G). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (A, B, C, E, F, G).

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
VPS9D1-AS1 mediates the crosstalk between tumors and T cells through TGF-β and IFN signaling.

(A) Western blotting assay to determine the levels of OAS1, TGFBR1, STAT1, TGF-β, and IFNAR1 in HCT116 cells. (B) IFNAR1 levels in CD4+ cells after coculturing with sgControl, sgVPS, CTRL, and VPS overexpression (OE) cells. (C) Representative results of T cell cytotoxicity assays of the indicated MC38CTRL and MC38VPS OE cell lines after exposure to OT-1 CD8+ T cells. p-Values were obtained by unpaired t test (B). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (B).

Figure 6 with 1 supplement
VPS9D1-AS1 overexpression (OE) cells inhibited T cell function in vivo.

(A) VPS9D1-AS1 OE promoted the expression of TGF-β, TGFBR1, SMAD1, and STAT1 in murine cells. (B) MC38 VPS9D1-AS1 OE and control (CTRL) cells were determined proliferation using CCK8 assays. (C) Growth curves of MC38 allograft tumors (n=7 per group). (D) Plots represent the percentages of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and PD1 frequencies in allograft tumors and spleens. (E) Levels of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were compared in the tumor and spleen. (F) Levels of PD1 in CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells were compared between CTRL and VPS OE allograft tumors (left) and spleens (right). p-Values were obtained by two-way ANOVA (B) and unpaired t nonparametric tests (E, F). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (E, F). **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 6—source data 1

TGF-β, SMAD1, STAT1, TGFBR1, and β-actin western blot for Figure 6A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79811/elife-79811-fig6-data1-v2.zip
Figure 6—figure supplement 1
VPS9D1-AS1 inhibited T-infiltrating lymphocyte in allograft tumors.

(A) Schematic of human VPS9D1-AS1 and murine NR045849 locations on the chromosome. (B) Fold changes in the expression levels of VPS9D1-AS1 and NR045849 in MC38 and CT26W cells. (C) qRT-PCR confirmed the overexpression of VPS9D1-AS1 after three transfections with lentivirus vectors in MC38 cells. (D) In vivo imaging showed transplanted MC38CTRL and MC38VPS-OE allograft tumors. (E) Allograft tumors were harvested 35 days after injection (one mouse in the control [CTRL] group did not form tumors). (F) Allograft tumor weights for MC38CTRL and MC38VPS OE. (G) Representative flow cytometry results of CD44, CD62L, CD107, and CCR7 in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (H) Comparisons of the levels of CD44, CD62L, CD107, and CCR7. p-Values were obtained by unpaired t test (F, H). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (F, H).

Figure 7 with 3 supplements
Transgenic mice validated the inhibitory role of VPS9D1-AS1 on CD8+ T cell infiltration and demonstrated the antitumor effects of targeting VPS9D1-AS1 with an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) drug.

(A) Treatment scheme of the azoxymethane/dextran sulfate sodium salt (AOM/DSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) model. Endpoint at 12 weeks. (B) Representative images of colorectal tumors in mice of the indicated genotypes. (C) Hematoxylin (H) and eosin (E) staining showing the AOM/DSS-induced murine tumors. (D) Tumor volumes are plotted for wild-type (WT) and VPS Tg mice. (E) The overall survival (OS) curve depicts the difference in survival rate for WT and VPS Tg mice. (F), (G) VPS9D1-AS1 suppressed CD8+ T cell infiltration in AOM/DSS-induced CRC tissues. (ROI, region of interest). (H) The levels of Ifnar1 were upregulated in VPS Tg tumors compared with WT tumors. (I) Tumors, their weights, and (J) growth curves of HCT116 xenograft tumors after injecting ASO-VPS (n=6) and ASO-NC (n=6). (K) Western blotting assays of the proteins involved in TGF-β, IFN, ERK, and EMT signaling in xenograft tumors. (L) Treatment scheme of ASO-treated mice with AOM/DSS-induced CRC. (M) ASO-VPS treatment decreased tumor volumes and increased OS of VPS Tg mice with AOM/DSS-induced CRC. (N) Ifnar1 expression upon ASO-VPS and ASO-NC treatment. p-Values were obtained by unpaired t nonparametric test (D, G, H, I, K, M, N), log-rank test (E, M), and two-way ANOVA tests (J). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (D, G, H, I, K, M, N). * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.

Figure 7—source data 1

TGF-β, TGFBR1, SMAD1, OAS1, IFI27, ERK, E-cadherin, vimentin, and β-actin western blot for Figure 7K.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79811/elife-79811-fig7-data1-v2.zip
Figure 7—figure supplement 1
VPS9D1-AS1 drives azoxymethane/dextran sulfate sodium salt (AOM/DSS)-induced mouse model of colorectal cancer.

(A) Genotyping of VPS Tg mice. Internal control (IntCon). (B) RNA FISH identified VPS9D1-AS1 expression in intestinal epithelium of VPS Tg and wild-type (WT) mice. A probe targeting GAPDH mRNA was used as a positive control. (C) Body weight changes upon AOM/DSS treatment. (D) Comparison of Ifnar1 expression in normal tissue and tumor tissue. (E) CCK-8 assays for evaluating the proliferation of MC38VPS OE, HCT116, and SW480 cells after antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) treatment. (F) Fold changes in the levels of VPS9D1-AS1 in xenograft tumors. (G) Representative pictures of the mouse intestine treated with ASO-NC and ASO-VPS. (H) VPS Tg mice were treated with ASO-VPS and ASO-NC, and body weight changes were measured weekly. p-Values were obtained by one-way ANOVA (E) or unpaired t nonparametric test (D). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (C, E, H) or box plots with minimum, first quartile, mean, third quartile, and maximum values (D, F).

Figure 7—figure supplement 2
IFNAR1 knockdown (KD) inhibits tumor proliferation in VPS9D1-AS1 overexpression (OE) cells.

(A) Western blotting identified the levels of IFNAR1 after transfection of three shRNAs targeting IFNAR1 in HCT116 control (CTRL) and VPS9D1-AS1 OE cells. (B) CCK8 assays determined the cell proliferated rates for HCT116 CTRL cells, VPS OE cells, and these cells with stably IFNAR1KD.

Figure 7—figure supplement 3
Illustration of the mechanism of VPS9D1-AS1 on promoting immune evasion via TGF-β signaling and interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes (OAS1 and IFNAR1).
Author response image 1
Isotype for IFNAR1 in CD4 and CD8 T cells.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
AntibodyTGF-β (Rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 3711 smfIHC(1:800)
WB(1:200)
IF (1:100)
AntibodyTGFBR1 (Rabbit polyclonal)AbcamCat# ab31013IF (1:1000) mfIHC(1:2000)
WB(1:500)
IHC(1:400)
AntibodyTGFBR2 (Mouse monoclonal)AbcamCat# ab78419WB(1:500)
AntibodySMAD1/5/9 (Rabbit polyclonal)AbcamCat# ab66737mfIHC(1:1000)
WB(1:400)
AntibodypSMAD1/5/9 (Ser 463/Ser465) (Rabbit polyclonal)Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat# sc-12353mfIHC(1:500)
AntibodySMAD4 (Mouse monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 46535mfIHC(1:1000)
AntibodySMAD2/3 (Rabbit polyclonal)Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat# sc-8332mfIHC(1:400)
AntibodypSMAD2/3 (Ser 423/425) (Rabbit polyclonal)Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat# sc-11769mfIHC(1:1000)
AntibodySMAD6 (Rabbit polyclonal)Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat# sc-25321WB(1:200)
AntibodyCytokeratin (CK) (Mouse monoclonal)Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat# sc-57004mfIHC(1:200)
WB(1:500)
AntibodySTAT1 (Rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 14994WB(1:500)
AntibodypSTAT1(Tyr701) (Rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 9167WB(1:500)
AntibodyERK (Rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 4695 SWB(1:200)
AntibodypERK (Rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 4376 SWB(1:200)
AntibodyVimentin (Rabbit monoclonal)AbcamCat# ab92547WB(1:100)
AntibodyE-cadherin (Rabbit polyclonal)AbcamCat# ab15148WB(1:100)
AntibodyN-cadherin (Rabbit polyclonal)AbcamCat# ab12221WB(1:100)
AntibodyGAPDH (Mouse monoclonal)BeyotimeCat# AG019-1WB(1:1000)
Antibodyβ-actin (Mouse monoclonal)BeyotimeCat# AF0003WB(1:1000)
AntibodyCD4 (Rabbit monoclonal)AbcamCat# ab133616IHC(1:200) mfIHC(1:1000)
AntibodyCD8 (Mouse monoclonal)Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat# sc-53212IHC(1:500) mfIHC(1:200)
AntibodyFOXP3 (Rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 98377IHC(1:200) mfIHC(1:800)
AntibodyOAS1 (Rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 14498IHC(1:100)
AntibodyIFI27 (Rabbit polyclonal)AbclonalCat# A14174WB(1:100)
AntibodyRPS3 (Rabbit monoclonal)AbcamCat# ab128995WB(1:200)
AntibodyIFNAR1 (Rabbit polyclonal)AbcamCat# ab45172WB(1:100)
AntibodyPDL1 (Rabbit monoclonal)AbcamCat# ab205921WB (1:100)
AntibodyKi67 (Rabbit polyclonal)ZSGB-BioCat# ZM-0166IHC (1:1000)
AntibodyHuman CD3 (OKT3) FG (Mouse monoclonal)eBioscienceCat# 16-0037-85(1:100)
AntibodyHuman CD28 FG 16-0289-85 (Mouse monoclonal)eBioscienceCat# 16-0289-85
AntibodyHuman FITC CD3 (Mouse monoclonal)BD PharmingenCat# 555332FCM(1:100)
AntibodyHuman APC CD4 (Mouse monoclonal)BD PharmingenCat# 555349FCM(1:100)
AntibodyHuman PE CD8 (Mouse monoclonal)BD PharmingenCat# 555637FCM(1:100)
AntibodyUltra-LEAF purified anti-mouse CD3 Antibody (Rabbit monoclonal)BioLegendCat# 100239FCM (1:100)
AntibodyUltra-LEAF purified anti-mouse CD28 Antibody (Mouse monoclonal)BioLegendCat# 122021(1:100)
AntibodyMouse FITC CD3 (Rabbit monoclonal)BioLegendCat# 100204FCM(1:100)
AntibodyMouse PE CD8a (Rabbit monoclonal)BioLegendCat# 100708FCM(1:100)
AntibodyMouse APC CD44 (Rabbit monoclonal)BioLegendCat# 103012FCM(1:100)
AntibodyMouse BV421 CD62L (Rabbit monoclonal)BioLegendCat# 104435FCM(1:100)
AntibodyMouse APC CD279 (PD-1) (Rabbit monoclonal)BioLegendCat# 135209FCM(1:100)
AntibodyMouse PE/Cy7 CD107a(LAMP-1) (Rabbit monoclonal)BioLegendCat# 121619FCM(1:100)
AntibodyMouse PE/Cy7 CD197 (CCR7) (Rabbit monoclonal)BioLegendCat# 353211FCM(1:100)
AntibodyInVivoPlus Anti-mouse PD-1 (Mouse monoclonal)BiXcellCat# BP0273(1:100)
AntibodyInVivoPlus Anti-mouse/human TGF-β (Mouse monoclonal)BiXcellCat# BP0057(1:100)
AntibodyHuman IFN-alpha/beta R1 PE-conjugated antibody (Mouse monoclonal)R&DCat# FAB245PFCM(1:100)
Biological samples (Homo sapiens)Human colon cancer tissue microarrayOUTDOHCol-AS-180Su-14
Biological samples (H. sapiens)Human rectal cancer tissue microarrayOUTDOHRec-Ade180Sur-05
Biological samples (H. sapiens)Human colorectal cancer tissue cDNAOUTDOHcolA30CS01
Cell lines (H. sapiens)HCT116Dr. L. Yang (Beijing Chaoyang Hospital)
Cell lines (H. sapiens)SW480Dr. L. Yang (Beijing Chaoyang Hospital)
Cell lines (H. sapiens)RKODr. L. Yang (Beijing Chaoyang Hospital)
Cell lines (H. sapiens)HEK293TDr. L. Yang (Beijing Chaoyang Hospital)
cell lines (Mus musculus)MC38PUMC
Cell lines (M. musculus)CT26WPUMC
Commercial assay or kitQuantiNova SYBR Green PCR kitQiagenCat# 208054
Commercial assay or kitQuantiTect Reverse Transcription kitQiagenCat# 205314
Commercial assay or kitPoerce BCA Protein Assay KitThermoCat# RB230514
Chemical compound, drugLipofectamine 3000InvitrogenCat# L3000015
Recombinant proteinsHuman Interleukin-2 (hIL-2)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 8907SC
Commercial assay or kitPerkinElmer Opal 7-color fIHC KitPerkinElmerCat# NEL797001KT
Commercial assay or kitFicoll reagentSolarbioCat# P8900
Commercial assay or kitTumor Dissociation Kit, mouseMiltenyi BiotecCat# 130-091-376
Commercial assay or kitCD8a+ T Cell Isolation Kit, mouseMiltenyi BiotecCat# 130-104-075
Commercial assay or kitAnti-Human CD8 Magnetic Particles-DMBD PharmingenCat# 557766
Commercial assay or kitHiScribeTM T7 Quick High Yeild RNA Synthesis KitNEBCat# E2040S
Commercial assay or kitMonarch RNA Cleanup KitNEBCat# T2030S
Commercial assay or kitIP Lysis BufferThermo FisherCat# 87787
Commercial assay or kitPierce RNA 3’ Desthiobiotinylation kitThermo FisherCat# 20163
Commercial assay or kitPIERCE MAGNETIC RNA PULL-DOWN KITThermo FisherCat# 20164
Chemical compound, drugCX-5461MCECat# HY-13323
Recombinant proteinsHuman Interferon-α1Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 8927SC
Commercial assay or kitDIG Northern StarterRocheCat# 12039672910
Commercial assay or kitVPS9D1-AS1 FISH ProbesBiosearchN/A
Commercial assay or kitMagna RIP RNA-Binding Protein
Immunoprecipitation Kit
MilliporeCat# 17–700
Commercial assay or kitPositively Charged Biodyne Nylon membraneInvitrogenCat# 10100
Commercial assay or kitChIP-IT Express Enzymatic Magnetic Chromatin Immunoprecipitation kitActive MotifCat# 53009
Commercial assay or kitStellaris RNA FISH Wash Buffer ABIOSEARCHCat# SMF-WA1-60
Commercial assay or kitStellaris RNA FISH Wash Buffer BBIOSEARCHCat# SMF-WA1-20
Commercial assay or kitStellaris RNA FISH Hybridization buffersBIOSEARCHCat# SMF-HB1-10
Commercial assay or kitStellaris FISH Probes with Quasar 570 DyeBIOSEARCHCat# SMF-1063–5
Commercial assay or kitFITC labeled Goat anti-rabbit secondly antibodyByotimeCat# 0652
Commercial assay or kitFITC labeled Goat anti-mouse secondly antibodyByotimeCat# A0568
Commercial assay or kitAntifade mounting medium with DAPISolarbioCat# S2110

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Sequences for sgRNA, PCR primer, siRNA and shRNA.

(a) sgRNA sequence. (b) Primers for PCR. (c) siRNA and shRNA sequences. (d) The primer for RNA pull down (RPD) probe synthesized. (e) The Primers for ChIP-PCR.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79811/elife-79811-supp1-v2.docx
MDAR checklist
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/79811/elife-79811-mdarchecklist1-v2.pdf

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lei Yang
  2. Xichen Dong
  3. Zheng Liu
  4. Jinjing Tan
  5. Xiaoxi Huang
  6. Tao Wen
  7. Hao Qu
  8. Zhenjun Wang
(2022)
VPS9D1-AS1 overexpression amplifies intratumoral TGF-β signaling and promotes tumor cell escape from CD8+ T cell killing in colorectal cancer
eLife 11:e79811.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79811