Efficacy of ultra-short, response-guided sofosbuvir and daclatasvir therapy for Hepatitis C: a single arm mechanistic pilot study

Abstract

Background: WHO has called for research into predictive factors for selecting persons who could be successfully treated with shorter durations of direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for Hepatitis C. We evaluated early virological response as a means of shortening treatment and explored host, viral and pharmacokinetic contributors to treatment outcome.

Methods: Duration of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir (SOF/DCV) was determined according to day 2 (D2) virologic response for HCV genotype (gt) 1- or 6-infected adults in Vietnam with mild liver disease. Participants received 4- or 8-weeks treatment according to whether D2 HCV RNA was above or below 500 IU/ml (standard duration is 12 weeks). Primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR12). Those failing therapy were retreated with 12 weeks SOF/DCV. Host IFNL4 genotype and viral sequencing was performed at baseline, with repeat viral sequencing if virological rebound was observed. Levels of SOF, its inactive metabolite GS-331007 and DCV were measured on day 0 and 28.

Results: Of 52 adults enrolled, 34 received 4 weeks SOF/DCV, 17 got 8 weeks and one withdrew. SVR12 was achieved in 21/34 (62%) treated for 4 weeks, and 17/17 (100%) treated for 8 weeks. Overall, 38/51 (75%) were cured with first-line treatment (mean duration 37 days). Despite a high prevalence of putative NS5A-inhibitor resistance associated substitutions (RAS), all first-line treatment failures cured after retreatment (13/13). We found no evidence treatment failure was associated with host IFNL4 genotype, viral subtype, baseline RAS, SOF or DCV levels.

Conclusions: Shortened SOF/DCV therapy, with retreatment if needed, reduces DAA use in patients with mild liver disease, while maintaining high cure rates. D2 virologic response alone does not adequately predict SVR12 with 4 weeks treatment.

Funding: Funded by the Medical Research Council (grant MR/P025064/1) and The Global Challenges Research Fund (Wellcome Trust Grant 206/296/Z/17/Z).)

Clinical trial number: ISRCTN17100273

Data availability

The study protocol and processed study data have been uploaded to the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN17100273; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17100273). The data are available under unrestricted access. The raw, pseudo-anonymised viral load data is available in Source Data File 1. The virus sequencing dataset has been uploaded to Dryad (https://datadryad.org) and is available here: doi:10.5061/dryad.x0k6djhnp. All data generated in this study is provided in the main text, appendix 1 and Source Data File 1.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Barnaby Flower Dr

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    For correspondence
    bflower@oucru.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2659-544X
  2. Le Manh Hung

    Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Leanne Mccabe

    MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Leanne Mccabe, has received a grant from the Medical Research Council UK to the MRC Clinical Trials Unit [MC_UU_00004/03]. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  4. M Azim Ansari

    Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Chau Le Ngoc

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Thu Vo Thi

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Hang Vu Thi Kim

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Phuong Nguyen Thi Ngoc

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Le Thanh Phuong

    Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Vo Minh Quang

    Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Thuan Dang Trong

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Thao Le Thi

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Tran Nguyen Bao

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Cherry Kingsley

    Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. David Smith

    Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Richard M Hoglund

    Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Joel Tarning

    Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4566-4030
  18. Evelyne Kestelyn

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5728-0918
  19. Sarah L Pett

    MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Sarah L Pett, has received grants from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Janssen-Cilag, Academy of Medical Sciences, EDCTP, NIHR, NIH, and is a member of the TIPAL (Treating people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with the addition of lansoprazole trial, ISRCTN13526307) DSMB. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  20. Rogier van Doorn

    Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  21. Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  22. Hugo Turner

    MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  23. Guy E Thwaites

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2858-2087
  24. Eleanor Barnes

    Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  25. Motiur Rahman

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  26. Ann Sarah Walker

    Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0412-8509
  27. Jeremy N Day

    Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7843-6280
  28. Nguyen VV Chau

    Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh CIty, Viet Nam
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  29. Graham S Cooke

    Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Graham S Cooke, is a board member of MHRA. The author has no other competing interests to declare..

Funding

Medical Research Council (MR/P025064/1)

  • Graham S Cooke

Wellcome Trust (206/296/Z/17/Z)

  • Graham S Cooke

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: In METHODS section we state: Patients referred to the trial were initially enrolled into an observational study which included fibroscan assessment and genotyping. Individuals in this cohort found to be potentially eligible for the trial were invited for further screening. All patients provided written informed consent.In Ethics subsection we state: The trial was approved by the research ethics committees of The Hospital for Tropical Diseases31 (ref: CS/BND/18/25), Vietnam Ministry of Health32 (ref: 6172/QĐ-BYTtnam MoH), Imperial College London33 (ref: 17IC4238), and Oxford University Tropical Research Ethics Committee34 (ref: 43-17). The study's conduct and reporting is fully compliant with the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.35 The trial was registered at ISRCTN, registration number is ISRCTN1710027336.

Copyright

© 2023, Flower et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,022
    views
  • 131
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Barnaby Flower Dr
  2. Le Manh Hung
  3. Leanne Mccabe
  4. M Azim Ansari
  5. Chau Le Ngoc
  6. Thu Vo Thi
  7. Hang Vu Thi Kim
  8. Phuong Nguyen Thi Ngoc
  9. Le Thanh Phuong
  10. Vo Minh Quang
  11. Thuan Dang Trong
  12. Thao Le Thi
  13. Tran Nguyen Bao
  14. Cherry Kingsley
  15. David Smith
  16. Richard M Hoglund
  17. Joel Tarning
  18. Evelyne Kestelyn
  19. Sarah L Pett
  20. Rogier van Doorn
  21. Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil
  22. Hugo Turner
  23. Guy E Thwaites
  24. Eleanor Barnes
  25. Motiur Rahman
  26. Ann Sarah Walker
  27. Jeremy N Day
  28. Nguyen VV Chau
  29. Graham S Cooke
(2023)
Efficacy of ultra-short, response-guided sofosbuvir and daclatasvir therapy for Hepatitis C: a single arm mechanistic pilot study
eLife 12:e81801.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81801

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81801

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Medicine
    Haiyi Fei, Xiaowen Lu ... Lingling Jiang
    Research Article

    Preeclampsia (PE), a major cause of maternal and perinatal mortality with highly heterogeneous causes and symptoms, is usually complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, a comprehensive understanding of the immune microenvironment in the placenta of PE and the differences between PE and GDM is still lacking. In this study, cytometry by time of flight indicated that the frequencies of memory-like Th17 cells (CD45RACCR7+IL-17A+CD4+), memory-like CD8+ T cells (CD38+CXCR3CCR7+HeliosCD127CD8+) and pro-inflam Macs (CD206CD163CD38midCD107alowCD86midHLA-DRmidCD14+) were increased, while the frequencies of anti-inflam Macs (CD206+CD163CD86midCD33+HLA-DR+CD14+) and granulocyte myeloid-derived suppressor cells (gMDSCs, CD11b+CD15hiHLA-DRlow) were decreased in the placenta of PE compared with that of normal pregnancy (NP), but not in that of GDM or GDM&PE. The pro-inflam Macs were positively correlated with memory-like Th17 cells and memory-like CD8+ T cells but negatively correlated with gMDSCs. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that transferring the F4/80+CD206 pro-inflam Macs with a Folr2+Ccl7+Ccl8+C1qa+C1qb+C1qc+ phenotype from the uterus of PE mice to normal pregnant mice induced the production of memory-like IL-17a+Rora+Il1r1+TNF+Cxcr6+S100a4+CD44+ Th17 cells via IGF1–IGF1R, which contributed to the development and recurrence of PE. Pro-inflam Macs also induced the production of memory-like CD8+ T cells but inhibited the production of Ly6g+S100a8+S100a9+Retnlg+Wfdc21+ gMDSCs at the maternal–fetal interface, leading to PE-like symptoms in mice. In conclusion, this study revealed the PE-specific immune cell network, which was regulated by pro-inflam Macs, providing new ideas about the pathogenesis of PE.

    1. Medicine
    Gabriel O Heckerman, Eileen Tzng ... Adrienne Mueller
    Research Article

    Background: Several fields have described low reproducibility of scientific research and poor accessibility in research reporting practices. Although previous reports have investigated accessible reporting practices that lead to reproducible research in other fields, to date, no study has explored the extent of accessible and reproducible research practices in cardiovascular science literature.

    Methods: To study accessibility and reproducibility in cardiovascular research reporting, we screened 639 randomly selected articles published in 2019 in three top cardiovascular science publications: Circulation, the European Heart Journal, and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). Of those 639 articles, 393 were empirical research articles. We screened each paper for accessible and reproducible research practices using a set of accessibility criteria including protocol, materials, data, and analysis script availability, as well as accessibility of the publication itself. We also quantified the consistency of open research practices within and across cardiovascular study types and journal formats.

    Results: We identified that fewer than 2% of cardiovascular research publications provide sufficient resources (materials, methods, data, and analysis scripts) to fully reproduce their studies. Of the 639 articles screened, 393 were empirical research studies for which reproducibility could be assessed using our protocol, as opposed to commentaries or reviews. After calculating an accessibility score as a measure of the extent to which an article makes its resources available, we also showed that the level of accessibility varies across study types with a score of 0.08 for Case Studies or Case Series and 0.39 for Clinical Trials (p = 5.500E-5) and across journals (0.19 through 0.34, p = 1.230E-2). We further showed that there are significant differences in which study types share which resources.

    Conclusion: Although the degree to which reproducible reporting practices are present in publications varies significantly across journals and study types, current cardiovascular science reports frequently do not provide sufficient materials, protocols, data, or analysis information to reproduce a study. In the future, having higher standards of accessibility mandated by either journals or funding bodies will help increase the reproducibility of cardiovascular research.

    Funding: Authors Gabriel Heckerman, Arely Campos-Melendez, and Chisomaga Ekwueme were supported by an NIH R25 grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (R25HL147666). Eileen Tzng was supported by an AHA Institutional Training Award fellowship (18UFEL33960207).