A choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase essential for phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and blood stage development in the malaria parasite

  1. Abhinay Ramaprasad
  2. Paul-Christian Burda
  3. Enrica Calvani
  4. Aaron J Sait
  5. Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  6. Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  7. Fiona Hackett
  8. James Macrae
  9. Lucy Collinson
  10. Tim Wolf Gilberger  Is a corresponding author
  11. Michael J Blackman  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  2. Centre for Structural Systems Biology, Germany
  3. Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Germany

Abstract

The malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum synthesizes significant amounts of phospholipids to meet the demands of replication within red blood cells. De novo phosphatidylcholine (PC) biosynthesis via the Kennedy pathway is essential, requiring choline that is primarily sourced from host serum lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC). LysoPC also acts as an environmental sensor to regulate parasite sexual differentiation. Despite these critical roles for host lysoPC, the enzyme(s) involved in its breakdown to free choline for PC synthesis are unknown. Here we show that a parasite glycerophosphodiesterase (PfGDPD) is indispensable for blood stage parasite proliferation. Exogenous choline rescues growth of PfGDPD-null parasites, directly linking PfGDPD function to choline incorporation. Genetic ablation of PfGDPD reduces choline uptake from lysoPC, resulting in depletion of several PC species in the parasite, whilst purified PfGDPD releases choline from glycerophosphocholine in vitro. Our results identify PfGDPD as a choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase that mediates a critical step in PC biosynthesis and parasite survival.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in ENA under Project PRJEB55180.All data generated or analysed are included in the manuscript or provided as source data files.All source codes are available via github - https://github.com/a2g1n/GDPDxcute.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Abhinay Ramaprasad

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9372-5526
  2. Paul-Christian Burda

    Centre for Structural Systems Biology, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0461-4352
  3. Enrica Calvani

    Mass Spectrometry Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Aaron J Sait

    Electron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6091-0426
  5. Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran

    Mass Spectrometry Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Chrislaine Withers-Martinez

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fiona Hackett

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. James Macrae

    Mass Spectrometry Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1464-8583
  9. Lucy Collinson

    Electron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Tim Wolf Gilberger

    Parasitology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    gilberger@bnitm.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7965-8272
  11. Michael J Blackman

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Mike.Blackman@crick.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7442-3810

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (751865)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad

Wellcome Trust (20318/A/20/Z)

  • Michael J Blackman

Cancer Research UK (CC2129)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad
  • Enrica Calvani
  • Aaron J Sait
  • Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  • Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  • Fiona Hackett
  • James Macrae
  • Lucy Collinson
  • Michael J Blackman

Medical Research Council (CC2129)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad
  • Enrica Calvani
  • Aaron J Sait
  • Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  • Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  • Fiona Hackett
  • James Macrae
  • Lucy Collinson
  • Michael J Blackman

Wellcome Trust (CC2129)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad
  • Enrica Calvani
  • Aaron J Sait
  • Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  • Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  • Fiona Hackett
  • James Macrae
  • Lucy Collinson
  • Michael J Blackman

Wellcome Trust (ISSF2)

  • Michael J Blackman

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (414222880)

  • Paul-Christian Burda

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Ramaprasad et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,055
    views
  • 214
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Abhinay Ramaprasad
  2. Paul-Christian Burda
  3. Enrica Calvani
  4. Aaron J Sait
  5. Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  6. Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  7. Fiona Hackett
  8. James Macrae
  9. Lucy Collinson
  10. Tim Wolf Gilberger
  11. Michael J Blackman
(2022)
A choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase essential for phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and blood stage development in the malaria parasite
eLife 11:e82207.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82207

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82207

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kira Breunig, Xuifen Lei ... Luiz O Penalva
    Research Article

    RNA binding proteins (RBPs) containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are present in diverse molecular complexes where they function as dynamic regulators. Their characteristics promote liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and the formation of membraneless organelles such as stress granules and nucleoli. IDR-RBPs are particularly relevant in the nervous system and their dysfunction is associated with neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumor development. Serpine1 mRNA-binding protein 1 (SERBP1) is a unique member of this group, being mostly disordered and lacking canonical RNA-binding domains. We defined SERBP1’s interactome, uncovered novel roles in splicing, cell division and ribosomal biogenesis, and showed its participation in pathological stress granules and Tau aggregates in Alzheimer’s brains. SERBP1 preferentially interacts with other G-quadruplex (G4) binders, implicated in different stages of gene expression, suggesting that G4 binding is a critical component of SERBP1 function in different settings. Similarly, we identified important associations between SERBP1 and PARP1/polyADP-ribosylation (PARylation). SERBP1 interacts with PARP1 and its associated factors and influences PARylation. Moreover, protein complexes in which SERBP1 participates contain mostly PARylated proteins and PAR binders. Based on these results, we propose a feedback regulatory model in which SERBP1 influences PARP1 function and PARylation, while PARylation modulates SERBP1 functions and participation in regulatory complexes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Parnian Arafi, Sujan Devkota ... Michael S Wolfe
    Research Article

    Missense mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin-1 (PSEN1) cause early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD) and alter proteolytic production of secreted 38-to-43-residue amyloid β-peptides (Aβ) by the PSEN1-containing γ-secretase complex, ostensibly supporting the amyloid hypothesis of pathogenesis. However, proteolysis of APP substrate by γ-secretase is processive, involving initial endoproteolysis to produce long Aβ peptides of 48 or 49 residues followed by carboxypeptidase trimming in mostly tripeptide increments. We recently reported evidence that FAD mutations in APP and PSEN1 cause deficiencies in early steps in processive proteolysis of APP substrate C99 and that this results from stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes. These stalled complexes triggered synaptic degeneration in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of FAD independently of Aβ production. Here, we conducted full quantitative analysis of all proteolytic events on APP substrate by γ-secretase with six additional PSEN1 FAD mutations and found that all six are deficient in multiple processing steps. However, only one of these (F386S) was deficient in certain trimming steps but not in endoproteolysis. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in intact cells revealed that all six PSEN1 FAD mutations lead to stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate/intermediate complexes. The F386S mutation, however, does so only in Aβ-rich regions of the cells, not in C99-rich regions, consistent with the deficiencies of this mutant enzyme only in trimming of Aβ intermediates. These findings provide further evidence that FAD mutations lead to stalled and stabilized γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes and are consistent with the stalled process rather than the products of γ-secretase proteolysis as the pathogenic trigger.