Photosynthesis: Surviving on low-energy light comes at a price
Two species of photosynthetic cyanobacteria can thrive in far-red light but they either become less resilient to photodamage or less energy efficient.
- Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Spain
Life on Earth as we know it depends on photosynthesis. In this process, plants, algae and cyanobacteria use solar energy to convert water and carbon dioxide into the oxygen we breathe and the glucose that fuels many biological processes (Blankenship, 2002).
The photosynthetic machinery is made from an intricate and complicated collection of protein complexes containing mainly chlorophyll a molecules and carotenoid molecules. Several of these complexes work together in a synchronised fashion to accomplish an amazing feat: to split water molecules (one of the most stable molecules on earth) to extract electrons and produce oxygen, and to transfer electrons to quinone molecules so that photosynthesis can continue. The efficiency of this initial energy-conversion step determines the outcome of the whole process.
For many years it was thought that the red light absorbed by chlorophyll a (which has a wavelength of 680 nanometres) was the lowest-energy light that could be used to drive oxygenic photosynthesis while minimising the damage caused by high levels of light (Rutherford et al., 2012). However, previous research has shown that some cyanobacteria living in shaded environments can thrive in far-red light, which is close to the limit of what we can see: this light is lower in energy than red light because its wavelength is longer (720 nanometres) (Figure 1). These cyanobacteria contain chlorophyll d and chlorophyll f in addition to chlorophyll a, but they can still perform the same reactions as organisms that contain only chlorophyll a (Miyashita et al., 1996; Renger and Schlodder, 2008; Gan et al., 2014; Nürnberg et al., 2018; Davis et al., 2016). So far, however, it has not been clear if these species pay a price in terms of resilience to photodamage or energy conversion efficiency.
Figure 1
Photosynthesis in red light and far-red light.
Plants, algae and cyanobacteria use a molecule called chlorophyll a (Chl-a) to absorb red light to power the process of photosynthesis. Studies have shown that Chl-a is resilient to photodamage and is efficient in using light energy. Some cyanobacteria (green circles in the blue pond; not to scale) have adapted to their darker environments by using different chlorophyll molecules – chlorophyll d (Chl-d) and chlorophyll f (Chl-f) – to absorb far-red light (which is less energetic than red light). However, the use of these molecules comes at a price: Chl-d organisms are energy efficient but they are not resilient to photodamage; Chl-f organisms, on the other hand, are not energy efficient but they are resilient to photodamage.
Now, in eLife, Stefania Viola and A William Rutherford of Imperial College London and colleagues – who are based at Imperial, the CNR in Milan, the Free University of Berlin, Sorbonne University and CEA-Saclay – report new insights into far-red photosynthesis (Viola et al., 2022). The team studied two species of cyanobacteria that use far-red photosynthesis: Acaryochloris marina, which lives in shaded environments, and Chroococcidiopsis thermalis, which lives in variable light conditions and can switch between standard photosynthesis and far-red photosynthesis depending on the light energy. To assess whether these organisms have the same resilience to photodamage and energy conversion efficiency as organisms that contain only chlorophyll a, Viola et al. investigated many aspects of the first initial energy-conversion step in photosynthesis (as described above). This included measuring the amount of oxygen generated, as well as the quantity of reactive oxygen species produced, which can lead to photodamage.
This revealed that both species of cyanobacteria produced comparable amounts of oxygen to chlorophyll a-only cyanobacteria. The photosystem II of A. marina, which contains 34 chlorophyll d molecules and just one chlorophyll a molecule, was highly efficient, but also produced high levels of reactive oxygen species when exposed to high-light levels, making it less resilient to photodamage. In contrast, when C. thermalis – which contains four chlorophyll f, one chlorophyll d and 30 chlorophyll a molecules – was grown in far-red light it produced fewer reactive oxygen species, but was also less energy efficient.
Viola et al. present a detailed picture of how these organisms have adapted to the low-light conditions specific to their environments and the associated costs of their traits. A better understanding of how photosynthetic organisms make use of low-energy light could help scientists to engineer far-red photosystems into algae or plants containing only chlorophyll a, thereby enhancing their use of sunlight and improving crop yields (Chen and Blankenship, 2011). Moreover, in the future, artificial systems could be designed to use low-energy light to generate solar fuels.
References
-
BookMolecular Mechanisms of PhotosynthesisOxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758472
-
Expanding the solar spectrum used by photosynthesisTrends in Plant Science 16:427–431.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.011
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2022, Romero
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,563
- views
-
- 166
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Photosynthesis: Surviving on low-energy light comes at a price
eLife 11:e82221.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82221
Further reading
-
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates gene expression programs in response to ligand binding. Endogenous and synthetic ligands, including covalent antagonist inhibitors GW9662 and T0070907, are thought to compete for the orthosteric pocket in the ligand-binding domain (LBD). However, we previously showed that synthetic PPARγ ligands can cooperatively cobind with and reposition a bound endogenous orthosteric ligand to an alternate site, synergistically regulating PPARγ structure and function (Shang et al., 2018). Here, we reveal the structural mechanism of cobinding between a synthetic covalent antagonist inhibitor with other synthetic ligands. Biochemical and NMR data show that covalent inhibitors weaken—but do not prevent—the binding of other ligands via an allosteric mechanism, rather than direct ligand clashing, by shifting the LBD ensemble toward a transcriptionally repressive conformation, which structurally clashes with orthosteric ligand binding. Crystal structures reveal different cobinding mechanisms including alternate site binding to unexpectedly adopting an orthosteric binding mode by altering the covalent inhibitor binding pose. Our findings highlight the significant flexibility of the PPARγ orthosteric pocket, its ability to accommodate multiple ligands, and demonstrate that GW9662 and T0070907 should not be used as chemical tools to inhibit ligand binding to PPARγ.
-
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
SCARF1 (scavenger receptor class F member 1, SREC-1 or SR-F1) is a type I transmembrane protein that recognizes multiple endogenous and exogenous ligands such as modified low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) and is important for maintaining homeostasis and immunity. But the structural information and the mechanisms of ligand recognition of SCARF1 are largely unavailable. Here, we solve the crystal structures of the N-terminal fragments of human SCARF1, which show that SCARF1 forms homodimers and its epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains adopt a long-curved conformation. Then, we examine the interactions of SCARF1 with lipoproteins and are able to identify a region on SCARF1 for recognizing modified LDLs. The mutagenesis data show that the positively charged residues in the region are crucial for the interaction of SCARF1 with modified LDLs, which is confirmed by making chimeric molecules of SCARF1 and SCARF2. In addition, teichoic acids, a cell wall polymer expressed on the surface of gram-positive bacteria, are able to inhibit the interactions of modified LDLs with SCARF1, suggesting the ligand binding sites of SCARF1 might be shared for some of its scavenging targets. Overall, these results provide mechanistic insights into SCARF1 and its interactions with the ligands, which are important for understanding its physiological roles in homeostasis and the related diseases.
