Exploring therapeutic strategies for infantile neuronal axonal dystrophy (INAD/PARK14)

  1. Guang Lin
  2. Burak Tepe
  3. Geoff McGrane
  4. Regine C Tipon
  5. Gist Croft
  6. Leena Panwala
  7. Amanda Hope
  8. Agnes JH Liang
  9. Zhongyuan Zuo
  10. Seul Kee Byeon
  11. Lily Wang
  12. Akhilesh Pandey
  13. Hugo J Bellen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. New York Stem Cell Foundation, United States
  3. INADcure Foundation, United States
  4. Mayo Clinic, United States

Abstract

Infantile Neuroaxonal Dystrophy (INAD) is caused by recessive variants in PLA2G6 and is a lethal pediatric neurodegenerative disorder. Loss of the Drosophila homolog of PLA2G6, leads to ceramide accumulation, lysosome expansion, and mitochondrial defects. Here, we report that retromer function, ceramide metabolism, the endolysosomal pathway, and mitochondrial morphology are affected in INAD patient-derived neurons. We show that in INAD mouse models the same features are affected in Purkinje cells, arguing that the neuropathological mechanisms are evolutionary conserved and that these features can be used as biomarkers. We tested 20 drugs that target these pathways and found that Ambroxol, Desipramine, Azoramide, and Genistein alleviate neurodegenerative phenotypes in INAD flies and INAD patient-derived NPCs. We also develop an AAV-based gene therapy approach that delays neurodegeneration and prolongs lifespan in an INAD mouse model.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1, 3, 4 and Suppl. Figure 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Guang Lin

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5594-3397
  2. Burak Tepe

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4371-2502
  3. Geoff McGrane

    New York Stem Cell Foundation, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Regine C Tipon

    New York Stem Cell Foundation, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5473-7353
  5. Gist Croft

    New York Stem Cell Foundation, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Leena Panwala

    INADcure Foundation, New Jersey, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Amanda Hope

    INADcure Foundation, New Jersey, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Agnes JH Liang

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Zhongyuan Zuo

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Seul Kee Byeon

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Lily Wang

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Akhilesh Pandey

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9943-6127
  13. Hugo J Bellen

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    hbellen@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    Hugo J Bellen, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5992-5989

Funding

Baylor College of Medicine (P50HD103555)

  • Hugo J Bellen

Huffington Foundation

  • Hugo J Bellen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental animals were treated in compliance with the United States Department of Health and Human Services and the Baylor College of Medicine IACUC guidelines. Protocol (AN-5596).

Copyright

© 2023, Lin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,323
    views
  • 353
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Guang Lin
  2. Burak Tepe
  3. Geoff McGrane
  4. Regine C Tipon
  5. Gist Croft
  6. Leena Panwala
  7. Amanda Hope
  8. Agnes JH Liang
  9. Zhongyuan Zuo
  10. Seul Kee Byeon
  11. Lily Wang
  12. Akhilesh Pandey
  13. Hugo J Bellen
(2023)
Exploring therapeutic strategies for infantile neuronal axonal dystrophy (INAD/PARK14)
eLife 12:e82555.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82555

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82555

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Paul I Jaffe, Gustavo X Santiago-Reyes ... Russell A Poldrack
    Research Article

    Evidence accumulation models (EAMs) are the dominant framework for modeling response time (RT) data from speeded decision-making tasks. While providing a good quantitative description of RT data in terms of abstract perceptual representations, EAMs do not explain how the visual system extracts these representations in the first place. To address this limitation, we introduce the visual accumulator model (VAM), in which convolutional neural network models of visual processing and traditional EAMs are jointly fitted to trial-level RTs and raw (pixel-space) visual stimuli from individual subjects in a unified Bayesian framework. Models fitted to large-scale cognitive training data from a stylized flanker task captured individual differences in congruency effects, RTs, and accuracy. We find evidence that the selection of task-relevant information occurs through the orthogonalization of relevant and irrelevant representations, demonstrating how our framework can be used to relate visual representations to behavioral outputs. Together, our work provides a probabilistic framework for both constraining neural network models of vision with behavioral data and studying how the visual system extracts representations that guide decisions.

    1. Neuroscience
    Aneri Soni, Michael J Frank
    Research Article

    How and why is working memory (WM) capacity limited? Traditional cognitive accounts focus either on limitations on the number or items that can be stored (slots models), or loss of precision with increasing load (resource models). Here, we show that a neural network model of prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia can learn to reuse the same prefrontal populations to store multiple items, leading to resource-like constraints within a slot-like system, and inducing a trade-off between quantity and precision of information. Such ‘chunking’ strategies are adapted as a function of reinforcement learning and WM task demands, mimicking human performance and normative models. Moreover, adaptive performance requires a dynamic range of dopaminergic signals to adjust striatal gating policies, providing a new interpretation of WM difficulties in patient populations such as Parkinson’s disease, ADHD, and schizophrenia. These simulations also suggest a computational rather than anatomical limit to WM capacity.