Divergent functions of two clades of flavodoxin in diatoms mitigate oxidative stress and iron limitation

Abstract

Phytoplankton rely on diverse mechanisms to adapt to the decreased iron bioavailability and oxidative stress-inducing conditions of today's oxygenated oceans, including replacement of the iron-requiring ferredoxin electron shuttle protein with a less-efficient iron-free flavodoxin under iron limiting conditions. And yet, diatoms transcribe flavodoxins in high-iron regions in contrast to other phytoplankton. Here, we show that the two clades of flavodoxins present within diatoms exhibit a functional divergence, with only clade II flavodoxins displaying the canonical role in acclimation to iron limitation. We created CRISPR/Cas9 knock-outs of the clade I flavodoxin from the model diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana and found these cell lines are hypersensitive to oxidative stress, while maintaining a wild-type response to iron limitation. Within natural diatom communities, clade I flavodoxin transcript abundance is regulated over the diel cycle rather than in response to iron availability, whereas clade II transcript abundances increase either in iron‑limiting regions or under artificially induced iron-limitation. The observed functional specialization of two flavodoxin variants within diatoms reiterates two major stressors associated with contemporary oceans and illustrates diatom strategies to flourish in diverse aquatic ecosystems.

Data availability

Sequencing data from cultures have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE217467. All other relevant data supporting the findings of the study are available in this article and its Supplementary files.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shiri Graff van Creveld

    School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3445-3046
  2. Sacha N Coesel

    School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Stephen Blaskowski

    School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ryan D Groussman

    School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Megan J Schatz

    School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. E Virginia Armbrust

    School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    armbrust@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7865-5101

Funding

Simons Foundation (426570SP)

  • E Virginia Armbrust

Simons Foundation (721244)

  • E Virginia Armbrust

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Graff van Creveld et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 705
    views
  • 90
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shiri Graff van Creveld
  2. Sacha N Coesel
  3. Stephen Blaskowski
  4. Ryan D Groussman
  5. Megan J Schatz
  6. E Virginia Armbrust
(2023)
Divergent functions of two clades of flavodoxin in diatoms mitigate oxidative stress and iron limitation
eLife 12:e84392.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84392

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84392

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kathleen T Quach, Gillian A Hughes, Sreekanth H Chalasani
    Research Article

    Prey must balance predator avoidance with feeding, a central dilemma in prey refuge theory. Additionally, prey must assess predatory imminence—how close threats are in space and time. Predatory imminence theory classifies defensive behaviors into three defense modes: pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike, corresponding to increasing levels of threat—–suspecting, detecting, and contacting a predator. Although predatory risk often varies in spatial distribution and imminence, how these factors intersect to influence defensive behaviors is poorly understood. Integrating these factors into a naturalistic environment enables comprehensive analysis of multiple defense modes in consistent conditions. Here, we combine prey refuge and predatory imminence theories to develop a model system of nematode defensive behaviors, with Caenorhabditis elegans as prey and Pristionchus pacificus as predator. In a foraging environment comprised of a food-rich, high-risk patch and a food-poor, low-risk refuge, C. elegans innately exhibits circa-strike behaviors. With experience, it learns post- and pre-encounter behaviors that proactively anticipate threats. These defense modes intensify with predator lethality, with only life-threatening predators capable of eliciting all three modes. SEB-3 receptors and NLP-49 peptides, key stress regulators, vary in their impact and interdependence across defense modes. Overall, our model system reveals fine-grained insights into how stress-related signaling regulates defensive behaviors.

    1. Ecology
    Laura Fargeot, Camille Poesy ... Blanchet Simon
    Research Article

    Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning stands as a cornerstone in ecological research. Extensive evidence now underscores the profound impact of species loss on the stability and dynamics of ecosystem functions. However, it remains unclear whether the loss of genetic diversity within key species yields similar consequences. Here, we delve into the intricate relationship between species diversity, genetic diversity, and ecosystem functions across three trophic levels – primary producers, primary consumers, and secondary consumers – in natural aquatic ecosystems. Our investigation involves estimating species diversity and genome-wide diversity – gauged within three pivotal species – within each trophic level, evaluating seven key ecosystem functions, and analyzing the magnitude of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions (BEFs). We found that, overall, the absolute effect size of genetic diversity on ecosystem functions mirrors that of species diversity in natural ecosystems. We nonetheless unveil a striking dichotomy: while genetic diversity was positively correlated with various ecosystem functions, species diversity displays a negative correlation with these functions. These intriguing antagonist effects of species and genetic diversity persist across the three trophic levels (underscoring its systemic nature), but were apparent only when BEFs were assessed within trophic levels rather than across them. This study reveals the complexity of predicting the consequences of genetic and species diversity loss under natural conditions, and emphasizes the need for further mechanistic models integrating these two facets of biodiversity.