p38γ and p38δ modulate innate immune response by regulating MEF2D activation

  1. Alejandra Escós
  2. Ester Diaz-Mora
  3. Michael Pattison
  4. Pilar Fajardo
  5. Diego González-Romero
  6. Ana Risco
  7. José Martín-Gómez
  8. Éric Bonneil
  9. Nahum Sonenberg
  10. Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad
  11. Juan José Sanz-Ezquerro
  12. Steven C Ley
  13. Ana Cuenda  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Spain
  2. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  3. Université de Montréal, Canada
  4. McGill University, Canada
  5. Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom
  6. University College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Evidence implicating p38γ and p38δ (p38γ/p38δ) in inflammation are mainly based on experiments using Mapk12/Mapk13 deficient (p38γ/δKO) mice, which show low levels of TPL2, the kinase upstream of MKK1-ERK1/2 in myeloid cells. This could obscure p38γ/p38δ roles, since TPL2 is essential for regulating inflammation. Here we generated a Mapk12D171A/D171A/Mapk13-/- (p38γ/δKIKO) mouse, expressing kinase-inactive p38γ and lacking p38δ. This mouse exhibited normal TPL2 levels, making it an excellent tool to elucidate specific p38γ/p38δ functions. p38γ/δKIKO mice showed a reduced inflammatory response and less susceptibility to LPS-induced septic shock and Candida albicans infection than wild-type mice. Gene expression analyses in LPS-activated WT and p38γ/δKIKO macrophages revealed that p38γ/p38δ regulated numerous genes implicated in innate immune response. Additionally, phospho-proteomic analyses and in vitro kinase assays showed that the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor-2D (MEF2D) was phosphorylated at Ser444 via p38γ/p38δ. Mutation of MEF2D Ser444 to the non-phosphorylatable residue Ala increased its transcriptional activity and the expression of Nos2 and Il1b mRNA. These results suggest that p38γ/p38δ govern innate immune responses by regulating MEF2D phosphorylation and transcriptional activity.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alejandra Escós

    Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Ester Diaz-Mora

    Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Michael Pattison

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Pilar Fajardo

    Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Diego González-Romero

    Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0564-3326
  6. Ana Risco

    Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. José Martín-Gómez

    Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Éric Bonneil

    Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Nahum Sonenberg

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Nahum Sonenberg, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4707-8759
  10. Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad

    Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5129-7081
  11. Juan José Sanz-Ezquerro

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9084-6354
  12. Steven C Ley

    Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5911-9223
  13. Ana Cuenda

    Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    For correspondence
    acuenda@cnb.csic.es
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9013-5077

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2019-108349RB-100)

  • Juan José Sanz-Ezquerro
  • Ana Cuenda

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (SAF2016-79792R)

  • Juan José Sanz-Ezquerro
  • Ana Cuenda

Wellcome Trust (FC001103)

  • Steven C Ley

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mice were housed in specific pathogen‐free conditions in the CNB‐CSIC animal house. Animal procedures were performed in accordance with national and EU guidelines, with the approval of the Centro Nacional de Biotecnología Animal Ethics Committee, CSIC and Comunidad de Madrid (Reference: PROEX 316/15 and PROEX 071/19).

Copyright

© 2023, Escós et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 713
    views
  • 146
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alejandra Escós
  2. Ester Diaz-Mora
  3. Michael Pattison
  4. Pilar Fajardo
  5. Diego González-Romero
  6. Ana Risco
  7. José Martín-Gómez
  8. Éric Bonneil
  9. Nahum Sonenberg
  10. Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad
  11. Juan José Sanz-Ezquerro
  12. Steven C Ley
  13. Ana Cuenda
(2023)
p38γ and p38δ modulate innate immune response by regulating MEF2D activation
eLife 12:e86200.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86200

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86200

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.