Abstract

Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code s 7KQ8, 7L5C, and 7M8H. All other data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Natalia Dolgova

    Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Eva-Maria E Uhlemann

    Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michal T Boniecki

    Protein Characterization and Crystallization Facility, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Frederick S Vizeacoumar

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anjuman Ara

    Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Paria Nouri

    Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Martina Ralle

    Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Marco Tonelli

    National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Syed A Abbas

    Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jaala Patry

    Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Hussain Elhasasna

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2810-3138
  12. Andrew Freywald

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Franco Vizeacoumar

    Cancer Research Department, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    For correspondence
    franco.vizeacoumar@usask.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6452-5207
  14. Oleg Y Dmitriev

    Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
    For correspondence
    Oleg.Dmitriev@usask.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1307-5063

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-178246)

  • Oleg Y Dmitriev

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2017-06822)

  • Oleg Y Dmitriev

Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI-33364)

  • Franco Vizeacoumar

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-156309)

  • Franco Vizeacoumar

Saskatchewan Cancer Agency (N/A)

  • Franco Vizeacoumar

University of Saskatchewan (N/A)

  • Oleg Y Dmitriev

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2024, Dolgova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,563
    views
  • 259
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Natalia Dolgova
  2. Eva-Maria E Uhlemann
  3. Michal T Boniecki
  4. Frederick S Vizeacoumar
  5. Anjuman Ara
  6. Paria Nouri
  7. Martina Ralle
  8. Marco Tonelli
  9. Syed A Abbas
  10. Jaala Patry
  11. Hussain Elhasasna
  12. Andrew Freywald
  13. Franco Vizeacoumar
  14. Oleg Y Dmitriev
(2024)
MEMO1 binds iron and modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells
eLife 13:e86354.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86354

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86354

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.