Growth: Inside help from the microbiome
Elucidating the role of one of the proteins produced by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum reveals a new molecule that allows this gut bacterium to support the development of fruit fly larvae.
- Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, United States
Whether an animal can grow and put on weight as a juvenile not only depends on the nutrients it receives, but also on the microorganisms that live inside its gut (Schwarzer et al., 2016). In fruit flies, for example, a broad range of microbes can support the growth of malnourished larvae (Keebaugh et al., 2018). A closer look at the mechanisms involved in these interactions has shown that certain gut bacteria increase the protein and moisture content of the food the insect consumes; however, it has also revealed that cell wall components such as peptidoglycan can trigger intestinal cells to produce proteases that help flies make the most of their nutrients (Erkosar et al., 2015; Lesperance and Broderick, 2020). It therefore remains unclear whether the microbiome supports growth by altering the nutritional quality of food or by directly influencing certain biological processes in the flies.
Previous studies have shown that certain strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, a species of Gram-positive bacteria which colonize in the gut of fruit flies, can boost the growth of larvae raised with limited access to proteins (Shin et al., 2011; Storelli et al., 2011). This ability relies on a cluster of six co-regulated genes known as the pbpX2-dltXABCD operon; five of these genes (dltX, dltA, dltB, dltC and dltD) code for proteins that help to add the molecule D-alanine onto teichoic acids, the most abundant component in the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria (Matos et al., 2017; Nikolopoulos et al., 2022).
Two types of teichoic acids exist: lipoteichoic acids, which are anchored in the cell membrane, and wall teichoic acids, which are attached to peptidoglycan. Together these complex polymers allow the bacteria to interact with their host in both beneficial and pathogenic ways (Atilano et al., 2010; Brown et al., 2013). In L. plantarum, the D-alanine esterification of the cell wall which is supported by the pbpX2-dltXABCD operon leads to intestinal cells producing peptidases that are important for growth (Matos et al., 2017). However, the role of the pbpX2 gene in the operon has remained unclear. Now, in eLife, Marie-Pierre Chapot-Chartier, Christophe Grangeasse, François Leulier and colleagues — including Nikos Nikolopoulos, Renata Matos, Stéphanie Ravaud and Pascal Courtin as joint first authors — report additional insights into the protein coded by pbpX2, and the role of teichoic acids in the growth of fruit fly larvae (Nikolopoulos et al., 2023).
The team (who are based in various institutes in France and Japan) found that the enzyme pbpX2 encodes does not participate in the maturation of peptidoglycan, as was previously expected. Instead, further analyses showed that it works alongside the Dlt proteins from the operon to add D-alanine onto the glycerol residues of lipoteichoic acids. These results led Nikolopoulos et al. to rename the protein ‘DltE’, and to consider D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids as a signal required for L. plantarum to support intestinal function and juvenile growth.
Experiments conducted on LpNC8, a strain of L. plantarum known to help larvae develop when nutrients are scarce, allowed Nikolopoulos et al. to better understand which cell wall components the bacteria need for their growth-boosting role. This showed that LpNC8 primarily produces glycerol residues for its lipoteichoic acids, but ribitol residues for its wall teichoic acids. In fact, unlike other L. plantarum strains, only lipoteichoic acids are D- alanylated in LpNC8 bacteria. This suggests a need to systematically analyze the composition of teichoic acids and their modifications across multiple L. plantarum strains to understand how these patterns correlate with the bacteria’s ability to support fly growth.
Finally, the team investigated the roles of different cell wall components in larval development by purifying them individually from LpNC8 bacteria or from a LpNC8 mutant strain lacking the operon. This demonstrated that, unlike wall teichoic acids or unaltered lipoteichoic acids, D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids are a necessary and sufficient cue for promoting larval growth and for inducing the production of proteases in the gut. However, the presence of both peptidoglycan fragments and D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids is needed for optimal growth, suggesting that the flies use independent, additive signals to boost the production of peptidases and overall juvenile development (Figure 1).
Figure 1
The recognition of certain bacterial cell wall components supports the growth of fruit fly larvae.
Certain strains of the bacteria Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, such as LpNC8, can help the fruit fly larvae (bottom) in which they live to grow when nutrients are scarce. Various components of the L. plantarum cell wall (top) help with this process. For instance, fragments of peptidoglycan (mDAP PG) can be recognized by peptidoglycan recognition receptors (PGRP-LE) present at the surface of the intestinal cells of the fly; this, in turns, triggers a molecular pathway (Imd/Dredd) which leads to the production of proteases that help the larva grow. Nikolopoulos et al. show that other cell wall components known as D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids (D-Ala-LTA; yellow) also support protease production and larval growth through an independent, additional mechanism that remains unknown. They demonstrate that the addition of D-alanine (pale blue circles) onto lipoteichoic acids is supported by the proteins generated by the pbpX2-dltXABCD (or dlt) operon; this includes the protein encoded by the pbpX2 gene, which they rename DltE. LpNC8 is unique in that D-alanine can only be added to its lipoteichoic acids, but not other similar polymers known as wall teichoic acids (green).
It remains unclear how D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids in L. plantarum manage to reach cells lining the midgut of Drosophila. Nikolopoulos et al. propose that the molecules may be released inside micro-vesicles that the intestinal cells then capture through endocytosis. The signaling pathways by which D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids induce intestinal proteases also remains to be identified, but they are probably separate from the molecular cascade elicited by peptidoglycans and other cell wall components. Overall, these results add to increasing evidence demonstrating the breadth and diversity of the bacterial components that underlie fly-microbiome interactions. As L. plantarum also supports growth in mice, this study opens new, exciting avenues of research into the role of host bacteria in the development of mammals and other animals.
References
-
Wall teichoic acids of gram-positive bacteriaAnnual Review of Microbiology 67:313–336.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155620
-
Gut bacteria mediate nutrient availability in Drosophila dietsApplied and Environmental Microbiology 87:e01401-20.https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01401-20
Article and author information
Author details
Nichole A Broderick
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Agrawal and Broderick
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 583
- views
-
- 43
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Growth: Inside help from the microbiome
eLife 12:e88873.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88873
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Accurate estimation of the effects of mutations on SARS-CoV-2 viral fitness can inform public-health responses such as vaccine development and predicting the impact of a new variant; it can also illuminate biological mechanisms including those underlying the emergence of variants of concern. Recently, Lan et al. reported a model of SARS-CoV-2 secondary structure and its underlying dimethyl sulfate reactivity data (Lan et al., 2022). I investigated whether base reactivities and secondary structure models derived from them can explain some variability in the frequency of observing different nucleotide substitutions across millions of patient sequences in the SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic tree. Nucleotide basepairing was compared to the estimated ‘mutational fitness’ of substitutions, a measurement of the difference between a substitution’s observed and expected frequency that is correlated with other estimates of viral fitness (Bloom and Neher, 2023). This comparison revealed that secondary structure is often predictive of substitution frequency, with significant decreases in substitution frequencies at basepaired positions. Focusing on the mutational fitness of C→U, the most common type of substitution, I describe C→U substitutions at basepaired positions that characterize major SARS-CoV-2 variants; such mutations may have a greater impact on fitness than appreciated when considering substitution frequency alone.
-
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Protein NƐ-lysine acetylation (Kac) modifications play crucial roles in diverse physiological and pathological functions in cells. In prokaryotic cells, there are only two types of lysine deacetylases (KDACs) that are Zn2+- or NAD+-dependent. In this study, we reported a protein, AhCobQ, in Aeromonas hydrophila ATCC 7966 that presents NAD+- and Zn2+-independent KDAC activity. Furthermore, its KDAC activity is located in an unidentified domain (from 195 to 245 aa). Interestingly, AhCobQ has no homology with current known KDACs, and no homologous protein was found in eukaryotic cells. A protein substrate analysis showed that AhCobQ has specific protein substrates in common with other known KDACs, indicating that these KDACs can dynamically co-regulate the states of Kac proteins. Microbiological methods employed in this study affirmed AhCobQ’s positive regulation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICD) enzymatic activity at the K388 site, implicating AhCobQ in the modulation of bacterial enzymatic activities. In summary, our findings present compelling evidence that AhCobQ represents a distinctive type of KDAC with significant roles in bacterial biological functions.
