Abstract

The mammary gland is a unique organ that undergoes dynamic alterations throughout a female's reproductive life, making it an ideal model for developmental, stem cell and cancer biology research. Mammary gland development begins in utero and proceeds via a quiescent bud stage before the initial outgrowth and subsequent branching morphogenesis. How mammary epithelial cells transit from quiescence to an actively proliferating and branching tissue during embryogenesis and, importantly, how the branch pattern is determined remain largely unknown. Here we provide evidence indicating that epithelial cell proliferation and onset of branching are independent processes, yet partially coordinated by the Eda signaling pathway. Through heterotypic and heterochronic epithelial-mesenchymal recombination experiments between mouse mammary and salivary gland tissues and ex vivo live imaging, we demonstrate that unlike previously concluded, the mode of branching is an intrinsic property of the mammary epithelium whereas the pace of growth and the density of ductal tree are determined by the mesenchyme. Transcriptomic profiling and ex vivo and in vivo functional studies in mice disclose that mesenchymal Wnt/ß-catenin signaling, and in particular IGF-1 downstream of it critically regulate mammary gland growth. These results underscore the general need to carefully deconstruct the different developmental processes producing branched organs.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE225821.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Qiang Lan

    Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7765-6767
  2. Ewelina Trela

    Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Riitta Lindström

    Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5177-0564
  4. Jyoti Prabha Satta

    Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Beata Kaczyńska

    Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mona M Christensen

    Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0655-8665
  7. Martin Holzenberger

    Research Center UMRS938, INSERM and Sorbonne Universities, UPMC, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4869-725X
  8. Jukka Jernvall

    Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6575-8486
  9. Marja L Mikkola

    Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    For correspondence
    marja.mikkola@helsinki.fi
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9890-3835

Funding

Research Council of Finland (318287)

  • Marja L Mikkola

Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö

  • Marja L Mikkola

Helsinki Institute of Life Science, Helsingin Yliopisto

  • Marja L Mikkola

Helsingin Yliopiston Tiedesäätiö

  • Ewelina Trela

Helsingin Yliopiston Tiedesäätiö

  • Mona M Christensen

Suomen Kulttuurirahasto

  • Jyoti Prabha Satta

Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin Säätiö

  • Jyoti Prabha Satta

Oskar Öflunds Stiftelse

  • Qiang Lan

Suomen Kulttuurirahasto

  • Beata Kaczyńska

Research Council of Finland (272280)

  • Marja L Mikkola

Research Council of Finland (307421)

  • Marja L Mikkola

Cancer Society of Finland

  • Marja L Mikkola

Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö

  • Marja L Mikkola

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse experiments were approved by the Laboratory Animal Center at the University of Helsinki and the National Animal Experiment Board of Finland with the licenses number KEK19-019, KEK22-014 and ESAVI/2363/04.10.07/2017. Mice were euthanized with CO2 followed by cervical dislocation.

Copyright

© 2024, Lan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 886
    views
  • 165
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Qiang Lan
  2. Ewelina Trela
  3. Riitta Lindström
  4. Jyoti Prabha Satta
  5. Beata Kaczyńska
  6. Mona M Christensen
  7. Martin Holzenberger
  8. Jukka Jernvall
  9. Marja L Mikkola
(2024)
On growth and form of the mouse mammary gland
eLife 13:e93326.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.93326

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.93326

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Wei Yan
    Editorial

    The articles in this special issue highlight the diversity and complexity of research into reproductive health, including the need for a better understanding of the fundamental biology of reproduction and for new treatments for a range of reproductive disorders.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Anastasiia Lozovska, Ana Casaca ... Moises Mallo
    Research Article

    During the trunk to tail transition the mammalian embryo builds the outlets for the intestinal and urogenital tracts, lays down the primordia for the hindlimb and external genitalia, and switches from the epiblast/primitive streak (PS) to the tail bud as the driver of axial extension. Genetic and molecular data indicate that Tgfbr1 is a key regulator of the trunk to tail transition. Tgfbr1 has been shown to control the switch of the neuromesodermal competent cells from the epiblast to the chordoneural hinge to generate the tail bud. We now show that in mouse embryos Tgfbr1 signaling also controls the remodeling of the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) and of the embryonic endoderm associated with the trunk to tail transition. In the absence of Tgfbr1, the two LPM layers do not converge at the end of the trunk, extending instead as separate layers until the caudal embryonic extremity, and failing to activate markers of primordia for the hindlimb and external genitalia. The vascular remodeling involving the dorsal aorta and the umbilical artery leading to the connection between embryonic and extraembryonic circulation was also affected in the Tgfbr1 mutant embryos. Similar alterations in the LPM and vascular system were also observed in Isl1 null mutants, indicating that this factor acts in the regulatory cascade downstream of Tgfbr1 in LPM-derived tissues. In addition, in the absence of Tgfbr1 the embryonic endoderm fails to expand to form the endodermal cloaca and to extend posteriorly to generate the tail gut. We present evidence suggesting that the remodeling activity of Tgfbr1 in the LPM and endoderm results from the control of the posterior PS fate after its regression during the trunk to tail transition. Our data, together with previously reported observations, place Tgfbr1 at the top of the regulatory processes controlling the trunk to tail transition.