Emergence of power-law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias

  1. David B Blumenthal  Is a corresponding author
  2. Marta Lucchetta
  3. Linda Kleist
  4. Sándor P Fekete
  5. Markus List  Is a corresponding author
  6. Martin H Schaefer  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
  2. European Institute of Oncology, Italy
  3. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
  4. Technical University of Munich, Germany

Abstract

Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study bias affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.

Data availability

We analyzed only previously published data for this work. To facilitate reproducibility, we deposited the used datasets at https://zenodo.org/record/8288898.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David B Blumenthal

    Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    david.b.blumenthal@fau.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8651-750X
  2. Marta Lucchetta

    Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Linda Kleist

    Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sándor P Fekete

    Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Markus List

    Data Science in Systems Biology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    For correspondence
    markus.list@tum.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Martin H Schaefer

    Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
    For correspondence
    martin.schaefer@ieo.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7503-6364

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031L0309A)

  • David B Blumenthal

Klaus Tschira Stiftung (00.003.2024)

  • David B Blumenthal
  • Markus List
  • Martin H Schaefer

Fondazione AIRC per la ricerca sul cancro ETS (MFAG 21791)

  • Martin H Schaefer

Fondazione AIRC per la ricerca sul cancro ETS (Bridge Grant n. 29162)

  • Martin H Schaefer

Ministero della Salute (Ricerca Corrente)

  • Martin H Schaefer

Ministero della Salute (5x1000 funds)

  • Martin H Schaefer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2024, Blumenthal et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David B Blumenthal
  2. Marta Lucchetta
  3. Linda Kleist
  4. Sándor P Fekete
  5. Markus List
  6. Martin H Schaefer
(2024)
Emergence of power-law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
eLife 13:e99951.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99951

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99951

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Bernhard Englitz, Sahar Akram ... Shihab Shamma
    Research Article

    Perception can be highly dependent on stimulus context, but whether and how sensory areas encode the context remains uncertain. We used an ambiguous auditory stimulus – a tritone pair – to investigate the neural activity associated with a preceding contextual stimulus that strongly influenced the tritone pair’s perception: either as an ascending or a descending step in pitch. We recorded single-unit responses from a population of auditory cortical cells in awake ferrets listening to the tritone pairs preceded by the contextual stimulus. We find that the responses adapt locally to the contextual stimulus, consistent with human MEG recordings from the auditory cortex under the same conditions. Decoding the population responses demonstrates that cells responding to pitch-changes are able to predict well the context-sensitive percept of the tritone pairs. Conversely, decoding the individual pitch representations and taking their distance in the circular Shepard tone space predicts the opposite of the percept. The various percepts can be readily captured and explained by a neural model of cortical activity based on populations of adapting, pitch and pitch-direction cells, aligned with the neurophysiological responses. Together, these decoding and model results suggest that contextual influences on perception may well be already encoded at the level of the primary sensory cortices, reflecting basic neural response properties commonly found in these areas.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Sabrina Benas, Ximena Fernandez, Emilio Kropff
    Research Article

    Entorhinal grid cells implement a spatial code with hexagonal periodicity, signaling the position of the animal within an environment. Grid maps of cells belonging to the same module share spacing and orientation, only differing in relative two-dimensional spatial phase, which could result from being part of a two-dimensional attractor guided by path integration. However, this architecture has the drawbacks of being complex to construct and rigid, path integration allowing for no deviations from the hexagonal pattern such as the ones observed under a variety of experimental manipulations. Here, we show that a simpler one-dimensional attractor is enough to align grid cells equally well. Using topological data analysis, we show that the resulting population activity is a sample of a torus, while the ensemble of maps preserves features of the network architecture. The flexibility of this low dimensional attractor allows it to negotiate the geometry of the representation manifold with the feedforward inputs, rather than imposing it. More generally, our results represent a proof of principle against the intuition that the architecture and the representation manifold of an attractor are topological objects of the same dimensionality, with implications to the study of attractor networks across the brain.