1. Computational and Systems Biology

Emergence of power-law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias

  1. David B Blumenthal  Is a corresponding author
  2. Marta Lucchetta
  3. Linda Kleist
  4. Sándor P Fekete
  5. Markus List  Is a corresponding author
  6. Martin H Schaefer  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
  2. European Institute of Oncology, Italy
  3. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
  4. Technical University of Munich, Germany
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99951
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. David B Blumenthal
  2. Marta Lucchetta
  3. Linda Kleist
  4. Sándor P Fekete
  5. Markus List
  6. Martin H Schaefer
(2024)
Emergence of power-law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
eLife 13:e99951.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99951
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study bias affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.

Data availability

We analyzed only previously published data for this work. To facilitate reproducibility, we deposited the used datasets at https://zenodo.org/record/8288898.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. David B Blumenthal

    Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    david.b.blumenthal@fau.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8651-750X

  2. Marta Lucchetta

    Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Linda Kleist

    Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Sándor P Fekete

    Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Markus List

    Data Science in Systems Biology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
    For correspondence
    markus.list@tum.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Martin H Schaefer

    Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
    For correspondence
    martin.schaefer@ieo.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7503-6364

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031L0309A)

  • David B Blumenthal

Klaus Tschira Stiftung (00.003.2024)

  • David B Blumenthal
  • Markus List
  • Martin H Schaefer

Fondazione AIRC per la ricerca sul cancro ETS (MFAG 21791)

  • Martin H Schaefer

Fondazione AIRC per la ricerca sul cancro ETS (Bridge Grant n. 29162)

  • Martin H Schaefer

Ministero della Salute (Ricerca Corrente)

  • Martin H Schaefer

Ministero della Salute (5x1000 funds)

  • Martin H Schaefer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2024, Blumenthal et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 713
    views
  • 138
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. David B Blumenthal
  2. Marta Lucchetta
  3. Linda Kleist
  4. Sándor P Fekete
  5. Markus List
  6. Martin H Schaefer
(2024)
Emergence of power-law distributions in protein-protein interaction networks through study bias
eLife 13:e99951.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99951

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99951

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology

    Barcode-free multiplex plasmid sequencing using Bayesian analysis and nanopore sequencing

    Masaaki Uematsu, Jeremy M Baskin
    Tools and Resources

    Plasmid construction is central to life science research, and sequence verification is arguably its costliest step. Long-read sequencing has emerged as a competitor to Sanger sequencing, with the principal benefit that whole plasmids can be sequenced in a single run. Nevertheless, the current cost of nanopore sequencing is still prohibitive for routine sequencing during plasmid construction. We develop a computational approach termed Simple Algorithm for Very Efficient Multiplexing of Oxford Nanopore Experiments for You (SAVEMONEY) that guides researchers to mix multiple plasmids and subsequently computationally de-mixes the resultant sequences. SAVEMONEY defines optimal mixtures in a pre-survey step, and following sequencing, executes a post-analysis workflow involving sequence classification, alignment, and consensus determination. By using Bayesian analysis with prior probability of expected plasmid construction error rate, high-confidence sequences can be obtained for each plasmid in the mixture. Plasmids differing by as little as two bases can be mixed as a single sample for nanopore sequencing, and routine multiplexing of even six plasmids per 180 reads can still maintain high accuracy of consensus sequencing. SAVEMONEY should further democratize whole-plasmid sequencing by nanopore and related technologies, driving down the effective cost of whole-plasmid sequencing to lower than that of a single Sanger sequencing run.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology

    In silico screening by AlphaFold2 program revealed the potential binding partners of nuage-localizing proteins and piRNA-related proteins

    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Neural population dynamics underlying evidence accumulation in multiple rat brain regions

    Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow
    Research Article Updated

    Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.