Neuronal Development: Rethinking sensorimotor circuits
New research shows that the neural circuit responsible for stabilising gaze can develop in the absence of motor neurons, contrary to a long-standing model in the field.
- School of Psychology and Neuroscience and Centre of Biophotonics, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom
As you nod in agreement, or furiously shake your head side-to-side, your gaze stays almost perfectly stable. This remarkable ability to fix your eyes on whoever you may be agreeing (or disagreeing) with relies on a sensorimotor neural circuit in the brain that adjusts eye position to accommodate shifts in head orientation.
Sensorimotor circuits are made up of three key components: (i) sensory neurons that detect external stimuli; (ii) projection neurons that transmit information from sensory neurons; and (iii) motor neurons that receive this information and innervate muscle cells to produce a response. In the circuit that stabilizes gaze – known as the vestibulo-ocular reflex (or VOR for short) – the sensory neurons detect changes in balance caused by movements of the head (Figure 1A). This information is then relayed via the projection neurons to extraocular motor neurons, which move the eyes in the opposite direction of the movement of the head in order to maintain visual stability.
Figure 1
Testing the retrograde specification model.
(A) The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) circuit in zebrafish larvae contains three core components: sensory neurons (black), projection neurons (yellow), and extraocular motor neurons (blue). The sensory neurons detect changes in head orientation and relay this information via synapses (represented as triangles) to the projection neurons, which then pass it to the motor neurons that innervate muscles in the eye. (B) It has been proposed that motor neurons have an important role in specifying the fate of projection neurons during development. However, when Goldblatt et al. tested this ‘retrograde specification model’ by genetically removing motor neurons from the VOR circuit in zebrafish larvae, they found that the mutations did not alter the connectivity, activity or gene expression of the projection neurons.
Graphic of zebrafish in panel A adapted from Yang et al., 2022.
For decades, scientists have theorised that motor neurons have an essential role during the development of sensorimotor circuits that involves specifying the fate of the projection neurons (Glover, 2000; Glover, 2003). This ‘retrograde specification model’ was in part inspired by the observation that extraocular motor neurons establish connections with muscle cells before projection neurons connect to them. This suggests that projection neurons might require additional cues to know what sensory information to transmit and which cells to target. Now, in eLife, David Schoppik and colleagues at New York University – including Dena Goldblatt as first author – report new findings that challenge this theory (Goldblatt et al., 2024).
To test the retrograde specification model, the team studied the development of the VOR circuit in zebrafish larvae – a model organism that is ideal for investigating the nervous system due to its transparency, relatively simple neural circuitry and genetics. Goldblatt et al. removed a gene called phox2a that specifies the fate of extraocular motor neurons to prevent the zebrafish larvae from developing these types of cells (Guo et al., 1999; Nakano et al., 2001; Coppola et al., 2005; Hasan et al., 2010).
Before testing whether this modification affects the wiring of the VOR circuit, Goldblatt et al. confirmed that the phox2a mutant larvae were definitely lacking extraocular motor neurons. These neurons typically express the transcription factor isl1 and are located in cranial nucleus III and cranial nucleus IV, two regions in the brain that control eye movement (Greaney et al., 2017). Goldblatt et al. found the mutation nearly eliminated all isl1-expressing cells. They were also unable to detect another motor neuron marker called vachta. Moreover, the eyes of the mutant larvae rotated toward their ears, an effect that is often seen when motor neurons are lost from cranial nuclei III and IV.
According to the retrograde specification model, projection neurons in the VOR circuit in the mutant zebrafish should no longer be able to receive sensory information about how the head is tilted, because they either failed to develop or are mis-wired. However, Goldblatt et al. found that projection neurons in the phox2a mutants maintained normal patterns of activity, and their anatomy and quantity was unaffected. This suggests that the connections between sensory and projection neurons in the VOR circuit can still form correctly even in the absence of functional motor neurons (Figure 1B).
Further experiments revealed that removal of phox2a did not cause the axons of the projection neurons to misroute or connect to the wrong target. In addition, the set of genes that assemble the synapses of projection neurons in wildtype cells were still expressed in the mutant larvae. This suggests that the projection neurons do not require extraocular motor neurons to select and form connections with the correct target cells.
Finally, Goldblatt et al. tested if the projection neurons depend on their target motor neurons to determine which genes to express. They found no meaningful differences in gene expression between the phox2a mutants and wild-type larvae, providing further evidence that projection neurons can develop normally without their pre-synaptic motor neuron partners.
These findings are significant not only for understanding the VOR, but also for other sensorimotor circuits. Similar principles might apply to circuits in the spinal cord that control motor responses to other types of sensory stimuli. The study also adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that certain neurons may develop more independently than previously thought (Sürmeli et al., 2011; Sweeney et al., 2018), an insight that could reshape our understanding of how sensorimotor circuits form across the nervous system.
References
-
BookNeuroepithelial ‘compartments’ and the specification of vestibular projectionsIn: Gerrits NM, Ruigrok TJH, de Zeeuw CI, editors. Progress in Brain Research. Elesiver. pp. 3–21.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(00)24004-1
-
The development of vestibulo-ocular circuitry in the chicken embryoJournal of Physiology, Paris 97:17–25.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2003.10.003
-
Extraocular motoneuron pools develop along a dorsoventral axis in zebrafish, Danio rerioThe Journal of Comparative Neurology 525:65–78.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24042
-
PHOX2A regulation of oculomotor complex nucleogenesisDevelopment 137:1205–1213.https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.041251
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Zwart
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 261
- views
-
- 27
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Neuronal Development: Rethinking sensorimotor circuits
eLife 13:e104111.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104111
Further reading
-
- Developmental Biology
Many cell fate decisions are determined transcriptionally. Accordingly, some fate specification is prevented by Inhibitor of DNA-binding (Id) proteins that interfere with DNA binding by master regulatory transcription factors. We show that the Drosophila Id protein Extra macrochaetae (Emc) also affects developmental decisions by regulating caspase activity. Emc, which prevents proneural bHLH transcription factors from specifying neural cell fate, also prevents homodimerization of another bHLH protein, Daughterless (Da), and thereby maintains expression of the Death-Associated Inhibitor of Apoptosis (diap1) gene. Accordingly, we found that multiple effects of emc mutations on cell growth and on eye development were all caused by activation of caspases. These effects included acceleration of the morphogenetic furrow, failure of R7 photoreceptor cell specification, and delayed differentiation of non-neuronal cone cells. Within emc mutant clones, Notch signaling was elevated in the morphogenetic furrow, increasing morphogenetic furrow speed. This was associated with caspase-dependent increase in levels of Delta protein, the transmembrane ligand for Notch. Posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, elevated Delta cis-inhibited Notch signaling that was required for R7 specification and cone cell differentiation. Growth inhibition of emc mutant clones in wing imaginal discs also depended on caspases. Thus, emc mutations reveal the importance of restraining caspase activity even in non-apoptotic cells to prevent abnormal development, in the Drosophila eye through effects on Notch signaling.
-
- Developmental Biology
Mammalian sperm delve into the female reproductive tract to fertilize the female gamete. The available information about how sperm regulate their motility during the final journey to the fertilization site is extremely limited. In this work, we investigated the structural and functional changes in the sperm flagellum after acrosomal exocytosis (AE) and during the interaction with the eggs. The evidence demonstrates that the double helix actin network surrounding the mitochondrial sheath of the midpiece undergoes structural changes prior to the motility cessation. This structural modification is accompanied by a decrease in diameter of the midpiece and is driven by intracellular calcium changes that occur concomitant with a reorganization of the actin helicoidal cortex. Midpiece contraction occurs in a subset of cells that undergo AE, and live-cell imaging during in vitro fertilization showed that the midpiece contraction is required for motility cessation after fusion is initiated. These findings provide the first evidence of the F-actin network’s role in regulating sperm motility, adapting its function to meet specific cellular requirements during fertilization, and highlighting the broader significance of understanding sperm motility.
