1. Developmental Biology

Extramacrochaetae regulates Notch signaling in the Drosophila eye through non-apoptotic caspase activity

  1. Sudershana Nair
  2. Nicholas E Baker  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  2. Department of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  3. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91988.3
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Sudershana Nair
  2. Nicholas E Baker
(2024)
Extramacrochaetae regulates Notch signaling in the Drosophila eye through non-apoptotic caspase activity
eLife 12:RP91988.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91988.3
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

eLife Assessment

This important work presents data showing that all non-proneural phenotypes of the Inhibitor of DNA binding (Id) protein Emc are mediated through inappropriate nonapoptotic caspase activity. Using the developing Drosophila retina as a model the authors show that Emc acts by transcriptionally regulating the Death-Associated Inhibitor of Apoptosis 1 (diap1) gene, which impacts on Notch signaling by caspase-dependent increase of Delta protein. These are compelling findings, interesting for the caspase/apoptosis field as they add more non-apoptotic functions of caspases to the list, as well as for the Id field, which examines how Id proteins inhibit cell differentiation.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91988.3.sa0

Abstract

Many cell fate decisions are determined transcriptionally. Accordingly, some fate specification is prevented by Inhibitor of DNA-binding (Id) proteins that interfere with DNA binding by master regulatory transcription factors. We show that the Drosophila Id protein Extra macrochaetae (Emc) also affects developmental decisions by regulating caspase activity. Emc, which prevents proneural bHLH transcription factors from specifying neural cell fate, also prevents homodimerization of another bHLH protein, Daughterless (Da), and thereby maintains expression of the Death-Associated Inhibitor of Apoptosis (diap1) gene. Accordingly, we found that multiple effects of emc mutations on cell growth and on eye development were all caused by activation of caspases. These effects included acceleration of the morphogenetic furrow, failure of R7 photoreceptor cell specification, and delayed differentiation of non-neuronal cone cells. Within emc mutant clones, Notch signaling was elevated in the morphogenetic furrow, increasing morphogenetic furrow speed. This was associated with caspase-dependent increase in levels of Delta protein, the transmembrane ligand for Notch. Posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, elevated Delta cis-inhibited Notch signaling that was required for R7 specification and cone cell differentiation. Growth inhibition of emc mutant clones in wing imaginal discs also depended on caspases. Thus, emc mutations reveal the importance of restraining caspase activity even in non-apoptotic cells to prevent abnormal development, in the Drosophila eye through effects on Notch signaling.

Introduction

Inhibitor of DNA-binding proteins (Id proteins), which are HLH proteins lacking basic DNA-binding sequences, form inactive heterodimers with proneural bHLH proteins, preventing DNA binding and transcriptional regulation of target genes (Benezra et al., 1990; Cabrera et al., 1994; Ellis, 1994; Ellis et al., 1990; Garrell and Modolell, 1990; Norton, 2000). Accordingly, mutations in Id protein genes, of which there are four in mammals and one in Drosophila, permit enhanced proneural bHLH function, deregulating neurogenesis at many developmental stages and in many tissues (Ling et al., 2014; Oproescu et al., 2021; Roschger and Cabrele, 2017; Wang and Baker, 2015a).

Is this the only mechanism of Id protein function? Not all Id gene mutant phenotypes resemble gain of proneural gene function (Ling et al., 2014; Wang and Baker, 2015a). The sole Drosophila Id protein gene extra macrochaetae (emc) is required for normal growth of imaginal discs (Alonso and Garcia-Bellido, 1988). Imaginal discs are larval progenitors of adult tissues and remain proliferative and undifferentiated until late in the final larval instar; no proneural gene is active in these proliferating cells. A second example is that emc is required for ovarian follicle cell development (Adam and Montell, 2004), which does not depend on proneural bHLH genes. In Drosophila eye development, emc is required for the specification of the R7 photoreceptor cells and the non-neuronal cone cells, neither of which depends on any known proneural bHLH gene, and also restrains the rate at which the morphogenetic furrow, a wave of fate specification that traverses across the eye imaginal disc as retinal patterning and differentiation begin (Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009; Brown et al., 1995).

Insights into how Emc acts independently of proneural genes have emerged from several studies. Regarding the proper proliferation of imaginal disc cells (Alonso and Garcia-Bellido, 1988), independence of imaginal disc growth from proneural bHLH genes is confirmed by the lack of requirement for da, the only E protein in Drosophila (Andrade-Zapata and Baonza, 2014; Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011). E proteins are ubiquitously expressed bHLH proteins that are heterodimer partners for proneural bHLH proteins. Proneural bHLH proteins cannot function without Da, so normal growth of da mutant cells implies independence from all Da heterodimer partners. Instead, it is ectopic Da activity that causes poor growth in emc mutant cells, because normal growth is restored in emc da double mutant cells (Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011). Elevated Da levels activate transcription of expanded (ex), a component of the Salvador–Warts–Hippo (SWH) tumor suppressor pathway, to inhibit growth of imaginal disc cells (Wang and Baker, 2015b).

In the course of these studies, we noticed that ex mutations affected the number of sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells in the thorax (Wang and Baker, 2015b). This was due to activity of Yorkie (Yki), the target of SHW signals, in the ex mutant cells. Yki in turn increased transcription of a direct Yki target gene, Death-Associated Inhibitor of Apoptosis 1 (diap1) (Wang and Baker, 2019). Diap1 is a ubiquitin ligase that prevents accumulation of a processed form of Dronc, an apical caspase in Drosophila (Hawkins et al., 2000; Meier et al., 2000). Caspases are proteases that drive apoptosis by cleaving cellular substrates. They are expressed as inactive zymogens that are then activated by signals (initiator caspases) or by cleavage by caspases (effector caspases) in a feed-forward process that is expected to kill cells rapidly once a threshold of caspase activity has been crossed (Fuchs and Steller, 2011). Caspases can also mediate non-apoptotic processes. What differentiates apoptotic from non-apoptotic outcomes is uncertain, as the same caspase cascade of initiator and effector caspases seems to be involved in both (Aram et al., 2017; Baena-Lopez et al., 2018; Colon-Plaza and Su, 2022; Kanuka et al., 2005; Kuranaga and Miura, 2007; Nakajima and Kuranaga, 2017; Su, 2020). In ex mutants, the increased diap1 transcription does not affect cell death much but does cause an increase in wg signaling activity (Wang and Baker, 2019). Wg signaling promotes SOP cell determination in the thorax, and it has been shown previously that Wg signaling is antagonized by caspases, through a mechanism that is non-apoptotic but whose direct target is not yet certain (Baker, 1988; Kanuka et al., 2005; Wang and Baker, 2019).

Since emc mutations elevate ex expression (Wang and Baker, 2015b), we wondered whether emc also changes Diap1 levels and affects caspase activities. Increased ex expression would be expected to reduce transcription of the diap1 gene and potentially increase caspase activity, the opposite of what occurs in ex mutants. Remarkably, we found that caspase activity was responsible for all the aspects of the emc phenotype that we tested. This included reduced growth of imaginal disc cells, accelerated morphogenetic furrow progression, and loss of R7 and cone cells fates in the eye. The effects on eye development all reflected caspase-dependent expression of the Notch ligand Delta, which is known to contribute to morphogenetic furrow progression, and to R7 and cone cell fate specification. Thus, caspase-dependent non-apoptotic signaling underlies multiple roles of emc that are independent of proneural bHLH proteins.

Results

Caspase activity causes growth defects in emc mutants

To determine the contribution of caspases to growth inhibition in emc mutant cells, we used the Flippase (FLP)/FLP Recombinase Target (FRT) system (Xu and Rubin, 1993) to generate clones of emc mutant cells that were unable to activate caspases normally. We achieved this by homozygously deleting the linked reaper (rpr), head involution defective (hid), and grim genes using Df(3L)H99. Rpr, Hid, and Grim proteins promote Diap1 degradation in response to apoptotic stimuli and allow activation of initiator caspases such as dronc to start apoptosis (Yoo et al., 2002). By removing all three pro-apoptotic proteins, Df(3L)H99 affects both apoptotic and non-apoptotic caspase functions in Drosophila (Tapadia and Gautam, 2011; White et al., 1994). Thus, clones of emc Df(3L)H99 mutant cells should be defective for caspase activation. In addition, we also made clones of emc mutant cells also mutated for dronc, which encodes the main initiator caspase in Drosophila that is necessary for most developmental apoptosis (Hawkins et al., 2000; Meier et al., 2000; Quinn et al., 2000). Dronc contributes to non-apoptotic caspase functions as well, so emc dronc mutant cells should also show reduced non-apoptotic and well as apoptotic caspase functions.

In comparison to neutral clones, which grew equivalently to their twin-spot controls, emc mutant clones showed greatly reduced growth in eye or wing imaginal discs, as described previously (Figure 1A–D, Andrade-Zapata and Baonza, 2014; Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011; Alonso and Garcia-Bellido, 1988). In contrast, emc mutant clones that were also mutant for dronc (dronci29; Xu et al., 2005), or emc Df(3L)H99 clones that lacked the rpr, grim, and hid genes, grew more like their twin-spot controls in both eye and wing (Figure 1E–H). Statistically, growth of emc clones also deleted for the rpr, hid, and grim genes was not distinguishable from the wild-type, and similarly for emc clones also mutated for dronc (see Figure 1N for quantification). Neither homozygosity for dronc, nor deletion of rpr, grim, and hid, significantly affected growth of otherwise wild-type imaginal disc clones (Figure 1I–L).

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
Df(3L)H99 recues growth defect of emc mutant clones.

(A–L) Control and mutant clones in eye and wing imaginal disc were induced at the end of first instar and are associated with sibling twin-spot clones marked by two copies of the GFP marker (brighter gray) that serves as internal control for growth. Clones are labeled by the absence of GFP. (M) emc H99 clones induced in the Minute background (N) Quantification of the ratio of clone size to twin-spot measured in wing imaginal discs. Geometrical means ± SEM are shown. After log-transformation of clone/twin-spot ratios to ensure normality, one-way ANOVA rejected the null hypothesis that these results are the same (p = 5.72 × 10−8). The Holm correction for multiple comparison was used to identify significant differences between all pairs of samples. *** denotes highly significant difference from the FRT80 control (p < 0.001), NS denotes no significant difference (p > 0.05). Whereas the clone/twin-spot ratio for emc homozygous clones was significantly different from the FRT80 control (p = 5.72 × 10−6), this was not true for any of the other genotypes (H99, p = 0.79; dronc, p = 0.906; emc H99, p = 0.92; emc dronc, p = 0.345). The clone/twin-spot ratio for emc homozygous clones was also significantly different from that for emc H99 or emc dronc (p = 4.12 × 10−6 and p = 0.0177, respectively), whereas emc H99 and emc dronc did not differ significantly from H99 or dronc clones (p = 1 and p = 0.136, respectively). Source data for (N) are provided in Figure 1—source data 1. Genotypes: (A, C) ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80, (B, D) ywhsF;emcAP6FRT80/[Ubi-GFP]FRT80, (E, G) ywhsF;dronci29emcAP6 FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80, (F, H) ywhsF;emcAP6 Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80, (I, K) ywhsF;dronci29 FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80, (J, L) ywhsF;;Df(3L)H99FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80, (M) ywhsF; emcAP6 Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80. N = 10 for each genotype.

Figure 1—source data 1

Clone size source data for Figure 1N.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/91988/elife-91988-fig1-data1-v1.xlsx

Previous studies of emc phenotypes have often used Minute genetic backgrounds (i.e. heterozygosity for mutations in Rp genes) to retard growth and enhance the size of the emc mutant clones (Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009). When emc Df(3L)H99 clones were induced in the M(3)67C background, the clones took over almost the entire disc, leaving only a few M(3)67C heterozygous cells remaining (Figure 1M). The growth advantage of emc dronc clones was not so marked.

These results indicate that the growth disadvantage of emc mutant imaginal disc clones is mostly attributable to cell death genes. Preventing caspase activation, either by mutating the main initiator caspase, or by preventing Diap1 turnover, partially or completed restored normal growth. Our data did not support a previous suggestion that dronc was required for normal wing disc growth (Verghese et al., 2012).

Emc regulates furrow progression through non-apoptotic caspase activity

Emc mutations have multiple effects on the eye imaginal disc, although only a few aspects of retinal differentiation depend on proneural bHLH genes. The proneural gene atonal is required, along with da, for the specification of R8 photoreceptor precursors in the morphogenetic furrow that initiate each ommatidial cluster in the larval eye disc (Brown et al., 1996; Jarman et al., 1994). Later, during pupal development, proneural genes of the Achaete-Scute gene Complex (AS-C), along with da, are required for the specification of the interommatidial bristles (Cadigan et al., 2002). All the other cell types develop independently of proneural bHLH genes, and most of them develop independently of da (Brown et al., 1996; Jiménez and Campos-Ortega, 1987).

In emc mutant clones, retinal differentiation begins precociously, associated with more rapid transit of the morphogenetic furrow across the disc (Figure 2A, B, Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011; Bhattacharya and Baker, 2012; Brown et al., 1995). In contrast, we found that 75% of the time, the morphogenetic furrow progressed normally through emc dronc double mutant clones (Figure 2C). Eye discs containing emcDf(3L)H99 double mutant clones always appeared completely normal (Figure 2D). Control dronc and Df(3L)H99 mutant clones that lacked emc mutations also showed normal furrow progression (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A, B).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Morphogenetic furrow progression is affected by cell death pathways.

In all panels, the differentiating neurons are marked by Elav (in blue), and mutant cells are identified by the absence of GFP expression (in green). (A) The wave of retinal differentiation from posterior to anterior (right to left), marked here by Senseless expression in R8 photoreceptor cells (red) is normal in FRT80 control clones. (B) emc null clones lacking GFP show acceleration of retinal differentiation illustrated by yellow arrows (premature differentiation can also continue into wild-type regions ahead of such clones). In addition, ectopic neural differentiation also occurs sporadically anterior to the morphogenetic furrow, and unassociated with it (magenta arrows). (C) In contrast, retinal differentiation proceeds at the same pace in emc dronc double mutant clones as in nearby wild-type regions in 75% of the eye discs. (D) emc H99 double mutants show a stronger suppression of the acceleration of retinal differentiation (compare panel B). Genotypes: (A) ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (B) ywhsF;emcAP6FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (C) ywhsF;dronci29emcAP6 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80 (n = 12), (D) ywhsF;emcAP6 Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80. N = 8 for each genotype.

In addition, emc mutant clones also exhibit sporadic ectopic differentiation of neurons anterior to the morphogenetic furrow, which do not take photoreceptor cell fate (Figure 2A, B; Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011; Brown et al., 1995). This was likewise absent from emc dronc and emcDf(3L)H99 double mutant clones (Figure 2C, D).

The overall pattern of retinal differentiation revealed by labeling for Senseless, which is specific for R8 photoreceptor cells in the retina, and Elav, which labels all neuronal photoreceptor cells, appeared so normal in these genotypes that we deemed it necessary to confirm that the supposedly emc dronc mutant and emc Df(3L)H99 mutant clones were indeed mutated for emc. This was confirmed by lack of staining by an antibody against Emc protein, similar to plain emc mutant clones that did affect the morphogenetic furrow (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C–E). We also found that emc dronc and emc Df(3L)H99 clones upregulated Da protein expression to a comparable degree to plain emc mutant clones (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C–E, Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011). This further confirmed the absence of emc function from emc dronc mutant and emc Df(3L)H99 genotypes, and also showed that cell death pathways were not required for the regulation of Da protein levels by emc.

We have previously concluded that diap1 transcription is reduced in emc mutant clones, and in Da-overexpressing cells, due to Yki inhibition downstream of ex (Wang and Baker, 2015b). In eye imaginal discs, Diap1 protein was normally present uniformly (Figure 3A). Diap1 protein levels were cell-autonomously reduced in emc mutant clones posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, compared to emc/+ cells in the same eye discs, and shown and quantified in (Figure 3B, E). A comparable reduction was also seen in emc Df(3L)H99 clones, compared to emc/+ Df(3L)H99/+ cells in the same eye discs (Figure 3C, E). There was also no difference in Diap1 levels between Df(3L)H99 homozygous clones and Df(3L)H99/+ cells in the same eye discs (Figure 3D, E). These data suggest emc affects Diap1 protein levels, whereas rpr, grim, and hid affect Diap1 protein activity. A caveat is that Diap1 levels in mutant clones were not compared directly to wild-type cells, none of which were present in the same eye discs, and that Df(3L)H99 might affect Diap1 protein levels dominantly. Interestingly, we did not detect emc-dependent changes in Diap1 levels in wing discs (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B).

Figure 3 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Diap1 expression in emc clones.

In mosaic eye discs with (A) FRT80 clones, there is no difference in Diap1 levels within and outside the clone. However, both (B) emc mutant clones and (C) emc H99 clones show reduced Diap1 levels posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, compared to the heterozygous background. (D) H99 clones showed similar Diap1 levels, compared to the heterozygous background. (E) Quantification of Diap1 levels in different clone genotypes, compared to the background levels outside the clones. Means ± SEM are shown. Note that our experiments did not generate mosaics of wild-type and Df(3L)H99/+ cells for direct comparison of these genotypes. Statistical significance calculated by two-way ANOVA (****p ≤ 0.0001). Source data for (E) are provided in Figure 3—source data 1. Genotypes: (A) ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (B) ywhsF;emcAP6FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (C) ywhsF;emcAP6 Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (D) ywhsF; Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80. N = 6 for each genotype.

Figure 3—source data 1

Anti-Diap1 labeling source data for Figure 3E.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/91988/elife-91988-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx

To test the role of Diap1 in the eye directly, diap1 was over-expressed in the posterior eye by transcription under GMR-Gal4 control. This rescued morphogenetic furrow speed to normal in emc clones (Figure 3—figure supplement 2B). We also saw restoration of morphogenetic furrow speed in emc clones that expressed Baculovirus P35 under GMR-Gal4 control (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A). Baculovirus P35 encodes a caspase pseudo-substrate that inhibits all Drosophila caspases except Dronc (Hawkins et al., 2000; Hay et al., 1994; Meier et al., 2000; Xue and Horvitz, 1995). The emc clones expressing p35 also lacked cell death (Figure 3—figure supplement 3B). The restoration of morphogenetic furrow speed by Diap1, a Dronc antagonist, as well as by the caspase inhibitor P35, suggest that the effect of morphogenetic furrow acceleration in emc mutant clones is due to the caspase cascade.

To test whether reduced Diap1 expression promoted apoptosis and thereby accelerated the morphogenetic furrow, we assessed apoptosis levels by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) of eye discs containing mutant clones. We found almost no cell death posterior to the furrow in emc clones (Figure 3—figure supplement 2D), and cell death in emc clones anterior to the furrow was comparable to controls and less than that of cells surrounding the clones (Figure 3—figure supplement 2C, D). Some cell death is expected outside emc or control clones, as these cells have the M background that is itself associated with an increase in apoptosis (Coelho et al., 2005; Kale et al., 2015; Li and Baker, 2007). Similar to TUNEL, we found no cell death in emc clones posterior the furrow with Dcp1 staining (Figure 3—figure supplement 3D). To test whether apoptosis in the eye disc would be sufficient to promote morphogenetic furrow progression, we generated mosaic clones for a pineapple eye (pie) mutation. These pie mutant cells have an elevated rate of apoptosis in imaginal discs, but not sufficient to prevent pie homozygous clones surviving late into larval and even adult life (Shi et al., 2003). The rate of morphogenetic furrow progression was unaffected in eye discs containing pie clones (Figure 3—figure supplement 3A). Because no excess cell death was detected in emc clones, and cell death was insufficient to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow in otherwise wild-type eye discs, emc clones might be affected by a non-apoptotic caspase activity.

Wingless and Dpp signaling are unaffected by emc

To understand how caspases could affect the speed of the morphogenetic furrow, we analyzed pathways known to contribute. Hedgehog (Hh) and Decapentaplegic (Dpp) signaling drive this differentiation wave, along with a contribution from Notch signaling (Baonza and Freeman, 2001; Borod and Heberlein, 1998; Fu and Baker, 2003; Heberlein et al., 1993; Ma et al., 1993). A negative regulator of morphogenetic furrow progression is Wingless (Wg), which is expressed at the dorsal and ventral eye disc margins (Lee and Treisman, 2002; Maurel-Zaffran and Treisman, 2000).

Because we found that ex mutations affected thoracic bristle patterning through a caspase-dependent non-apoptotic effect on Wg signaling (Wang and Baker, 2019), we looked first to see whether emc mutations reduced Wg signaling in the eye. We used Frizzled-3 RFP (Fz3-RFP) as a reporter (Sato et al., 1999). In control eye discs, the Fz3-RFP recapitulates the pattern of endogenous Wg signaling activity at the wing margins (Figure 4—figure supplement 1, Treisman and Rubin, 1995). Frizzled-3 RFP expression was not changed in emc clones (Figure 4A). We then used a mutation in naked cuticle (nkd), encoding a negative feedback regulator of Wg signaling, to modulate Wg signaling (Chang et al., 2008; Zeng et al., 2000). If the morphogenetic furrow was accelerated in emc mutant clones due to reduced Wg signaling, more normal development should occur in emc nkd clones. The morphogenetic furrow was still accelerated in emc nkd clones, however (Figure 4B). These results provided no evidence that Wg signaling was the relevant emc target in the eye.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Wingless and Dpp signaling are not caspase targets.

(A) No reduction in the Wg signaling reporter Fz3-RFP was detectable in emc clones. See Figure 4—figure supplement 1 for Fz3-RFP expression in the wild-type. (B) Retinal differentiation is accelerated in emc nkd3 double mutant clones like in emc clones. Senseless expression in R8 photoreceptor cells and Elav staining in differentiating photoreceptors are shown. (C) p-Mad accumulates around the morphogenetic furrow in eye discs containing control clones (Firth et al., 2010; Vrailas and Moses, 2006). (E) Except for the advanced progression, p-Mad levels were unchanged in emc clones. Genotypes: (A) Fz3-RFP/+; emcAP6FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (B) ywhsF;emcAP6nkd3FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (C) ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (D) ywhsF;emcAP6FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80. N = 8 for each genotype.

We also examined Dpp signaling, since ectopic Dpp signaling is sufficient to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow (Pignoni and Zipursky, 1997). The pattern of pMad, a readout of Dpp signaling, was identical in emc mutant and control clones spanning the morphogenetic furrow (Figure 4C, D). Thus, Dpp signaling did not seem altered by emc mutants either.

Hedgehog pathway

Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is a key mover of the morphogenetic furrow (Heberlein et al., 1993; Ma et al., 1993; Treisman, 2013). Elevated Hh signaling is sufficient to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow (Heberlein et al., 1995; Ma and Moses, 1995). Notably, it has been suggested previously that emc mutations affect the morphogenetic furrow by activating Hedgehog signaling, because emc mutant cells accumulate Ci protein (Spratford and Kumar, 2013). Full-length Ci protein (Ci155) is targeted to the proteosome by Cul1 for processing into a transcriptional repressor protein Ci75 (Aza-Blanc et al., 1997). By inhibiting this processing, Hh prevents repression of target genes by Ci75 and promotes transcriptional activation downstream of Ci155. Accordingly, Ci155 accumulation is a feature of cells receiving Hh signals (Motzny and Holmgren, 1995).

We confirmed that emc mutant cells contain higher levels of Ci155, as reported previously (Figure 5A, Spratford and Kumar, 2013). Ci155 was elevated in emc dronc clones (Figure 5B) but reduced to wild-type levels in emc Df(3L)H99 clones (Figure 5C, Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Thus, Ci155 levels did not correlate perfectly with behavior of the morphogenetic furrow.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Ci expression and function in emc mutant clones.

(A) Ci is elevated within emc mutant cells (yellow arrows). This was also true posterior to the morphogenetic furrow (orange arrow). (B) Higher Ci was also seen in emc dronc mutant cells, even when the morphogenetic furrow progressed normally, as indicated by Elav staining. (C) Ci levels were completely normal in emc H99 clones. (D) emc and ci double mutant clones lacking GFP shows accelerated retinal differentiation (blue arrow). Genotypes: (A) ywhsF;emcAP6FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (B) ywhsF;dronci29emcAP6 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (C) ywhsF;emcAP6 Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (D) ywhsF;emcAP6FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] ci+ M(3)67C FRT80;ci[94]/ci[94]. N = 8 for each genotype except (D) which has n = 3.

We noticed that Ci155 levels were elevated in emc mutant clones in the posterior, differentiating eye disc, as well as in and ahead of the morphogenetic furrow (Figure 5A). This is significant, because Ci155 is not affected by Hh-dependent Cul1 processing posterior to the morphogenetic furrow (Baker et al., 2009; Ou et al., 2002). Ci155 accumulation posterior to the furrow suggests a Hh-independent mechanism.

To test whether Ci155 accumulation in emc clones indicates elevated Hh target signaling, we looked at the transmembrane receptor Patched (Ptc) which is a transcriptional target of Hh signaling, acting in a negative feedback loop (Hepker et al., 1997). We saw no changes in Ptc protein levels in either emc or emc Df(3L)H99 clones compared to controls, questioning the notion that Hh signaling was altered by emc (Figure 5—figure supplement 2).

To test functionally whether Ci155 is responsible for accelerating the furrow in emc clones, we generated emc ci double mutant clones. To achieve this, a genomic transgene that rescues ci94 flies to adulthood (Little et al., 2020), was introduced into chromosome arm 3L where it is linked to the wild-type emc locus, so that mitotic recombination in the ci94 null background leads to emc ci double mutant clones. For unknown reasons, emc ci double mutant clones were small and difficult to obtain, even in the Minute background. Eye differentiation was still accelerated in those emc ci double mutant clones we found that spanned the morphogenetic furrow (Figure 5D). The unexplained synergistic growth effects in particular could be consistent with interactions between emc and Hh signaling, but emc must regulate the speed of the morphogenetic furrow through at least one other target besides Ci in order to explain the furrow acceleration observed in emc ci double mutant clones.

Delta expression is a target of caspases

The remaining signaling pathway that contributes to morphogenetic furrow movement is Notch. Specifically, only cells where Notch signaling is active are competent to initiate retinal differentiation in response to Dpp (Baonza and Freeman, 2001; Fu and Baker, 2003). Accordingly, ectopic expression of Delta, the transmembrane ligand for Notch, is sufficient to accelerate retinal differentiation anterior to the morphogenetic furrow by expanding the effective range of Dpp signaling (Baonza and Freeman, 2001; Li and Baker, 2001).

To test whether emc restrains Notch, we examined the bHLH proteins of the E(spl)-C, widely characterized targets of the Notch pathway (Bray, 2006). We used mAb323 to detect up to five E(spl) bHLH proteins with Notch-dependent expression (Jennings et al., 1994). E(spl) protein expression, and hence Notch signaling, was higher in the morphogenetic furrow in emc clones than in wild-type cells (Figure 6A). In contrast, E(spl) protein expression was normal in emc dronc clones (Figure 6B).

Figure 6
Download asset Open asset
Notch activity and function in emc mutant clones.

(A) E(spl), an important N target for lateral inhibition, is elevated in the morphogenetic furrow region of emc clones (yellow arrows). (B) emc dronc clones have normal levels of E(spl) protein. (C) Senseless staining shows a neurogenic phenotype in psn mutant clones, due to reduced Notch signaling. Morphogenetic furrow progression is unaffected. (D) A neurogenic phenotype was also observed in emc psn clones, along with normal furrow progression. (E) Su(H) mutant clones identified by absence of GFP labeling show a strong neurogenic phenotype as well as advanced retinal differentiation (orange arrow) (Li and Baker, 2001). The cell-autonomous effect results in a discontinuity at the borders of Su(H) clones, where differentiation outside the clones lags that within clones (orange arrow) Genotypes: (A) ywhsF;emcAP6 FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (B) ywhsF; dronci29emcAP6 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (C) ywhsF/+;psnV1 FRT80/[Ubi-GFP]M(3)67CFRT80, (D) ywhsF/+; emcAP6 psnV1 FRT80/[Ubi-GFP]M(3)67CFRT80, (E) ywhsF; Su(H)D47FRT40/FRT40[UbiGFP]. N = 6 for each genotype.

To test whether elevated Notch signaling was required to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow in emc mutants, we examined emc psn double mutant clones. Presenilin (Psn) is the enzymatic component of γ-secretase that releases the intracellular domain of Notch during active Notch signaling, and the psn gene is linked to emc. Loss of psn function leads to a Notch loss of function phenotype (Struhl and Greenwald, 1999; Ye et al., 1999). Accordingly, psn clones lead to a neurogenic phenotype in the eye, without affecting the progression of the morphogenetic furrow (Figure 6C, Li and Baker, 2001). The position of the morphogenetic furrow was also not affected in emc psn clones (Figure 6D). Thus, the furrow was not accelerated in emc mutant clones also defective for Notch signaling.

These two results together indicated that emc mutants promoted Notch signaling in the morphogenetic furrow, acting through caspase signaling on a step prior to γ-secretase cleavage of the intracellular domain of Notch. Accordingly, we decided to check Delta (Dl) protein levels. We found that Dl protein levels were significantly and consistently elevated cell-autonomously throughout emc clones, both posterior and anterior to the furrow (Figure 7B, E). This included the region just ahead of the morphogenetic furrow that lacks Delta expression in normal development (Baker and Yu, 1998; Parks et al., 1995, Figure 7B). In contrast, levels of Dl protein in emc Df(3L)H99 clones were similar to those of wild-type controls (Figure 7A, D, E). Levels in emc dronc clones were also similar to wild-type on average, although some clones seemed to show an increase, smaller than in emc clones (Figure 7A, C, E). This indicated that Dl protein is a target of caspases, directly or indirectly. The Delta protein sequence contains multiple predicted caspase target sites, as do many proteins (Wang et al., 2014). Only one candidate site lies in the intracellular domain, where it would potentially be accessible to caspases (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). Truncation of the Dl intracellular domain is usually associated with loss of Dl function, not stabilization and enhanced function, however (Daskalaki et al., 2011).

Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Caspases regulate Delta levels.

(A) Normal levels of Delta protein are seen in FRT80 clones as compared to elevated Delta levels in (B) emc clones (arrowheads) whereas that phenotype is reversed in (D) emc H99 clones. However, as seen in (C), some dronc emc clones show intermediate Delta levels, although most resemble wild type. (E) Quantification of Delta levels in different clone genotypes, compared to the background levels outside the clones. Means ± SEM are shown. Significance was determined using one-way Anova with Tukey’s post hoc test. (**p ≤ 0.01, ****p ≤ 0.0001). Source data for (E) are provided in Figure 7—source data 1. Genotypes: (A) ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (B) ywhsF;emcAP6FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (C) ywhsF;dronci29emcAP6 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (D) ywhsF;emcAP6 Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP]FRT80. N = 7 for each genotype.

Figure 7—source data 1

Anti-Dl labeling source data for Figure 7E.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/91988/elife-91988-fig7-data1-v1.xlsx

Because Dl activates Notch signaling cell non-autonomously, we wondered whether the effect of emc mutant clones was cell-autonomous. We note that, in all the experiments reported here, and in all the previous studies of emc mutant clones affecting morphogenetic furrow movement, the morphogenetic furrow is maintained as a continuous groove across the eye disc (Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011; Bhattacharya and Baker, 2012; Brown et al., 1995; Spratford and Kumar, 2013). That is, the advanced front of retinal differentiation within emc clones is always smoothly continuous with the normal morphogenetic furrow outside the clones, implying a progressive gradual increase in morphogenetic furrow speed near the lateral edges of emc mutant clones (e.g. Figures 2B, 4B, D—6A). Clones of Su(H) null mutants, which act cell-autonomously, provide a contrasting example. Complete loss of Su(H) accelerates the morphogenetic furrow due to loss of default Su(H) repression of Notch targets (Li and Baker, 2001). The boundaries of Su(H) null clones exhibit a clear discontinuity between the rates of differentiation within and outside the clones (Figure 6E). This difference between Su(H) and emc mutant clones is consistent with the idea that emc affects morphogenetic furrow progression differently from Su(H).

Specific ommatidial cell fates are regulated by caspases in emc mutants

Because the general pattern of neurogenesis revealed by pan-neuronal anti-Elav staining appeared so normal in emc dronc and emc Df(3L)H99 clones (Figure 2C, D), we examined whether effects of emc on particular retinal cell fates was caspase dependent. Emc is also required for R7 differentiation and for timely onset of cone cell differentiation (Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009), two cell fate decisions that also depend on Notch signaling (Cooper and Bray, 2000; Flores et al., 2000; Tomlinson and Struhl, 2001; Treisman, 2013). These cell fates are normally independent of da, but like imaginal disc cell growth and morphogenetic furrow progression, ectopic da activity perturbs them in emc mutants (Brown et al., 1996; Reddy Onteddu et al., 2024).

Clones of emc mutant cells lack R7 photoreceptor cells (Figure 8A, B, Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009). R7 differentiation was restored to 90% of ommatidia in emc Df(3L)H99 clones (Figure 8C). As shown before, emc mutant clones delayed cone cell differentiation by two to three columns (corresponding to a delay of 3–6 hr) (Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009, Figure 8D, E). We found no delay in cone cell differentiation in most emc Df(3L)H99 clones (Figure 8F). These results indicated that caspase activity contributes to the R7 and cone cell differentiation defects that are also characteristic of emc mutants.

Figure 8
Download asset Open asset
Caspases contribute to R7 photoreceptor and cone cell defects in emc mutants.

In all panels, emc mutant cells are marked by the absence of GFP expression (in green) and photoreceptor neurons are marked by Elav in blue. (A) Runt (in red) is expressed in R7 and R8 (yellow arrowhead) photoreceptor cells inside and outside the clone in FRT80 controls. (B) Inside emc clone, Runt expression is lost from R7 cells, while expression in R8 cells remains unaffected (orange arrowhead). (C) However, inside the emc H99 clones, Runt is expressed in both R7 and R8 cells. (D) Cut (in red) is expressed in cone cells in FRT80 controls. (E) Inside emc clones, cut is delayed. (F) However, inside the emc H99 clones, cut staining is not delayed. Genotypes: (A, D) ywhsF;FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (B, E) ywhsF;emcAP6FRT80/[Ubi-GFP] M(3)67C FRT80, (C, F) ywhsF;emcAP6 Df(3L)H99 FRT80/[UbiGFP] M(3)67C FRT80. N = 4 for each genotype.

Discussion

The Id proteins are important regulators of differentiation (Ling et al., 2014; Massari and Murre, 2000; Roschger and Cabrele, 2017; Singh et al., 2022; Wang and Baker, 2015a). They are well known to antagonize proneural basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) proteins (Benezra et al., 1990; Cabrera et al., 1994; Ellis, 1994; Ellis et al., 1990; Garrell and Modolell, 1990; Norton, 2000). It has been uncertain whether this is their only function, as in Drosophila it is clear that emc mutations affect processes that are independent of proneural genes.

One other known effect of emc is that it restrains the Drosophila E protein Da. Da is expressed ubiquitously and is the obligate heterodimer partner of proneural bHLH proteins in neurogenesis. In undifferentiated progenitor cells, most or all Da is thought to be sequestered in inactive heterodimers with Emc (Li and Baker, 2018). In emc mutant cells, Da levels rise and become functional, potentially as homodimers (Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011). Multiple aspects of emc mutants, including poor growth, speed of morphogenetic furrow progression, and R7 photoreceptor and cone cells fates, depend on this ectopic da activity (Bhattacharya and Baker, 2011; Reddy Onteddu et al., 2024).

It was noticed, in the context of imaginal disc cell growth, that emc mutant cells experience da-dependent over-expression of the ex gene (Wang and Baker, 2015b; Wang and Baker, 2018). Although most study of ex has focused on its role in growth control through the SWH pathway, ex was shown to influence patterning through Yki-dependent transcription of diap1, an important regulator of cell death pathways. This was in the developing thorax, where ex mutations affect bristle patterning through diap1 and a non-apoptotic effect of caspases on Wg signaling (Wang and Baker, 2019). This observation led us to explore whether aspects of the emc phenotype could reflect reduced diap1 expression and elevated caspase activity.

Remarkably, we found that all four features of the emc phenotype we examined depended on the caspase-mediated cell death pathway. The normal growth of imaginal disc cells, normal speed of the morphogenetic furrow, specification of R7 photoreceptor cells, and timing of non-neuronal cone cell development were all restored when caspase activation was prevented, which was achieved by inactivating the initiator caspase Dronc, deleting the proapoptotic rpr, grim, and hid genes, over-expressing diap1, or over-expressing baculovirus p35. These appeared to be non-apoptotic effects because no elevation in apoptosis was apparent in emc mutant cells, because generating apoptosis by another means did not mimic the effects, and because the effects were mediated by elevate Dl protein expression in cells that were not apoptotic. They appeared to be effects of caspase activity because they depended in part on dronc, an initiator caspase that cleaves and activates effector caspases, because they were suppressed by baculovirus p35, a caspase inhibitor that is a caspase pseudo-substrate, and because they were suppressed by Diap1, a ubiquitin ligase that targets caspases for degradation. The effects may depend on the full caspase cascade because sensitivity to p35 indicates that caspases other than Dronc are necessary, and because mutating dronc alone gave lesser degrees of rescue than deleting rpr, grim, and hid. This is consistent with many other studies that describe the pathways for apoptotic and non-apoptotic caspase functions as similar (Aram et al., 2017; Baena-Lopez et al., 2018; Colon-Plaza and Su, 2022; Kanuka et al., 2005; Kuranaga and Miura, 2007; Nakajima and Kuranaga, 2017; Su, 2020).

Whereas non-apoptotic caspase activity promotes Wg signaling during specification of thoracic bristles (Kanuka et al., 2005), in the Drosophila eye the non-apoptotic caspase target was Notch signaling, due to elevated Delta protein levels. We do not know whether Delta is the direct caspase target. Dl protein levels could also be elevated through other mechanisms, for example through elevated Dl gene transcription, or through proteins that affect Dl protein stability.

Notably, emc mutations accelerate the morphogenetic furrow by enhancing Notch signaling, potentially non-autonomously, but inhibit R7 and cone cell differentiation through cell-autonomously reduced N signaling (Bhattacharya and Baker, 2009; Reddy Onteddu et al., 2024). These contrasts may be explained through the dual functions of the Notch ligand Delta in trans-activation and in cis-inhibition (Bray, 2016; Jacobsen et al., 1998; Li and Baker, 2004; Micchelli et al., 1997). The eye disc region ahead of the morphogenetic furrow lacks Delta expression (Baker and Yu, 1998; Parks et al., 1995). Ectopic Dl expression here is sufficient to activate N non-autonomously and drive morphogenetic furrow progression (Baonza and Freeman, 2001; Li and Baker, 2001). Within the R7 equivalence group, Delta is expressed early in R1 and R6 photoreceptor precursors, protecting them from N activation through cis-inhibition, and establishing the distinction between R1,6 and R7 precursor cells (Miller et al., 2009). Ectopic Dl expression posterior to the morphogenetic furrow has cis-inhibitory effect. Elevated Dl levels within emc mutant clones may render potential R7 and cone cell precursors cell-autonomously resistant to N activation, as normally seen in R1/6 precursor cells.

A previous study suggested that emc mutations might affect Hh signaling (Spratford and Kumar, 2013). Our data point much more clearly to an effect on Notch signaling. Although the Hh target Ci155 accumulates in emc mutant cells, increased Hh signaling is not the only possible cause. Ci155 is cytoplasmic, and thought to be only a precursor for a labile nuclear activator molecule (Ohlmeyer and Kalderon, 1998). Preventing activation and nuclear translocation of Ci155 by mutating the kinase fused also leads to Ci155 accumulation, but inactivates Hh signaling, showing that Ci155 levels and Hh activity can be separated. Presumably Ci155 accumulates in fu mutants because it is more stable than its activated derivative (Ohlmeyer and Kalderon, 1998). Significantly, emc mutant cells have been reported to over-express the fused antagonist su(fu), providing a potential alternative explanation of Ci155 accumulation in emc mutant cells (Spratford and Kumar, 2013). Analyzing emc ci double mutant cells suggested that ci was not essential to accelerate the morphogenetic furrow in emc mutant clones.

Here, we show that multiple effects of emc mutations that occur independently of proneural bHLH genes, due to the loss of restraint on da function in emc mutant cells, are caused by caspase-dependent non-apoptotic processes that result from reduced expression of Diap1 protein (Figure 9). Caspase-dependent non-apoptotic processes have previously been shown to affect Wg activity in the developing notum, although the direct target remains to be identified. Here we show that in eye development, Notch signaling is the target. Expression of Dl protein is increased in a caspase-dependent manner, which leads either to Notch activation or to Notch inhibition, depending on whether Delta acts through trans-activation or cis-inhibition. Our results show that, in addition to contributing to normal development, non-apoptotic caspase activities contribute to mutant phenotypes. In the Drosophila eye, multiple aspects of the emc phenotype result from caspase-dependent changes in Notch signaling, one of the major cell–cell signaling pathways that contributes to many, many cell fate decisions, and other, unidentified caspase-dependent events affect the growth of emc mutant cells in undifferentiated imaginal discs.

Figure 9
Download asset Open asset
Model of emc effects on Drosophila eye development.

Loss of emc allows Da protein to form homodimers and activate ex transcription, increasing Salvador–Warts–Hippo (SWH) pathway activity. SWH activity reduces DIAP1 expression, thereby derepressing caspase activity. In the eye, non-apoptotic caspase activity increases expression of the Notch ligand Delta. Elevated Delta expression accelerates morphogenetic furrow progression, while cis-inhibiting Notch signaling posterior to the morphogenetic furrow, inhibiting R7 cell specification and cone cell differentiation. In wild-type cells, most Da is likely heterodimerized with either a proneural protein or with Emc protein, and there is no role of caspases in Dl expression.

Da protein binds to and potentially regulates hundreds of genes throughout the Drosophila genome (Li et al., 2008). Accordingly, Da activity in emc mutant cells might be expected to lead to non-specific and pleiotropic effects. It is therefore remarkable that multiple aspects of proneural bHLH-independent emc mutant phenotypes have a simple common basis in elevated caspase activity.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Gene (Drosophila melanogaster)emcGenBankFBgn0000575
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)emc [AP6]PMID:7947322FBal0051626
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)dronc [i29]PMID:15800001FBal0190283
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Df(3L)H99PMID:8171319FBab0022359
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)nkd[3]PMID:2081466FBal0013025
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)PBac{y+ w + ci+}VK33This paper
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)psn[v1]Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterFBal0316340 BDSC: 63237
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Fz3-RFPPMID:21869817
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)pie[eB3]PMID:1634999FBal0032439
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Su(H)Δ47PMID:1617730FBal0103950
AntibodyEmc (Rabbit polyclonal)Y.N. Jan(1:8000)
AntibodyDa (Mouse monoclonal)PMID:3802198(1:200)
AntibodyGFP (Rat monoclonal)Nacalai TesqueCat #GF090R RRID:AB_2314545(1:50)
AntibodyGFP (Rabbit polyclonal)InvitrogenCat #A-11122 RRID:AB_221569(1:500)
Antibodyβ-Gal (Mouse monoclonal)Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat #40-1a RRID:AB_528100(1:100)
Antibodyβ-Gal (Rabbit polyclonal)Cappel (MP Biomedicals)Cat #55976 RRID:AB_2313707(1:100)
AntibodyRunt (Guinea pig polyclonal)PMID:9683745(1:500)
AntibodyE(spl)bHLH mAb323 (Mouse monoclonal)PMID:1618155(1:50)
AntibodySenseless (Guinea pig polyclonal)PMID:10975525(1:500)
AntibodyCleaved Drosophila Dcp-1 (Rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat #9578 RRID:AB_2721060(1:100)
AntibodyDIAP1 (Rabbit polyclonal)PMID:12021769(1:50)
Antibodyphospho-Smad1/5 (Rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat #9516 RRID:AB_491015(1:100)
AntibodyDelta (Mouse monoclonal)Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat #C594.9B RRID:AB_528194(1:2000)
AntibodyCut (Mouse monoclonal)Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat #2B10 RRID:AB_528186(1:50)
AntibodyPtc (Mouse monoclonal)Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat #Apa 1 RRID:AB_528441(1:40)
AntibodyElav (Rat monoclonal)Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat #7E8A10 RRID:AB_528218(1:50)
AntibodyElav (Mouse monoclonal)Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat #9F8A9 RRID:AB_528217(1:100)
AntibodyCi (Rat monoclonal)Developmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat #2A1 RRID:AB_2109711(1:10)
AntibodyCy2, Cy3, and Cy5Jackson ImmunoResearch(1:200)
AntibodyAlexa 555 (Guinea pig polyclonal)InvitrogenCat #A-21435 RRID:AB_2535856(1:500)
Recombinant DNA reagentgenomic CiPMID:33084577
Commercial assay or kitApopTag Red in situ apoptosis detection kitMillipore SigmaCat #S7165
SoftwareCascleave 2.0PMID:24149049

Drosophila strains

Request a detailed protocol

The following stocks were employed in this study and were maintained at 25°C unless otherwise stated – hsflp;emcAP6 FRT80/TM6B, hsflp;dronci29FRT80/TM6B, hsflp;dronci29emcAP6, hsflp;Df(3L)H99/TM3, hsflp;Df(3L)H99 emc AP6/TM3, Ubi-GFP M(3)67C FRT80, FRT42 M(2)56F Ubi-GFP, FRT82 M(3)95A Ubi-GFP, hsflp; Ubi-GFPFRT80, hsflp; Su(H)Δ47FRT40, pieeB3 FRT40, psn[v1]FRT80/TM6B, Fz3-RFP;D/TM6B (kind gift from Yu Kimata, University of Cambridge). We obtained genomic Ci construct from Kalderon lab and used BestGene Inc to target the transgene to the third chromosome and then recombined these flies to generate hsflp;ci+M(3)67Calz FRT80/TM6B;ci94/y+spa.

Mosaic analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Mosaic clones were obtained using FLP/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination (Golic, 1991; Xu and Rubin, 1993). For non-Minute genotypes, larvae were subjected to heat shock for 30 minutes at 37°C, 60 ± 12 hr after egg laying. For Minute genotypes, heat shock was performed 84 ± 12 hr after egg laying for 50 minutes. Larvae were dissected 72 hr after heat shock. All flies were maintained at 25°C unless otherwise stated.

Clonal growth measurements

Request a detailed protocol

Clone and twin-spot areas were measured by tracing in ImageJ. To quantify the growth effects of various genotypes, the sum of clone areas per wing disc was divided by the sum of twin-spot areas in the same wing disc. This avoids any subjectivity in identifying individual clones and assigning them to individual twin spots. Clone/twin-spot ratios were log-transformed to ensure normality before statistical analysis.

Immunohistochemistry and histology

Request a detailed protocol

Unless otherwise noted, preparation of eye and wing imaginal discs for immunostaining and confocal imaging were performed as described previously (Baker et al., 2014). Antibodies from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB): anti-Ptc (mouse, 1:40), anti-Elav (mouse, 1:100), anti-Elav (rat, 1:50), anti-Cut (mouse, 1:50), anti-Delta C594.9B (mouse, 1:2000), anti-βGal (mouse, 1:100), mouse anti-βGal (1:100, DSHB 40-1a), and anti-Ci (rat, 1:10). Other antibodies: anti-phospho-Smad1/5 (rabbit, 1:100, Cell Signaling), anti-DIAP1 (rabbit, 1:50) (gift from Hyun Don Ryoo, NYU), anti-Dcp1 (rabbit, 1:100, Cell Signaling), anti-Sens (guinea pig, a gift from Hugo Bellen used at 1:500), anti-Da (mouse, 1:200), rabbit anti-Emc (1:8000), anti-GFP (rat, 1:50 from Nacalai Tesque # GF090R), rabbit anti-GFP (1:500), rabbit anti-β-Galactosidase (1:100, Cappel), E(spl)bHLH (1:50,mAb323), and guinea pig anti-runt (1:500). Secondary antibodies conjugated with Cy2, Cy3, and Cy5 dyes (1:200) were from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories and Alexa 555 (1:500). Multi-labelling images were sequentially scanned with Leica SP8 confocal microscopes and were projected and processed with ImageJ. All images were assembled into figure format using Adobe Illustrator 2020.

Quantifying immunofluorescence

Request a detailed protocol

Anti-DIAP1 and anti-Dl labeling were quantified within clones using the average density measurement in ImageJ and normalized to control regions in the same tissue. For anti-DIAP1 labeling, in particular, we lack any measurement of any non-specific background labeling that may occur. Differences in Diap1 levels between genotypes may be underestimated if a component of the labeling is non-specific.

TUNEL assay

Request a detailed protocol

For labeling dead cells with TUNEL assay, ApopTag Red In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (Cat #S7165) was used according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, dissected eye discs were fixed for 20 min at room temperature followed by three washes with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then the samples were incubated in equilibration buffer for 1 min followed by incubation in reaction buffer (TdT enzyme; ratio 7:3) at 37°C for 1 hr. TdT reaction mix was replaced with stop buffer (diluted 1:34 in dH2O) and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Samples were washed three times with 1× PBS, 5 min per wash; and incubated with anti-digoxigenin antibody solution (diluted 31:34 in blocking solution) for 30 min at room temperature. The samples were then washed three times in 1× PBS, 5 min per wash. For the subsequent antibody staining, the samples were blocked in PBST (1× PBS + 0.5% Triton-X) for 30 min, and incubated with primary antibodies in PBST overnight at 4°C. The samples were next washed with PBST and incubated for 2 hr with secondary antibodies in PBST, and then again washed with PBST, followed by PBS wash and samples were mounted in mounting media.

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7. The statistical tests used are described in the figure legends. Statistical significance is shown as follows: n.s., p > 0.05; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

Prediction of caspase cleavage sites

Request a detailed protocol

Caspase cleavage sites were predicted for Delta using Cascleave 2.0 (Wang et al., 2014). Cascleave 2.0 was set to a medium stringency threshold for prediction of cleavage sites.

Materials availability

Request a detailed protocol

All new materials generated in this project are available from the corresponding author.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files have been provided for Figures 1, 3 and 7.

References

    1. Bray SJ
    (2016) Notch signalling in context
    Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 17:722–735.
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.94
    1. Jiménez F
    2. Campos-Ortega JA
    (1987)
    Genes in subdivision 1B of the Drosophila melanogaster X-chromosome and their influence on neural development
    Journal of Neurogenetics 4:179–200.
    1. Treisman JE
    (2013) Retinal differentiation in Drosophila
    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Developmental Biology 2:545–557.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.100

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sudershana Nair

    Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  2. Nicholas E Baker

    1. Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    2. Department of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    3. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
    Present address
    1. Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, United States
    2. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    nebaker@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4250-3488

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM047892)

  • Nicholas E Baker

National Institutes of Health (EY028990)

  • Nicholas E Baker

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Y Kimata, D Kalderon, H Bellen, HD Ryoo, and Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies and Drosophila strains, and Tao Wang for statistical advice. We thank C Khan, A Kumar, J Secombe, and A Jenny for comments on the manuscript. Confocal microscopy was performed at the Analytical Imaging Facility, Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The Leica SP8 microscope was acquired through NIH SIG 1S10 OD023591. Supported by grants from the NIH (GM047892 and EY028990).

Version history

  1. Sent for peer review:
  2. Preprint posted:
  3. Reviewed Preprint version 1:
  4. Reviewed Preprint version 2:
  5. Version of Record published:

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91988. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

© 2023, Nair and Baker

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 366
    views
  • 13
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sudershana Nair
  2. Nicholas E Baker
(2024)
Extramacrochaetae regulates Notch signaling in the Drosophila eye through non-apoptotic caspase activity
eLife 12:RP91988.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91988.3

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91988

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology

    Motor neurons are dispensable for the assembly of a sensorimotor circuit for gaze stabilization

    Dena Goldblatt, Basak Rosti ... David Schoppik
    Research Article

    Sensorimotor reflex circuits engage distinct neuronal subtypes, defined by precise connectivity, to transform sensation into compensatory behavior. Whether and how motor neuron populations specify the subtype fate and/or sensory connectivity of their pre-motor partners remains controversial. Here, we discovered that motor neurons are dispensable for proper connectivity in the vestibular reflex circuit that stabilizes gaze. We first measured activity following vestibular sensation in pre-motor projection neurons after constitutive loss of their extraocular motor neuron partners. We observed normal responses and topography indicative of unchanged functional connectivity between sensory neurons and projection neurons. Next, we show that projection neurons remain anatomically and molecularly poised to connect appropriately with their downstream partners. Lastly, we show that the transcriptional signatures that typify projection neurons develop independently of motor partners. Our findings comprehensively overturn a long-standing model: that connectivity in the circuit for gaze stabilization is retrogradely determined by motor partner-derived signals. By defining the contribution of motor neurons to specification of an archetypal sensorimotor circuit, our work speaks to comparable processes in the spinal cord and advances our understanding of principles of neural development.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics

    Rescuable sleep and synaptogenesis phenotypes in a Drosophila model of O-GlcNAc transferase intellectual disability

    Ignacy Czajewski, Bijayalaxmi Swain ... Daan MF van Aalten
    Research Article

    O-GlcNAcylation is an essential intracellular protein modification mediated by O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA). Recently, missense mutations in OGT have been linked to intellectual disability, indicating that this modification is important for the development and functioning of the nervous system. However, the processes that are most sensitive to perturbations in O-GlcNAcylation remain to be identified. Here, we uncover quantifiable phenotypes in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster carrying a patient-derived OGT mutation in the catalytic domain. Hypo-O-GlcNAcylation leads to defects in synaptogenesis and reduced sleep stability. Both these phenotypes can be partially rescued by genetically or chemically targeting OGA, suggesting that a balance of OGT/OGA activity is required for normal neuronal development and function.

    1. Developmental Biology

    Neuronal Development: Rethinking sensorimotor circuits

    Maarten F Zwart
    Insight

    New research shows that the neural circuit responsible for stabilising gaze can develop in the absence of motor neurons, contrary to a long-standing model in the field.