Small molecule inhibition of apicomplexan FtsH1 disrupts plastid biogenesis in human pathogens

  1. Katherine Amberg-Johnson
  2. Sanjay B Hari
  3. Suresh M Ganesan
  4. Hernan A Lorenzi
  5. Robert T Sauer
  6. Jacquin C Niles
  7. Ellen Yeh  Is a corresponding author
  1. Stanford Medical School, United States
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  3. The J. Craig Venter Institute, United States

Abstract

The malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum and related apicomplexan pathogens contain an essential plastid organelle, the apicoplast, which is a key anti-parasitic target. Derived from secondary endosymbiosis, the apicoplast depends on novel, but largely cryptic, mechanisms for protein/lipid import and organelle inheritance during parasite replication. These critical biogenesis pathways present untapped opportunities to discover new parasite-specific drug targets. We used an innovative screen to identify actinonin as having a novel mechanism-of-action inhibiting apicoplast biogenesis. Resistant mutation, chemical-genetic interaction, and biochemical inhibition demonstrate that the unexpected target of actinonin in P. falciparum and Toxoplasma gondii is FtsH1, a homolog of a bacterial membrane AAA+ metalloprotease. PfFtsH1 is the first novel factor required for apicoplast biogenesis identified in a phenotypic screen. Our findings demonstrate that FtsH1 is a novel and, importantly, druggable antimalarial target. Development of FtsH1 inhibitors will have significant advantages with improved drug kinetics and multistage efficacy against multiple human parasites.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Katherine Amberg-Johnson

    Department of Biochemistry, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sanjay B Hari

    Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Suresh M Ganesan

    Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hernan A Lorenzi

    Department of Infectious Disease, The J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Robert T Sauer

    Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jacquin C Niles

    Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ellen Yeh

    Department of Biochemistry, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    ellenyeh@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3974-3816

Funding

National Institutes of Health (1K08AI097239)

  • Ellen Yeh

National Institutes of Health (F32GM116241)

  • Sanjay B Hari

National Institutes of Health (T32GM007276)

  • Katherine Amberg-Johnson

Burroughs Wellcome Fund

  • Ellen Yeh

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1069759)

  • Jacquin C Niles

Stanford Bio-X SIGF William and Lynda Steere Fellowship

  • Katherine Amberg-Johnson

National Institutes of Health (1DP5OD012119)

  • Ellen Yeh

National Institutes of Health (U19AI110819)

  • Hernan A Lorenzi

National Institutes of Health (1DP2OD007124)

  • Jacquin C Niles

National Institutes of Health (P50 GM098792)

  • Jacquin C Niles

National Institutes of Health (AI016892)

  • Robert T Sauer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2017, Amberg-Johnson et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,053
    views
  • 524
    downloads
  • 52
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Katherine Amberg-Johnson
  2. Sanjay B Hari
  3. Suresh M Ganesan
  4. Hernan A Lorenzi
  5. Robert T Sauer
  6. Jacquin C Niles
  7. Ellen Yeh
(2017)
Small molecule inhibition of apicomplexan FtsH1 disrupts plastid biogenesis in human pathogens
eLife 6:e29865.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29865

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29865

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Edited by Olivier Silvie et al.
    Collection

    eLife has recently published a wide range of papers on malaria, covering a diversity of themes including parasite biology, epidemiology, immunology, drugs and vaccines.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.