Kallikrein-kinin blockade in patients with COVID-19 to prevent acute respiratory distress syndrome

  1. Frank L van de Veerdonk  Is a corresponding author
  2. Mihai G Netea
  3. Marcel van Deuren
  4. Jos WM van der Meer
  5. Quirijn de Mast
  6. Roger J Brüggemann
  7. Hans van der Hoeven
  1. Radboud University Medical Center, Netherlands
  2. Radboud University Medical Centre, Netherlands

Abstract

COVID-19 patients can present with pulmonary edema early in disease. We propose that the this is due to a local vascular problem because of activation of bradykinin 1 receptor (B1R) and B2R on endothelial cells in the lungs. SARS-CoV-2 enters the cell via ACE2 that next to its role in RAS is needed to inactivate des-Arg9 bradykinin, the potent ligand of the bradykinin receptor type 1 (B1). Without ACE2 acting as a guardian to inactivate the ligands of B1, the lung environment is prone for local vascular leakage leading to angioedema. Here we hypothesize that a bradykinin-dependent local lung angioedema via B1 and B2 receptors is an important feature of COVID-19. We propose that blocking the B2 receptor and inhibiting kallikrein activity might have an ameliorating effect on early disease caused by COVID-19 and might prevent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In addition, this pathway might indirectly be responsive to anti-inflammatory agents.

Data availability

There are no datasets associated with this work.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Frank L van de Veerdonk

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    frank.vandeveerdonk@radboudumc.nl
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1121-4894
  2. Mihai G Netea

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Marcel van Deuren

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Jos WM van der Meer

    Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    Jos WM van der Meer, Senior editor, eLife.
  5. Quirijn de Mast

    Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Roger J Brüggemann

    Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Hans van der Hoeven

    Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

No external funding was received for this work.

Copyright

© 2020, van de Veerdonk et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,892
    views
  • 1,443
    downloads
  • 230
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Frank L van de Veerdonk
  2. Mihai G Netea
  3. Marcel van Deuren
  4. Jos WM van der Meer
  5. Quirijn de Mast
  6. Roger J Brüggemann
  7. Hans van der Hoeven
(2020)
Kallikrein-kinin blockade in patients with COVID-19 to prevent acute respiratory distress syndrome
eLife 9:e57555.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57555

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57555

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    3. Epidemiology and Global Health
    4. Immunology and Inflammation
    Edited by Jos WM van der Meer et al.
    Collection

    eLife has published articles on a wide range of infectious diseases, including COVID-19, influenza, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, malaria and typhoid fever.

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Joanna Kosinska, Julian C Assmann ... Markus Schwaninger
    Research Article

    Monomethyl fumarate (MMF) and its prodrug dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are currently the most widely used agents for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, not all patients benefit from DMF. We hypothesized that the variable response of patients may be due to their diet. In support of this hypothesis, mice subjected to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model of MS, did not benefit from DMF treatment when fed a lauric acid-rich (LA) diet. Mice on normal chow (NC) diet, in contrast, and even more so mice on high-fiber (HFb) diet showed the expected protective DMF effect. DMF lacked efficacy in the LA diet-fed group despite similar resorption and preserved effects on plasma lipids. When mice were fed the permissive HFb diet, the protective effect of DMF treatment depended on hydroxycarboxylic receptor 2 (HCAR2) which is highly expressed in neutrophil granulocytes. Indeed, deletion of Hcar2 in neutrophils abrogated DMF protective effects in EAE. Diet had a profound effect on the transcriptional profile of neutrophils and modulated their response to MMF. In summary, DMF required HCAR2 on neutrophils as well as permissive dietary effects for its therapeutic action. Translating the dietary intervention into the clinic may improve MS therapy.