Niche partitioning facilitates coexistence of closely related honey bee gut bacteria

  1. Silvia Brochet
  2. Andrew Quinn  Is a corresponding author
  3. Ruben AT Mars  Is a corresponding author
  4. Nicolas Neuschwander  Is a corresponding author
  5. Uwe Sauer  Is a corresponding author
  6. Philipp Engel  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. ETH Zürich, Switzerland
  3. ETH Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Ecological processes underlying bacterial coexistence in the gut are not well understood. Here, we disentangled the effect of the host and the diet on the coexistence of four closely related Lactobacillus species colonizing the honey bee gut. We serially passaged the four species through gnotobiotic bees and in liquid cultures in the presence of either pollen (bee diet) or simple sugars. Although the four species engaged in negative interactions, they were able to stably coexist, both in vivo and in vitro. However, coexistence was only possible in the presence of pollen, and not in simple sugars, independent of the environment. Using metatranscriptomics and metabolomics, we found that the four species utilize different pollen-derived carbohydrate substrates indicating resource partitioning as the basis of coexistence. Our results show that despite longstanding host association, gut bacterial interactions can be recapitulated in vitro providing insights about bacterial coexistence when combined with in vivo experiments.

Data availability

The amplicon sequencing data and the RNA sequencing data are available under the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA700984 and the GEO record GSE166724 respectively.All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Bacterial abundance data (CFUs) are included into Supplementary File 3, amplicon sequencing processed data are included into Supplementary File 4, RNA sequencing processed data, statistical analysis results (enrichment tests) and transcript per million data are included into Supplementary File 5-9, metabolomics analysis data are included into Supplementary File 10. All differential expression analysis results of this study are included in Supplementary File 11.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Silvia Brochet

    Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6443-185X
  2. Andrew Quinn

    Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    andrew.quinn@unil.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1401-1053
  3. Ruben AT Mars

    Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    Mars.Ruben@mayo.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nicolas Neuschwander

    Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    nicolas.neuschwander@unil.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Uwe Sauer

    Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    sauer@imsb.biol.ethz.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5923-0770
  6. Philipp Engel

    Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    philipp.engel@unil.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4678-6200

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A_160345)

  • Philipp Engel

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A_179487)

  • Andrew Quinn
  • Nicolas Neuschwander
  • Philipp Engel

H2020 European Research Council (714804)

  • Silvia Brochet
  • Philipp Engel

NCCR Microbiomes (51NF40_180575)

  • Philipp Engel

Human Frontier Science Program (RGY0077/2016)

  • Philipp Engel

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Brochet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,182
    views
  • 624
    downloads
  • 85
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Silvia Brochet
  2. Andrew Quinn
  3. Ruben AT Mars
  4. Nicolas Neuschwander
  5. Uwe Sauer
  6. Philipp Engel
(2021)
Niche partitioning facilitates coexistence of closely related honey bee gut bacteria
eLife 10:e68583.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68583

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68583

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kathleen T Quach, Gillian A Hughes, Sreekanth H Chalasani
    Research Article

    Prey must balance predator avoidance with feeding, a central dilemma in prey refuge theory. Additionally, prey must assess predatory imminence—how close threats are in space and time. Predatory imminence theory classifies defensive behaviors into three defense modes: pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike, corresponding to increasing levels of threat—–suspecting, detecting, and contacting a predator. Although predatory risk often varies in spatial distribution and imminence, how these factors intersect to influence defensive behaviors is poorly understood. Integrating these factors into a naturalistic environment enables comprehensive analysis of multiple defense modes in consistent conditions. Here, we combine prey refuge and predatory imminence theories to develop a model system of nematode defensive behaviors, with Caenorhabditis elegans as prey and Pristionchus pacificus as predator. In a foraging environment comprised of a food-rich, high-risk patch and a food-poor, low-risk refuge, C. elegans innately exhibits circa-strike behaviors. With experience, it learns post- and pre-encounter behaviors that proactively anticipate threats. These defense modes intensify with predator lethality, with only life-threatening predators capable of eliciting all three modes. SEB-3 receptors and NLP-49 peptides, key stress regulators, vary in their impact and interdependence across defense modes. Overall, our model system reveals fine-grained insights into how stress-related signaling regulates defensive behaviors.