Inflammatory response in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells triggered by activating SHP2 mutations evokes blood defects

  1. Maja Solman
  2. Sasja Blokzijl-Franke
  3. Florian Piques
  4. Chuan Yan
  5. Qiqi Yang
  6. Marion Strullu
  7. Sarah M Kamel
  8. Pakize Ak
  9. Jeroen Bakkers
  10. David M Langenau
  11. Helene Cave
  12. Jeroen den Hertog  Is a corresponding author
  1. Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, Netherlands
  2. Hôpital Robert Debré, France
  3. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
  4. University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands

Abstract

Gain-of-function mutations in the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 are the most frequently occurring mutations in sporadic juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) and JMML-like myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) associated with Noonan syndrome (NS). Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) are the disease propagating cells of JMML. Here, we explored transcriptomes of HSPCs with Shp2 mutations derived from JMML patients and a novel NS zebrafish model. In addition to major NS traits, CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in Shp2D61G mutant zebrafish recapitulated a JMML-like MPN phenotype, including myeloid lineage hyperproliferation, ex vivo growth of myeloid colonies and in vivo transplantability of HSPCs. Single cell mRNA sequencing of HSPCs from Shp2D61G zebrafish embryos and bulk sequencing of HSPCs from JMML patients revealed an overlapping inflammatory gene expression pattern. Strikingly, an anti-inflammatory agent rescued JMML-like MPN in Shp2D61G zebrafish embryos. Our results indicate that a common inflammatory response was triggered in the HSPCs from sporadic JMML patients and syndromic NS zebrafish, which potentiated MPN and may represent a future target for JMML therapies.

Data availability

Sequencing data has been deposited to GEO under accession codes GSE167787 and GSE183252Figure 1-Source Data 1, Figure 3-Source Data 1 and Figure 5-Source Data 1-3 contain the source data for the respective figures

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maja Solman

    Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sasja Blokzijl-Franke

    Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Florian Piques

    Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chuan Yan

    Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Qiqi Yang

    Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Marion Strullu

    Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sarah M Kamel

    Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4424-9732
  8. Pakize Ak

    Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jeroen Bakkers

    Cardiac Development and Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9418-0422
  10. David M Langenau

    Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6664-8318
  11. Helene Cave

    Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2840-1511
  12. Jeroen den Hertog

    Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, Utrecht, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    j.denhertog@hubrecht.eu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8642-8088

Funding

European Commission (ERARE NSEURONET)

  • Jeroen den Hertog

European Commission (EJPRD NSEURONET)

  • Helene Cave

European Commission (EJPRD NSEURONET)

  • Jeroen den Hertog

KWF Kankerbestrijding (12829)

  • Jeroen den Hertog

NIH Office of the Director (R01CA211734)

  • David M Langenau

NIH Office of the Director (R24OD016761)

  • David M Langenau

European Commission (ERARE NSEURONET)

  • Helene Cave

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures involving experimental animals were approved by the animal experiments committee of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Dierexperimenten commissie protocol HI18-0702, and performed under the local guidelines in compliance with national and European law.

Human subjects: All children's samples were obtained after parents had given their written informed consent. Experiments were approved by the institutional review board of the French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) (IORG0003254) in accordance with the Helsinki declaration. Healthy children bone marrows were obtained from intrafamilial BM transplantation donors and used with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of "Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val-de-Seine," Paris 7 University, AP-HP), (IRB: 00006477), in accordance with the Helsinki declaration.

Copyright

© 2022, Solman et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,659
    views
  • 263
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maja Solman
  2. Sasja Blokzijl-Franke
  3. Florian Piques
  4. Chuan Yan
  5. Qiqi Yang
  6. Marion Strullu
  7. Sarah M Kamel
  8. Pakize Ak
  9. Jeroen Bakkers
  10. David M Langenau
  11. Helene Cave
  12. Jeroen den Hertog
(2022)
Inflammatory response in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells triggered by activating SHP2 mutations evokes blood defects
eLife 11:e73040.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73040

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73040

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Ismail M Meraz, Mourad Majidi ... Jack A Roth
    Research Article

    Expression of NPRL2/TUSC4, a tumor-suppressor gene, is reduced in many cancers including NSCLC. Restoration of NPRL2 induces DNA damage, apoptosis, and cell-cycle arrest. We investigated NPRL2 antitumor immune responses in aPD1R/KRAS/STK11mt NSCLC in humanized-mice. Humanized-mice were generated by transplanting fresh human cord blood-derived CD34 stem cells into sub-lethally irradiated NSG mice. Lung-metastases were developed from KRAS/STK11mt/aPD1R A549 cells and treated with NPRL2 w/wo pembrolizumab. NPRL2-treatment reduced lung metastases significantly, whereas pembrolizumab was ineffective. Antitumor effect was greater in humanized than non-humanized-mice. NPRL2 + pembrolizumab was not synergistic in KRAS/STK11mt/aPD1R tumors but was synergistic in KRASwt/aPD1S H1299. NPRL2 also showed a significant antitumor effect on KRASmt/aPD1R LLC2 syngeneic-tumors. The antitumor effect was correlated with increased infiltration of human cytotoxic-T, HLA-DR+DC, CD11c+DC, and downregulation of myeloid and regulatory-T cells in TME. Antitumor effect was abolished upon in-vivo depletion of CD8-T, macrophages, and CD4-T cells whereas remained unaffected upon NK-cell depletion. A distinctive protein-expression profile was found after NPRL2 treatment. IFNγ, CD8b, and TBX21 associated with T-cell functions were significantly increased, whereas FOXP3, TGFB1/B2, and IL-10RA were strongly inhibited by NPRL2. A list of T-cell co-inhibitory molecules was also downregulated. Restoration of NPRL2 exhibited significantly slower tumor growth in humanized-mice, which was associated with increased presence of human cytotoxic-T, and DC and decreased percentage of Treg, MDSC, and TAM in TME. NPRL2-stable cells showed a substantial increase in colony-formation inhibition and heightened sensitivity to carboplatin. Stable-expression of NPRL2 resulted in the downregulation of MAPK and AKT-mTOR signaling. Taken-together, NPRL2 gene-therapy induces antitumor activity on KRAS/STK11mt/aPD1R tumors through DC-mediated antigen-presentation and cytotoxic immune-cell activation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cancer Biology
    Flavie Coquel, Sing-Zong Ho ... Philippe Pasero
    Research Article

    Cancer cells display high levels of oncogene-induced replication stress (RS) and rely on DNA damage checkpoint for viability. This feature is exploited by cancer therapies to either increase RS to unbearable levels or inhibit checkpoint kinases involved in the DNA damage response. Thus far, treatments that combine these two strategies have shown promise but also have severe adverse effects. To identify novel, better-tolerated anticancer combinations, we screened a collection of plant extracts and found two natural compounds from the plant, Psoralea corylifolia, that synergistically inhibit cancer cell proliferation. Bakuchiol inhibited DNA replication and activated the checkpoint kinase CHK1 by targeting DNA polymerases. Isobavachalcone interfered with DNA double-strand break repair by inhibiting the checkpoint kinase CHK2 and DNA end resection. The combination of bakuchiol and isobavachalcone synergistically inhibited cancer cell proliferation in vitro. Importantly, it also prevented tumor development in xenografted NOD/SCID mice. The synergistic effect of inhibiting DNA replication and CHK2 signaling identifies a vulnerability of cancer cells that might be exploited by using clinically approved inhibitors in novel combination therapies.