Abstract

Spermidine and other polyamines alleviate oxidative stress, yet excess spermidine seems toxic to Escherichia coli unless it is neutralized by SpeG, an enzyme for the spermidine N-acetyl transferase function. Thus, wild-type E. coli can tolerate applied exogenous spermidine stress, but DspeG strain of E. coli fails to do that. Here, using different ROS probes and performing electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, we provide evidence that although spermidine mitigates oxidative stress by lowering overall ROS levels, excess of it simultaneously triggers the production of superoxide radicals, thereby causing toxicity in the DspeG strain. Furthermore, performing microarray experiment and other biochemical assays, we show that the spermidine-induced superoxide anions affected redox balance and iron homeostasis. Finally, we demonstrate that while RNA-bound spermidine inhibits iron oxidation, free spermidine interacts and oxidizes the iron to evoke superoxide radicals directly. Therefore, we propose that the spermidine-induced superoxide generation is one of the major causes of spermidine toxicity in E. coli.

Data availability

Microarray data is available in the GEO server. GEO accession Number GSE154618 has been provided in the material and method section.Source files for the following Figures were provided as a zip folder:Figure 1A, 1B, 1C, 1FFigure 2Figure 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F, 3GFigure 4B (ii), 4C, 4D, 4EFigure 5A, 5B, 5DFigure 6D, 6E, 6GFigure 1-figure supplement 1C

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vineet Kumar

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Rajesh Kumar Mishra

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Debarghya Ghose

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Arunima Kalita

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Pulkit Dhiman

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Anand Prakash

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Nirja Thakur

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gopa Mitra

    Division of Molecular Medicine, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Vinod D Chaudhari

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Amit Arora

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3503-4695
  11. Dipak Dutta

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    For correspondence
    dutta@imtech.res.in
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0458-4109

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India (MLP042)

  • Dipak Dutta

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Kumar et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,465
    views
  • 312
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vineet Kumar
  2. Rajesh Kumar Mishra
  3. Debarghya Ghose
  4. Arunima Kalita
  5. Pulkit Dhiman
  6. Anand Prakash
  7. Nirja Thakur
  8. Gopa Mitra
  9. Vinod D Chaudhari
  10. Amit Arora
  11. Dipak Dutta
(2022)
Free spermidine evokes superoxide radicals that manifest toxicity
eLife 11:e77704.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77704

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77704

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.