Selection on plastic adherence leads to hyper-multicellular strains and incidental virulence in the budding yeast

Abstract

Many disease-causing microbes are not obligate pathogens; rather, they are environmental microbes taking advantage of an ecological opportunity. The existence of microbes whose life cycle does not require a host and are not normally pathogenic, yet are well-suited to host exploitation, is an evolutionary puzzle. One hypothesis posits that selection in the environment may favor traits that incidentally lead to pathogenicity and virulence, or serve as pre-adaptations for survival in a host. An example of such a trait is surface adherence. To experimentally test the idea of 'accidental virulence', replicate populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were evolved to attach to a plastic bead for hundreds of generations. Along with plastic adherence, two multicellular phenotypes- biofilm formation and flor formation- increased; another phenotype, pseudohyphal growth, responded to the nutrient limitation. Thus, experimental selection led to the evolution of highly-adherent, hyper-multicellular strains. Wax moth larvae injected with evolved hyper-multicellular strains were significantly more likely to die than those injected with evolved non-multicellular strains. Hence, selection on plastic adherence incidentally led to the evolution of enhanced multicellularity and increased virulence. Our results support the idea that selection for a trait beneficial in the open environment can inadvertently generate opportunistic, 'accidental' pathogens.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1, 2, and 5.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Luke I Ekdahl

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Juliana A Salcedo

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Matthew M Dungan

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Despina V Mason

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dulguun Myagmarsuren

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Helen A Murphy

    Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, United States
    For correspondence
    hamurphy@wm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4363-4543

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R15-GM122032)

  • Helen A Murphy

National Science Foundation (DEB-1839555)

  • Helen A Murphy

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Ekdahl et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,096
    views
  • 153
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Luke I Ekdahl
  2. Juliana A Salcedo
  3. Matthew M Dungan
  4. Despina V Mason
  5. Dulguun Myagmarsuren
  6. Helen A Murphy
(2023)
Selection on plastic adherence leads to hyper-multicellular strains and incidental virulence in the budding yeast
eLife 12:e81056.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81056

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81056

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Vendula Bohlen Šlechtová, Tomáš Dvořák ... Joerg Bohlen
    Research Article

    Eurasia has undergone substantial tectonic, geological, and climatic changes throughout the Cenozoic, primarily associated with tectonic plate collisions and a global cooling trend. The evolution of present-day biodiversity unfolded in this dynamic environment, characterised by intricate interactions of abiotic factors. However, comprehensive, large-scale reconstructions illustrating the extent of these influences are lacking. We reconstructed the evolutionary history of the freshwater fish family Nemacheilidae across Eurasia and spanning most of the Cenozoic on the base of 471 specimens representing 279 species and 37 genera plus outgroup samples. Molecular phylogeny using six genes uncovered six major clades within the family, along with numerous unresolved taxonomic issues. Dating of cladogenetic events and ancestral range estimation traced the origin of Nemacheilidae to Indochina around 48 mya. Subsequently, one branch of Nemacheilidae colonised eastern, central, and northern Asia, as well as Europe, while another branch expanded into the Burmese region, the Indian subcontinent, the Near East, and northeast Africa. These expansions were facilitated by tectonic connections, favourable climatic conditions, and orogenic processes. Conversely, aridification emerged as the primary cause of extinction events. Our study marks the first comprehensive reconstruction of the evolution of Eurasian freshwater biodiversity on a continental scale and across deep geological time.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Ljiljana Mihajlovic, Bharat Ravi Iyengar ... Yolanda Schaerli
    Research Article

    Gene duplication drives evolution by providing raw material for proteins with novel functions. An influential hypothesis by Ohno (1970) posits that gene duplication helps genes tolerate new mutations and thus facilitates the evolution of new phenotypes. Competing hypotheses argue that deleterious mutations will usually inactivate gene duplicates too rapidly for Ohno’s hypothesis to work. We experimentally tested Ohno’s hypothesis by evolving one or exactly two copies of a gene encoding a fluorescent protein in Escherichia coli through several rounds of mutation and selection. We analyzed the genotypic and phenotypic evolutionary dynamics of the evolving populations through high-throughput DNA sequencing, biochemical assays, and engineering of selected variants. In support of Ohno’s hypothesis, populations carrying two gene copies displayed higher mutational robustness than those carrying a single gene copy. Consequently, the double-copy populations experienced relaxed purifying selection, evolved higher phenotypic and genetic diversity, carried more mutations and accumulated combinations of key beneficial mutations earlier. However, their phenotypic evolution was not accelerated, possibly because one gene copy rapidly became inactivated by deleterious mutations. Our work provides an experimental platform to test models of evolution by gene duplication, and it supports alternatives to Ohno’s hypothesis that point to the importance of gene dosage.