EHD2 overexpression promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer by regulating store-operated calcium entry

Abstract

With nearly all cancer deaths a result of metastasis, elucidating novel pro-metastatic cellular adaptations could provide new therapeutic targets. Here, we show that overexpression of the EPS15-Homology Domain-containing 2 (EHD2) protein in a large subset of breast cancers (BCs), especially the triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2+ subtypes, correlates with shorter patient survival. The mRNAs for EHD2 and Caveolin-1/2, structural components of caveolae, show co-overexpression across breast tumors, predicting shorter survival in basal-like BC. EHD2 shRNA knockdown and CRISPR-Cas9 knockout with mouse Ehd2 rescue, in TNBC cell line models demonstrate a major positive role of EHD2 in promoting tumorigenesis and metastasis. Mechanistically, we link these roles of EHD2 to store-operated calcium entry (SOCE), with EHD2-dependent stabilization of plasma membrane caveolae ensuring high cell surface expression of the SOCE-linked calcium channel Orai1. The novel EHD2-SOCE oncogenic axis represents a potential therapeutic target in EHD2 and CAV1/2-overexpressing BC.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Haitao Luan

    Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Timothy A Bielecki

    Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Bhopal C Mohapatra

    Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Namista Islam

    Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Insha Mushtaq

    Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Aaqib M Bhat

    Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Sameer Mirza

    Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Sukanya Chakraborty

    Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Mohsin Raza

    Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Matthew D Storck

    Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Michael S Toss

    Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Jane L Meza

    Departments of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Wallace B Thoreson

    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7104-042X
  14. Donald W Coulter

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Emad A Rakha

    Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Vimla Band

    Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    For correspondence
    vband@unmc.edu
    Competing interests
    Vimla Band, received funding from Nimbus Therapeutics for an unrelated project..
  17. Hamid Band

    Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States
    For correspondence
    hband@unmc.edu
    Competing interests
    Hamid Band, received funding from Nimbus Therapeutics for an unrelated project..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4996-9002

Funding

Department of Defence (W81XWH-17-1-0616 and W81XWH-20-1-0058)

  • Hamid Band

Department of Defence (W81XWH-20-1-0546)

  • Vimla Band

National Institutes of Health (R21CA241055 and R03CA253193)

  • Vimla Band

Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (Pilot grant)

  • Vimla Band

Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (Pilot grant)

  • Hamid Band

University of Nebraska Medical Center (Graduate Student Fellowships)

  • Timothy A Bielecki

University of Nebraska Medical Center (Graduate Student Fellowships)

  • Aaqib M Bhat

University of Nebraska Medical Center (Graduate Student Fellowships)

  • Sukanya Chakraborty

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse xenograft and treatment studies were pre-approved by the UNMC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under the IACUC protocol number 19-115-10-FC and conducted strictly according to the pre-approved procedures, in compliance with Federal and State guidelines.

Human subjects: Human tissues were collected and processed at the Nottingham University Hospital, United Kingdom. This study was approved by the Yorkshire & The Humber-Leeds East Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 19/YH/0293) under the IRAS Project ID: 266925. Informed consent was obtained from all individuals prior to surgery for the use of their tissue materials in research. All samples were properly coded and anonymized in accordance with the approved protocols.

Copyright

© 2023, Luan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,426
    views
  • 229
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Haitao Luan
  2. Timothy A Bielecki
  3. Bhopal C Mohapatra
  4. Namista Islam
  5. Insha Mushtaq
  6. Aaqib M Bhat
  7. Sameer Mirza
  8. Sukanya Chakraborty
  9. Mohsin Raza
  10. Matthew D Storck
  11. Michael S Toss
  12. Jane L Meza
  13. Wallace B Thoreson
  14. Donald W Coulter
  15. Emad A Rakha
  16. Vimla Band
  17. Hamid Band
(2023)
EHD2 overexpression promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer by regulating store-operated calcium entry
eLife 12:e81288.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81288

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81288

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Zijing Wang, Bihan Xia ... Jilin Yang
    Research Article

    Bestrophin isoform 4 (BEST4) is a newly identified subtype of the calcium-activated chloride channel family. Analysis of colonic epithelial cell diversity by single-cell RNA-sequencing has revealed the existence of a cluster of BEST4+ mature colonocytes in humans. However, if the role of BEST4 is involved in regulating tumour progression remains largely unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that BEST4 overexpression attenuates cell proliferation, colony formation, and mobility in colorectal cancer (CRC) in vitro, and impedes the tumour growth and the liver metastasis in vivo. BEST4 is co-expressed with hairy/enhancer of split 4 (HES4) in the nucleus of cells, and HES4 signals BEST4 by interacting with the upstream region of the BEST4 promoter. BEST4 is epistatic to HES4 and downregulates TWIST1, thereby inhibiting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in CRC. Conversely, knockout of BEST4 using CRISPR/Cas9 in CRC cells revitalises tumour growth and induces EMT. Furthermore, the low level of the BEST4 mRNA is correlated with advanced and the worse prognosis, suggesting its potential role involving CRC progression.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Bruno Bockorny, Lakshmi Muthuswamy ... Senthil K Muthuswamy
    Tools and Resources

    Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of all common tumors. Earlier cancer diagnosis could increase survival rates and better assessment of metastatic disease could improve patient care. As such, there is an urgent need to develop biomarkers to diagnose this deadly malignancy. Analyzing circulating extracellular vesicles (cEVs) using ‘liquid biopsies’ offers an attractive approach to diagnose and monitor disease status. However, it is important to differentiate EV-associated proteins enriched in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from those with benign pancreatic diseases such as chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). To meet this need, we combined the novel EVtrap method for highly efficient isolation of EVs from plasma and conducted proteomics analysis of samples from 124 individuals, including patients with PDAC, benign pancreatic diseases and controls. On average, 912 EV proteins were identified per 100 µL of plasma. EVs containing high levels of PDCD6IP, SERPINA12, and RUVBL2 were associated with PDAC compared to the benign diseases in both discovery and validation cohorts. EVs with PSMB4, RUVBL2, and ANKAR were associated with metastasis, and those with CRP, RALB, and CD55 correlated with poor clinical prognosis. Finally, we validated a seven EV protein PDAC signature against a background of benign pancreatic diseases that yielded an 89% prediction accuracy for the diagnosis of PDAC. To our knowledge, our study represents the largest proteomics profiling of circulating EVs ever conducted in pancreatic cancer and provides a valuable open-source atlas to the scientific community with a comprehensive catalogue of novel cEVs that may assist in the development of biomarkers and improve the outcomes of patients with PDAC.