N-terminal domain on dystroglycan enables LARGE1 to extend matriglycan on α-dystroglycan and prevents muscular dystrophy

  1. Hidehiko Okuma
  2. Jeffrey M Hord
  3. Ishita Chandel
  4. David Venzke
  5. Mary E Anderson
  6. Ameya S Walimbe
  7. Soumya Joseph
  8. Zeita Gastel
  9. Yuji Hara
  10. Fumiaki Saito
  11. Kiichiro Matsumura
  12. Kevin P Campbell  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, United States
  2. University of Shizuoka, Japan
  3. Teikyo University, Japan

Abstract

Dystroglycan (DG) requires extensive post-translational processing and O-glycosylation to function as a receptor for extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins containing laminin-G-like (LG) domains. Matriglycan is an elongated polysaccharide of alternating xylose (Xyl) and glucuronic acid (GlcA) that binds with high-affinity to ECM proteins with LG-domains and is uniquely synthesized on α-dystroglycan (α-DG) by like-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-1 (LARGE1). Defects in the post-translational processing or O-glycosylation of α-DG that result in a shorter form of matriglycan reduce the size of α-DG and decrease laminin binding, leading to various forms of muscular dystrophy. Previously, we demonstrated that Protein O-Mannose Kinase (POMK) is required for LARGE1 to generate full-length matriglycan on α-DG (~150-250 kDa) (Walimbe et al., 2020). Here, we show that LARGE1 can only synthesize a short, non-elongated form of matriglycan in mouse skeletal muscle that lacks the DG N-terminus (α-DGN), resulting in a ~100-125 kDa α-DG. This smaller form of α-DG binds laminin and maintains specific force but does not prevent muscle pathophysiology, including reduced force production after eccentric contractions or abnormalities in the neuromuscular junctions. Collectively, our study demonstrates that α-DGN, like POMK, is required for LARGE1 to extend matriglycan to its full mature length on α-DG and thus prevent muscle pathophysiology.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 2C, 5C, 6B, 7B, Figure 2-figure supplement 1, Figure 2-figure supplement 2, Figure 5-figure supplement 1B, and Figure 6-figure supplement 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hidehiko Okuma

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2749-9855
  2. Jeffrey M Hord

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ishita Chandel

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. David Venzke

    Department of Department of Molecular Physiology and BiophysicsPhysiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8180-9562
  5. Mary E Anderson

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ameya S Walimbe

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Soumya Joseph

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Zeita Gastel

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Yuji Hara

    Department Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Fumiaki Saito

    Department of Neurology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Kiichiro Matsumura

    Department of Neurology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Kevin P Campbell

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    For correspondence
    kevin-campbell@uiowa.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2066-5889

Funding

Paul D. Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Specialized Research Center (1U54NS053672)

  • Kevin P Campbell

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Kevin P Campbell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols of the University of Iowa (#0081122).

Copyright

© 2023, Okuma et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,816
    views
  • 260
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hidehiko Okuma
  2. Jeffrey M Hord
  3. Ishita Chandel
  4. David Venzke
  5. Mary E Anderson
  6. Ameya S Walimbe
  7. Soumya Joseph
  8. Zeita Gastel
  9. Yuji Hara
  10. Fumiaki Saito
  11. Kiichiro Matsumura
  12. Kevin P Campbell
(2023)
N-terminal domain on dystroglycan enables LARGE1 to extend matriglycan on α-dystroglycan and prevents muscular dystrophy
eLife 12:e82811.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82811

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82811

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Nelson García-Vázquez, Tania J González-Robles ... Michele Pagano
    Research Article

    In healthy cells, cyclin D1 is expressed during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, where it activates CDK4 and CDK6. Its dysregulation is a well-established oncogenic driver in numerous human cancers. The cancer-related function of cyclin D1 has been primarily studied by focusing on the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (RB) gene product. Here, using an integrative approach combining bioinformatic analyses and biochemical experiments, we show that GTSE1 (G-Two and S phases expressed protein 1), a protein positively regulating cell cycle progression, is a previously unrecognized substrate of cyclin D1–CDK4/6 in tumor cells overexpressing cyclin D1 during G1 and subsequent phases. The phosphorylation of GTSE1 mediated by cyclin D1–CDK4/6 inhibits GTSE1 degradation, leading to high levels of GTSE1 across all cell cycle phases. Functionally, the phosphorylation of GTSE1 promotes cellular proliferation and is associated with poor prognosis within a pan-cancer cohort. Our findings provide insights into cyclin D1’s role in cell cycle control and oncogenesis beyond RB phosphorylation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mai Nguyen, Elda Bauda ... Cecile Morlot
    Research Article

    Teichoic acids (TA) are linear phospho-saccharidic polymers and important constituents of the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, either bound to the peptidoglycan as wall teichoic acids (WTA) or to the membrane as lipoteichoic acids (LTA). The composition of TA varies greatly but the presence of both WTA and LTA is highly conserved, hinting at an underlying fundamental function that is distinct from their specific roles in diverse organisms. We report the observation of a periplasmic space in Streptococcus pneumoniae by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The thickness and appearance of this region change upon deletion of genes involved in the attachment of TA, supporting their role in the maintenance of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria as a possible universal function. Consequences of these mutations were further examined by super-resolved microscopy, following metabolic labeling and fluorophore coupling by click chemistry. This novel labeling method also enabled in-gel analysis of cell fractions. With this approach, we were able to titrate the actual amount of TA per cell and to determine the ratio of WTA to LTA. In addition, we followed the change of TA length during growth phases, and discovered that a mutant devoid of LTA accumulates the membrane-bound polymerized TA precursor.