Moving in synchrony with regular musical events (i.e., beat) is a basic and generalized human ability that can reach sophisticated levels in professional percussionists (Honing et al., 2015; Merchant et al., 2015b). Indeed, humans are extremely sensitive to auditory regularities and can entrain to auditory beats across a wide range of tempos, as well as use timed movements of different body parts (such as finger or foot taps or body swaying) to keep the beat (Mendoza and Merchant, 2014; Repp and Su, 2013). A classical task used to study rhythmic entrainment is the synchronization-continuation task (SCT), where subjects first entrain their tapping to a set of isochronous stimuli, also known as a metronome, and then continue tapping without the periodic stimulus using an internal clock (Merchant et al., 2008a; Wing, 2002; Wing and Kristofferson, 1973). In this type of task, humans show negative asynchronies, namely they tap a few milliseconds before the metronome, supporting the notion that entrainment depends on a predictive internal beat that is phase-locked to the stimuli (Lenc et al., 2021; Repp and Su, 2013; Zarco et al., 2009). Neurophysiological and functional imaging studies have shown that the internal beat representation during an SCT rests in the motor system, including the basal ganglia and supplementary motor regions (Bartolo et al., 2014; Merchant et al., 2013a; Merchant and Averbeck, 2017; Rao et al., 2001; Sánchez-Moncada et al., 2024). These areas produce a regenerating rhythmic signal (Crowe et al., 2014; Gámez et al., 2019; Merchant et al., 2015a) that dynamically interacts with the auditory areas, creating audiomotor loops where the motor prediction of the beat is flexibly compared and adjusted depending on changes in the input stream of rhythmic stimuli to phase-lock sensory and motor signals (Comstock et al., 2018; Merchant and Honing, 2014b; Patel and Iversen, 2014). In addition, neurons in the supplementary motor areas (SMAs) are tuned to the tempo duration of tapping (Merchant et al., 2014a; Merchant et al., 2013b), giving rise to interval-specific circuits that define a chronotopic map with short preferred intervals in the anterior portion and long preferred intervals in the posterior portion of the medial premotor areas (Protopapa et al., 2019; Merchant et al., 2024b).

The existence of neural circuits with preferred intervals comprising chronotopic maps is consistent with the human flexibility to tap in phase (with asynchronies close to zero) and high precision to isochronous stimuli over a wide range of interstimulus-onset intervals (ISIs), spanning from 400 to 1200 ms (Mates, 1994; Repp, 2005). Within this window, subjects demonstrate a spontaneous rhythmic tempo, which corresponds to the interval produced naturally when asked to tap in without external cues (McAuley et al., 2006; Zamm et al., 2018). This spontaneous or preferred tempo is around 600–750 ms in human adults (Fischl, 2012; Fraisse, 1978, but see Parncutt, 1994), but is faster in early childhood and slower in late adulthood (McAuley et al., 2006). A recent study demonstrated that the perception of rhythmic stimuli also has a preferred tempo, with an optimal sampling rate of ~1.4 Hz (ISI of 714 ms) in audition and ~0.7 Hz (ISI of 1428 ms) in vision. Furthermore, motor tapping helps to synchronize the temporal fluctuations of attention with maximal effects at ~1.7 Hz (ISI of 588 ms), but only for the auditory modality (Zalta et al., 2020). These findings support the notion that ongoing motor activity shapes attention and beat perception, as it imposes temporal constraints on the sampling of sensory information within a narrow frequency range (Morillon et al., 2019). Hence, the audiomotor system is built to optimally work at a preferred tempo.

Although rhythmic entrainment is prevalent across all human cultures and is a natural behavior for social interaction (Nettle, 2000; Jacoby et al., 2024), there are wide individual differences in the period (inter-tap interval) and phase (asynchronies) of movement synchronization. There are subjects who lack musical training, yet spontaneously synchronize to rhythmic stimuli ranging from strictly periodic metronomes to complex musical pieces, with performance comparable to that of trained musicians (Scheurich et al., 2018; Tranchant et al., 2016). Conversely, there are poor synchronizers (around 10% of the population) that show low period accuracy and large asynchronies to isochronous metronomes and musical excerpts (Phillips-Silver et al., 2011; Sowiński and Dalla Bella, 2013; Tranchant et al., 2016). Furthermore, non-musicians synchronize less flexibly and less precisely across tempos than musicians (Scheurich et al., 2018). Hence, both genetic and learning factors influence the beat-entrainment abilities of humans. A large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) recently demonstrated a highly polygenic architecture of the human capacity to synchronize to a musical beat. The GWAS phenotype for beat synchronization was related to performance in beat synchronization tasks and rhythm perception tasks (Niarchou et al., 2022). Nevertheless, genetic influences account for only a small portion of human variation in beat synchronization, while environmental influences are the primary drivers of rhythmic accuracy. In fact, functional imaging has revealed that individual differences in beat perception depend on activation differences in the SMA and the posterior auditory cortex (Grahn and McAuley, 2009). In addition, the putamen, SMA, and auditory cortex show greater functional connectivity during rhythm perception, with larger modulation for musicians than non-musicians (Grahn and Rowe, 2009; Grahn and Rowe, 2013). Consequently, the magnitude of the anatomofunctional association between the auditory and motor control areas of the cerebral cortex seems to covary with the individual difference in how humans perceive and entrain to simple regular beats. Such brain networks rely on the structural connectivity provided by white matter, which can be evaluated through diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Long-range anatomical connectivity is supported by deep white matter (DWM) bundles, while short-range connectivity is achieved through fibers that run tangentially to the cortical surface and connect adjacent and proximal cortical regions. These fibers are collectively termed U-fibers due to their shape (Schüz and Braitenberg, 2002; Schmahmann et al., 2006, Shastin et al., 2022). In this work, we individually analyze the role of these two forms of connectivity in rhythmic entrainment abilities. We hypothesize that if the cortical connectivity of the audiomotor system is defining rhythmic entrainment abilities, then individual differences in tapping synchronization should covary with the degree of anatomical connectivity (Assaneo et al., 2019; Steele et al., 2013). Previous evidence suggests that the audiomotor system is tuned at a limited interaction rate (Zalta et al., 2020; Morillon et al., 2019). Hence, we also hypothesize that the relationship between rhythmic tapping abilities and the structural connectivity of the audiomotor system should be more evident for intervals close to the preferred tempo.

To test these hypotheses, we acquired DWIs from 32 subjects that had previously performed an SCT using flashing visual or auditory tones as metronomes in the range of hundreds of milliseconds (Figure 1). SCT rhythmic performance across durations (ISI: 550, 650, 750, 850, or 950 ms) and modalities (auditory and visual) was characterized using the absolute asynchronies, the autocorrelation of the inter-tap interval time series during the synchronization epoch, the constant error, and the temporal variability during both synchronization and continuation epochs. These parameters measure the phase accuracy, error correction, period accuracy, and period precision of the rhythmic tapping of the subjects, respectively (Figure 2A). We used an ISI range of 550–950 ms because it contains the preferred interval and is within the optimal window for tap synchronization (Repp, 2005). Hence, with this ISI range, we could potentially identify structural correlates for both the preferred tempo and interval selectivity. With this in mind, we evaluated DWM fascicles using a fixel-based approach (Dhollander et al., 2021) and developed two metrics for superficial white matter (SWM): fiber density corresponding to fibers entering or exiting the cortex and U-fibers running tangentially to the cortex. Widespread correlations in the right audiomotor circuit were found between the tangential U-fiber density and the phase accuracy of subjects during the synchronization epoch of the auditory condition for the 650 and 750 ms intervals. The interval specificity in these associations suggests that the preferred tempo for rhythmic entrainment has its origins in the structural properties of the U-fibers running superficially across the audiomotor circuit. In addition, there was a significant association between asynchronies in the auditory condition and the density and bundle diameter of the corpus callosum (CC), forming an interval-selective map with an anterior–posterior gradient, similar to the topography of interval-tuned clusters observed with functional imaging. Crucially, the anatomo-behavioral associations were negative, indicating that subjects with good predictive abilities and small asynchronies exhibited large superficial and deep apparent fiber densities (AFDs), while subjects with large asynchronies showed low fiber densities.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

The present research determined the intersubject association between the structural properties of the SWM and DWM and different measures of rhythmic timing during a synchronization-continuation tapping task. Our study supports five conclusions: First, the tapping phase and period during the SCT showed precision and accuracy, as well as error corrections that were biased toward auditory rather than visual metronomes, thereby confirming previous observations. Second, the right audiomotor system exhibited individual differences in SWM and U-fiber density. These differences were correlated with the degree of phase accuracy of the tapping synchronization across subjects. Notably, the correlations were selective for the synchronization epoch of the auditory condition and were specific to the 650 and 750 ms intervals. Third, there was a significant association between the rhythmic entrainment phase and the density and bundle diameter of the CC, forming an interval-selective map with an anterior–posterior trend. This implies that the behavioral and structural associations for short and long intervals tended to be in the anterior and posterior portions of the CC, respectively. Fourth, the fiber bundle diameter of the arcuate fasciculus, CC, forceps major, and superior longitudinal fasciculus showed a significant correlation with the mean asynchronies across all tested tempos. Finally, we found no significant associations between SWM and DWM properties and temporal variability, constant error, or lag 1 autocorrelation under the visual and auditory conditions during the synchronization and continuation epochs of the SCT. These last findings suggest that connectivity within the audiomotor system is tightly linked with the ability to synchronize in phase at the preferred tempo for auditory metronomes. We speculate that the structural white matter is associated with tapping-phase control, not with period representation, as the latter depends on neural population dynamics within the timing network (Gámez et al., 2019; Betancourt et al., 2023) and the former depends on a prior ability to detect changes in phase at the preferred tempo, whose intrinsic nature is defined in the audiomotor connectivity.

Many studies have shown that performance tapping synchronized to an auditory metronome is more precise and accurate than synchronization to a flashing visual metronome with the same timing characteristics (Chen et al., 2002; Hove et al., 2013; Merchant et al., 2008c; Patel et al., 2005; Repp and Penel, 2004; Zarco et al., 2009). This auditory–visual asymmetry can be cancelled out by visual moving metronomes (Hove et al., 2010; Pérez et al., 2023). Since the first processing relays, the auditory system has higher temporal resolution compared to the visual system (Duysens et al., 1996; He et al., 1997; Sayegh et al., 2011) and plays a critical role in time perception and reproduction across many tasks, not only in tapping SCTs (Grondin et al., 2005; Merchant et al., 2008b; Merchant and de Lafuente, 2014c). For example, when audiovisual stimuli are used in an oddball paradigm, the perceived duration is dominated by the auditory modality (Chen and Yeh, 2009). In addition, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) disruption of the auditory cortex impaired time estimation for auditory and visual stimuli, while disruption in the visual cortex only produced timing impairments for visual stimuli (Kanai et al., 2011). Consequently, a current hypothesis is that the auditory cortex is engaged in multimodal temporal processing, and the interaction between the auditory and motor systems in the frontal lobe allows not only time encoding but also time prediction (Merchant and Honing, 2014b; Merchant and Yarrow, 2016; Patel and Iversen, 2014; Schwartze et al., 2012). Our present findings support this notion in different ways. First, the rhythmic timing performance of our subjects was biased toward the auditory condition across different behavioral measures. Second, the right audiomotor system showed widespread and significant correlations between the density of superficial U-fibers and the degree of sensorimotor phase accuracy across subjects. These anatomo-behavioral associations are selective to the intervals in the 650–750 ms range. Third, the fiber bundle diameter of the left arcuate fasciculus, a key tract connecting the parietotemporal auditory system with the frontal lobe, showed a significant correlation with the mean asynchronies across all tested tempos. Furthermore, the clear clustering of subjects as either good or bad synchronizers in a syllabic isochronous entrainment task correlates with both the difference in the activation magnitude in frontal areas and the changes in white matter pathways (i.e., left arcuate fasciculus) that connect the auditory system with the premotor cortical system (Assaneo et al., 2019). Hence, our results accentuate the audiomotor structural foundation for rhythmic entrainment (Honing and Merchant, 2014; Miyata et al., 2022). The lack of structural associations in the visual condition is probably due to the larger variability in rhythmic tapping for this modality, making it difficult to infer statistical correlations between our metrics. As described above, the null anatomo-behavioral associations for the visual condition could also be due to the slow sampling rate of visual periodic temporal attention, with a sampling interval that is longer than our tested durations (Zalta et al., 2020).

The observed associations between the measured SWM and DWM properties and the accuracy in the synchronization phase were negative. This result indicates that the white matter parameter values were greater in subjects with asynchronies close to zero and an accurate tapping phase with the metronome than in subjects with large gaps in time between the stimuli and taps. These results support the theory that intersubject differences in rhythmic entrainment phase depend on micro- and macrostructural white matter properties, which could have a genetic and/or learned substrate. From a genetics perspective, we could speculate that the existence of poor and superior synchronizers (Blecher et al., 2016) may depend on the FD of superficial U-fibers in the right audiomotor system, as well as on the density of deep tracts such as the CC and arcuate fasciculus. From a training perspective, these SWM and DWM bundles may develop larger density and myelination during intense musical practice, distinguishing the audiomotor tracts between musicians and non-musicians (Palomar-García et al., 2020; Vaquero et al., 2018; Zatorre et al., 2007).

The correlations between the density of tangential U-fibers in the right audiomotor circuit and the asynchronies for the auditory condition were interval-selective for the intermediate tested tempos. The observed interval specificity corroborates the existence of an spontaneous rhythmic tempo, already observed in many studies of rhythmic entrainment, and with values between 600 and 750 ms (Drake et al., 2000a; Drake et al., 2000b; McAuley et al., 2006: Dalla Bella et al., 2017). The biological intrinsic periodicity may depend on a biased distribution of preferred tempos toward 1.5 Hz in the interval-tuned neurons of the motor system (Bartolo et al., 2014; Bartolo and Merchant, 2009; Pérez et al., 2023; Pérez and Merchant, 2018). Interestingly, Zalta et al., 2020 showed that humans were best at following auditory rhythms at a rate of ~1.4 Hz and that overt motor activity optimizes auditory periodic temporal attention at a similar rate. This rate is close to the intervals with structural associations in the present study. Consequently, we suggest that cortico-cortical connectivity within the audiomotor system is especially designed to support the internal representation of an auditory beat at the preferred tempo, providing larger phase-locking abilities with the metronome for spontaneous motor tempos (Balasubramaniam et al., 2021). On the other hand, Zalta et al., 2020 also demonstrated that the best rate for visual rhythms was far slower, at ~0.7 Hz (Zalta et al., 2020). Therefore, it is possible that we did not get effects in the visual condition because our target interval of 950 ms was not slow enough for this modality.

Ultra-high-field (7T) functional imaging revealed that the medial premotor areas (SMA and pre-SMA) of the human brain possess neural circuits that are tuned to different durations, forming a topographical arrangement during a visual discrimination task. These chronomaps show units with enhanced responses for the preferred interval and suppressed activity for the non-preferred duration, and define a topographical gradient with short preferred intervals in the anterior portion and long preferred intervals in the posterior portion of the medial premotor areas (Protopapa et al., 2019; Schwartze et al., 2012). Protopapa et al., 2019 also showed chronomaps in the SMA during an interval reproduction task using auditory cues, which is similar to the task used in this study. Notably, chronomaps also showed an anterior–posterior gradient, but they represent relative rather than absolute time, and they presented some flexibility in the location of the preferred interval depending on the task context (Bueti et al., 2021). In addition, a recent imaging study described the existence of large chronomaps covering the cortical mantle from the dorsal and ventral premotor areas to the occipital pole (Harvey et al., 2020; Hendrikx et al., 2022). Our measurements of the FDA also revealed a topographical arrangement in the correlations between FD in the DWM and CC and the sensorimotor phase accuracy of subjects. We also found significant anatomo-behavioral associations in the anterior part of the CC for short intervals and in the posterior CC for long tapping tempos (Schwartze et al., 2012). Nevertheless, our interval-selective map is defined by the correlation between asynchronies and FDA, with no topographic model of the distribution of preferred intervals as shown in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. These studies have not explored individual differences. Moreover, we found a frontal CC cluster of fixels with longer interval selectivity, producing a discontinuity in the anterior–posterior gradient of preferred intervals. These findings suggest that the map for duration selectivity starts anteriorly in the CC, which is linked to the premotor system, and ends in the CC of the visual areas of the occipital lobe. The anterior selectivity for the 650 and 750 ms ISI supports the notion that the motor system functions at 1.7 Hz during beat perception and entrainment and strongly influences the auditory system but not the visual system at this tempo (Zalta et al., 2020). The latter could explain why we did not find interval selectivity in the CC for the visual condition. Consequently, timing maps define a cortical processing framework for efficient timing integration that has both functional and anatomical bases, especially for the auditory modality (Merchant and de Lafuente, 2024a).

Previous studies have shown correlations between sensorimotor synchonization task performance and the microstructural characteristics of DWM. For instance, Blecher et al., 2016 found a positive association between the fractional anisotropy of the left arcuate fasciculus and CC and performance in an auditory-cued finger-tapping task. The SWM immediately below the cortex has received has been less studied than DWM fasciculi, even though it accounts for 60% of the total white matter volume and is pivotal in maintaining cortico-cortical connectivity (Schüz and Braitenberg, 2002; Schmahmann et al., 2006). Nonetheless, recent studies have implicated SWM abnormalities in epilepsy (Liu et al., 2016), autism spectrum disorder (Hong et al., 2019), Alzheimer’s disease (Phillips et al., 2016), schizophrenia (Nazeri et al., 2013), and stroke (Stockert et al., 2021). The SWM contains short-range association fibers that connect adjacent gyri (U-fibers) and the initial or final portions of long-range connections that traverse the DWM (Schüz and Braitenberg, 2002; Guevara et al., 2020; Kirilina et al., 2020; Yoshino et al., 2020). The SWM is difficult to study because of its complicated geometry and abundance of fiber crossings (Guevara et al., 2020). To better characterize the SWM microstructure, we separated the two components of the SWM and performed a surface- and depth-wise evaluation. Complementarily, we analyzed the DWM using FBA, which addresses many of the shortcomings of voxel-wise analysis of diffusion tensor imaging (Dhollander et al., 2021). This two-pronged approach allowed us to evaluate the entire white matter volume and show the association between its mesoscopic characteristics (i.e., AFD) and predictive tapping synchronization.

A potential limitation of our study is the relatively small number of participants, related to the time-consuming nature of the behavioral evaluation and the long scanning time. Moreover, many statistical tests were performed, relating several behavioral metrics to various diffusion metrics across the brain at different depths. To minimize the possibility of statistical errors, we performed an rCCA to jointly model the behavioral and imaging metrics, thus accounting for the numerous statistical tests and reducing the possibility of reporting false positive findings. This reinforced the importance of superficial cortico-cortical communication through U-fibers and the SCT for intervals around the preferred tempo. While we have attempted to control for statistical errors as much as possible, a sample of 32 young adults with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria may inevitably not represent the population. We expect our current findings to be replicated and extended in future studies.

In conclusion, our results showed that the subjects’ accuracy in SCT performance was associated with higher FC, FDC, or FD values. This is consistent with the literature that shows that better performance in different tasks is associated with higher values of FBA metrics. For example, better performance in a bimanual coordination task was associated with higher FBA values in the CC (Zivari Adab et al., 2020).

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our Institution (049H-RM).

Data is available at OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YNVF3.

1. 1. Garcia-Saldivar P
   2. Merchant H
   3. Concha P

   (2024) Open Science Framework

   MRI Data. White matter structural bases for phase accuracy during tapping synchronization.

   https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YNVF3

1. 1. Andersson JLR
   2. Sotiropoulos SN

   (2016) An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging

   NeuroImage 125:1063–1078.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Assaneo MF
   2. Ripollés P
   3. Orpella J
   4. Lin WM
   5. de Diego-Balaguer R
   6. Poeppel D

   (2019) Spontaneous synchronization to speech reveals neural mechanisms facilitating language learning

   Nature Neuroscience 22:627–632.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0353-z

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Avants BB
   2. Tustison NJ
   3. Song G
   4. Cook PA
   5. Klein A
   6. Gee JC

   (2011) A reproducible evaluation of ants similarity metric performance in brain image registration

   NeuroImage 54:2033–2044.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Balasubramaniam R
   2. Haegens S
   3. Jazayeri M
   4. Merchant H
   5. Sternad D
   6. Song JH

   (2021) Neural encoding and representation of time for sensorimotor control and learning

   The Journal of Neuroscience 41:866–872.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1652-20.2020

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bartolo R
   2. Merchant H

   (2009) Learning and generalization of time production in humans: Rules of transfer across modalities and interval durations

   Experimental Brain Research 197:91–100.

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1895-1

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bartolo R
   2. Prado L
   3. Merchant H

   (2014) Information processing in the primate basal ganglia during sensory-guided and internally driven rhythmic tapping

   The Journal of Neuroscience 34:3910–3923.

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2679-13.2014

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Betancourt A
   2. Pérez O
   3. Gámez J
   4. Mendoza G
   5. Merchant H

   (2023) Amodal population clock in the primate medial premotor system for rhythmic tapping

   Cell Reports 42:113234.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113234

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Blecher T
   2. Tal I
   3. Ben-Shachar M

   (2016) White matter microstructural properties correlate with sensorimotor synchronization abilities

   NeuroImage 138:1–12.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.022

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. Preprint

   1. Bueti D
   2. Kulashekhar S
   3. Maass SC
   4. Rijn H

   (2021) The Topographic Representation of Time and Its Link with Temporal Context and Perception

   Research Square.

   https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3902136

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Chen Y
    2. Repp BH
    3. Patel AD

    (2002) Spectral decomposition of variability in synchronization and continuation tapping: comparisons between auditory and visual pacing and feedback conditions

    Human Movement Science 21:515–532.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9457(02)00138-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Chen KM
    2. Yeh SL

    (2009) Asymmetric cross-modal effects in time perception

    Acta Psychologica 130:225–234.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.12.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Comstock DC
    2. Hove MJ
    3. Balasubramaniam R

    (2018) Sensorimotor synchronization with auditory and visual modalities: Behavioral and neural differences

    Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 12:53.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2018.00053

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Coupe P
    2. Yger P
    3. Prima S
    4. Hellier P
    5. Kervrann C
    6. Barillot C

    (2008) An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 27:425–441.

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2007.906087

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Crowe DA
    2. Zarco W
    3. Bartolo R
    4. Merchant H

    (2014) Dynamic representation of the temporal and sequential structure of rhythmic movements in the primate medial premotor cortex

    The Journal of Neuroscience 34:11972–11983.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2177-14.2014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Dalla Bella S
    2. Farrugia N
    3. Benoit CE
    4. Begel V
    5. Verga L
    6. Harding E
    7. Kotz SA

    (2017) BAASTA: Battery for the assessment of auditory sensorimotor and timing abilities

    Behavior Research Methods 49:1128–1145.

    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0773-6

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Dhollander T
    2. Clemente A
    3. Singh M
    4. Boonstra F
    5. Civier O
    6. Duque JD
    7. Egorova N
    8. Enticott P
    9. Fuelscher I
    10. Gajamange S
    11. Genc S
    12. Gottlieb E
    13. Hyde C
    14. Imms P
    15. Kelly C
    16. Kirkovski M
    17. Kolbe S
    18. Liang X
    19. Malhotra A
    20. Mito R
    21. Poudel G
    22. Silk TJ
    23. Vaughan DN
    24. Zanin J
    25. Raffelt D
    26. Caeyenberghs K

    (2021) Fixel-based analysis of diffusion mri: Methods, applications, challenges and opportunities

    NeuroImage 241:118417.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118417

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Drake C
    2. Jones MR
    3. Baruch C

    (2000a) The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: Attunement, referent period, focal attending

    Cognition 77:251–288.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00106-2

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Drake C
    2. Penel A
    3. Bigand E

    (2000b) Tapping in time with mechanically and expressively performed music

    Music Perception 18:1–23.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/40285899

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Duysens J
    2. Schaafsma SJ
    3. Orban GA

    (1996) Cortical off response tuning for stimulus duration

    Vision Research 36:3243–3251.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(96)00040-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Dyrby TB
    2. Lundell H
    3. Burke MW
    4. Reislev NL
    5. Paulson OB
    6. Ptito M
    7. Siebner HR

    (2014) Interpolation of diffusion weighted imaging datasets

    NeuroImage 103:202–213.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Eklund A
    2. Nichols TE
    3. Knutsson H

    (2016) Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates

    PNAS 113:7900–7905.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602413113

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Fan L
    2. Li H
    3. Zhuo J
    4. Zhang Y
    5. Wang J
    6. Chen L
    7. Yang Z
    8. Chu C
    9. Xie S
    10. Laird AR
    11. Fox PT
    12. Eickhoff SB
    13. Yu C
    14. Jiang T

    (2016) The Human Brainnetome Atlas: A new brain atlas based on connectional architecture

    Cerebral Cortex 26:3508–3526.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw157

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Fischl B
    2. Salat DH
    3. Busa E
    4. Albert M
    5. Dieterich M
    6. Haselgrove C
    7. van der Kouwe A
    8. Killiany R
    9. Kennedy D
    10. Klaveness S
    11. Montillo A
    12. Makris N
    13. Rosen B
    14. Dale AM

    (2002) Whole brain segmentation: Automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain

    Neuron 33:341–355.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Fischl B

    (2012) FreeSurfer

    NeuroImage 62:774–781.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. Book

    1. Fraisse P

    (1978) Time and rhythm perception

    In: Fraisse P, editors. Handbook of Perception. New York: Academic Press. pp. 203–254.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-161908-4.50012-7

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Gámez J
    2. Yc K
    3. Ayala YA
    4. Dotov D
    5. Prado L
    6. Merchant H

    (2018) Predictive rhythmic tapping to isochronous and tempo changing metronomes in the nonhuman primate

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1423:396–414.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13671

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Gámez J
    2. Mendoza G
    3. Prado L
    4. Betancourt A
    5. Merchant H

    (2019) The amplitude in periodic neural state trajectories underlies the tempo of rhythmic tapping

    PLOS Biology 17:e3000054.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000054

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Genc S
    2. Smith RE
    3. Malpas CB
    4. Anderson V
    5. Nicholson JM
    6. Efron D
    7. Sciberras E
    8. Seal ML
    9. Silk TJ

    (2018) Development of white matter fibre density and morphology over childhood: A longitudinal fixel-based analysis

    NeuroImage 183:666–676.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.043

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Grahn JA
    2. McAuley JD

    (2009) Neural bases of individual differences in beat perception

    NeuroImage 47:1894–1903.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.039

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Grahn JA
    2. Rowe JB

    (2009) Feeling the beat: Premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception

    The Journal of Neuroscience 29:7540–7548.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2018-08.2009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Grahn JA
    2. Rowe JB

    (2013) Finding and feeling the musical beat: striatal dissociations between detection and prediction of regularity

    Cerebral Cortex 23:913–921.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs083

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Grondin S
    2. Roussel M-E
    3. Gamache P-L
    4. Roy M
    5. Ouellet B

    (2005) The structure of sensory events and the accuracy of time judgments

    Perception 34:45–58.

    https://doi.org/10.1068/p5369

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Guevara M
    2. Guevara P
    3. Román C
    4. Mangin J-F

    (2020) Superficial white matter: A review on the dMRI analysis methods and applications

    NeuroImage 212:116673.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116673

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Harvey BM
    2. Dumoulin SO
    3. Fracasso A
    4. Paul JM

    (2020) A network of topographic maps in human association cortex hierarchically transforms visual timing-selective responses

    Current Biology 30:1424–1434.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.090

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. He J
    2. Hashikawa T
    3. Ojima H
    4. Kinouchi Y

    (1997) Temporal integration and duration tuning in the dorsal zone of cat auditory cortex

    The Journal of Neuroscience 17:2615–2625.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-07-02615.1997

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Hendrikx E
    2. Paul JM
    3. van Ackooij M
    4. van der Stoep N
    5. Harvey BM

    (2022) Visual timing-tuned responses in human association cortices and response dynamics in early visual cortex

    Nature Communications 13:3952.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31675-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Hong SJ
    2. Hyung B
    3. Paquola C
    4. Bernhardt BC

    (2019) The superficial white matter in autism and its role in connectivity anomalies and symptom severity

    Cerebral Cortex 29:4415–4425.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy321

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Honing H
    2. Merchant H

    (2014) Differences in auditory timing between human and nonhuman primates

    The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37:557–558.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13004056

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Honing H
    2. ten Cate C
    3. Peretz I
    4. Trehub SE

    (2015) Without it no music: Cognition, biology and evolution of musicality

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 370:20140088.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0088

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Hove MJ
    2. Spivey MJ
    3. Krumhansl CL

    (2010) Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 36:1525–1534.

    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019059

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Hove MJ
    2. Fairhurst MT
    3. Kotz SA
    4. Keller PE

    (2013) Synchronizing with auditory and visual rhythms: An fMRI assessment of modality differences and modality appropriateness

    NeuroImage 67:313–321.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.032

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Iversen JR
    2. Patel AD
    3. Nicodemus B
    4. Emmorey K

    (2015) Synchronization to auditory and visual rhythms in hearing and deaf individuals

    Cognition 134:232–244.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Jacoby N
    2. Polak R
    3. Grahn JA
    4. Cameron DJ
    5. Lee KM
    6. Godoy R
    7. Undurraga EA
    8. Huanca T
    9. Thalwitzer T
    10. Doumbia N
    11. Goldberg D
    12. Margulis EH
    13. Wong PCM
    14. Jure L
    15. Rocamora M
    16. Fujii S
    17. Savage PE
    18. Ajimi J
    19. Konno R
    20. Oishi S
    21. Jakubowski K
    22. Holzapfel A
    23. Mungan E
    24. Kaya E
    25. Rao P
    26. Rohit MA
    27. Alladi S
    28. Tarr B
    29. Anglada-Tort M
    30. Harrison PMC
    31. McPherson MJ
    32. Dolan S
    33. Durango A
    34. McDermott JH

    (2024) Commonality and variation in mental representations of music revealed by a cross-cultural comparison of rhythm priors in 15 countries

    Nature Human Behaviour 8:846–877.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01800-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Jazayeri M
    2. Shadlen MN

    (2010) Temporal context calibrates interval timing

    Nature Neuroscience 13:1020–1026.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2590

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Jeurissen B
    2. Tournier JD
    3. Dhollander T
    4. Connelly A
    5. Sijbers J

    (2014) Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data

    NeuroImage 103:411–426.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.061

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Jones SE
    2. Buchbinder BR
    3. Aharon I

    (2000) Three-dimensional mapping of cortical thickness using Laplace’s equation

    Human Brain Mapping 11:12–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200009)11:1<12::aid-hbm20>3.0.co;2-k

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Kanai R
    2. Lloyd H
    3. Bueti D
    4. Walsh V

    (2011) Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation

    Experimental Brain Research 209:465–471.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2577-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Kelly CE
    2. Thompson DK
    3. Genc S
    4. Chen J
    5. Yang JY
    6. Adamson C
    7. Beare R
    8. Seal ML
    9. Doyle LW
    10. Cheong JL
    11. Anderson PJ

    (2020) Long-term development of white matter fibre density and morphology up to 13 years after preterm birth: A fixel-based analysis

    NeuroImage 220:117068.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117068

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Kirilina E
    2. Helbling S
    3. Morawski M
    4. Pine K
    5. Reimann K
    6. Jankuhn S
    7. Dinse J
    8. Deistung A
    9. Reichenbach JR
    10. Trampel R
    11. Geyer S
    12. Müller L
    13. Jakubowski N
    14. Arendt T
    15. Bazin PL
    16. Weiskopf N

    (2020) Superficial white matter imaging: Contrast mechanisms and whole-brain in vivo mapping

    Science Advances 6:eaaz9281.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9281

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Lenc T
    2. Merchant H
    3. Keller PE
    4. Honing H
    5. Varlet M
    6. Nozaradan S

    (2021) Mapping between sound, brain and behaviour: Four-level framework for understanding rhythm processing in humans and non-human primates

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 376:20200325.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0325

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Lerch JP
    2. Carroll JB
    3. Dorr A
    4. Spring S
    5. Evans AC
    6. Hayden MR
    7. Sled JG
    8. Henkelman RM

    (2008) Cortical thickness measured from MRI in the YAC128 mouse model of Huntington’s disease

    NeuroImage 41:243–251.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.019

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Liu M
    2. Bernhardt BC
    3. Hong SJ
    4. Caldairou B
    5. Bernasconi A
    6. Bernasconi N

    (2016) The superficial white matter in temporal lobe epilepsy: A key link between structural and functional network disruptions

    Brain 139:2431–2440.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww167

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Manjón JV
    2. Coupé P
    3. Concha L
    4. Buades A
    5. Collins DL
    6. Robles M

    (2013) Diffusion weighted image denoising using overcomplete local PCA

    PLOS ONE 8:e73021.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073021

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Manjón JV
    2. Coupé P

    (2016) volBrain: An online MRI brain volumetry system

    Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 10:30.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2016.00030

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Mates J

    (1994) A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence

    Biological Cybernetics 70:463–473.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203239

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. McAuley JD
    2. Jones MR
    3. Holub S
    4. Johnston HM
    5. Miller NS

    (2006) The time of our lives: Life Span development of timing and event tracking

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 135:348–367.

    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.348

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Mendoza G
    2. Merchant H

    (2014) Motor system evolution and the emergence of high cognitive functions

    Progress in Neurobiology 122:73–93.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.09.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Merchant H
    2. Luciana M
    3. Hooper C
    4. Majestic S
    5. Tuite P

    (2008a) Interval timing and Parkinson’s disease: Heterogeneity in temporal performance

    Experimental Brain Research 184:233–248.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1097-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Merchant H
    2. Zarco W
    3. Bartolo R
    4. Prado L

    (2008b) The context of temporal processing is represented in the multidimensional relationships between timing tasks

    PLOS ONE 3:e3169.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003169

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Merchant H
    2. Zarco W
    3. Prado L

    (2008c) Do we have a common mechanism for measuring time in the hundreds of millisecond range? Evidence from multiple-interval timing tasks

    Journal of Neurophysiology 99:939–949.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01225.2007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Merchant H
    2. Harrington DL
    3. Meck WH

    (2013a) Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time

    Annual Review of Neuroscience 36:313–336.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170349

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Merchant H
    2. Pérez O
    3. Zarco W
    4. Gámez J

    (2013b) Interval tuning in the primate medial premotor cortex as a general timing mechanism

    The Journal of Neuroscience 33:9082–9096.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5513-12.2013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Merchant H
    2. Bartolo R
    3. Pérez O
    4. Méndez JC
    5. Mendoza G
    6. Gámez J
    7. Yc K
    8. Prado L

    (2014a) Neurophysiology of timing in the hundreds of milliseconds: multiple layers of neuronal clocks in the medial premotor areas

    Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 829:143–154.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1782-2_8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Merchant H
    2. Honing H

    (2014b) Are non-human primates capable of rhythmic entrainment? Evidence for the gradual audiomotor evolution hypothesis

    Frontiers in Neuroscience 7:274.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00274

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Merchant H
    2. de Lafuente V

    (2014c) Introduction to the neurobiology of interval timing

    Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 829:1–13.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1782-2_1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Merchant H
    2. Pérez O
    3. Bartolo R
    4. Méndez JC
    5. Mendoza G
    6. Gámez J
    7. Yc K
    8. Prado L

    (2015a) Sensorimotor neural dynamics during isochronous tapping in the medial premotor cortex of the macaque

    The European Journal of Neuroscience 41:586–602.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12811

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Merchant H
    2. Grahn J
    3. Trainor L
    4. Rohrmeier M
    5. Fitch WT

    (2015b) Finding the beat: A neural perspective across humans and non-human primates

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 370:20140093.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0093

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Merchant H
    2. Yarrow K

    (2016) How the motor system both encodes and influences our sense of time

    Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 8:22–27.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.01.006

    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Merchant H
    2. Averbeck BB

    (2017) The computational and neural basis of rhythmic timing in medial premotor cortex

    The Journal of Neuroscience 37:4552–4564.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0367-17.2017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Merchant H
    2. de Lafuente V

    (2024a) A second introduction to the neurobiology of interval timing

    Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 1455:3–23.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60183-5_1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. Preprint

    1. Merchant H
    2. Mendoza G
    3. Pérez O
    4. Betancourt A
    5. Garcia-Saldivar P
    6. Prado L

    (2024b) Different time encoding strategies within the medial premotor areas of the primate

    bioRxiv.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.28.526038

    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Mihalik A
    2. Chapman J
    3. Adams RA
    4. Winter NR
    5. Ferreira FS
    6. Shawe-Taylor J
    7. Mourão-Miranda J
    8. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

    (2022) Canonical correlation analysis and partial least squares for identifying brain-Behavior Associations: A tutorial and a comparative study

    Biological Psychiatry. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging 7:1055–1067.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.07.012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Mito R
    2. Raffelt D
    3. Dhollander T
    4. Vaughan DN
    5. Tournier JD
    6. Salvado O
    7. Brodtmann A
    8. Rowe CC
    9. Villemagne VL
    10. Connelly A

    (2018) Fibre-specific white matter reductions in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment

    Brain 141:888–902.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx355

    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Miyata K
    2. Yamamoto T
    3. Fukunaga M
    4. Sugawara S
    5. Sadato N

    (2022) Neural correlates with individual differences in temporal prediction during auditory-motor synchronization

    Cerebral Cortex Communications 3:tgac014.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Morillon B
    2. Arnal LH
    3. Schroeder CE
    4. Keitel A

    (2019) Prominence of delta oscillatory rhythms in the motor cortex and their relevance for auditory and speech perception

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 107:136–142.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Nazeri A
    2. Chakravarty MM
    3. Felsky D
    4. Lobaugh NJ
    5. Rajji TK
    6. Mulsant BH
    7. Voineskos AN

    (2013) Alterations of superficial white matter in schizophrenia and relationship to cognitive performance

    Neuropsychopharmacology 38:1954–1962.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.93

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Nettle B

    (2000) An ethnomusicologist contemplates universals in musical sound and musical culture

    The Origins of Music 1:463–472.

    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5190.003.0032

    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Niarchou M
    2. Gustavson DE
    3. Sathirapongsasuti JF
    4. Anglada-Tort M
    5. Eising E
    6. Bell E
    7. McArthur E
    8. Straub P
    9. 23andMe Research Team
    10. McAuley JD
    11. Capra JA
    12. Ullén F
    13. Creanza N
    14. Mosing MA
    15. Hinds DA
    16. Davis LK
    17. Jacoby N
    18. Gordon RL

    (2022) Genome-wide association study of musical beat synchronization demonstrates high polygenicity

    Nature Human Behaviour 6:1292–1309.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01359-x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Nichols TE
    2. Holmes AP

    (2002) Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples

    Human Brain Mapping 15:1–25.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.1058

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Palomar-García MÁ
    2. Hernández M
    3. Olcina G
    4. Adrián-Ventura J
    5. Costumero V
    6. Miró-Padilla A
    7. Villar-Rodríguez E
    8. Ávila C

    (2020) Auditory and frontal anatomic correlates of pitch discrimination in musicians, non-musicians, and children without musical training

    Brain Structure & Function 225:2735–2744.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02151-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Parncutt R

    (1994) A perceptual model of pulse salience and metrical accent in musical rhythms

    Music Perception 11:409–464.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/40285633

    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Patel AD
    2. Iversen JR
    3. Chen Y
    4. Repp BH

    (2005) The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beat

    Experimental Brain Research 163:226–238.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2159-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Patel AD
    2. Iversen JR

    (2014) The evolutionary neuroscience of musical beat perception: The action simulation for auditory prediction (ASAP) hypothesis

    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 8:57.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00057

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Pérez O
    2. Merchant H

    (2018) The synaptic properties of cells define the hallmarks of interval timing in a recurrent neural network

    The Journal of Neuroscience 38:4186–4199.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2651-17.2018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Pérez O
    2. Delle Monache S
    3. Lacquaniti F
    4. Bosco G
    5. Merchant H

    (2023) Rhythmic tapping to a moving beat motion kinematics overrules natural gravity

    iScience 26:107543.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107543

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Phillips OR
    2. Joshi SH
    3. Piras F
    4. Orfei MD
    5. Iorio M
    6. Narr KL
    7. Shattuck DW
    8. Caltagirone C
    9. Spalletta G
    10. Paola M

    (2016) The superficial white matter in alzheimer’s disease

    Human Brain Mapping 37:1321–1334.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23105

    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Phillips-Silver J
    2. Toiviainen P
    3. Gosselin N
    4. Piche O
    5. Nozaradan S
    6. Palmer C
    7. Peretz I

    (2011) Born to dance but beat deaf: A new form of congenital amusia

    Neuropsychologia URL:961–969.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.002

    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Protopapa F
    2. Hayashi MJ
    3. Kulashekhar S
    4. van der Zwaag W
    5. Battistella G
    6. Murray MM
    7. Kanai R
    8. Bueti D

    (2019) Chronotopic maps in human supplementary motor area

    PLOS Biology 17:e3000026.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000026

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Raffelt D
    2. Tournier JD
    3. Rose S
    4. Ridgway GR
    5. Henderson R
    6. Crozier S
    7. Salvado O
    8. Connelly A

    (2012) Apparent fibre density: A novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images

    NeuroImage 59:3976–3994.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.045

    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Raffelt AD
    2. Smith RE
    3. Ridgway GR
    4. Tournier JD
    5. Rose S
    6. Hender- son R
    7. Connelly A

    (2015) Connectivity-based fixel enhancement: Whole-brain statistical analysis of diffusion mri measures in the presence of crossing fibres

    NeuroImage 117:40–55.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage

    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Raffelt DA
    2. Tournier JD
    3. Smith RE
    4. Vaughan DN
    5. Jackson G
    6. Ridgway GR
    7. Connelly A

    (2017) Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis

    NeuroImage 144:58–73.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Rao SM
    2. Mayer AR
    3. Harrington DL

    (2001) The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing

    Nature Neuroscience 4:317–323.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/85191

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Rau YA
    2. Wang SM
    3. Tournier JD
    4. Lin SH
    5. Lu CS
    6. Weng YH
    7. Chen YL
    8. Ng SH
    9. Yu SW
    10. Wu YM
    11. Tsai CC
    12. Wang JJ

    (2019) A longitudinal fixel-based analysis of white matter alterations in patients with Parkinson’s disease

    NeuroImage. Clinical 24:102098.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102098

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Repp BH
    2. Penel A

    (2004) Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms

    Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 68:252–270.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0143-8

    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Repp BH

    (2005) Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature

    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12:969–992.

    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206433

    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Repp BH
    2. Su YH

    (2013) Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006-2012)

    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20:403–452.

    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Rojas-Vite G
    2. Coronado-Leija R
    3. Narvaez-Delgado O
    4. Ramírez-Manzanares A
    5. Marroquín JL
    6. Noguez-Imm R
    7. Aranda ML
    8. Scherrer B
    9. Larriva-Sahd J
    10. Concha L

    (2019) Histological validation of per-bundle water diffusion metrics within a region of fiber crossing following axonal degeneration

    NeuroImage 201:116013.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Sánchez-Moncada I
    2. Concha L
    3. Merchant H

    (2024) Pre-supplementary motor cortex mediates learning transfer from perceptual to motor timing

    The Journal of Neuroscience 44:e3191202023.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3191-20.2023

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Sayegh R
    2. Aubie B
    3. Faure PA

    (2011) Duration tuning in the auditory midbrain of echolocating and non-echolocating vertebrates

    Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 197:571–583.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-011-0627-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Scheurich R
     2. Zamm A
     3. Palmer C

     (2018) Tapping into rate flexibility: Musical training facilitates synchronization around spontaneous production rates

     Frontiers in Psychology 9:458.

     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00458

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. Book

     1. Schmahmann JD
     2. Schmahmann J
     3. Pandya D

     (2006) Fiber Pathways of the Brain

     New York: Oxford University Press.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.001.0001

     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Schüz A
     2. Braitenberg V

     (2002) The human cortical white matter: Quantitative aspects of cortico-cortical long-range connectivity

     Cortical Areas: Unity and Diversity 1:377–385.

     https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203299296.ch16

     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Schwartze M
     2. Rothermich K
     3. Kotz SA

     (2012) Functional dissociation of pre-sma and sma- proper in temporal processing

     NeuroImage 60:290–298.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11

     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Shastin D
     2. Genc S
     3. Parker GD
     4. Koller K
     5. Tax CMW
     6. Evans J
     7. Hamandi K
     8. Gray WP
     9. Jones DK
     10. Chamberland M

     (2022) Surface-based tracking for short association fibre tractography

     NeuroImage 260:119423.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119423

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Smith SM
     2. Jenkinson M
     3. Woolrich MW
     4. Beckmann CF
     5. Behrens TEJ
     6. Johansen-Berg H
     7. Bannister PR
     8. De Luca M
     9. Drobnjak I
     10. Flitney DE
     11. Niazy RK
     12. Saunders J
     13. Vickers J
     14. Zhang Y
     15. De Stefano N
     16. Brady JM
     17. Matthews PM

     (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL

     NeuroImage 23:S208–S219.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051

     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Smith RE
     2. Tournier JD
     3. Calamante F
     4. Connelly A

     (2013) SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms

     NeuroImage 67:298–312.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.049

     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Sowiński J
     2. Dalla Bella S

     (2013) Poor synchronization to the beat may result from deficient auditory-motor mapping

     Neuropsychologia 51:1952–1963.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.027

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Steele CJ
     2. Bailey JA
     3. Zatorre RJ
     4. Penhune VB

     (2013) Early musical training and white-matter plasticity in the corpus callosum: Evidence for a sensitive period

     The Journal of Neuroscience 33:1282–1290.

     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3578-12.2013

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Stockert A
     2. Schwartze M
     3. Poeppel D
     4. Anwander A
     5. Kotz SA

     (2021) Temporo-cerebellar connectivity underlies timing constraints in audition

     eLife 10:e67303.

     https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67303

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Tournier JD
     2. Calamante F
     3. Gadian DG
     4. Connelly A

     (2004) Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution

     NeuroImage 23:1176–1185.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.037

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Tournier JD
     2. Smith R
     3. Raffelt D
     4. Tabbara R
     5. Dhollander T
     6. Pietsch M
     7. Christiaens D
     8. Jeurissen B
     9. Yeh CH
     10. Connelly A

     (2019) MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation

     NeuroImage 202:116137.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Tranchant P
     2. Vuvan DT
     3. Peretz I

     (2016) Keeping the beat: A large sample study of bouncing and clapping to music

     PLOS ONE 11:e0160178.

     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160178

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Tustison NJ
     2. Cook PA
     3. Gee JC

     (2011) N4ITK: Improved N3 bias correction

     IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1:1310–1320.

     https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2010

     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Vaquero L
     2. Ramos-Escobar N
     3. François C
     4. Penhune V
     5. Rodríguez-Fornells A

     (2018) White-matter structural connectivity predicts short-term melody and rhythm learning in non-musicians

     NeuroImage 181:252–262.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.054

     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Warrington S
     2. Bryant KL
     3. Khrapitchev AA
     4. Sallet J
     5. Charquero-Ballester M
     6. Douaud G
     7. Jbabdi S
     8. Mars RB
     9. Sotiropoulos SN

     (2020) XTRACT - Standardised protocols for automated tractography in the human and macaque brain

     NeuroImage 217:116923.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116923

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
116. 1. Wing AM
     2. Kristofferson AB

     (1973) The timing of interresponse intervals

     Perception & Psychophysics 13:455–460.

     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205802

     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Wing AM

     (2002) Voluntary timing and brain function: An information processing approach

     Brain and Cognition 48:7–30.

     https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2001.1301

     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Worsley K
     2. Taylor J
     3. Carbonell F
     4. Chung M
     5. Duerden E
     6. Bernhardt B
     7. Lyttelton O
     8. Boucher M
     9. Evans A

     (2009) SurfStat: A Matlab toolbox for the statistical analysis of univariate and multivariate surface and volumetric data using linear mixed effects models and random field theory

     NeuroImage 47:S102.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70882-1

     • Google Scholar
119. 1. Yoshino M
     2. Saito K
     3. Kawasaki K
     4. Horiike T
     5. Shinmyo Y
     6. Kawasaki H

     (2020) The origin and development of subcortical U-fibers in gyrencephalic ferrets

     Molecular Brain 13:37.

     https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-020-00575-8

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
120. 1. Zalta A
     2. Petkoski S
     3. Morillon B

     (2020) Natural rhythms of periodic temporal attention

     Nature Communications 11:1051.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14888-8

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
121. 1. Zamm A
     2. Wellman C
     3. Palmer C

     (2016) Endogenous rhythms influence interpersonal synchrony

     Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 42:611–616.

     https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000201

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
122. 1. Zamm A
     2. Wang Y
     3. Palmer C

     (2018) Musicians’ natural frequencies of performance display optimal temporal stability

     Journal of Biological Rhythms 33:432–440.

     https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730418783651

     • Google Scholar
123. 1. Zarco W
     2. Merchant H
     3. Prado L
     4. Mendez JC

     (2009) Subsecond timing in primates: Comparison of interval production between human subjects and rhesus monkeys

     Journal of Neurophysiology 102:3191–3202.

     https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00066.2009

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
124. 1. Zatorre RJ
     2. Chen JL
     3. Penhune VB

     (2007) When the brain plays music: Auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production

     Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 8:547–558.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2152

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
125. 1. Zivari Adab H
     2. Chalavi S
     3. Monteiro TS
     4. Gooijers J
     5. Dhollander T
     6. Mantini D
     7. Swinnen SP

     (2020) Fiber-specific variations in anterior transcallosal white matter structure contribute to age-related differences in motor performance

     NeuroImage 209:116530.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116530

     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Pamela Garcia-Saldivar

   Institute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, Mexico

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3274-4955

2. Cynthia de León

   Institute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, Mexico

   Contribution

   Software, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4488-2864

3. Felipe A Mendez Salcido

   Institute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, Mexico

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1697-5203

4. Luis Concha

   1. Institute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, Mexico
   2. International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound (BRAMS), Montreal, Canada

   Contribution

   Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   lconcha@unam.mx

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7842-3869

5. Hugo Merchant

   Institute of Neurobiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, Mexico

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   hugomerchant@unam.mx

   Competing interests

   Reviewing editor, eLife

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3488-9501

• 201

  views

• 50

  downloads

• 0

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.